%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : RNG001-5 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 04:24:55 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.04s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP20874/RNG/RNG001-5+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .............................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 105] [nf = 0] [nu = 42] [ut = 18]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 5488] [nf = 100] [nu = 3414] [ut = 248]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 9287778] [nf = 311] [nu = 9235580] [ut = 3382]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 41 secs [nr = 9726073] [nf = 411] [nu = 9554756] [ut = 21932]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 81104343
% 	resolvents: 81103855	factors: 488
% Number of unit clauses generated: 80898990
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 99.75
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 8		[1] = 748	[2] = 18780	[3] = 7209	
% Total = 26745
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 80898990	[2] = 204847	[3] = 498	[4] = 8	
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] equalish_2		(+)5398	(-)1179
% [1] product_3		(+)4516	(-)1017
% [2] sum_3		(+)12764	(-)1871
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)22678	(-)4067
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 26745
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 454599
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 81104343
% Number of unification failures: 105382151
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 34838458
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 36957
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 235743
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 2014
% Max entries in substitution set: 12
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 80812597
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 34728927
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 12
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 4
% Number of states in UCFA table: 71830
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 273118
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.90
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.26
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 42
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 186486494
% ConstructUnitClause() = 80839334
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 107.22 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 270348
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 305 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------