TSTP Solution File: REL023-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : REL023-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 19:59:31 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.83s 1.03s
% Output   : Refutation 0.83s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   26 (  26 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   26 (  25 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (   7 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan_3,axiom,
    X = join(complement(join(complement(X),complement(Y))),complement(join(complement(X),Y))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan_3) ).

cnf(2,plain,
    join(complement(join(complement(X),complement(Y))),join(complement(join(complement(X),Y)),Z)) = join(X,Z),
    inference('EMBED',[status(thm)],[maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan_3]) ).

cnf(maddux4_definiton_of_meet_4,axiom,
    meet(X,Y) = complement(join(complement(X),complement(Y))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',maddux4_definiton_of_meet_4) ).

cnf(composition_distributivity_7,axiom,
    composition(join(X,Y),Z) = join(composition(X,Z),composition(Y,Z)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',composition_distributivity_7) ).

cnf(converse_cancellativity_11,axiom,
    join(composition(converse(X),complement(composition(X,Y))),complement(Y)) = complement(Y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',converse_cancellativity_11) ).

cnf(13,plain,
    join(composition(converse(X),complement(composition(X,Y))),join(complement(Y),Z)) = join(complement(Y),Z),
    inference('EMBED',[status(thm)],[converse_cancellativity_11]) ).

cnf(def_top_12,axiom,
    top = join(X,complement(X)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',def_top_12) ).

cnf(15,plain,
    join(X,join(complement(X),Y)) = join(top,Y),
    inference('EMBED',[status(thm)],[def_top_12]) ).

cnf(def_zero_13,axiom,
    zero = meet(X,complement(X)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',def_zero_13) ).

cnf(17,plain,
    zero = complement(top),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[def_zero_13,maddux4_definiton_of_meet_4,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(goals_14,negated_conjecture,
    join(composition(meet(sk1,converse(sk2)),meet(sk2,sk3)),composition(sk1,meet(sk2,sk3))) != composition(sk1,meet(sk2,sk3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals_14) ).

