TSTP Solution File: RNG001-5 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : RNG001-5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:12:00 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.88s 2.09s
% Output   : Refutation 1.88s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   23 (  16 unt;   0 nHn;  10 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   45 (   0 equ;  23 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   57 (   6 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(11,axiom,
    ( ~ e_qualish(A,B)
    | ~ product(C,D,A)
    | product(C,D,B) ),
    file('RNG001-5.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    ( ~ sum(A,B,C)
    | ~ sum(B,D,E)
    | ~ sum(C,D,F)
    | sum(A,E,F) ),
    file('RNG001-5.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    ( ~ sum(A,B,C)
    | ~ sum(B,D,E)
    | ~ sum(A,E,F)
    | sum(C,D,F) ),
    file('RNG001-5.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(17,axiom,
    ( ~ product(A,B,C)
    | ~ product(A,D,E)
    | ~ sum(B,D,F)
    | ~ product(A,F,G)
    | sum(C,E,G) ),
    file('RNG001-5.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(19,axiom,
    ( ~ product(A,B,C)
    | ~ product(D,B,E)
    | ~ sum(A,D,F)
    | ~ product(F,B,G)
    | sum(C,E,G) ),
    file('RNG001-5.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(20,axiom,
    ( ~ product(A,B,C)
    | ~ product(D,B,E)
    | ~ sum(A,D,F)
    | ~ sum(C,E,G)
    | product(F,B,G) ),
    file('RNG001-5.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(21,axiom,
    ( ~ sum(A,B,C)
    | ~ sum(A,B,D)
    | e_qualish(C,D) ),
    file('RNG001-5.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(23,axiom,
    ~ product(a,additive_identity,additive_identity),
    file('RNG001-5.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(25,axiom,
    sum(additive_identity,A,A),
    file('RNG001-5.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(26,axiom,
    sum(A,additive_identity,A),
    file('RNG001-5.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(27,axiom,
    product(A,B,multiply(A,B)),
    file('RNG001-5.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(29,axiom,
    sum(additive_inverse(A),A,additive_identity),
    file('RNG001-5.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(34,plain,
    sum(additive_identity,additive_identity,additive_inverse(additive_identity)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[29,13,26,26]),
    [iquote('hyper,29,13,26,26')] ).

cnf(37,plain,
    sum(additive_inverse(additive_identity),A,A),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[29,12,25,25]),
    [iquote('hyper,29,12,25,25')] ).

cnf(42,plain,
    sum(multiply(A,B),multiply(additive_identity,B),multiply(A,B)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[27,19,27,27,26]),
    [iquote('hyper,27,19,27,27,26')] ).

cnf(45,plain,
    sum(multiply(A,B),multiply(A,additive_identity),multiply(A,B)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[27,17,27,27,26]),
    [iquote('hyper,27,17,27,27,26')] ).

cnf(1062,plain,
    sum(additive_identity,multiply(additive_identity,A),additive_identity),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[42,13,29,29]),
    [iquote('hyper,42,13,29,29')] ).

cnf(2830,plain,
    sum(additive_identity,multiply(A,additive_identity),additive_identity),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[45,13,29,29]),
    [iquote('hyper,45,13,29,29')] ).

cnf(2988,plain,
    e_qualish(multiply(additive_identity,A),additive_identity),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[1062,21,25]),
    [iquote('hyper,1062,21,25')] ).

cnf(3253,plain,
    product(additive_identity,A,additive_identity),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[2988,11,27]),
    [iquote('hyper,2988,11,27')] ).

cnf(3279,plain,
    product(additive_inverse(additive_identity),A,additive_identity),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[3253,20,3253,34,26]),
    [iquote('hyper,3253,20,3253,34,26')] ).

cnf(4568,plain,
    product(A,additive_identity,additive_identity),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[2830,20,3279,27,37]),
    [iquote('hyper,2830,20,3279,27,37')] ).

