TSTP Solution File: RNG001-1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : RNG001-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:27:01 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11 % Problem : RNG001-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.11 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.11/0.31 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Mon May 30 16:00:42 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.34 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.34 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 0.11/0.34 # and selection function SelectCQIPrecWNTNp.
% 0.11/0.34 #
% 0.11/0.34 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.11/0.34 # Number of axioms: 18 Number of unprocessed: 18
% 0.11/0.34 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.11/0.34 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.11/0.34 # Hello from C++
% 0.16/0.44 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.16/0.44 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.16/0.44 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.16/0.44 # 18 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.16/0.44 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.16/0.44 # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.16/0.44 # Found 7 unit axioms.
% 0.16/0.44 # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.16/0.44 # 11 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.16/0.44 # 7 unit axiom clauses
% 0.16/0.44
% 0.16/0.44 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.16/0.44 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.16/0.45 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.16/0.45 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.16/0.45 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.16/0.45 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.16/0.45 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.16/0.45 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.16/0.45 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.16/0.45 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.16/0.45 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.45 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.45 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.16/0.45
% 0.16/0.45 # End clausification derivation
% 0.16/0.45 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.16/0.45 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (sum(X1,additive_identity,X1))).
% 0.16/0.45 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (sum(additive_identity,X1,X1))).
% 0.16/0.45 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (sum(X1,additive_inverse(X1),additive_identity))).
% 0.16/0.45 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (sum(additive_inverse(X1),X1,additive_identity))).
% 0.16/0.45 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (sum(X1,X2,add(X1,X2)))).
% 0.16/0.45 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (product(X1,X2,multiply(X1,X2)))).
% 0.16/0.45 cnf(i_0_36, negated_conjecture, (~product(a,additive_identity,additive_identity))).
% 0.16/0.45 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (sum(X1,X2,X3)|~sum(X2,X1,X3))).
% 0.16/0.45 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (X1=X2|~sum(X3,X4,X2)|~sum(X3,X4,X1))).
% 0.16/0.45 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (X1=X2|~product(X3,X4,X2)|~product(X3,X4,X1))).
% 0.16/0.45 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (sum(X1,X2,X3)|~sum(X4,X2,X5)|~sum(X6,X5,X3)|~sum(X6,X4,X1))).
% 0.16/0.45 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (product(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X4,X2,X5)|~product(X6,X5,X3)|~product(X6,X4,X1))).
% 0.16/0.45 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (product(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X4,X5,X3)|~product(X6,X5,X2)|~product(X1,X6,X4))).
% 0.16/0.45 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (sum(X1,X2,X3)|~sum(X4,X5,X3)|~sum(X6,X5,X2)|~sum(X1,X6,X4))).
% 0.16/0.45 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (product(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X4,X2,X5)|~product(X6,X2,X7)|~sum(X7,X5,X3)|~sum(X6,X4,X1))).
% 0.16/0.45 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (product(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X1,X4,X5)|~product(X1,X6,X7)|~sum(X7,X5,X3)|~sum(X6,X4,X2))).
% 0.16/0.45 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (sum(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X4,X5,X3)|~product(X4,X6,X2)|~product(X4,X7,X1)|~sum(X7,X6,X5))).
% 0.16/0.45 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (sum(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X4,X5,X3)|~product(X6,X5,X2)|~product(X7,X5,X1)|~sum(X7,X6,X4))).
% 0.16/0.45 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.16/0.45 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.16/0.45 # Found 9 steps
% 0.16/0.45 cnf(i_0_36, negated_conjecture, (~product(a,additive_identity,additive_identity)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.16/0.45 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (~product(a,additive_identity,additive_identity)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_31])).
% 0.16/0.45 cnf(i_0_68, plain, (~product(a,additive_identity,multiply(a,additive_identity))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_21])).
% 0.16/0.45 cnf(i_0_69, plain, (~product(a,additive_identity,multiply(a,additive_identity))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_21])).
% 0.16/0.45 cnf(i_0_71, plain, (~sum(additive_identity,additive_identity,additive_identity)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_20])).
% 0.16/0.45 cnf(i_0_70, plain, (~sum(multiply(a,additive_identity),multiply(a,additive_identity),additive_identity)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_26])).
% 0.16/0.45 cnf(i_0_91, plain, (~sum(additive_identity,multiply(a,additive_identity),multiply(a,additive_identity))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_19])).
% 0.16/0.45 cnf(i_0_92, plain, (~sum(additive_inverse(multiply(a,additive_identity)),multiply(a,additive_identity),additive_identity)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_23])).
% 0.16/0.45 cnf(i_0_93, plain, (~sum(additive_inverse(multiply(a,additive_identity)),additive_identity,multiply(a,additive_identity))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_93, ...])).
% 0.16/0.45 # End printing tableau
% 0.16/0.45 # SZS output end
% 0.16/0.45 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.16/0.45 # Returning from population with 4 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.16/0.45 # We now have 4 tableaux to operate on
% 0.16/0.45 # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 0.16/0.45 # Proof search is over...
% 0.16/0.45 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------