TSTP Solution File: RNG004-1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : RNG004-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:12:00 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.89s 2.05s
% Output   : Refutation 1.89s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   39 (  32 unt;   0 nHn;  31 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   59 (  12 equ;  22 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   49 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(2,axiom,
    ( ~ sum(A,B,C)
    | ~ sum(B,D,E)
    | ~ sum(A,E,F)
    | sum(C,D,F) ),
    file('RNG004-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ sum(A,B,C)
    | sum(B,A,C) ),
    file('RNG004-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ( ~ product(A,B,C)
    | ~ product(A,D,E)
    | ~ sum(B,D,F)
    | ~ product(A,F,G)
    | sum(C,E,G) ),
    file('RNG004-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    ( ~ product(A,B,C)
    | ~ product(A,D,E)
    | ~ sum(B,D,F)
    | ~ sum(C,E,G)
    | product(A,F,G) ),
    file('RNG004-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    ( ~ product(A,B,C)
    | ~ product(D,B,E)
    | ~ sum(A,D,F)
    | ~ product(F,B,G)
    | sum(C,E,G) ),
    file('RNG004-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    ( ~ sum(A,B,C)
    | ~ sum(A,B,D)
    | C = D ),
    file('RNG004-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    ( ~ product(A,B,C)
    | ~ product(A,B,D)
    | C = D ),
    file('RNG004-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    c != d,
    file('RNG004-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(13,plain,
    d != c,
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(copy,[status(thm)],[12])]),
    [iquote('copy,12,flip.1')] ).

cnf(15,axiom,
    sum(additive_identity,A,A),
    file('RNG004-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(16,axiom,
    sum(A,additive_identity,A),
    file('RNG004-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(17,axiom,
    product(A,B,multiply(A,B)),
    file('RNG004-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(18,axiom,
    sum(A,B,add(A,B)),
    file('RNG004-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(19,axiom,
    sum(additive_inverse(A),A,additive_identity),
    file('RNG004-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(21,axiom,
    product(a,b,c),
    file('RNG004-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(22,axiom,
    product(additive_inverse(a),additive_inverse(b),d),
    file('RNG004-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(42,plain,
    multiply(a,b) = c,
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[17,11,21])]),
    [iquote('hyper,17,11,21,flip.1')] ).

cnf(43,plain,
    sum(c,multiply(additive_identity,b),c),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[17,8,21,17,16]),42]),
    [iquote('hyper,17,8,21,17,16,demod,42')] ).

cnf(49,plain,
    sum(c,multiply(a,additive_identity),c),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[17,6,21,17,16]),42]),
    [iquote('hyper,17,6,21,17,16,demod,42')] ).

cnf(50,plain,
    sum(multiply(a,additive_inverse(b)),c,multiply(a,additive_identity)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[17,6,17,21,19]),
    [iquote('hyper,17,6,17,21,19')] ).

cnf(84,plain,
    add(A,additive_identity) = A,
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[18,10,16])]),
    [iquote('hyper,18,10,16,flip.1')] ).

cnf(86,plain,
    add(additive_identity,A) = A,
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[18,10,15])]),
    [iquote('hyper,18,10,15,flip.1')] ).

cnf(119,plain,
    sum(A,B,add(B,A)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[18,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,18,3')] ).

cnf(152,plain,
    sum(d,multiply(a,additive_inverse(b)),multiply(additive_identity,additive_inverse(b))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[22,8,17,19,17]),
    [iquote('hyper,22,8,17,19,17')] ).

cnf(202,plain,
    sum(additive_identity,multiply(additive_identity,b),additive_identity),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[43,2,19,19]),
    [iquote('hyper,43,2,19,19')] ).

cnf(254,plain,
    sum(additive_identity,multiply(a,additive_identity),additive_identity),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[49,2,19,19]),
    [iquote('hyper,49,2,19,19')] ).

cnf(427,plain,
    multiply(additive_identity,b) = additive_identity,
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[202,10,119]),84]),
    [iquote('hyper,202,10,119,demod,84')] ).

cnf(445,plain,
    product(additive_identity,b,additive_identity),
    inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[427,17]),
    [iquote('para_from,427.1.1,17.1.3')] ).

cnf(450,plain,
    product(additive_identity,additive_identity,multiply(additive_identity,additive_inverse(b))),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[445,7,17,19,119]),86]),
    [iquote('hyper,445,7,17,19,119,demod,86')] ).

cnf(452,plain,
    product(additive_identity,b,multiply(additive_identity,additive_identity)),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[445,7,17,15,119]),86]),
    [iquote('hyper,445,7,17,15,119,demod,86')] ).

