TSTP Solution File: RNG023-7 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : RNG023-7 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:54:44 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 4.32s 2.10s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.32s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (  11 unt;   8 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   11 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    2 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   10 (   5   >;   5   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (;  16   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ associator > multiply > commutator > add > #nlpp > additive_inverse > y > x > additive_identity

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(x,type,
    x: $i ).

tff(additive_identity,type,
    additive_identity: $i ).

tff(multiply,type,
    multiply: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(associator,type,
    associator: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(commutator,type,
    commutator: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(additive_inverse,type,
    additive_inverse: $i > $i ).

tff(y,type,
    y: $i ).

tff(add,type,
    add: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_59,axiom,
    ! [X] : ( add(X,additive_inverse(X)) = additive_identity ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_79,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] : ( multiply(multiply(X,X),Y) = multiply(X,multiply(X,Y)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_82,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] : ( associator(X,Y,Z) = add(multiply(multiply(X,Y),Z),additive_inverse(multiply(X,multiply(Y,Z)))) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_104,axiom,
    associator(x,x,y) != additive_identity,
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    ! [X_6] : ( add(X_6,additive_inverse(X_6)) = additive_identity ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_59]) ).

tff(c_26,plain,
    ! [X_21,Y_22] : ( multiply(multiply(X_21,X_21),Y_22) = multiply(X_21,multiply(X_21,Y_22)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_79]) ).

tff(c_1581,plain,
    ! [X_99,Y_100,Z_101] : ( add(multiply(multiply(X_99,Y_100),Z_101),additive_inverse(multiply(X_99,multiply(Y_100,Z_101)))) = associator(X_99,Y_100,Z_101) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_82]) ).

tff(c_1626,plain,
    ! [X_21,Y_22] : ( add(multiply(X_21,multiply(X_21,Y_22)),additive_inverse(multiply(X_21,multiply(X_21,Y_22)))) = associator(X_21,X_21,Y_22) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_26,c_1581]) ).

tff(c_1685,plain,
    ! [X_21,Y_22] : ( associator(X_21,X_21,Y_22) = additive_identity ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_12,c_1626]) ).

tff(c_46,plain,
    associator(x,x,y) != additive_identity,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_104]) ).

tff(c_1872,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_1685,c_46]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : RNG023-7 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 17:33:21 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 4.32/2.10  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.32/2.11  
% 4.32/2.11  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.32/2.13  
% 4.32/2.13  Inference rules
% 4.32/2.13  ----------------------
% 4.32/2.13  #Ref     : 0
% 4.32/2.13  #Sup     : 451
% 4.32/2.13  #Fact    : 0
% 4.32/2.13  #Define  : 0
% 4.32/2.13  #Split   : 0
% 4.32/2.13  #Chain   : 0
% 4.32/2.13  #Close   : 0
% 4.32/2.13  
% 4.32/2.13  Ordering : KBO
% 4.32/2.13  
% 4.32/2.13  Simplification rules
% 4.32/2.13  ----------------------
% 4.32/2.13  #Subsume      : 4
% 4.32/2.13  #Demod        : 531
% 4.32/2.13  #Tautology    : 292
% 4.32/2.13  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 4.32/2.13  #BackRed      : 1
% 4.32/2.13  
% 4.32/2.13  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 4.32/2.13  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 4.32/2.13  
% 4.32/2.13  Timing (in seconds)
% 4.32/2.13  ----------------------
% 4.32/2.14  Preprocessing        : 0.50
% 4.32/2.14  Parsing              : 0.24
% 4.32/2.14  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 4.32/2.14  Main loop            : 0.58
% 4.32/2.14  Inferencing          : 0.20
% 4.32/2.14  Reduction            : 0.23
% 4.32/2.14  Demodulation         : 0.18
% 4.32/2.14  BG Simplification    : 0.03
% 4.32/2.14  Subsumption          : 0.09
% 4.32/2.14  Abstraction          : 0.03
% 4.32/2.14  MUC search           : 0.00
% 4.32/2.14  Cooper               : 0.00
% 4.32/2.14  Total                : 1.12
% 4.32/2.14  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 4.32/2.14  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 4.32/2.14  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 4.32/2.14  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------