TSTP Solution File: REL031+1 by iProver---3.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.8
% Problem  : REL031+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 13:40:57 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.91s 1.18s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.91s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   56 (  50 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   71 (  70 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   24 (   9   ~;   0   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   77 (   0 sgn;  38   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',maddux1_join_commutativity) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : join(X0,join(X1,X2)) = join(join(X0,X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',maddux2_join_associativity) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : composition(X0,composition(X1,X2)) = composition(composition(X0,X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',composition_associativity) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0] : composition(X0,one) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',composition_identity) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : composition(join(X0,X1),X2) = join(composition(X0,X2),composition(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',composition_distributivity) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0] : converse(converse(X0)) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',converse_idempotence) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : converse(join(X0,X1)) = join(converse(X0),converse(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',converse_additivity) ).

fof(f10,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : converse(composition(X0,X1)) = composition(converse(X1),converse(X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',converse_multiplicativity) ).

fof(f14,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( one = join(composition(converse(X1),X1),one)
        & one = join(composition(converse(X0),X0),one) )
     => one = join(composition(converse(composition(X0,X1)),composition(X0,X1)),one) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(f15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ( one = join(composition(converse(X1),X1),one)
          & one = join(composition(converse(X0),X0),one) )
       => one = join(composition(converse(composition(X0,X1)),composition(X0,X1)),one) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( one != join(composition(converse(composition(X0,X1)),composition(X0,X1)),one)
      & one = join(composition(converse(X1),X1),one)
      & one = join(composition(converse(X0),X0),one) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( one != join(composition(converse(composition(X0,X1)),composition(X0,X1)),one)
      & one = join(composition(converse(X1),X1),one)
      & one = join(composition(converse(X0),X0),one) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1] :
        ( one != join(composition(converse(composition(X0,X1)),composition(X0,X1)),one)
        & one = join(composition(converse(X1),X1),one)
        & one = join(composition(converse(X0),X0),one) )
   => ( one != join(composition(converse(composition(sK0,sK1)),composition(sK0,sK1)),one)
      & one = join(composition(converse(sK1),sK1),one)
      & one = join(composition(converse(sK0),sK0),one) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ( one != join(composition(converse(composition(sK0,sK1)),composition(sK0,sK1)),one)
    & one = join(composition(converse(sK1),sK1),one)
    & one = join(composition(converse(sK0),sK0),one) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f17,f18]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : join(X0,join(X1,X2)) = join(join(X0,X1),X2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : composition(X0,composition(X1,X2)) = composition(composition(X0,X1),X2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ! [X0] : composition(X0,one) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : composition(join(X0,X1),X2) = join(composition(X0,X2),composition(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ! [X0] : converse(converse(X0)) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : converse(join(X0,X1)) = join(converse(X0),converse(X1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : converse(composition(X0,X1)) = composition(converse(X1),converse(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    one = join(composition(converse(sK0),sK0),one),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    one = join(composition(converse(sK1),sK1),one),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    one != join(composition(converse(composition(sK0,sK1)),composition(sK0,sK1)),one),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

cnf(c_49,plain,
    join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

cnf(c_50,plain,
    join(join(X0,X1),X2) = join(X0,join(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

cnf(c_52,plain,
    composition(composition(X0,X1),X2) = composition(X0,composition(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

cnf(c_53,plain,
    composition(X0,one) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).

cnf(c_54,plain,
    join(composition(X0,X1),composition(X2,X1)) = composition(join(X0,X2),X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

cnf(c_55,plain,
    converse(converse(X0)) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

cnf(c_56,plain,
    join(converse(X0),converse(X1)) = converse(join(X0,X1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

cnf(c_57,plain,
    composition(converse(X0),converse(X1)) = converse(composition(X1,X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

cnf(c_61,negated_conjecture,
    join(composition(converse(composition(sK0,sK1)),composition(sK0,sK1)),one) != one,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).

cnf(c_62,negated_conjecture,
    join(composition(converse(sK1),sK1),one) = one,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

cnf(c_63,negated_conjecture,
    join(composition(converse(sK0),sK0),one) = one,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

cnf(c_78,negated_conjecture,
    join(one,composition(converse(composition(sK0,sK1)),composition(sK0,sK1))) != one,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_50,c_49]) ).

cnf(c_79,negated_conjecture,
    join(one,composition(converse(sK1),sK1)) = one,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_50,c_49]) ).