cnf(474,plain,
    multiply(a,additive_identity) = additive_identity,
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[254,10,119]),84]),
    [iquote('hyper,254,10,119,demod,84')] ).

cnf(476,plain,
    sum(multiply(a,additive_inverse(b)),c,additive_identity),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(back_demod,[status(thm)],[50]),474]),
    [iquote('back_demod,50,demod,474')] ).

cnf(546,plain,
    multiply(additive_identity,additive_identity) = additive_identity,
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[452,11,445])]),
    [iquote('hyper,452,11,445,flip.1')] ).

cnf(558,plain,
    product(additive_identity,additive_identity,additive_identity),
    inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[546,17]),
    [iquote('para_from,546.1.1,17.1.3')] ).

cnf(1668,plain,
    multiply(additive_identity,additive_inverse(b)) = additive_identity,
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[450,11,558])]),
    [iquote('hyper,450,11,558,flip.1')] ).

cnf(1669,plain,
    sum(d,multiply(a,additive_inverse(b)),additive_identity),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(back_demod,[status(thm)],[152]),1668]),
    [iquote('back_demod,152,demod,1668')] ).

cnf(1708,plain,
    sum(additive_identity,c,d),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[1669,2,476,119]),86]),
    [iquote('hyper,1669,2,476,119,demod,86')] ).

cnf(1720,plain,
    d = c,
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[1708,10,119]),84])]),
    [iquote('hyper,1708,10,119,demod,84,flip.1')] ).

