TSTP Solution File: REL024+1 by SRASS---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SRASS---0.1
% Problem : REL024+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s
% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Dec 29 21:45:39 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 15.26s
% Output : Solution 15.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP3443/REL024+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM ...
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP3443/REL024+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP3443/REL024+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 3539
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.02 WC
% PrfWatch: 1.92 CPU 2.02 WC
% PrfWatch: 3.91 CPU 4.03 WC
% PrfWatch: 5.90 CPU 6.03 WC
% # Preprocessing time : 0.009 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% PrfWatch: 7.90 CPU 8.04 WC
% PrfWatch: 9.87 CPU 10.04 WC
% PrfWatch: 11.49 CPU 12.05 WC
% PrfWatch: 13.14 CPU 14.05 WC
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(1, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:join(X1,X2)=join(X2,X1),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', maddux1_join_commutativity)).
% fof(2, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:join(X1,join(X2,X3))=join(join(X1,X2),X3),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', maddux2_join_associativity)).
% fof(4, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:composition(join(X1,X2),X3)=join(composition(X1,X3),composition(X2,X3)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', composition_distributivity)).
% fof(5, axiom,![X1]:converse(converse(X1))=X1,file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', converse_idempotence)).
% fof(6, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:converse(join(X1,X2))=join(converse(X1),converse(X2)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', converse_additivity)).
% fof(7, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:converse(composition(X1,X2))=composition(converse(X2),converse(X1)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', converse_multiplicativity)).
% fof(8, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:join(composition(converse(X1),complement(composition(X1,X2))),complement(X2))=complement(X2),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', converse_cancellativity)).
% fof(9, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:meet(X1,X2)=complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', maddux4_definiton_of_meet)).
% fof(10, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:X1=join(complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),complement(join(complement(X1),X2))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan)).
% fof(11, axiom,![X1]:composition(X1,one)=X1,file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', composition_identity)).
% fof(12, axiom,![X1]:zero=meet(X1,complement(X1)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', def_zero)).
% fof(13, axiom,![X1]:top=join(X1,complement(X1)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', def_top)).
% fof(14, conjecture,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:join(composition(meet(X1,converse(X2)),meet(X2,X3)),composition(meet(X1,converse(X2)),X3))=composition(meet(X1,converse(X2)),X3),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', goals)).
% fof(15, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:join(composition(meet(X1,converse(X2)),meet(X2,X3)),composition(meet(X1,converse(X2)),X3))=composition(meet(X1,converse(X2)),X3)),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[14])).
% fof(16, plain,![X3]:![X4]:join(X3,X4)=join(X4,X3),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[1])).
% cnf(17,plain,(join(X1,X2)=join(X2,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[16])).
% fof(18, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:join(X4,join(X5,X6))=join(join(X4,X5),X6),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[2])).
% cnf(19,plain,(join(X1,join(X2,X3))=join(join(X1,X2),X3)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[18])).
% fof(22, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:composition(join(X4,X5),X6)=join(composition(X4,X6),composition(X5,X6)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[4])).
% cnf(23,plain,(composition(join(X1,X2),X3)=join(composition(X1,X3),composition(X2,X3))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[22])).
% fof(24, plain,![X2]:converse(converse(X2))=X2,inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[5])).
% cnf(25,plain,(converse(converse(X1))=X1),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[24])).
% fof(26, plain,![X3]:![X4]:converse(join(X3,X4))=join(converse(X3),converse(X4)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[6])).
% cnf(27,plain,(converse(join(X1,X2))=join(converse(X1),converse(X2))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[26])).
% fof(28, plain,![X3]:![X4]:converse(composition(X3,X4))=composition(converse(X4),converse(X3)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[7])).
% cnf(29,plain,(converse(composition(X1,X2))=composition(converse(X2),converse(X1))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[28])).
% fof(30, plain,![X3]:![X4]:join(composition(converse(X3),complement(composition(X3,X4))),complement(X4))=complement(X4),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[8])).
% cnf(31,plain,(join(composition(converse(X1),complement(composition(X1,X2))),complement(X2))=complement(X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[30])).
% fof(32, plain,![X3]:![X4]:meet(X3,X4)=complement(join(complement(X3),complement(X4))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[9])).
% cnf(33,plain,(meet(X1,X2)=complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2)))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[32])).
% fof(34, plain,![X3]:![X4]:X3=join(complement(join(complement(X3),complement(X4))),complement(join(complement(X3),X4))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[10])).
% cnf(35,plain,(X1=join(complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),complement(join(complement(X1),X2)))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[34])).
% fof(36, plain,![X2]:composition(X2,one)=X2,inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[11])).
% cnf(37,plain,(composition(X1,one)=X1),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[36])).
% fof(38, plain,![X2]:zero=meet(X2,complement(X2)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[12])).
% cnf(39,plain,(zero=meet(X1,complement(X1))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[38])).
% fof(40, plain,![X2]:top=join(X2,complement(X2)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[13])).
% cnf(41,plain,(top=join(X1,complement(X1))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[40])).
% fof(42, negated_conjecture,?[X1]:?[X2]:?[X3]:~(join(composition(meet(X1,converse(X2)),meet(X2,X3)),composition(meet(X1,converse(X2)),X3))=composition(meet(X1,converse(X2)),X3)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[15])).
% fof(43, negated_conjecture,?[X4]:?[X5]:?[X6]:~(join(composition(meet(X4,converse(X5)),meet(X5,X6)),composition(meet(X4,converse(X5)),X6))=composition(meet(X4,converse(X5)),X6)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[42])).
