TSTP Solution File: REL031+2 by iProver---3.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.8
% Problem  : REL031+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 13:40:58 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.57s 1.17s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   56 (  50 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   71 (  70 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   24 (   9   ~;   0   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   77 (   0 sgn;  38   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',maddux1_join_commutativity) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : join(X0,join(X1,X2)) = join(join(X0,X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',maddux2_join_associativity) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : composition(X0,composition(X1,X2)) = composition(composition(X0,X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',composition_associativity) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0] : composition(X0,one) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',composition_identity) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : composition(join(X0,X1),X2) = join(composition(X0,X2),composition(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',composition_distributivity) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0] : converse(converse(X0)) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',converse_idempotence) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : converse(join(X0,X1)) = join(converse(X0),converse(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',converse_additivity) ).

fof(f10,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : converse(composition(X0,X1)) = composition(converse(X1),converse(X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',converse_multiplicativity) ).

fof(f17,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( one = join(composition(converse(X1),X1),one)
        & one = join(composition(converse(X0),X0),one) )
     => one = join(composition(converse(composition(X0,X1)),composition(X0,X1)),one) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(f18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ( one = join(composition(converse(X1),X1),one)
          & one = join(composition(converse(X0),X0),one) )
       => one = join(composition(converse(composition(X0,X1)),composition(X0,X1)),one) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( one != join(composition(converse(composition(X0,X1)),composition(X0,X1)),one)
      & one = join(composition(converse(X1),X1),one)
      & one = join(composition(converse(X0),X0),one) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( one != join(composition(converse(composition(X0,X1)),composition(X0,X1)),one)
      & one = join(composition(converse(X1),X1),one)
      & one = join(composition(converse(X0),X0),one) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1] :
        ( one != join(composition(converse(composition(X0,X1)),composition(X0,X1)),one)
        & one = join(composition(converse(X1),X1),one)
        & one = join(composition(converse(X0),X0),one) )
   => ( one != join(composition(converse(composition(sK0,sK1)),composition(sK0,sK1)),one)
      & one = join(composition(converse(sK1),sK1),one)
      & one = join(composition(converse(sK0),sK0),one) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ( one != join(composition(converse(composition(sK0,sK1)),composition(sK0,sK1)),one)
    & one = join(composition(converse(sK1),sK1),one)
    & one = join(composition(converse(sK0),sK0),one) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f20,f21]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : join(X0,join(X1,X2)) = join(join(X0,X1),X2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : composition(X0,composition(X1,X2)) = composition(composition(X0,X1),X2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ! [X0] : composition(X0,one) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : composition(join(X0,X1),X2) = join(composition(X0,X2),composition(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ! [X0] : converse(converse(X0)) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : converse(join(X0,X1)) = join(converse(X0),converse(X1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : converse(composition(X0,X1)) = composition(converse(X1),converse(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f39,plain,
    one = join(composition(converse(sK0),sK0),one),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f40,plain,
    one = join(composition(converse(sK1),sK1),one),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f41,plain,
    one != join(composition(converse(composition(sK0,sK1)),composition(sK0,sK1)),one),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

cnf(c_49,plain,
    join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

cnf(c_50,plain,
    join(join(X0,X1),X2) = join(X0,join(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

cnf(c_52,plain,
    composition(composition(X0,X1),X2) = composition(X0,composition(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

cnf(c_53,plain,
    composition(X0,one) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

cnf(c_54,plain,
    join(composition(X0,X1),composition(X2,X1)) = composition(join(X0,X2),X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

cnf(c_55,plain,
    converse(converse(X0)) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

cnf(c_56,plain,
    join(converse(X0),converse(X1)) = converse(join(X0,X1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f31]) ).

cnf(c_57,plain,
    composition(converse(X0),converse(X1)) = converse(composition(X1,X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

cnf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
    join(composition(converse(composition(sK0,sK1)),composition(sK0,sK1)),one) != one,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f41]) ).

cnf(c_65,negated_conjecture,
    join(composition(converse(sK1),sK1),one) = one,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f40]) ).

cnf(c_66,negated_conjecture,
    join(composition(converse(sK0),sK0),one) = one,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f39]) ).

cnf(c_86,negated_conjecture,
    join(one,composition(converse(composition(sK0,sK1)),composition(sK0,sK1))) != one,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_50,c_49]) ).

cnf(c_87,negated_conjecture,
    join(one,composition(converse(sK1),sK1)) = one,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_50,c_49]) ).

