TSTP Solution File: RNG006-3 by iProver---3.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.8
% Problem  : RNG006-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 13:54:37 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.86s 1.16s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.86s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   45 (  39 unt;   0 nHn;  28 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   61 (  42 equ;  18 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   57 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,plain,
    sum(b,additive_inverse(c),bS_Ic),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b_plus_inverse_c) ).

cnf(c_50,plain,
    product(a,b,aPb),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_times_b) ).

cnf(c_51,plain,
    product(a,c,aPc),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_times_c) ).

cnf(c_52,plain,
    sum(aPb,additive_inverse(aPc),aPb_S_IaPc),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',aPb_plus_IaPc) ).

cnf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
    ~ product(a,bS_Ic,aPb_S_IaPc),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_a_times_bS_Ic_is_aPb_S__IaPc) ).

cnf(c_55,plain,
    sum(X0,additive_identity,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/RNG001-0.ax',additive_identity2) ).

cnf(c_59,plain,
    sum(X0,additive_inverse(X0),additive_identity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/RNG001-0.ax',right_inverse) ).

cnf(c_61,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X0,X1,X2)
    | ~ sum(X0,X3,X4)
    | ~ sum(X1,X5,X3)
    | sum(X2,X5,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/RNG001-0.ax',associativity_of_addition2) ).

cnf(c_62,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X0,X1,X2)
    | sum(X1,X0,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/RNG001-0.ax',commutativity_of_addition) ).

cnf(c_66,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X0,X1,X2)
    | ~ sum(X3,X4,X5)
    | ~ product(X6,X0,X3)
    | ~ product(X6,X1,X4)
    | product(X6,X2,X5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/RNG001-0.ax',distributivity2) ).

cnf(c_78,plain,
    add(b,additive_inverse(c)) = bS_Ic,
    inference(well_definedness,[status(thm)],[c_49]) ).

cnf(c_79,plain,
    multiply(a,b) = aPb,
    inference(well_definedness,[status(thm)],[c_50]) ).

cnf(c_80,plain,
    multiply(a,c) = aPc,
    inference(well_definedness,[status(thm)],[c_51]) ).

cnf(c_81,plain,
    add(aPb,additive_inverse(aPc)) = aPb_S_IaPc,
    inference(well_definedness,[status(thm)],[c_52]) ).

cnf(c_82,plain,
    multiply(a,bS_Ic) != aPb_S_IaPc,
    inference(well_definedness,[status(thm)],[c_53]) ).

cnf(c_84,plain,
    add(X0,additive_identity) = X0,
    inference(well_definedness,[status(thm)],[c_55]) ).

cnf(c_88,plain,
    add(X0,additive_inverse(X0)) = additive_identity,
    inference(well_definedness,[status(thm)],[c_59]) ).

cnf(c_91,plain,
    ( add(X0,X1) != X2
    | add(X0,X3) != X4
    | add(X1,X5) != X3
    | add(X2,X5) = X4 ),
    inference(well_definedness,[status(thm)],[c_61]) ).

cnf(c_93,plain,
    ( add(X0,X1) != X2
    | add(X1,X0) = X2 ),
    inference(well_definedness,[status(thm)],[c_62]) ).

cnf(c_101,plain,
    ( multiply(X0,X1) != X2
    | multiply(X0,X3) != X4
    | add(X1,X3) != X5
    | add(X2,X4) != X6
    | multiply(X0,X5) = X6 ),
    inference(well_definedness,[status(thm)],[c_66]) ).

cnf(c_228,plain,
    add(X0,X1) = add(X1,X0),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_93]) ).

cnf(c_234,plain,
    add(add(X0,X1),X2) = add(X0,add(X1,X2)),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_91]) ).

cnf(c_238,plain,
    add(multiply(X0,X1),multiply(X0,X2)) = multiply(X0,add(X1,X2)),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_101]) ).

cnf(c_365,plain,
    add(additive_identity,X0) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_84,c_228]) ).

cnf(c_373,plain,
    add(b,add(additive_inverse(c),X0)) = add(bS_Ic,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_78,c_234]) ).

cnf(c_374,plain,
    add(aPb,add(additive_inverse(aPc),X0)) = add(aPb_S_IaPc,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_81,c_234]) ).

cnf(c_376,plain,
    add(X0,add(additive_inverse(X0),X1)) = add(additive_identity,X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_88,c_234]) ).

