TSTP Solution File: RNG008-7 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : RNG008-7 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:14:42 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   53 (  53 unt;   0 nHn;  12 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   53 (  52 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   72 (   4 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(associativity_for_addition,axiom,
    add(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(add(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.iannO0NjJR/E---3.1_1264.p',associativity_for_addition) ).

cnf(right_additive_inverse,axiom,
    add(X1,additive_inverse(X1)) = additive_identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.iannO0NjJR/E---3.1_1264.p',right_additive_inverse) ).

cnf(left_additive_identity,axiom,
    add(additive_identity,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.iannO0NjJR/E---3.1_1264.p',left_additive_identity) ).

cnf(right_additive_identity,axiom,
    add(X1,additive_identity) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.iannO0NjJR/E---3.1_1264.p',right_additive_identity) ).

cnf(distribute1,axiom,
    multiply(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.iannO0NjJR/E---3.1_1264.p',distribute1) ).

cnf(boolean_ring,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.iannO0NjJR/E---3.1_1264.p',boolean_ring) ).

cnf(commutativity_for_addition,axiom,
    add(X1,X2) = add(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.iannO0NjJR/E---3.1_1264.p',commutativity_for_addition) ).

cnf(distribute2,axiom,
    multiply(add(X1,X2),X3) = add(multiply(X1,X3),multiply(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.iannO0NjJR/E---3.1_1264.p',distribute2) ).

cnf(associativity_for_multiplication,axiom,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)) = multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.iannO0NjJR/E---3.1_1264.p',associativity_for_multiplication) ).

cnf(a_times_b_is_c,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(a,b) = c,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.iannO0NjJR/E---3.1_1264.p',a_times_b_is_c) ).

cnf(prove_commutativity,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(b,a) != c,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.iannO0NjJR/E---3.1_1264.p',prove_commutativity) ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    add(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(add(X1,X2),X3),
    associativity_for_addition ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    add(X1,additive_inverse(X1)) = additive_identity,
    right_additive_inverse ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    add(additive_identity,X1) = X1,
    left_additive_identity ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    add(X1,add(additive_inverse(X1),X2)) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    add(X1,additive_identity) = X1,
    right_additive_identity ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    multiply(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
    distribute1 ).

cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,X1) = X1,
    boolean_ring ).

cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
    add(X1,X2) = add(X2,X1),
    commutativity_for_addition ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    additive_inverse(additive_inverse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_12]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,add(X2,X1)) = add(X1,multiply(X1,X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
    multiply(add(X1,X2),X3) = add(multiply(X1,X3),multiply(X2,X3)),
    distribute2 ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    add(additive_inverse(X1),add(X1,X2)) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
    add(X1,multiply(X1,additive_identity)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_13]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,hypothesis,
    multiply(add(X1,X2),X2) = add(X2,multiply(X1,X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_17]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,add(X1,X2)) = add(X1,multiply(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,additive_identity) = additive_identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_18]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,axiom,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)) = multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3),
    associativity_for_multiplication ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(a,b) = c,
    a_times_b_is_c ).

