TSTP Solution File: RNG012-6 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : RNG012-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:40:54 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.61s 0.82s
% Output   : Refutation 0.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : RNG012-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon May 30 05:48:14 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35  The process was started by sandbox2 on n029.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35  Mon May 30 05:48:14 2022
% 0.12/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 30776.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=1.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  All clauses are units, and equality is present; the
% 0.12/0.35  strategy will be Knuth-Bendix with positive clauses in sos.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 20 during input processing: 0 [copy,20,flip.1] {-} add(A,B)=add(B,A).
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 34 during input processing: 0 [copy,34,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.12/0.39  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.12/0.39  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.12/0.39  number of clauses in intial UL: 1
% 0.12/0.39  number of clauses initially in problem: 31
% 0.12/0.39  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 3
% 0.12/0.39  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 55
% 0.12/0.39  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.12/0.39  absolute distinct symbol count: 9
% 0.12/0.39     distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.12/0.39     distinct function count: 5
% 0.12/0.39     distinct constant count: 3
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.61/0.82  
% 0.61/0.82  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.61/0.82  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.61/0.82  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.61/0.82  
% 0.61/0.82  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.61/0.82  
% 0.61/0.82  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.61/0.82  
% 0.61/0.82  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.61/0.82  
% 0.61/0.82  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.61/0.82  
% 0.61/0.82  Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.61/0.82  
% 0.61/0.82  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.61/0.82  
% 0.61/0.82  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.61/0.82  
% 0.61/0.82  Model 6 [ 6 0 752 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.61/0.82  
% 0.61/0.82  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.61/0.82  
% 0.61/0.82  Model 7 [ 1 0 1196 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.61/0.82  
% 0.61/0.82  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.61/0.82  
% 0.61/0.82  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.61/0.82  
% 0.61/0.82  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.61/0.82  
% 0.61/0.82  Model 8 [ 9 0 203 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.61/0.82  
% 0.61/0.82  Model 9 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.61/0.82  
% 0.61/0.82  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.61/0.82  
% 0.61/0.82  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.45 sec ----> 127 [binary,125.1,1.1] {+} $F.
% 0.61/0.82  
% 0.61/0.82  Length of proof is 7.  Level of proof is 5.
% 0.61/0.82  
% 0.61/0.82  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.61/0.82  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.61/0.82  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.61/0.82  
% 0.61/0.82  1 [] {+} multiply(additive_inverse(a),additive_inverse(b))!=multiply(a,b).
% 0.61/0.82  3,2 [] {+} add(additive_identity,A)=A.
% 0.61/0.82  5,4 [] {+} add(A,additive_identity)=A.
% 0.61/0.82  7,6 [] {+} multiply(additive_identity,A)=additive_identity.
% 0.61/0.82  9,8 [] {+} multiply(A,additive_identity)=additive_identity.
% 0.61/0.82  10 [] {+} add(additive_inverse(A),A)=additive_identity.
% 0.61/0.82  12 [] {-} add(A,additive_inverse(A))=additive_identity.
% 0.61/0.82  14 [] {-} additive_inverse(additive_inverse(A))=A.
% 0.61/0.82  16 [] {-} multiply(A,add(B,C))=add(multiply(A,B),multiply(A,C)).
% 0.61/0.82  18 [] {-} multiply(add(A,B),C)=add(multiply(A,C),multiply(B,C)).
% 0.61/0.82  21 [] {-} add(A,add(B,C))=add(add(A,B),C).
% 0.61/0.82  22 [copy,21,flip.1] {-} add(add(A,B),C)=add(A,add(B,C)).
% 0.61/0.82  37 [para_into,16.1.1.2,12.1.1,demod,9,flip.1] {-} add(multiply(A,B),multiply(A,additive_inverse(B)))=additive_identity.
% 0.61/0.82  56 [para_into,22.1.1.1,10.1.1,demod,3,flip.1] {+} add(additive_inverse(A),add(A,B))=B.
% 0.61/0.82  74 [para_into,18.1.1.1,12.1.1,demod,7,flip.1] {-} add(multiply(A,B),multiply(additive_inverse(A),B))=additive_identity.
% 0.61/0.82  87,86 [para_into,56.1.1.2,37.1.1,demod,5] {-} additive_inverse(multiply(A,B))=multiply(A,additive_inverse(B)).
% 0.61/0.82  106 [para_from,74.1.1,56.1.1.2,demod,87,5] {-} multiply(A,additive_inverse(B))=multiply(additive_inverse(A),B).
% 0.61/0.82  125 [para_into,106.1.1.2,14.1.1,flip.1] {-} multiply(additive_inverse(A),additive_inverse(B))=multiply(A,B).
% 0.61/0.82  127 [binary,125.1,1.1] {+} $F.
% 0.61/0.82  
% 0.61/0.82  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.61/0.82  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.61/0.82  
% 0.61/0.82  
% 0.61/0.82  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.61/0.82  
% 0.61/0.82  
% 0.61/0.82  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.61/0.82  
% 0.61/0.82  ============ end of search ============
% 0.61/0.82  
% 0.61/0.82  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.61/0.82  
% 0.61/0.82  true clauses given           2      (9.1%)
% 0.61/0.82  false clauses given         20
% 0.61/0.82  
% 0.61/0.82        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.61/0.82     8  0         2
% 0.61/0.82     9  1         0
% 0.61/0.82    10  1         1
% 0.61/0.82    11  0         4
% 0.61/0.82    12  5         2
% 0.61/0.82    13  2         0
% 0.61/0.82    14  6         0
% 0.61/0.82    15  1         1
% 0.61/0.82    16  5         0
% 0.61/0.82    17  2         0
% 0.61/0.82    18  2         0
% 0.61/0.82    19  3         0
% 0.61/0.82    31  0         2
% 0.61/0.82    47  1         0
% 0.61/0.82  tot:  29        12      (29.3% true)
% 0.61/0.82  
% 0.61/0.82  
% 0.61/0.82  Model 9 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.61/0.82  
% 0.61/0.82  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.61/0.82  
% 0.61/0.82  Process 30776 finished Mon May 30 05:48:14 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------