TSTP Solution File: RNG008-3 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : RNG008-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:39:10 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.66s 0.98s
% Output   : Refutation 0.66s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : RNG008-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime : Mon May 30 18:45:21 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.66/0.98  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.66/0.98  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.66/0.98  Process 24127 was started by sandbox2 on n024.cluster.edu,
% 0.66/0.98  Mon May 30 18:45:22 2022
% 0.66/0.98  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_23974_n024.cluster.edu".
% 0.66/0.98  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.66/0.98  
% 0.66/0.98  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.66/0.98  
% 0.66/0.98  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_23974_n024.cluster.edu
% 0.66/0.98  
% 0.66/0.98  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.66/0.98  set(auto2).
% 0.66/0.98      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.66/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.66/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.66/0.98      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.66/0.98      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.66/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.66/0.98      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.66/0.98      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.66/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.66/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.66/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.66/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.66/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.66/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.66/0.98      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.66/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.66/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.66/0.98      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.66/0.98      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.66/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.66/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.66/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.66/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.66/0.98      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.66/0.98      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.66/0.98      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.66/0.98      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.66/0.98  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.66/0.98  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.66/0.98  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.66/0.98  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.66/0.98  clear(print_given).
% 0.66/0.98  
% 0.66/0.98  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (19 formulas)
% 0.66/0.98  
% 0.66/0.98  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.66/0.98  
% 0.66/0.98  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.66/0.98  
% 0.66/0.98  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.66/0.98  
% 0.66/0.98  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.66/0.98  
% 0.66/0.98  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.66/0.98  
% 0.66/0.98  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.66/0.98  
% 0.66/0.98  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.66/0.98  
% 0.66/0.98  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.66/0.98  
% 0.66/0.98  Auto_denials:
% 0.66/0.98    % copying label prove_commutativity to answer in negative clause
% 0.66/0.98  
% 0.66/0.98  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.66/0.98  
% 0.66/0.98  % Assigning unary symbol additive_inverse kb_weight 0 and highest precedence (8).
% 0.66/0.98  Function symbol KB weights:  additive_identity=1. a=1. b=1. c=1. multiply=1. add=1. additive_inverse=0.
% 0.66/0.98  
% 0.66/0.98  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.66/0.98  
% 0.66/0.98  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.66/0.98  
% 0.66/0.98  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.66/0.98  
% 0.66/0.98  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.66/0.98  
% 0.66/0.98  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.66/0.98  
% 0.66/0.98  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.66/0.98  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.66/0.98  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.66/0.98  
% 0.66/0.98  % Proof 1 at 0.03 (+ 0.00) seconds: prove_commutativity.
% 0.66/0.98  % Length of proof is 35.
% 0.66/0.98  % Level of proof is 9.
% 0.66/0.98  % Maximum clause weight is 13.000.
% 0.66/0.98  % Given clauses 40.
% 0.66/0.98  
% 0.66/0.98  3 additive_inverse(additive_inverse(A)) = A # label(additive_inverse_additive_inverse) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.66/0.98  4 multiply(A,additive_identity) = additive_identity # label(multiply_additive_id1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.66/0.98  5 multiply(additive_identity,A) = additive_identity # label(multiply_additive_id2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.66/0.98  6 add(A,additive_identity) = A # label(right_identity) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.66/0.98  7 multiply(A,A) = A # label(boolean_ring) # label(hypothesis).  [assumption].
% 0.66/0.98  8 multiply(a,b) = c # label(a_times_b_is_c) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.66/0.98  9 c = multiply(a,b).  [copy(8),flip(a)].
% 0.66/0.98  11 add(A,additive_inverse(A)) = additive_identity # label(right_inverse) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.66/0.98  12 add(A,B) = add(B,A) # label(commutative_addition) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.66/0.98  13 multiply(A,additive_inverse(B)) = additive_inverse(multiply(A,B)) # label(multiply_additive_inverse1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.66/0.98  14 additive_inverse(multiply(A,B)) = multiply(A,additive_inverse(B)).  [copy(13),flip(a)].
% 0.66/0.98  15 multiply(additive_inverse(A),B) = additive_inverse(multiply(A,B)) # label(multiply_additive_inverse2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.66/0.98  16 multiply(additive_inverse(A),B) = multiply(A,additive_inverse(B)).  [copy(15),rewrite([14(4)])].
