TSTP Solution File: RNG001-3 by Vampire-SAT---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem  : RNG001-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Apr 30 14:49:40 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.45s
% Output   : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   51 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   59 (  30   ~;  29   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   70 (  70   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f3044,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[],[f3040,f8]) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ~ product(a,additive_identity,additive_identity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_a_times_additive_id_is_additive_id) ).

fof(f3040,plain,
    ! [X0] : product(X0,additive_identity,additive_identity),
    inference(resolution,[],[f3019,f1]) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0] : sum(additive_identity,X0,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',additive_identity1) ).

fof(f3019,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ sum(additive_identity,additive_identity,X0)
      | product(X1,X0,additive_identity) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f2970,f1353]) ).

fof(f1353,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4] :
      ( ~ sum(multiply(X0,X1),multiply(X0,X2),X3)
      | ~ sum(X1,X2,X4)
      | product(X0,X4,X3) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f295,f5]) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : product(X0,X1,multiply(X0,X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',closure_of_multiplication) ).

fof(f295,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4,X5] :
      ( ~ product(X0,X1,X2)
      | ~ sum(multiply(X0,X3),X2,X4)
      | ~ sum(X3,X1,X5)
      | product(X0,X5,X4) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f7,f5]) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X3,X0,X1,X8,X6,X9,X7] :
      ( ~ product(X0,X1,X6)
      | ~ product(X0,X3,X7)
      | ~ sum(X6,X7,X9)
      | ~ sum(X1,X3,X8)
      | product(X0,X8,X9) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',distributivity2) ).

fof(f2970,plain,
    ! [X0] : sum(multiply(X0,additive_identity),multiply(X0,additive_identity),additive_identity),
    inference(resolution,[],[f1974,f1858]) ).

fof(f1858,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : sum(multiply(X0,additive_identity),multiply(X0,X1),multiply(X0,X1)),
    inference(resolution,[],[f1428,f1]) ).

fof(f1428,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ sum(X0,X1,X2)
      | sum(multiply(X3,X0),multiply(X3,X1),multiply(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f1113,f5]) ).

fof(f1113,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4] :
      ( ~ product(X0,X1,X2)
      | ~ sum(X3,X1,X4)
      | sum(multiply(X0,X3),X2,multiply(X0,X4)) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f178,f5]) ).

fof(f178,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4,X5] :
      ( ~ product(X0,X1,X2)
      | ~ product(X0,X3,X4)
      | ~ sum(X5,X3,X1)
      | sum(multiply(X0,X5),X4,X2) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f6,f5]) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X3,X0,X1,X8,X6,X9,X7] :
      ( ~ product(X0,X1,X6)
      | ~ product(X0,X8,X9)
      | ~ product(X0,X3,X7)
      | ~ sum(X1,X3,X8)
      | sum(X6,X7,X9) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',distributivity1) ).

fof(f1974,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ sum(X0,X1,multiply(X2,additive_identity))
      | sum(X0,X1,additive_identity) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f1966,f67]) ).

fof(f67,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ sum(additive_identity,X0,X1)
      | ~ sum(X2,X3,X0)
      | sum(X2,X3,X1) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f4,f1]) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4,X5] :
      ( ~ sum(X0,X1,X2)
      | ~ sum(X0,X4,X5)
      | ~ sum(X1,X3,X4)
      | sum(X2,X3,X5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity_of_addition2) ).

fof(f1966,plain,
    ! [X0] : sum(additive_identity,multiply(X0,additive_identity),additive_identity),
    inference(resolution,[],[f1858,f788]) ).

fof(f788,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ sum(X0,X1,X0)
      | sum(additive_identity,X1,additive_identity) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f68,f2]) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0] : sum(additive_inverse(X0),X0,additive_identity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',additive_inverse1) ).

fof(f68,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ sum(additive_inverse(X0),X1,X2)
      | ~ sum(X0,X3,X1)
      | sum(additive_identity,X3,X2) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f4,f2]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : RNG001-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.15  % Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.16/0.36  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.36  % DateTime   : Tue Apr 30 02:05:47 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.36  % (28823)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.16/0.38  % (28827)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3:gsp=on:nm=4_470 on theBenchmark for (470ds/0Mi)
% 0.16/0.38  Detected minimum model sizes of [1,1]
% 0.16/0.38  Detected maximum model sizes of [max,1]
% 0.16/0.38  TRYING [1,1]
% 0.16/0.38  TRYING [2,1]
% 0.16/0.38  % (28824)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.16/0.38  % (28825)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.16/0.38  % (28826)dis-2_2:3_amm=sco:anc=none:bce=on:fsr=off:gsp=on:nm=16:nwc=1.2:nicw=on:sac=on:sp=weighted_frequency_476 on theBenchmark for (476ds/0Mi)
% 0.16/0.38  TRYING [3,1]
% 0.16/0.38  % (28828)dis+1_20_av=off:lcm=predicate:nm=2:nwc=2.0_396 on theBenchmark for (396ds/0Mi)
% 0.16/0.38  % (28829)dis+11_4:5_nm=4_216 on theBenchmark for (216ds/0Mi)
% 0.16/0.38  % (28830)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2:si=on:rtra=on:rawr=on:rp=on:fmbksg=on_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.16/0.38  TRYING [1]
% 0.16/0.38  TRYING [2]
% 0.16/0.38  Detected minimum model sizes of [1,1]
% 0.16/0.38  Detected maximum model sizes of [max,1]
% 0.16/0.38  TRYING [1,1]
% 0.16/0.38  TRYING [1]
% 0.16/0.38  TRYING [2,1]
% 0.16/0.38  TRYING [2]
% 0.16/0.38  TRYING [3]
% 0.16/0.38  TRYING [3,1]
% 0.16/0.38  TRYING [3]
% 0.16/0.39  TRYING [4,1]
% 0.16/0.39  TRYING [4]
% 0.16/0.39  TRYING [4,1]
% 0.16/0.39  TRYING [4]
% 0.16/0.40  TRYING [5,1]
% 0.16/0.40  TRYING [5]
% 0.22/0.40  TRYING [5,1]
% 0.22/0.40  TRYING [5]
% 0.22/0.42  TRYING [6,1]
% 0.22/0.42  TRYING [6]
% 0.22/0.43  TRYING [6,1]
% 0.22/0.43  TRYING [6]
% 0.22/0.45  % (28828)First to succeed.
% 0.22/0.45  % (28828)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.22/0.45  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.45  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.45  % (28828)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.45  % (28828)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.22/0.45  % (28828)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.22/0.45  
% 0.22/0.45  % (28828)Memory used [KB]: 1243
% 0.22/0.45  % (28828)Time elapsed: 0.069 s
% 0.22/0.45  % (28828)Instructions burned: 134 (million)
% 0.22/0.45  % (28828)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.45  % (28828)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.45  % (28823)Success in time 0.086 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------