TSTP Solution File: REL031+1 by Twee---2.4.2

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem  : REL031+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 13:44:16 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.74s
% Output   : Proof 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : REL031+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.12/0.35  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 20:19:45 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.74  Command-line arguments: --flatten
% 0.20/0.74  
% 0.20/0.74  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.74  
% 0.20/0.74  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.75  Axiom 1 (converse_idempotence): converse(converse(X)) = X.
% 0.20/0.75  Axiom 2 (maddux1_join_commutativity): join(X, Y) = join(Y, X).
% 0.20/0.75  Axiom 3 (composition_identity): composition(X, one) = X.
% 0.20/0.75  Axiom 4 (converse_additivity): converse(join(X, Y)) = join(converse(X), converse(Y)).
% 0.20/0.75  Axiom 5 (maddux2_join_associativity): join(X, join(Y, Z)) = join(join(X, Y), Z).
% 0.20/0.75  Axiom 6 (converse_multiplicativity): converse(composition(X, Y)) = composition(converse(Y), converse(X)).
% 0.20/0.75  Axiom 7 (composition_associativity): composition(X, composition(Y, Z)) = composition(composition(X, Y), Z).
% 0.20/0.75  Axiom 8 (goals): join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one) = one.
% 0.20/0.75  Axiom 9 (goals_1): join(composition(converse(x0), x0), one) = one.
% 0.20/0.75  Axiom 10 (composition_distributivity): composition(join(X, Y), Z) = join(composition(X, Z), composition(Y, Z)).
% 0.20/0.75  
% 0.20/0.75  Lemma 11: converse(composition(converse(X), Y)) = composition(converse(Y), X).
% 0.20/0.75  Proof:
% 0.20/0.75    converse(composition(converse(X), Y))
% 0.20/0.75  = { by axiom 6 (converse_multiplicativity) }
% 0.20/0.75    composition(converse(Y), converse(converse(X)))
% 0.20/0.75  = { by axiom 1 (converse_idempotence) }
% 0.20/0.75    composition(converse(Y), X)
% 0.20/0.75  
% 0.20/0.75  Lemma 12: join(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one), X) = join(X, one).
% 0.20/0.75  Proof:
% 0.20/0.75    join(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one), X)
% 0.20/0.75  = { by axiom 2 (maddux1_join_commutativity) R->L }
% 0.20/0.75    join(X, join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one))
% 0.20/0.75  = { by axiom 8 (goals) }
% 0.20/0.75    join(X, one)
% 0.20/0.75  
% 0.20/0.75  Lemma 13: composition(converse(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one)), X) = X.
% 0.20/0.75  Proof:
% 0.20/0.75    composition(converse(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one)), X)
% 0.20/0.75  = { by axiom 8 (goals) }
% 0.20/0.75    composition(converse(one), X)
% 0.20/0.75  = { by lemma 11 R->L }
% 0.20/0.75    converse(composition(converse(X), one))
% 0.20/0.75  = { by axiom 3 (composition_identity) }
% 0.20/0.75    converse(converse(X))
% 0.20/0.75  = { by axiom 1 (converse_idempotence) }
% 0.20/0.75    X
% 0.20/0.75  
% 0.20/0.75  Lemma 14: composition(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one), X) = X.
% 0.20/0.75  Proof:
% 0.20/0.75    composition(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one), X)
% 0.20/0.75  = { by lemma 13 R->L }
% 0.20/0.75    composition(converse(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one)), composition(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one), X))
% 0.20/0.75  = { by axiom 8 (goals) }
% 0.20/0.75    composition(converse(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one)), composition(one, X))
% 0.20/0.75  = { by axiom 7 (composition_associativity) }
% 0.20/0.75    composition(composition(converse(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one)), one), X)
% 0.20/0.75  = { by axiom 3 (composition_identity) }
% 0.20/0.75    composition(converse(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one)), X)
% 0.20/0.75  = { by lemma 13 }
% 0.20/0.75    X
% 0.20/0.75  
% 0.20/0.75  Goal 1 (goals_2): join(composition(converse(composition(x0, x1)), composition(x0, x1)), one) = one.