cnf(c_428,plain,
    add(bS_Ic,additive_inverse(additive_inverse(c))) = add(b,additive_identity),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_88,c_373]) ).

cnf(c_435,plain,
    add(bS_Ic,additive_inverse(additive_inverse(c))) = add(additive_identity,b),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_428,c_234,c_228]) ).

cnf(c_437,plain,
    add(bS_Ic,additive_inverse(additive_inverse(c))) = b,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_435,c_365]) ).

cnf(c_460,plain,
    add(X0,add(additive_inverse(X0),X1)) = X1,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_376,c_365]) ).

cnf(c_465,plain,
    additive_inverse(additive_inverse(X0)) = add(X0,additive_identity),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_88,c_460]) ).

cnf(c_466,plain,
    add(X0,add(X1,additive_inverse(X0))) = X1,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_228,c_460]) ).

cnf(c_480,plain,
    additive_inverse(additive_inverse(X0)) = X0,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_465,c_84]) ).

cnf(c_482,plain,
    add(bS_Ic,c) = b,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_437,c_480]) ).

cnf(c_485,plain,
    add(c,bS_Ic) = b,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_482,c_234,c_228]) ).

cnf(c_503,plain,
    add(multiply(X0,c),multiply(X0,bS_Ic)) = multiply(X0,b),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_485,c_238]) ).

cnf(c_527,plain,
    add(aPb_S_IaPc,additive_inverse(aPb)) = additive_inverse(aPc),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_466,c_374]) ).

cnf(c_1269,plain,
    add(aPc,multiply(a,bS_Ic)) = multiply(a,b),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_80,c_503]) ).

cnf(c_1284,plain,
    add(aPc,multiply(a,bS_Ic)) = aPb,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1269,c_79]) ).

cnf(c_1291,plain,
    add(aPc,add(multiply(a,bS_Ic),X0)) = add(aPb,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1284,c_234]) ).

cnf(c_1959,plain,
    add(aPb,additive_inverse(aPc)) = multiply(a,bS_Ic),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1291,c_466]) ).

cnf(c_1962,plain,
    add(aPb,add(aPb_S_IaPc,additive_inverse(aPb))) = multiply(a,bS_Ic),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1959,c_527]) ).

cnf(c_2046,plain,
    multiply(a,bS_Ic) = aPb_S_IaPc,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1962,c_466]) ).

cnf(c_2047,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2046,c_82]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : RNG006-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 02:47:52 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.47  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 3.86/1.16  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.86/1.16  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.86/1.16  
% 3.86/1.16  %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 3.86/1.16  
% 3.86/1.16  ------  iProver source info
% 3.86/1.16  
% 3.86/1.16  git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 3.86/1.16  git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 3.86/1.16  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.86/1.16  git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 3.86/1.16  
% 3.86/1.16  ------ Parsing...successful
% 3.86/1.16  
% 3.86/1.16  
% 3.86/1.16  
% 3.86/1.16  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 15  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sup_sim: 1  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 3.86/1.16  
% 3.86/1.16  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 3.86/1.16  
% 3.86/1.16  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.86/1.16  ------ Proving...
% 3.86/1.16  ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.86/1.16  
% 3.86/1.16  
% 3.86/1.16  clauses                                 12
% 3.86/1.16  conjectures                             0
% 3.86/1.16  EPR                                     0
% 3.86/1.16  Horn                                    12
% 3.86/1.16  unary                                   12
% 3.86/1.16  binary                                  0
% 3.86/1.16  lits                                    12
% 3.86/1.16  lits eq                                 12
% 3.86/1.16  fd_pure                                 0
% 3.86/1.16  fd_pseudo                               0
% 3.86/1.16  fd_cond                                 0
% 3.86/1.16  fd_pseudo_cond                          0
% 3.86/1.16  AC symbols                              1
% 3.86/1.16  
% 3.86/1.16  ------ Schedule UEQ
% 3.86/1.16  
% 3.86/1.16  ------ Option_UEQ Time Limit: 10.
% 3.86/1.16  
% 3.86/1.16  
% 3.86/1.16  ------ 
% 3.86/1.16  Current options:
% 3.86/1.16  ------ 
% 3.86/1.16  
% 3.86/1.16  
% 3.86/1.16  
% 3.86/1.16  
% 3.86/1.16  ------ Proving...
% 3.86/1.16  
% 3.86/1.16  
% 3.86/1.16  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.86/1.16  
% 3.86/1.16  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.86/1.17  
% 3.86/1.17  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------