cnf(19,plain,
    composition(join(complement(join(complement(sk1),complement(converse(sk2)))),sk1),complement(join(complement(sk2),complement(sk3)))) != composition(sk1,complement(join(complement(sk2),complement(sk3)))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[goals_14,composition_distributivity_7,maddux4_definiton_of_meet_4,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(26,plain,
    join(top,X) = join(top,complement(join(Y,complement(join(X,Y))))),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[15,15,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(66,plain,
    join(complement(X),complement(composition(converse(Y),complement(composition(Y,X))))) = join(top,complement(X)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[15,13,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(78,plain,
    complement(X) = join(zero,complement(join(complement(complement(X)),X))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan_3,def_top_12,theory(equality)]),17,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(80,plain,
    X = complement(complement(X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan_3,def_top_12,theory(equality)]),78,17,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(83,plain,
    X = join(complement(join(complement(X),complement(join(X,Y)))),complement(join(top,Y))),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan_3,15,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(85,plain,
    X = join(complement(join(top,complement(X))),X),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan_3,converse_cancellativity_11,theory(equality)]),80,66,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(101,plain,
    join(top,complement(X)) = join(top,complement(join(complement(Y),X))),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[15,2,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(103,plain,
    join(top,X) = join(top,complement(Y)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[26,101,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(124,plain,
    top = join(top,X),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[def_top_12,103,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(144,plain,
    X = join(zero,X),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[85,17,124,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(149,plain,
    X = complement(join(complement(X),complement(join(X,Y)))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[83,144,17,124,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(340,plain,
    join(complement(X),complement(join(X,Y))) = complement(X),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[80,149,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(379,plain,
    join(X,complement(join(complement(X),Y))) = X,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[340,80,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(381,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[19,379,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : REL023-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Jul  8 13:28:01 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.48  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.50  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.21/0.50  * 
% 0.21/0.50  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.21/0.50  * 
% 0.21/0.50  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.21/0.50   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.21/0.50   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.21/0.50   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.50   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.50   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.21/0.50   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.21/0.50   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.21/0.50   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.21/0.50   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.21/0.50   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.21/0.50   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.21/0.50   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.21/0.50  * 
% 0.21/0.50  "."
% 0.21/0.50  * 
% 0.21/0.50  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-08T13:28:01
% 0.21/0.50  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n017.cluster.edu at 2022-07-08T13:28:01
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  ; Recognized commutativity assertion (= (|join| ?X ?Y) (|join| ?Y ?X)).
% 0.21/0.51  ; Recognized associativity assertion (= (|join| ?X (|join| ?Y ?Z)) (|join| (|join| ?X ?Y) ?Z)).
% 0.21/0.51  ; Recognized associativity assertion (= (|composition| ?X (|composition| ?Y ?Z)) (|composition| (|composition| ?X ?Y) ?Z)).
% 0.21/0.51  ; Recognized right identity assertion (= (|composition| ?X |one|) ?X).
% 0.21/0.51  ; Recognized possible right inverse assertion (= |top| (|join| ?X (|complement| ?X))).
% 0.21/0.51  ; Recognized possible right inverse assertion (= |zero| (|meet| ?X (|complement| ?X))).
% 0.21/0.51  ; Declaring join to be commutative.
% 0.83/1.03  ; Declaring join to be associative-commutative.
% 0.83/1.03  
% 0.83/1.03  #||
% 0.83/1.03  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.83/1.03  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.83/1.04  ||#
% 0.83/1.04  
% 0.83/1.04  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.83/1.04  ;      2042 formulas have been input or derived (from 60 formulas).
% 0.83/1.04  ;       381 (19%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.83/1.04  ;          109 (29%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.83/1.04  ;          272 (71%) are still being kept.
% 0.83/1.04  ; 
% 0.83/1.04  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.83/1.04  ;     0.003   1%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.83/1.04  ;     0.001   0%   Assert                       (14 calls)
% 0.83/1.04  ;     0.043   8%   Process new row              (1,829 calls)
% 0.83/1.04  ;     0.003   1%   Resolution                   (118 calls)
% 0.83/1.04  ;     0.046   9%   Paramodulation               (59 calls)
% 0.83/1.04  ;     0.003   1%   Embedding                    (145 calls)
% 0.83/1.04  ;     0.138  26%   Forward simplification       (1,357 calls)
% 0.83/1.04  ;     0.019   4%   Backward simplification      (238 calls)
% 0.83/1.04  ;     0.020   4%   Ordering                     (5,141 calls)
% 0.83/1.04  ;     0.229  43%   Ordering ac                  (3,272 calls)
% 0.83/1.04  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.83/1.04  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.83/1.04  ;     0.027   5%   Other
% 0.83/1.04  ;     0.532        Total
% 0.83/1.04  ;     0.534        Real time
% 0.83/1.04  ; 
% 0.83/1.04  ; Term-hash-array has 1,197 terms in all.
% 0.83/1.04  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 0 entries (0 at peak, 0 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.83/1.04  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1 node (1 at peak, 1 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.83/1.04  ; Path-index has 939 entries (950 at peak, 1,273 added, 334 deleted).
% 0.83/1.04  ; Path-index has 1,260 nodes (1,288 at peak, 1,380 added, 120 deleted).
% 0.83/1.04  ; Trie-index has 939 entries (950 at peak, 1,273 added, 334 deleted).
% 0.83/1.04  ; Trie-index has 981 nodes (994 at peak, 1,107 added, 126 deleted).
% 0.83/1.04  ; Retrieved 195,022 generalization terms in 11,740 calls.
% 0.83/1.04  ; Retrieved 1,145 instance terms in 332 calls.
% 0.83/1.04  ; Retrieved 6,596 unifiable terms in 357 calls.
% 0.83/1.04  ; 
% 0.83/1.04  ; The agenda of rows to process has 183 entries:
% 0.83/1.04  ;    13 with value 17              7 with value 26               2 with value 34
% 0.83/1.04  ;     4 with value 18             14 with value 27               3 with value 35
% 0.83/1.04  ;    10 with value 19              8 with value 28               5 with value 36
% 0.83/1.04  ;     3 with value 20              5 with value 29               3 with value 37
% 0.83/1.04  ;    23 with value 21             17 with value 30               4 with value 39
% 0.83/1.04  ;     7 with value 22              5 with value 31               1 with value 40
% 0.83/1.04  ;    13 with value 23              4 with value 32               1 with value 41
% 0.83/1.04  ;    15 with value 24              8 with value 33               1 with value 45
% 0.83/1.04  ;     7 with value 25
% 0.83/1.04  ; The agenda of rows to give has 226 entries:
% 0.83/1.04  ;     4 with value (4 16)         17 with value (4 23)           3 with value (4 29)
% 0.83/1.04  ;    16 with value (4 17)         23 with value (4 24)           1 with value (4 30)
% 0.83/1.04  ;    10 with value (4 18)         11 with value (4 25)           4 with value (4 31)
% 0.83/1.04  ;     7 with value (4 19)          8 with value (4 26)           3 with value (4 32)
% 0.83/1.04  ;    21 with value (4 20)         11 with value (4 27)           2 with value (4 36)
% 0.83/1.04  ;    22 with value (4 21)          7 with value (4 28)           2 with value (4 37)
% 0.83/1.04  ;    54 with value (4 22)
% 0.83/1.04  Evaluation took:
% 0.83/1.04    0.534 seconds of real time
% 0.83/1.04    0.512379 seconds of user run time
% 0.83/1.04    0.022032 seconds of system run time
% 0.83/1.04    [Run times include 0.011 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.83/1.04    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.83/1.04    0 page faults and
% 0.83/1.04    27,723,904 bytes consed.
% 0.83/1.04  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.83/1.04  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-08T13:28:01
% 0.83/1.04  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.83/1.04  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------