TSTP Solution File: RNG015-6 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : RNG015-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:40:54 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.62s 0.81s
% Output   : Refutation 0.62s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : RNG015-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Mon May 30 13:43:10 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.36  The process was started by sandbox on n017.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.36  Mon May 30 13:43:10 2022
% 0.14/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 2979.
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  list(usable).
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=1.
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  All clauses are units, and equality is present; the
% 0.14/0.36  strategy will be Knuth-Bendix with positive clauses in sos.
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 21 during input processing: 0 [copy,21,flip.1] {-} add(A,B)=add(B,A).
% 0.14/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 35 during input processing: 0 [copy,35,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.14/0.40  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.14/0.40  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.14/0.40  number of clauses in intial UL: 0
% 0.14/0.40  number of clauses initially in problem: 31
% 0.14/0.40  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 0
% 0.14/0.40  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 0
% 0.14/0.40  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.14/0.40  absolute distinct symbol count: 10
% 0.14/0.40     distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.14/0.40     distinct function count: 5
% 0.14/0.40     distinct constant count: 4
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.62/0.81  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.62/0.81  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  Model 6 [ 3 1 1198 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  Model 7 [ 6 0 881 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  Model 8 [ 9 0 76 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  Model 9 [ 5 1 1039 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  Model 10 [ 8 0 388 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  Model 11 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.42 sec ----> 93 [binary,92.1,35.1] {+} $F.
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  Length of proof is 7.  Level of proof is 4.
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.62/0.81  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.62/0.81  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  1 [] {-} multiply(x,add(y,additive_inverse(z)))!=add(multiply(x,y),additive_inverse(multiply(x,z))).
% 0.62/0.81  2 [copy,1,flip.1] {-} add(multiply(x,y),additive_inverse(multiply(x,z)))!=multiply(x,add(y,additive_inverse(z))).
% 0.62/0.81  4,3 [] {+} add(additive_identity,A)=A.
% 0.62/0.81  6,5 [] {+} add(A,additive_identity)=A.
% 0.62/0.81  10,9 [] {+} multiply(A,additive_identity)=additive_identity.
% 0.62/0.81  11 [] {+} add(additive_inverse(A),A)=additive_identity.
% 0.62/0.81  13 [] {+} add(A,additive_inverse(A))=additive_identity.
% 0.62/0.81  18,17 [] {-} multiply(A,add(B,C))=add(multiply(A,B),multiply(A,C)).
% 0.62/0.81  22 [] {-} add(A,add(B,C))=add(add(A,B),C).
% 0.62/0.81  23 [copy,22,flip.1] {-} add(add(A,B),C)=add(A,add(B,C)).
% 0.62/0.81  35 [] {+} A=A.
% 0.62/0.81  36 [back_demod,2,demod,18] {+} add(multiply(x,y),additive_inverse(multiply(x,z)))!=add(multiply(x,y),multiply(x,additive_inverse(z))).
% 0.62/0.81  39 [para_into,17.1.1.2,13.1.1,demod,10,flip.1] {-} add(multiply(A,B),multiply(A,additive_inverse(B)))=additive_identity.
% 0.62/0.81  58 [para_into,23.1.1.1,11.1.1,demod,4,flip.1] {+} add(additive_inverse(A),add(A,B))=B.
% 0.62/0.81  89,88 [para_into,58.1.1.2,39.1.1,demod,6] {-} additive_inverse(multiply(A,B))=multiply(A,additive_inverse(B)).
% 0.62/0.81  92 [back_demod,36,demod,89] {-} add(multiply(x,y),multiply(x,additive_inverse(z)))!=add(multiply(x,y),multiply(x,additive_inverse(z))).
% 0.62/0.81  93 [binary,92.1,35.1] {+} $F.
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.62/0.81  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  ============ end of search ============
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  true clauses given           2      (11.8%)
% 0.62/0.81  false clauses given         15
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.62/0.81     8  0         2
% 0.62/0.81    10  2         1
% 0.62/0.81    11  1         4
% 0.62/0.81    12  3         1
% 0.62/0.81    14  4         0
% 0.62/0.81    16  3         0
% 0.62/0.81    17  1         1
% 0.62/0.81    19  2         0
% 0.62/0.81    31  0         2
% 0.62/0.81  tot:  16        11      (40.7% true)
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  Model 11 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  Process 2979 finished Mon May 30 13:43:10 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------