% 0.20/0.75  Proof:
% 0.20/0.75    join(composition(converse(composition(x0, x1)), composition(x0, x1)), one)
% 0.20/0.75  = { by lemma 12 R->L }
% 0.20/0.75    join(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one), composition(converse(composition(x0, x1)), composition(x0, x1)))
% 0.20/0.75  = { by lemma 12 R->L }
% 0.20/0.75    join(join(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one), composition(converse(x1), x1)), composition(converse(composition(x0, x1)), composition(x0, x1)))
% 0.20/0.75  = { by axiom 5 (maddux2_join_associativity) R->L }
% 0.20/0.75    join(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one), join(composition(converse(x1), x1), composition(converse(composition(x0, x1)), composition(x0, x1))))
% 0.20/0.75  = { by lemma 11 R->L }
% 0.20/0.75    join(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one), join(composition(converse(x1), x1), converse(composition(converse(composition(x0, x1)), composition(x0, x1)))))
% 0.20/0.75  = { by axiom 7 (composition_associativity) }
% 0.20/0.75    join(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one), join(composition(converse(x1), x1), converse(composition(composition(converse(composition(x0, x1)), x0), x1))))
% 0.20/0.75  = { by axiom 6 (converse_multiplicativity) }
% 0.20/0.75    join(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one), join(composition(converse(x1), x1), composition(converse(x1), converse(composition(converse(composition(x0, x1)), x0)))))
% 0.20/0.75  = { by lemma 11 }
% 0.20/0.75    join(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one), join(composition(converse(x1), x1), composition(converse(x1), composition(converse(x0), composition(x0, x1)))))
% 0.20/0.75  = { by axiom 7 (composition_associativity) }
% 0.20/0.75    join(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one), join(composition(converse(x1), x1), composition(converse(x1), composition(composition(converse(x0), x0), x1))))
% 0.20/0.75  = { by axiom 7 (composition_associativity) }
% 0.20/0.75    join(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one), join(composition(converse(x1), x1), composition(composition(converse(x1), composition(converse(x0), x0)), x1)))
% 0.20/0.75  = { by axiom 10 (composition_distributivity) R->L }
% 0.20/0.75    join(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one), composition(join(converse(x1), composition(converse(x1), composition(converse(x0), x0))), x1))
% 0.20/0.75  = { by lemma 11 R->L }
% 0.20/0.75    join(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one), composition(join(converse(x1), composition(converse(x1), converse(composition(converse(x0), x0)))), x1))
% 0.20/0.75  = { by axiom 1 (converse_idempotence) R->L }
% 0.20/0.75    join(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one), composition(join(converse(x1), composition(converse(converse(converse(x1))), converse(composition(converse(x0), x0)))), x1))
% 0.20/0.75  = { by axiom 6 (converse_multiplicativity) R->L }
% 0.20/0.75    join(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one), composition(join(converse(x1), converse(composition(composition(converse(x0), x0), converse(converse(x1))))), x1))
% 0.20/0.75  = { by axiom 1 (converse_idempotence) R->L }
% 0.20/0.75    join(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one), composition(join(converse(converse(converse(x1))), converse(composition(composition(converse(x0), x0), converse(converse(x1))))), x1))
% 0.20/0.75  = { by axiom 4 (converse_additivity) R->L }
% 0.20/0.75    join(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one), composition(converse(join(converse(converse(x1)), composition(composition(converse(x0), x0), converse(converse(x1))))), x1))
% 0.20/0.75  = { by lemma 14 R->L }
% 0.20/0.75    join(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one), composition(converse(join(composition(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one), converse(converse(x1))), composition(composition(converse(x0), x0), converse(converse(x1))))), x1))
% 0.20/0.75  = { by axiom 10 (composition_distributivity) R->L }
% 0.20/0.75    join(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one), composition(converse(composition(join(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one), composition(converse(x0), x0)), converse(converse(x1)))), x1))
% 0.20/0.75  = { by lemma 12 }
% 0.20/0.75    join(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one), composition(converse(composition(join(composition(converse(x0), x0), one), converse(converse(x1)))), x1))
% 0.20/0.75  = { by axiom 9 (goals_1) }
% 0.20/0.75    join(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one), composition(converse(composition(one, converse(converse(x1)))), x1))
% 0.20/0.75  = { by axiom 8 (goals) R->L }
% 0.20/0.75    join(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one), composition(converse(composition(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one), converse(converse(x1)))), x1))
% 0.20/0.75  = { by lemma 14 }
% 0.20/0.75    join(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one), composition(converse(converse(converse(x1))), x1))
% 0.20/0.75  = { by axiom 1 (converse_idempotence) }
% 0.20/0.75    join(join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one), composition(converse(x1), x1))
% 0.20/0.75  = { by lemma 12 }
% 0.20/0.75    join(composition(converse(x1), x1), one)
% 0.20/0.75  = { by axiom 8 (goals) }
% 0.20/0.75    one
% 0.20/0.75  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.75  
% 0.20/0.75  RESULT: Theorem (the conjecture is true).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------