% 0.66/0.98  18 add(add(A,B),C) = add(A,add(B,C)) # label(associative_addition) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.66/0.98  19 add(A,add(B,C)) = add(C,add(A,B)).  [copy(18),rewrite([12(2)]),flip(a)].
% 0.66/0.98  21 multiply(A,add(B,C)) = add(multiply(A,B),multiply(A,C)) # label(distribute1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.66/0.98  22 add(multiply(A,B),multiply(A,C)) = multiply(A,add(B,C)).  [copy(21),flip(a)].
% 0.66/0.98  23 multiply(add(A,B),C) = add(multiply(A,C),multiply(B,C)) # label(distribute2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.66/0.98  24 add(multiply(A,B),multiply(C,B)) = multiply(add(A,C),B).  [copy(23),flip(a)].
% 0.66/0.98  25 multiply(b,a) != c # label(prove_commutativity) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(prove_commutativity).  [assumption].
% 0.66/0.98  26 multiply(b,a) != multiply(a,b) # answer(prove_commutativity).  [copy(25),rewrite([9(4)])].
% 0.66/0.98  27 multiply(b,a) = c_0.  [new_symbol(26)].
% 0.66/0.98  28 multiply(a,b) != c_0 # answer(prove_commutativity).  [back_rewrite(26),rewrite([27(3)]),flip(a)].
% 0.66/0.98  29 multiply(A,additive_inverse(A)) = additive_inverse(A).  [para(7(a,1),14(a,1,1)),flip(a)].
% 0.66/0.98  30 additive_inverse(A) = A.  [para(7(a,1),14(a,2)),rewrite([16(2),29(2),3(2)]),flip(a)].
% 0.66/0.98  32 add(A,A) = additive_identity.  [back_rewrite(11),rewrite([30(1)])].
% 0.66/0.98  35 add(additive_identity,multiply(A,B)) = multiply(A,B).  [para(4(a,1),22(a,1,1)),rewrite([12(5),6(5)])].
% 0.66/0.98  36 add(A,multiply(A,B)) = multiply(A,add(A,B)).  [para(7(a,1),22(a,1,1))].
% 0.66/0.98  37 add(A,multiply(B,A)) = multiply(add(A,B),A).  [para(7(a,1),24(a,1,1))].
% 0.66/0.98  43 add(A,add(A,B)) = B.  [para(32(a,1),19(a,2,2)),rewrite([6(4)])].
% 0.66/0.98  86 multiply(add(a,b),a) = add(a,c_0).  [para(27(a,1),37(a,1,2)),flip(a)].
% 0.66/0.98  102 multiply(add(a,b),b) = add(b,c_0).  [para(86(a,1),36(a,1,2)),rewrite([19(7),12(6),43(6),12(3),12(11),43(11)]),flip(a)].
% 0.66/0.98  159 multiply(add(additive_identity,a),b) = c_0.  [para(102(a,1),37(a,1,2)),rewrite([43(5),19(6,R),32(5),12(4)]),flip(a)].
% 0.66/0.98  166 multiply(a,b) = c_0.  [para(159(a,1),24(a,2)),rewrite([5(3),35(5)])].
% 0.66/0.98  167 $F # answer(prove_commutativity).  [resolve(166,a,28,a)].
% 0.66/0.98  
% 0.66/0.98  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.66/0.98  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.66/0.98  
% 0.66/0.98  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.66/0.98  
% 0.66/0.98  Given=40. Generated=718. Kept=159. proofs=1.
% 0.66/0.98  Usable=36. Sos=104. Demods=135. Limbo=3, Disabled=34. Hints=0.
% 0.66/0.98  Megabytes=0.18.
% 0.66/0.98  User_CPU=0.03, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.66/0.98  
% 0.66/0.98  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.66/0.98  
% 0.66/0.98  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.66/0.98  
% 0.66/0.98  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.66/0.98  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.66/0.98  
% 0.66/0.98  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.66/0.98  
% 0.66/0.98  Process 24127 exit (max_proofs) Mon May 30 18:45:22 2022
% 0.66/0.98  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------