TSTP Solution File: REL048+1 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : REL048+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 19:54:31 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.81s 1.11s
% Output   : Refutation 0.81s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11  % Problem  : REL048+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Jul  8 15:16:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.72/0.98  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.72/0.98  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.72/0.98  Process 4974 was started by sandbox on n008.cluster.edu,
% 0.72/0.98  Fri Jul  8 15:16:09 2022
% 0.72/0.98  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_4808_n008.cluster.edu".
% 0.72/0.98  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.72/0.98  
% 0.72/0.98  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.72/0.98  
% 0.72/0.98  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_4808_n008.cluster.edu
% 0.72/0.98  
% 0.72/0.98  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.72/0.98  set(auto2).
% 0.72/0.98      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.72/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.72/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.72/0.98      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.72/0.98      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.72/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.72/0.98      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.72/0.98      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.72/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.72/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.72/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.72/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.72/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.72/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.72/0.98      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.72/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.72/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.72/0.98      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.72/0.98      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.72/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.72/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.72/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.72/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.72/0.98      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.72/0.98      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.72/0.98      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.72/0.98      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.72/0.98  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.72/0.98  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.72/0.98  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.72/0.98  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.72/0.98  clear(print_given).
% 0.72/0.98  
% 0.72/0.98  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (14 formulas)
% 0.72/0.98  
% 0.72/0.98  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.72/0.98  
% 0.72/0.98  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.72/0.98  
% 0.72/0.98  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.72/0.98  
% 0.72/0.98  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.72/0.98  1 (all X0 all X1 join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0)) # label(maddux1_join_commutativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/0.98  2 (all X0 all X1 all X2 join(X0,join(X1,X2)) = join(join(X0,X1),X2)) # label(maddux2_join_associativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/0.98  3 (all X0 all X1 X0 = join(complement(join(complement(X0),complement(X1))),complement(join(complement(X0),X1)))) # label(maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/0.98  4 (all X0 all X1 meet(X0,X1) = complement(join(complement(X0),complement(X1)))) # label(maddux4_definiton_of_meet) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/0.98  5 (all X0 all X1 all X2 composition(X0,composition(X1,X2)) = composition(composition(X0,X1),X2)) # label(composition_associativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/0.98  6 (all X0 composition(X0,one) = X0) # label(composition_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/0.98  7 (all X0 all X1 all X2 composition(join(X0,X1),X2) = join(composition(X0,X2),composition(X1,X2))) # label(composition_distributivity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/0.98  8 (all X0 converse(converse(X0)) = X0) # label(converse_idempotence) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/0.98  9 (all X0 all X1 converse(join(X0,X1)) = join(converse(X0),converse(X1))) # label(converse_additivity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/0.98  10 (all X0 all X1 converse(composition(X0,X1)) = composition(converse(X1),converse(X0))) # label(converse_multiplicativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/0.98  11 (all X0 all X1 join(composition(converse(X0),complement(composition(X0,X1))),complement(X1)) = complement(X1)) # label(converse_cancellativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/0.98  12 (all X0 top = join(X0,complement(X0))) # label(def_top) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/0.98  13 (all X0 zero = meet(X0,complement(X0))) # label(def_zero) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.11  14 -(all X0 all X1 all X2 (join(join(X0,X1),X2) = X2 -> join(X0,X2) = X2 & join(X1,X2) = X2)) # label(goals) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.11  
% 0.81/1.11  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.81/1.11  
% 0.81/1.11  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.81/1.11  
% 0.81/1.11  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.81/1.11  
% 0.81/1.11  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.81/1.11  
% 0.81/1.11  Auto_denials:
% 0.81/1.11    % copying label goals to answer in negative clause
% 0.81/1.11  
% 0.81/1.11  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.81/1.11  Function symbol KB weights:  one=1. top=1. zero=1. c1=1. c2=1. c3=1. join=1. composition=1. meet=1. complement=1. converse=1.
% 0.81/1.11  
% 0.81/1.11  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.81/1.11  
% 0.81/1.11  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.81/1.11  
% 0.81/1.11  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.81/1.11  
% 0.81/1.11  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.81/1.11  
% 0.81/1.11  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.81/1.11  
% 0.81/1.11  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.81/1.11  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.81/1.11  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.81/1.11  
% 0.81/1.11  % Proof 1 at 0.13 (+ 0.00) seconds: goals.
% 0.81/1.11  % Length of proof is 56.
% 0.81/1.11  % Level of proof is 17.
% 0.81/1.11  % Maximum clause weight is 21.000.