cnf(4569,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[4568,23]),
    [iquote('binary,4568.1,23.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11  % Problem  : RNG001-5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 02:07:10 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.69/1.92  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.69/1.92  The process was started by sandbox2 on n010.cluster.edu,
% 1.69/1.92  Wed Jul 27 02:07:10 2022
% 1.69/1.92  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 30252.
% 1.69/1.92  
% 1.69/1.92  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.69/1.92  set(auto).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.69/1.92  clear(print_given).
% 1.69/1.92  
% 1.69/1.92  list(usable).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] e_qualish(X,X).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -e_qualish(X,Y)|e_qualish(Y,X).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -e_qualish(X,Y)| -e_qualish(Y,Z)|e_qualish(X,Z).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -e_qualish(X,Y)|e_qualish(additive_inverse(X),additive_inverse(Y)).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -e_qualish(X,Y)|e_qualish(add(X,W),add(Y,W)).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -e_qualish(X,Y)| -sum(X,W,Z)|sum(Y,W,Z).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -e_qualish(X,Y)| -sum(W,X,Z)|sum(W,Y,Z).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -e_qualish(X,Y)| -sum(W,Z,X)|sum(W,Z,Y).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -e_qualish(X,Y)|e_qualish(multiply(X,W),multiply(Y,W)).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -e_qualish(X,Y)| -product(X,W,Z)|product(Y,W,Z).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -e_qualish(X,Y)| -product(W,X,Z)|product(W,Y,Z).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -e_qualish(X,Y)| -product(W,Z,X)|product(W,Z,Y).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] sum(additive_identity,X,X).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] sum(X,additive_identity,X).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] product(X,Y,multiply(X,Y)).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] sum(X,Y,add(X,Y)).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] sum(additive_inverse(X),X,additive_identity).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] sum(X,additive_inverse(X),additive_identity).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -sum(X,Y,U)| -sum(Y,Z,V)| -sum(U,Z,W)|sum(X,V,W).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -sum(X,Y,U)| -sum(Y,Z,V)| -sum(X,V,W)|sum(U,Z,W).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -sum(X,Y,Z)|sum(Y,X,Z).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -product(X,Y,U)| -product(Y,Z,V)| -product(U,Z,W)|product(X,V,W).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -product(X,Y,U)| -product(Y,Z,V)| -product(X,V,W)|product(U,Z,W).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -product(X,Y,V1)| -product(X,Z,V2)| -sum(Y,Z,V3)| -product(X,V3,V4)|sum(V1,V2,V4).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -product(X,Y,V1)| -product(X,Z,V2)| -sum(Y,Z,V3)| -sum(V1,V2,V4)|product(X,V3,V4).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -product(Y,X,V1)| -product(Z,X,V2)| -sum(Y,Z,V3)| -product(V3,X,V4)|sum(V1,V2,V4).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -product(Y,X,V1)| -product(Z,X,V2)| -sum(Y,Z,V3)| -sum(V1,V2,V4)|product(V3,X,V4).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -sum(X,Y,U)| -sum(X,Y,V)|e_qualish(U,V).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -product(X,Y,U)| -product(X,Y,V)|e_qualish(U,V).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -product(a,additive_identity,additive_identity).
% 1.69/1.92  end_of_list.
% 1.69/1.92  
% 1.69/1.92  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 1.69/1.92  
% 1.69/1.92  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 1.69/1.92  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 1.69/1.92  in usable.
% 1.69/1.92  
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 1.69/1.92  
% 1.69/1.92  ------------> process usable:
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 1 [] -e_qualish(A,B)|e_qualish(B,A).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 2 [] -e_qualish(A,B)| -e_qualish(B,C)|e_qualish(A,C).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 3 [] -e_qualish(A,B)|e_qualish(additive_inverse(A),additive_inverse(B)).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 4 [] -e_qualish(A,B)|e_qualish(add(A,C),add(B,C)).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 5 [] -e_qualish(A,B)| -sum(A,C,D)|sum(B,C,D).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 6 [] -e_qualish(A,B)| -sum(C,A,D)|sum(C,B,D).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 7 [] -e_qualish(A,B)| -sum(C,D,A)|sum(C,D,B).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 8 [] -e_qualish(A,B)|e_qualish(multiply(A,C),multiply(B,C)).