cnf(1722,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[1720,13]),
    [iquote('binary,1720.1,13.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : RNG004-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.14/0.33  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 02:11:06 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.71/1.90  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.71/1.90  The process was started by sandbox2 on n009.cluster.edu,
% 1.71/1.90  Wed Jul 27 02:11:06 2022
% 1.71/1.90  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 9039.
% 1.71/1.90  
% 1.71/1.90  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.71/1.90  set(auto).
% 1.71/1.90     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.71/1.90     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.71/1.90     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.71/1.90     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.71/1.90     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.71/1.90     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.71/1.90     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.71/1.90     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.71/1.90     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.71/1.90     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.71/1.90     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.71/1.90  clear(print_given).
% 1.71/1.90  
% 1.71/1.90  list(usable).
% 1.71/1.90  0 [] A=A.
% 1.71/1.90  0 [] sum(additive_identity,X,X).
% 1.71/1.90  0 [] sum(X,additive_identity,X).
% 1.71/1.90  0 [] product(X,Y,multiply(X,Y)).
% 1.71/1.90  0 [] sum(X,Y,add(X,Y)).
% 1.71/1.90  0 [] sum(additive_inverse(X),X,additive_identity).
% 1.71/1.90  0 [] sum(X,additive_inverse(X),additive_identity).
% 1.71/1.90  0 [] -sum(X,Y,U)| -sum(Y,Z,V)| -sum(U,Z,W)|sum(X,V,W).
% 1.71/1.90  0 [] -sum(X,Y,U)| -sum(Y,Z,V)| -sum(X,V,W)|sum(U,Z,W).
% 1.71/1.90  0 [] -sum(X,Y,Z)|sum(Y,X,Z).
% 1.71/1.90  0 [] -product(X,Y,U)| -product(Y,Z,V)| -product(U,Z,W)|product(X,V,W).
% 1.71/1.90  0 [] -product(X,Y,U)| -product(Y,Z,V)| -product(X,V,W)|product(U,Z,W).
% 1.71/1.90  0 [] -product(X,Y,V1)| -product(X,Z,V2)| -sum(Y,Z,V3)| -product(X,V3,V4)|sum(V1,V2,V4).
% 1.71/1.90  0 [] -product(X,Y,V1)| -product(X,Z,V2)| -sum(Y,Z,V3)| -sum(V1,V2,V4)|product(X,V3,V4).
% 1.71/1.90  0 [] -product(Y,X,V1)| -product(Z,X,V2)| -sum(Y,Z,V3)| -product(V3,X,V4)|sum(V1,V2,V4).
% 1.71/1.90  0 [] -product(Y,X,V1)| -product(Z,X,V2)| -sum(Y,Z,V3)| -sum(V1,V2,V4)|product(V3,X,V4).
% 1.71/1.90  0 [] -sum(X,Y,U)| -sum(X,Y,V)|U=V.
% 1.71/1.90  0 [] -product(X,Y,U)| -product(X,Y,V)|U=V.
% 1.71/1.90  0 [] product(a,b,c).
% 1.71/1.90  0 [] product(additive_inverse(a),additive_inverse(b),d).
% 1.71/1.90  0 [] c!=d.
% 1.71/1.90  end_of_list.
% 1.71/1.90  
% 1.71/1.90  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 1.71/1.90  
% 1.71/1.90  This is a Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 1.71/1.90  Knuth-Bendix and hyper_res, with positive clauses in
% 1.71/1.90  sos and nonpositive clauses in usable.
% 1.71/1.90  
% 1.71/1.90     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.71/1.90     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.71/1.90     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.71/1.90     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.71/1.90     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.71/1.90     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.71/1.90     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.71/1.90     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.71/1.90     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.71/1.90     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.71/1.90     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.71/1.90     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.71/1.90     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.71/1.90     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.71/1.90     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 1.71/1.90  
% 1.71/1.90  ------------> process usable:
% 1.71/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 1 [] -sum(A,B,C)| -sum(B,D,E)| -sum(C,D,F)|sum(A,E,F).
% 1.71/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 2 [] -sum(A,B,C)| -sum(B,D,E)| -sum(A,E,F)|sum(C,D,F).
% 1.71/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 3 [] -sum(A,B,C)|sum(B,A,C).
% 1.71/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 4 [] -product(A,B,C)| -product(B,D,E)| -product(C,D,F)|product(A,E,F).
% 1.71/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 5 [] -product(A,B,C)| -product(B,D,E)| -product(A,E,F)|product(C,D,F).
% 1.71/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=20): 6 [] -product(A,B,C)| -product(A,D,E)| -sum(B,D,F)| -product(A,F,G)|sum(C,E,G).
% 1.71/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=20): 7 [] -product(A,B,C)| -product(A,D,E)| -sum(B,D,F)| -sum(C,E,G)|product(A,F,G).
% 1.71/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=20): 8 [] -product(A,B,C)| -product(D,B,E)| -sum(A,D,F)| -product(F,B,G)|sum(C,E,G).
% 1.71/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=20): 9 [] -product(A,B,C)| -product(D,B,E)| -sum(A,D,F)| -sum(C,E,G)|product(F,B,G).
% 1.71/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 10 [] -sum(A,B,C)| -sum(A,B,D)|C=D.
% 1.71/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 11 [] -product(A,B,C)| -product(A,B,D)|C=D.
% 1.71/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 13 [copy,12,flip.1] d!=c.
% 1.71/1.90  
% 1.71/1.90  ------------> process sos:
% 1.71/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 14 [] A=A.
% 1.71/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 15 [] sum(additive_identity,A,A).
% 1.71/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 16 [] sum(A,additive_identity,A).
% 1.71/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 17 [] product(A,B,multiply(A,B)).
% 1.71/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 18 [] sum(A,B,add(A,B)).
% 1.71/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 19 [] sum(additive_inverse(A),A,additive_identity).
% 1.71/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 20 [] sum(A,additive_inverse(A),additive_identity).
% 1.71/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 21 [] product(a,b,c).
% 1.71/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 22 [] product(additive_inverse(a),additive_inverse(b),d).
% 1.71/1.90    Following clause subsumed by 14 during input processing: 0 [copy,14,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.71/1.90  
% 1.71/1.90  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.71/1.90  
% 1.71/1.90  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.89/2.05  
% 1.89/2.05  
% 1.89/2.05  Resetting weight limit to 8.
% 1.89/2.05  
% 1.89/2.05  
% 1.89/2.05  Resetting weight limit to 8.
% 1.89/2.05  
% 1.89/2.05  sos_size=1335
% 1.89/2.05  
% 1.89/2.05  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.89/2.05  
% 1.89/2.05  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.15 sec ----> 1722 [binary,1720.1,13.1] $F.
% 1.89/2.05  
% 1.89/2.05  Length of proof is 23.  Level of proof is 12.
% 1.89/2.05  
% 1.89/2.05  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.89/2.05  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.89/2.05  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.89/2.05  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.89/2.05  
% 1.89/2.05  
% 1.89/2.05  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.89/2.05  
% 1.89/2.05  
% 1.89/2.05  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.89/2.05  
% 1.89/2.05  ============ end of search ============
% 1.89/2.05  
% 1.89/2.05  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.89/2.05  clauses given                 83
% 1.89/2.05  clauses generated          12789
% 1.89/2.05  clauses kept                1678
% 1.89/2.05  clauses forward subsumed    9778
% 1.89/2.05  clauses back subsumed         24
% 1.89/2.05  Kbytes malloced             4882
% 1.89/2.05  
% 1.89/2.05  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.89/2.05  user CPU time          0.15          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.89/2.05  system CPU time        0.01          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.89/2.05  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 1.89/2.05  
% 1.89/2.05  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.89/2.05  
% 1.89/2.05  Process 9039 finished Wed Jul 27 02:11:08 2022
% 1.89/2.05  Otter interrupted
% 1.89/2.05  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------