% 0.81/1.11  % Given clauses 123.
% 0.81/1.11  
% 0.81/1.11  1 (all X0 all X1 join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0)) # label(maddux1_join_commutativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.11  2 (all X0 all X1 all X2 join(X0,join(X1,X2)) = join(join(X0,X1),X2)) # label(maddux2_join_associativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.11  3 (all X0 all X1 X0 = join(complement(join(complement(X0),complement(X1))),complement(join(complement(X0),X1)))) # label(maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.11  4 (all X0 all X1 meet(X0,X1) = complement(join(complement(X0),complement(X1)))) # label(maddux4_definiton_of_meet) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.11  5 (all X0 all X1 all X2 composition(X0,composition(X1,X2)) = composition(composition(X0,X1),X2)) # label(composition_associativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.11  6 (all X0 composition(X0,one) = X0) # label(composition_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.11  8 (all X0 converse(converse(X0)) = X0) # label(converse_idempotence) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.11  10 (all X0 all X1 converse(composition(X0,X1)) = composition(converse(X1),converse(X0))) # label(converse_multiplicativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.11  11 (all X0 all X1 join(composition(converse(X0),complement(composition(X0,X1))),complement(X1)) = complement(X1)) # label(converse_cancellativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.11  12 (all X0 top = join(X0,complement(X0))) # label(def_top) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.11  13 (all X0 zero = meet(X0,complement(X0))) # label(def_zero) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.11  14 -(all X0 all X1 all X2 (join(join(X0,X1),X2) = X2 -> join(X0,X2) = X2 & join(X1,X2) = X2)) # label(goals) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.11  15 composition(A,one) = A # label(composition_identity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(6)].
% 0.81/1.11  16 converse(converse(A)) = A # label(converse_idempotence) # label(axiom).  [clausify(8)].
% 0.81/1.11  17 join(A,complement(A)) = top # label(def_top) # label(axiom).  [clausify(12)].
% 0.81/1.11  18 meet(A,complement(A)) = zero # label(def_zero) # label(axiom).  [clausify(13)].
% 0.81/1.11  19 join(A,B) = join(B,A) # label(maddux1_join_commutativity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(1)].
% 0.81/1.11  20 join(join(c1,c2),c3) = c3 # label(goals) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(14)].
% 0.81/1.11  21 join(c3,join(c1,c2)) = c3.  [copy(20),rewrite([19(5)])].
% 0.81/1.11  22 meet(A,B) = complement(join(complement(A),complement(B))) # label(maddux4_definiton_of_meet) # label(axiom).  [clausify(4)].
% 0.81/1.11  25 converse(composition(A,B)) = composition(converse(B),converse(A)) # label(converse_multiplicativity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(10)].
% 0.81/1.11  26 composition(converse(A),converse(B)) = converse(composition(B,A)).  [copy(25),flip(a)].
% 0.81/1.11  27 join(join(A,B),C) = join(A,join(B,C)) # label(maddux2_join_associativity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(2)].
% 0.81/1.11  28 join(A,join(B,C)) = join(C,join(A,B)).  [copy(27),rewrite([19(2)]),flip(a)].
% 0.81/1.11  29 composition(composition(A,B),C) = composition(A,composition(B,C)) # label(composition_associativity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(5)].
% 0.81/1.11  32 complement(A) = join(composition(converse(B),complement(composition(B,A))),complement(A)) # label(converse_cancellativity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(11)].
% 0.81/1.11  33 join(complement(A),composition(converse(B),complement(composition(B,A)))) = complement(A).  [copy(32),rewrite([19(7)]),flip(a)].
% 0.81/1.11  34 join(complement(join(complement(A),complement(B))),complement(join(complement(A),B))) = A # label(maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan) # label(axiom).  [clausify(3)].
% 0.81/1.11  35 join(complement(join(A,complement(B))),complement(join(complement(A),complement(B)))) = B.  [copy(34),rewrite([19(6),19(8)]),rewrite([19(6)])].
% 0.81/1.11  36 join(c1,c3) != c3 | join(c2,c3) != c3 # label(goals) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(goals).  [clausify(14)].
% 0.81/1.11  37 complement(top) = zero.  [back_rewrite(18),rewrite([22(2),17(4)])].
% 0.81/1.11  38 join(c1,join(c2,c3)) = c3.  [back_rewrite(21),rewrite([28(5),19(4),28(5,R),19(4)])].
% 0.81/1.11  41 converse(composition(converse(A),B)) = composition(converse(B),A).  [para(16(a,1),26(a,1,2)),flip(a)].