cnf(c_80,negated_conjecture,
    join(one,composition(converse(sK0),sK0)) = one,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_50,c_49]) ).

cnf(c_216,plain,
    converse(composition(converse(X0),X1)) = composition(converse(X1),X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_57]) ).

cnf(c_221,plain,
    join(one,join(composition(converse(sK1),sK1),X0)) = join(one,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_79,c_50]) ).

cnf(c_331,plain,
    composition(X0,composition(one,X1)) = composition(X0,X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_52]) ).

cnf(c_346,plain,
    join(one,composition(join(converse(sK1),X0),sK1)) = join(one,composition(X0,sK1)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_221]) ).

cnf(c_401,plain,
    join(one,composition(converse(join(sK1,X0)),sK1)) = join(one,composition(converse(X0),sK1)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_346]) ).

cnf(c_609,plain,
    composition(converse(one),X0) = converse(converse(X0)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_216]) ).

cnf(c_629,plain,
    composition(converse(one),X0) = X0,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_609,c_55]) ).

cnf(c_648,plain,
    composition(converse(one),X0) = composition(one,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_629,c_331]) ).

cnf(c_651,plain,
    composition(one,X0) = X0,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_648,c_629]) ).

cnf(c_674,plain,
    join(X0,composition(X1,X0)) = composition(join(one,X1),X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_651,c_54]) ).

cnf(c_4879,plain,
    join(X0,composition(composition(converse(sK0),sK0),X0)) = composition(one,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_80,c_674]) ).

cnf(c_4978,plain,
    join(X0,composition(composition(converse(sK0),sK0),X0)) = X0,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_4879,c_651]) ).

cnf(c_5598,plain,
    join(X0,composition(converse(sK0),composition(sK0,X0))) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_4978,c_52]) ).

cnf(c_5624,plain,
    join(one,composition(converse(composition(converse(sK0),composition(sK0,sK1))),sK1)) = join(one,composition(converse(sK1),sK1)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_5598,c_401]) ).

cnf(c_5650,plain,
    join(one,composition(converse(composition(converse(sK0),composition(sK0,sK1))),sK1)) = one,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_5624,c_79]) ).

cnf(c_5691,plain,
    join(one,composition(converse(composition(sK0,sK1)),composition(sK0,sK1))) = one,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_5650,c_52,c_216]) ).

cnf(c_5692,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_5691,c_78]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : REL031+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 20:38:17 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.47  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 3.91/1.18  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.91/1.18  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.91/1.18  
% 3.91/1.18  %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 3.91/1.18  
% 3.91/1.18  ------  iProver source info
% 3.91/1.18  
% 3.91/1.18  git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 3.91/1.18  git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 3.91/1.18  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.91/1.18  git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 3.91/1.18  
% 3.91/1.18  ------ Parsing...
% 3.91/1.18  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 3.91/1.18  
% 3.91/1.18  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 3.91/1.18  
% 3.91/1.18  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 3.91/1.18  
% 3.91/1.18  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.91/1.18  ------ Proving...
% 3.91/1.18  ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.91/1.18  
% 3.91/1.18  
% 3.91/1.18  clauses                                 15
% 3.91/1.18  conjectures                             3
% 3.91/1.18  EPR                                     0
% 3.91/1.18  Horn                                    15
% 3.91/1.18  unary                                   15
% 3.91/1.18  binary                                  0
% 3.91/1.18  lits                                    15
% 3.91/1.18  lits eq                                 15
% 3.91/1.18  fd_pure                                 0
% 3.91/1.18  fd_pseudo                               0
% 3.91/1.18  fd_cond                                 0
% 3.91/1.18  fd_pseudo_cond                          0
% 3.91/1.18  AC symbols                              1
% 3.91/1.18  
% 3.91/1.18  ------ Schedule UEQ
% 3.91/1.18  
% 3.91/1.18  ------ Option_UEQ Time Limit: 10.
% 3.91/1.18  
% 3.91/1.18  
% 3.91/1.18  ------ 
% 3.91/1.18  Current options:
% 3.91/1.18  ------ 
% 3.91/1.18  
% 3.91/1.18  
% 3.91/1.18  
% 3.91/1.18  
% 3.91/1.18  ------ Proving...
% 3.91/1.18  
% 3.91/1.18  
% 3.91/1.18  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.91/1.18  
% 3.91/1.18  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.91/1.18  
% 3.91/1.19  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------