TSTP Solution File: REL046+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : REL046+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 19:13:54 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.38s 2.47s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.38s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 14 unt; 0 nHn; 8 RR)
% Number of literals : 20 ( 19 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 19 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_13,plain,
join(join(X1,X2),X3) = join(X1,join(X2,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rss0k35g/input.p',i_0_13) ).
cnf(i_0_11,negated_conjecture,
join(esk1_0,complement(join(complement(esk2_0),complement(esk3_0)))) = complement(join(complement(esk2_0),complement(esk3_0))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rss0k35g/input.p',i_0_11) ).
cnf(i_0_14,plain,
join(complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),complement(join(complement(X1),X2))) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rss0k35g/input.p',i_0_14) ).
cnf(i_0_12,plain,
join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rss0k35g/input.p',i_0_12) ).
cnf(i_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( join(esk1_0,esk2_0) != esk2_0
| join(esk1_0,esk3_0) != esk3_0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rss0k35g/input.p',i_0_10) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
join(join(X1,X2),X3) = join(X1,join(X2,X3)),
i_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
join(esk1_0,complement(join(complement(esk2_0),complement(esk3_0)))) = complement(join(complement(esk2_0),complement(esk3_0))),
i_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
join(complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),complement(join(complement(X1),X2))) = X1,
i_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
i_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
( join(esk1_0,esk2_0) != esk2_0
| join(esk1_0,esk3_0) != esk3_0 ),
i_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
join(esk1_0,join(complement(join(complement(esk2_0),complement(esk3_0))),X1)) = join(complement(join(complement(esk2_0),complement(esk3_0))),X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
join(complement(join(complement(X1),X2)),complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2)))) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( join(esk2_0,esk1_0) != esk2_0
| join(esk3_0,esk1_0) != esk3_0 ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_23]),c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
join(esk2_0,esk1_0) = esk2_0,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
join(complement(join(X1,complement(X2))),complement(join(complement(X2),complement(X1)))) = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
join(esk3_0,esk1_0) != esk3_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28])]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_29]),c_0_23]),c_0_30]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : REL046+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jul 8 10:49:26 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.45 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.38/2.47 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 8.38/2.47 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 8.38/2.47 # Preprocessing time : 0.010 s
% 8.38/2.47
% 8.38/2.47 # Proof found!
% 8.38/2.47 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.38/2.47 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.38/2.47 # Proof object total steps : 17
% 8.38/2.47 # Proof object clause steps : 12
% 8.38/2.47 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 8.38/2.47 # Proof object conjectures : 8
% 8.38/2.47 # Proof object clause conjectures : 6
% 8.38/2.47 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 8.38/2.47 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 8.38/2.47 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 8.38/2.47 # Proof object generating inferences : 4
% 8.38/2.47 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 8
% 8.38/2.47 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.38/2.47 # Parsed axioms : 14
% 8.38/2.47 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 8.38/2.47 # Initial clauses : 14
% 8.38/2.47 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 8.38/2.47 # Initial clauses in saturation : 14
% 8.38/2.47 # Processed clauses : 83
% 8.38/2.47 # ...of these trivial : 14
% 8.38/2.47 # ...subsumed : 18
% 8.38/2.47 # ...remaining for further processing : 51
% 8.38/2.47 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 8.38/2.47 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 8.38/2.47 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 8.38/2.47 # Backward-rewritten : 7
% 8.38/2.47 # Generated clauses : 681
% 8.38/2.47 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 583
% 8.38/2.47 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 8.38/2.47 # Paramodulations : 681
% 8.38/2.47 # Factorizations : 0
% 8.38/2.47 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 8.38/2.47 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 8.38/2.47 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 8.38/2.47 # Current number of processed clauses : 44
% 8.38/2.47 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 40
% 8.38/2.47 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 8.38/2.47 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 8.38/2.47 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 8.38/2.47 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 465
% 8.38/2.47 # ...number of literals in the above : 465
% 8.38/2.47 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 8.38/2.47 # Current number of archived clauses : 7
% 8.38/2.47 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 8.38/2.47 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 8.38/2.47 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 8.38/2.47 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 8.38/2.47 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 8.38/2.47 # BW rewrite match attempts : 61
% 8.38/2.47 # BW rewrite match successes : 35
% 8.38/2.47 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 8.38/2.47 # Condensation successes : 0
% 8.38/2.47 # Termbank termtop insertions : 8076
% 8.38/2.47
% 8.38/2.47 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.38/2.47 # User time : 0.011 s
% 8.38/2.47 # System time : 0.005 s
% 8.38/2.47 # Total time : 0.016 s
% 8.38/2.47 # ...preprocessing : 0.010 s
% 8.38/2.47 # ...main loop : 0.006 s
% 8.38/2.47 # Maximum resident set size: 7132 pages
% 8.38/2.47
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------