% 0.81/1.11  42 join(A,join(B,complement(A))) = join(B,top).  [para(17(a,1),28(a,2,2)),rewrite([19(2)])].
% 0.81/1.11  43 composition(A,composition(one,B)) = composition(A,B).  [para(15(a,1),29(a,1,1)),flip(a)].
% 0.81/1.11  54 join(zero,complement(join(complement(A),complement(A)))) = A.  [para(17(a,1),35(a,1,1,1)),rewrite([37(2)])].
% 0.81/1.11  58 join(complement(A),complement(join(join(B,complement(A)),complement(join(complement(B),complement(A)))))) = join(complement(B),complement(A)).  [para(35(a,1),35(a,1,2,1)),rewrite([19(10)])].
% 0.81/1.11  62 join(complement(join(top,complement(A))),complement(join(zero,complement(A)))) = A.  [para(37(a,1),35(a,1,2,1,1))].
% 0.81/1.11  75 composition(converse(one),A) = A.  [para(15(a,1),41(a,1,1)),rewrite([16(2)]),flip(a)].
% 0.81/1.11  81 converse(one) = one.  [para(75(a,1),15(a,1)),flip(a)].
% 0.81/1.11  85 join(complement(A),complement(composition(one,A))) = complement(A).  [para(75(a,1),33(a,1,2))].
% 0.81/1.11  86 composition(one,A) = A.  [para(75(a,1),43(a,2)),rewrite([81(2),43(4)])].
% 0.81/1.11  87 join(complement(A),complement(A)) = complement(A).  [back_rewrite(85),rewrite([86(3)])].
% 0.81/1.11  88 join(zero,complement(complement(A))) = A.  [back_rewrite(54),rewrite([87(4)])].
% 0.81/1.11  93 join(top,complement(A)) = top.  [para(87(a,1),42(a,1,2)),rewrite([17(2),19(4)]),flip(a)].
% 0.81/1.11  94 join(zero,complement(join(zero,complement(A)))) = A.  [back_rewrite(62),rewrite([93(3),37(2)])].
% 0.81/1.11  143 join(zero,complement(A)) = complement(A).  [para(88(a,1),94(a,1,2,1))].
% 0.81/1.11  144 complement(complement(A)) = A.  [back_rewrite(94),rewrite([143(4),143(4)])].
% 0.81/1.11  152 join(A,A) = A.  [para(144(a,1),87(a,1,1)),rewrite([144(2),144(3)])].
% 0.81/1.11  156 join(A,join(A,B)) = join(A,B).  [para(152(a,1),28(a,1)),rewrite([19(3),28(4,R),19(3),28(3,R),152(2)]),flip(a)].
% 0.81/1.11  157 join(A,complement(join(B,complement(A)))) = A.  [para(35(a,1),156(a,1,2)),rewrite([19(4),35(12)])].
% 0.81/1.11  158 join(c1,c3) = c3.  [para(38(a,1),156(a,1,2)),rewrite([38(8)])].
% 0.81/1.11  159 join(c2,c3) != c3 # answer(goals).  [back_rewrite(36),rewrite([158(3)]),xx(a)].
% 0.81/1.11  270 join(complement(A),complement(join(B,A))) = complement(A).  [para(157(a,1),58(a,2)),rewrite([144(2),144(4),144(8),58(13)])].
% 0.81/1.11  602 complement(join(c2,c3)) = complement(c3).  [para(38(a,1),270(a,1,2,1)),rewrite([19(7),270(7)]),flip(a)].
% 0.81/1.11  634 $F # answer(goals).  [para(602(a,1),35(a,1,1,1,2)),rewrite([602(9),35(10)]),flip(a),unit_del(a,159)].
% 0.81/1.11  
% 0.81/1.11  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.81/1.11  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.81/1.11  
% 0.81/1.11  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.81/1.11  
% 0.81/1.11  Given=123. Generated=3695. Kept=612. proofs=1.
% 0.81/1.11  Usable=99. Sos=382. Demods=464. Limbo=1, Disabled=145. Hints=0.
% 0.81/1.11  Megabytes=0.81.
% 0.81/1.11  User_CPU=0.14, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.81/1.11  
% 0.81/1.11  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.81/1.11  
% 0.81/1.11  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.81/1.11  
% 0.81/1.11  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.81/1.11  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.81/1.11  
% 0.81/1.11  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.81/1.11  
% 0.81/1.11  Process 4974 exit (max_proofs) Fri Jul  8 15:16:09 2022
% 0.81/1.11  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------