% 1.69/1.93  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 9 [] -e_qualish(A,B)| -product(A,C,D)|product(B,C,D).
% 1.69/1.93  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 10 [] -e_qualish(A,B)| -product(C,A,D)|product(C,B,D).
% 1.69/1.93  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 11 [] -e_qualish(A,B)| -product(C,D,A)|product(C,D,B).
% 1.69/1.93  ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 12 [] -sum(A,B,C)| -sum(B,D,E)| -sum(C,D,F)|sum(A,E,F).
% 1.69/1.93  ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 13 [] -sum(A,B,C)| -sum(B,D,E)| -sum(A,E,F)|sum(C,D,F).
% 1.69/1.93  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 14 [] -sum(A,B,C)|sum(B,A,C).
% 1.69/1.93  ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 15 [] -product(A,B,C)| -product(B,D,E)| -product(C,D,F)|product(A,E,F).
% 1.69/1.93  ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 16 [] -product(A,B,C)| -product(B,D,E)| -product(A,E,F)|product(C,D,F).
% 1.69/1.93  ** KEPT (pick-wt=20): 17 [] -product(A,B,C)| -product(A,D,E)| -sum(B,D,F)| -product(A,F,G)|sum(C,E,G).
% 1.69/1.93  ** KEPT (pick-wt=20): 18 [] -product(A,B,C)| -product(A,D,E)| -sum(B,D,F)| -sum(C,E,G)|product(A,F,G).
% 1.69/1.93  ** KEPT (pick-wt=20): 19 [] -product(A,B,C)| -product(D,B,E)| -sum(A,D,F)| -product(F,B,G)|sum(C,E,G).
% 1.69/1.93  ** KEPT (pick-wt=20): 20 [] -product(A,B,C)| -product(D,B,E)| -sum(A,D,F)| -sum(C,E,G)|product(F,B,G).
% 1.88/2.09  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 21 [] -sum(A,B,C)| -sum(A,B,D)|e_qualish(C,D).
% 1.88/2.09  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 22 [] -product(A,B,C)| -product(A,B,D)|e_qualish(C,D).
% 1.88/2.09  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 23 [] -product(a,additive_identity,additive_identity).
% 1.88/2.09  
% 1.88/2.09  ------------> process sos:
% 1.88/2.09  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 24 [] e_qualish(A,A).
% 1.88/2.09  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 25 [] sum(additive_identity,A,A).
% 1.88/2.09  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 26 [] sum(A,additive_identity,A).
% 1.88/2.09  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 27 [] product(A,B,multiply(A,B)).
% 1.88/2.09  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 28 [] sum(A,B,add(A,B)).
% 1.88/2.09  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 29 [] sum(additive_inverse(A),A,additive_identity).
% 1.88/2.09  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 30 [] sum(A,additive_inverse(A),additive_identity).
% 1.88/2.09  
% 1.88/2.09  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.88/2.09  
% 1.88/2.09  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.88/2.09  
% 1.88/2.09  
% 1.88/2.09  Resetting weight limit to 8.
% 1.88/2.09  
% 1.88/2.09  
% 1.88/2.09  Resetting weight limit to 8.
% 1.88/2.09  
% 1.88/2.09  sos_size=4032
% 1.88/2.09  
% 1.88/2.09  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.88/2.09  
% 1.88/2.09  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.16 sec ----> 4569 [binary,4568.1,23.1] $F.
% 1.88/2.09  
% 1.88/2.09  Length of proof is 10.  Level of proof is 6.
% 1.88/2.09  
% 1.88/2.09  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.88/2.09  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.88/2.09  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.88/2.09  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.88/2.09  
% 1.88/2.09  
% 1.88/2.09  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.88/2.09  
% 1.88/2.09  
% 1.88/2.09  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.88/2.09  
% 1.88/2.09  ============ end of search ============
% 1.88/2.09  
% 1.88/2.09  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.88/2.09  clauses given                 68
% 1.88/2.09  clauses generated          22005
% 1.88/2.09  clauses kept                4568
% 1.88/2.09  clauses forward subsumed   17432
% 1.88/2.09  clauses back subsumed        436
% 1.88/2.09  Kbytes malloced             4882
% 1.88/2.09  
% 1.88/2.09  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.88/2.09  user CPU time          0.16          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.88/2.09  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.88/2.09  wall-clock time        1             (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 1.88/2.09  
% 1.88/2.09  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.88/2.09  
% 1.88/2.09  Process 30252 finished Wed Jul 27 02:07:11 2022
% 1.88/2.09  Otter interrupted
% 1.88/2.09  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------