% fof(44, negated_conjecture,~(join(composition(meet(esk1_0,converse(esk2_0)),meet(esk2_0,esk3_0)),composition(meet(esk1_0,converse(esk2_0)),esk3_0))=composition(meet(esk1_0,converse(esk2_0)),esk3_0)),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[43])).
% cnf(45,negated_conjecture,(join(composition(meet(esk1_0,converse(esk2_0)),meet(esk2_0,esk3_0)),composition(meet(esk1_0,converse(esk2_0)),esk3_0))!=composition(meet(esk1_0,converse(esk2_0)),esk3_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[44])).
% cnf(46,plain,(complement(join(complement(X1),complement(complement(X1))))=zero),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[39,33,theory(equality)]),['unfolding']).
% cnf(47,negated_conjecture,(join(composition(complement(join(complement(esk1_0),complement(converse(esk2_0)))),complement(join(complement(esk2_0),complement(esk3_0)))),composition(complement(join(complement(esk1_0),complement(converse(esk2_0)))),esk3_0))!=composition(complement(join(complement(esk1_0),complement(converse(esk2_0)))),esk3_0)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[45,33,theory(equality)]),33,theory(equality)]),33,theory(equality)]),33,theory(equality)]),['unfolding']).
% cnf(48,negated_conjecture,(join(composition(complement(join(complement(esk1_0),complement(converse(esk2_0)))),esk3_0),composition(complement(join(complement(esk1_0),complement(converse(esk2_0)))),complement(join(complement(esk3_0),complement(esk2_0)))))!=composition(complement(join(complement(esk1_0),complement(converse(esk2_0)))),esk3_0)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[47,17,theory(equality)]),17,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(57,plain,(converse(X1)=composition(converse(one),converse(X1))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[29,37,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(59,plain,(complement(top)=zero),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[46,41,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(85,plain,(converse(join(composition(X1,X3),composition(X2,X3)))=composition(converse(X3),converse(join(X1,X2)))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[29,23,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(92,plain,(join(composition(converse(X3),converse(X1)),composition(converse(X3),converse(X2)))=composition(converse(X3),converse(join(X1,X2)))),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[85,27,theory(equality)]),29,theory(equality)]),29,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(93,plain,(join(composition(converse(X3),converse(X1)),composition(converse(X3),converse(X2)))=composition(converse(X3),join(converse(X1),converse(X2)))),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[92,27,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(100,plain,(join(complement(X2),composition(converse(X1),complement(composition(X1,X2))))=complement(X2)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[31,17,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(117,plain,(join(complement(join(complement(X1),X2)),complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))))=X1),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[35,17,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(154,plain,(composition(converse(one),X1)=X1),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[57,25,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(160,plain,(one=converse(one)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[37,154,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(173,plain,(composition(one,X1)=X1),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[154,160,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(177,plain,(join(complement(X1),composition(converse(one),complement(X1)))=complement(X1)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[100,173,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(181,plain,(join(complement(X1),complement(X1))=complement(X1)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[177,160,theory(equality)]),173,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(187,plain,(join(complement(complement(X1)),complement(join(complement(X1),complement(complement(X1)))))=X1),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[117,181,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(189,plain,(join(zero,zero)=zero),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[181,59,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(193,plain,(join(complement(complement(X1)),zero)=X1),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[187,41,theory(equality)]),59,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(196,plain,(join(zero,X1)=join(zero,join(zero,X1))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[19,189,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(228,plain,(join(zero,complement(complement(X1)))=X1),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[193,17,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(249,plain,(join(zero,X1)=X1),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[196,228,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(269,plain,(complement(complement(X1))=X1),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[228,249,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(282,plain,(join(X1,X1)=X1),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[181,269,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(315,plain,(join(X1,X2)=join(X1,join(X1,X2))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[19,282,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(335,plain,(join(complement(join(complement(X1),X2)),X1)=X1),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[315,117,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(814,plain,(join(X1,complement(join(complement(X1),X2)))=X1),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[335,17,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(4277,plain,(composition(X1,join(converse(X2),converse(X3)))=join(composition(X1,converse(X2)),composition(X1,converse(X3)))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[93,25,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(195847,plain,(composition(X1,join(converse(X2),X3))=join(composition(X1,converse(X2)),composition(X1,X3))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[4277,25,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(196368,plain,(composition(X1,join(X2,X3))=join(composition(X1,X2),composition(X1,X3))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[195847,25,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(197247,plain,(composition(X1,X2)=join(composition(X1,X2),composition(X1,complement(join(complement(X2),X3))))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[196368,814,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(571382,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[48,197247,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(571383,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[571382,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(571384,negated_conjecture,($false),571383,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses : 7943
% # ...of these trivial : 5365
% # ...subsumed : 1480
% # ...remaining for further processing: 1098
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed : 0
% # Backward-rewritten : 208
% # Generated clauses : 270361
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 107258
% # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% # Paramodulations : 270361
% # Factorizations : 0
% # Equation resolutions : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 890
% # Positive orientable unit clauses: 884
% # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 6
% # Negative unit clauses : 0
% # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 88491
% # ...number of literals in the above : 88491
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 28
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 67
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts : 10428
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes : 394
% # Backwards rewriting index: 438 leaves, 3.86+/-5.615 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index: 287 leaves, 3.11+/-3.747 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index: 427 leaves, 3.70+/-5.395 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time : 6.751 s
% # System time : 0.277 s
% # Total time : 7.028 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 14.41 CPU 15.34 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 14.41 CPU 15.34 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP3443/REL024+1.tptp
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------