cnf(c_88,negated_conjecture,
    join(one,composition(converse(sK0),sK0)) = one,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_66,c_50,c_49]) ).

cnf(c_238,plain,
    converse(composition(converse(X0),X1)) = composition(converse(X1),X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_57]) ).

cnf(c_243,plain,
    join(one,join(composition(converse(sK1),sK1),X0)) = join(one,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_87,c_50]) ).

cnf(c_353,plain,
    composition(X0,composition(one,X1)) = composition(X0,X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_52]) ).

cnf(c_368,plain,
    join(one,composition(join(converse(sK1),X0),sK1)) = join(one,composition(X0,sK1)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_243]) ).

cnf(c_456,plain,
    join(one,composition(converse(join(sK1,X0)),sK1)) = join(one,composition(converse(X0),sK1)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_368]) ).

cnf(c_1129,plain,
    composition(converse(one),X0) = converse(converse(X0)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_238]) ).

cnf(c_1153,plain,
    composition(converse(one),X0) = X0,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1129,c_55]) ).

cnf(c_1187,plain,
    composition(converse(one),X0) = composition(one,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1153,c_353]) ).

cnf(c_1190,plain,
    composition(one,X0) = X0,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1187,c_1153]) ).

cnf(c_1227,plain,
    join(X0,composition(X1,X0)) = composition(join(one,X1),X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1190,c_54]) ).

cnf(c_6137,plain,
    join(X0,composition(composition(converse(sK0),sK0),X0)) = composition(one,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_88,c_1227]) ).

cnf(c_6235,plain,
    join(X0,composition(composition(converse(sK0),sK0),X0)) = X0,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_6137,c_1190]) ).

cnf(c_6434,plain,
    join(X0,composition(converse(sK0),composition(sK0,X0))) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_6235,c_52]) ).

cnf(c_6460,plain,
    join(one,composition(converse(composition(converse(sK0),composition(sK0,sK1))),sK1)) = join(one,composition(converse(sK1),sK1)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6434,c_456]) ).

cnf(c_6481,plain,
    join(one,composition(converse(composition(converse(sK0),composition(sK0,sK1))),sK1)) = one,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_6460,c_87]) ).

cnf(c_6538,plain,
    join(one,composition(converse(composition(sK0,sK1)),composition(sK0,sK1))) = one,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_6481,c_52,c_238]) ).

cnf(c_6539,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6538,c_86]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : REL031+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 19:02:18 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 3.57/1.17  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.57/1.17  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.57/1.17  
% 3.57/1.17  %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 3.57/1.17  
% 3.57/1.17  ------  iProver source info
% 3.57/1.17  
% 3.57/1.17  git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 3.57/1.17  git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 3.57/1.17  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.57/1.17  git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 3.57/1.17  
% 3.57/1.17  ------ Parsing...
% 3.57/1.17  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 3.57/1.17  
% 3.57/1.17  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 3.57/1.17  
% 3.57/1.17  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 3.57/1.17  
% 3.57/1.17  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.57/1.17  ------ Proving...
% 3.57/1.17  ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.57/1.17  
% 3.57/1.17  
% 3.57/1.17  clauses                                 18
% 3.57/1.17  conjectures                             3
% 3.57/1.17  EPR                                     0
% 3.57/1.17  Horn                                    18
% 3.57/1.17  unary                                   18
% 3.57/1.17  binary                                  0
% 3.57/1.17  lits                                    18
% 3.57/1.17  lits eq                                 18
% 3.57/1.17  fd_pure                                 0
% 3.57/1.17  fd_pseudo                               0
% 3.57/1.17  fd_cond                                 0
% 3.57/1.17  fd_pseudo_cond                          0
% 3.57/1.17  AC symbols                              1
% 3.57/1.17  
% 3.57/1.17  ------ Schedule UEQ
% 3.57/1.17  
% 3.57/1.17  ------ Option_UEQ Time Limit: 10.
% 3.57/1.17  
% 3.57/1.17  
% 3.57/1.17  ------ 
% 3.57/1.17  Current options:
% 3.57/1.17  ------ 
% 3.57/1.17  
% 3.57/1.17  
% 3.57/1.17  
% 3.57/1.17  
% 3.57/1.17  ------ Proving...
% 3.57/1.17  
% 3.57/1.17  
% 3.57/1.17  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.57/1.17  
% 3.57/1.17  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.57/1.17  
% 3.57/1.17  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------