cnf(c_0_29,hypothesis,
    add(X1,multiply(additive_identity,X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_13]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,hypothesis,
    add(X1,multiply(X1,additive_inverse(X1))) = additive_identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_12]),c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(a,multiply(b,X1)) = multiply(c,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,hypothesis,
    multiply(add(X1,X2),X1) = add(X1,multiply(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,hypothesis,
    multiply(additive_identity,X1) = additive_identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_29]),c_0_18]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,hypothesis,
    multiply(additive_inverse(X1),X1) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_30]),c_0_15]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,hypothesis,
    multiply(add(X1,multiply(X1,X2)),X3) = multiply(X1,multiply(add(X2,X1),X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,hypothesis,
    multiply(c,b) = c,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_17]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,hypothesis,
    add(X1,X1) = additive_identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_12]),c_0_33]),c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,multiply(X1,X2))) = multiply(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,hypothesis,
    multiply(c,multiply(add(b,c),X1)) = additive_identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_37]),c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,hypothesis,
    add(X1,add(X1,X2)) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_37]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,hypothesis,
    add(c,multiply(b,c)) = additive_identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),c_0_26]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X1,X2)) = multiply(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,hypothesis,
    multiply(b,c) = c,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,hypothesis,
    multiply(add(X1,multiply(X2,X1)),X3) = multiply(add(X2,X1),multiply(X1,X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(a,c) = c,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(b,multiply(c,a)) = multiply(b,a),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,hypothesis,
    multiply(b,multiply(c,X1)) = multiply(c,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(add(a,c),multiply(c,X1)) = additive_identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]),c_0_37]),c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(c,a) = multiply(b,a),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,hypothesis,
    add(c,multiply(b,a)) = additive_identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_48]),c_0_26]),c_0_20]),c_0_49]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(b,a) != c,
    prove_commutativity ).

cnf(c_0_52,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_50]),c_0_15]),c_0_51]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.10  % Problem    : RNG008-7 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.06/0.11  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.30  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.30  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.11/0.30  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.30  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 19:45:49 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.30  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.17/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.iannO0NjJR/E---3.1_1264.p
% 0.17/0.42  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.17/0.42  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.42  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.42  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.42  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.42  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.42  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.42  # sh5l with pid 1345 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.42  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.17/0.42  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.42  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.42  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.42  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.42  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.42  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.42  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.17/0.42  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.42  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.42  # Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.42  # U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1351 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.42  # Result found by U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.17/0.42  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.42  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.42  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.42  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.42  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.42  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.42  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.17/0.42  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.42  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.42  # Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.42  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.42  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.42  
% 0.17/0.42  # Proof found!
% 0.17/0.42  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.17/0.42  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.42  # Parsed axioms                        : 12
% 0.17/0.42  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.17/0.42  # Initial clauses                      : 12
% 0.17/0.42  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.17/0.42  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 12
% 0.17/0.42  # Processed clauses                    : 240
% 0.17/0.42  # ...of these trivial                  : 74
% 0.17/0.42  # ...subsumed                          : 56
% 0.17/0.42  # ...remaining for further processing  : 110
% 0.17/0.42  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.17/0.42  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.17/0.42  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.17/0.42  # Backward-rewritten                   : 30
% 0.17/0.42  # Generated clauses                    : 2030
% 0.17/0.42  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1235
% 0.17/0.42  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.17/0.42  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.17/0.42  # Paramodulations                      : 2030
% 0.17/0.42  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.17/0.42  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.17/0.42  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.17/0.42  # Total rewrite steps                  : 2971
% 0.17/0.42  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.17/0.42  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.17/0.42  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.42  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.17/0.42  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.42  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.17/0.42  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.17/0.42  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.17/0.42  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.17/0.42  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.17/0.42  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.17/0.42  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.17/0.42  # Current number of processed clauses  : 69
% 0.17/0.42  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 65
% 0.17/0.42  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.17/0.42  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.17/0.42  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.17/0.42  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 939
% 0.17/0.42  # ...number of literals in the above   : 939
% 0.17/0.42  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.17/0.42  # Current number of archived clauses   : 41
% 0.17/0.42  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.17/0.42  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.17/0.42  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.17/0.42  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.17/0.42  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.17/0.42  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 132
% 0.17/0.42  # BW rewrite match successes           : 78
% 0.17/0.42  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.17/0.42  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.17/0.42  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 19664
% 0.17/0.42  
% 0.17/0.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.42  # User time                : 0.012 s
% 0.17/0.42  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.17/0.42  # Total time               : 0.015 s
% 0.17/0.42  # Maximum resident set size: 1608 pages
% 0.17/0.42  
% 0.17/0.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.42  # User time                : 0.012 s
% 0.17/0.42  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.17/0.42  # Total time               : 0.018 s
% 0.17/0.42  # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 0.17/0.42  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.17/0.42  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------