TSTP Solution File: REL019-2 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : REL019-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:11:51 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unknown 1.85s 2.05s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12  % Problem  : REL019-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.08/0.13  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 09:59:25 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.74/1.94  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.74/1.94  The process was started by sandbox2 on n010.cluster.edu,
% 1.74/1.94  Wed Jul 27 09:59:25 2022
% 1.74/1.94  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 7420.
% 1.74/1.94  
% 1.74/1.94  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.74/1.94  set(auto).
% 1.74/1.94     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.74/1.94     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.74/1.94     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.74/1.94     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.74/1.94     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.74/1.94     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.74/1.94     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.74/1.94     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.74/1.94     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.74/1.94     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.74/1.94     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.74/1.94  clear(print_given).
% 1.74/1.94  
% 1.74/1.94  list(usable).
% 1.74/1.94  0 [] A=A.
% 1.74/1.94  0 [] join(A,B)=join(B,A).
% 1.74/1.94  0 [] join(A,join(B,C))=join(join(A,B),C).
% 1.74/1.94  0 [] A=join(complement(join(complement(A),complement(B))),complement(join(complement(A),B))).
% 1.74/1.94  0 [] meet(A,B)=complement(join(complement(A),complement(B))).
% 1.74/1.94  0 [] composition(A,composition(B,C))=composition(composition(A,B),C).
% 1.74/1.94  0 [] composition(A,one)=A.
% 1.74/1.94  0 [] composition(join(A,B),C)=join(composition(A,C),composition(B,C)).
% 1.74/1.94  0 [] converse(converse(A))=A.
% 1.74/1.94  0 [] converse(join(A,B))=join(converse(A),converse(B)).
% 1.74/1.94  0 [] converse(composition(A,B))=composition(converse(B),converse(A)).
% 1.74/1.94  0 [] join(composition(converse(A),complement(composition(A,B))),complement(B))=complement(B).
% 1.74/1.94  0 [] top=join(A,complement(A)).
% 1.74/1.94  0 [] zero=meet(A,complement(A)).
% 1.74/1.94  0 [] join(meet(composition(A,B),C),composition(meet(A,composition(C,converse(B))),meet(B,composition(converse(A),C))))=composition(meet(A,composition(C,converse(B))),meet(B,composition(converse(A),C))).
% 1.74/1.94  0 [] join(meet(composition(A,B),C),meet(composition(A,meet(B,composition(converse(A),C))),C))=meet(composition(A,meet(B,composition(converse(A),C))),C).
% 1.74/1.94  0 [] join(meet(composition(A,B),C),meet(composition(meet(A,composition(C,converse(B))),B),C))=meet(composition(meet(A,composition(C,converse(B))),B),C).
% 1.74/1.94  0 [] composition(sk1,top)=sk1.
% 1.74/1.94  0 [] composition(sk2,top)=sk2.
% 1.74/1.94  0 [] composition(meet(sk1,sk2),top)!=meet(sk1,sk2).
% 1.74/1.94  end_of_list.
% 1.74/1.94  
% 1.74/1.94  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=1.
% 1.74/1.94  
% 1.74/1.94  All clauses are units, and equality is present; the
% 1.74/1.94  strategy will be Knuth-Bendix with positive clauses in sos.
% 1.74/1.94  
% 1.74/1.94     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.74/1.94     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.74/1.94     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.74/1.94     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.74/1.94     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.74/1.94     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.74/1.94     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.74/1.94     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.74/1.94     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.74/1.94     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.74/1.94     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.74/1.94     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.74/1.94     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.74/1.94  
% 1.74/1.94  ------------> process usable:
% 1.74/1.94  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 1 [] composition(meet(sk1,sk2),top)!=meet(sk1,sk2).
% 1.74/1.94  
% 1.74/1.94  ------------> process sos:
% 1.74/1.94  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 2 [] A=A.
% 1.74/1.94  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 3 [] join(A,B)=join(B,A).
% 1.74/1.94  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 5 [copy,4,flip.1] join(join(A,B),C)=join(A,join(B,C)).
% 1.74/1.94  ---> New Demodulator: 6 [new_demod,5] join(join(A,B),C)=join(A,join(B,C)).
% 1.74/1.94  ** KEPT (pick-wt=14): 8 [copy,7,flip.1] join(complement(join(complement(A),complement(B))),complement(join(complement(A),B)))=A.
% 1.74/1.94  ---> New Demodulator: 9 [new_demod,8] join(complement(join(complement(A),complement(B))),complement(join(complement(A),B)))=A.
% 1.74/1.94  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 11 [copy,10,flip.1] complement(join(complement(A),complement(B)))=meet(A,B).
% 1.74/1.94  ---> New Demodulator: 12 [new_demod,11] complement(join(complement(A),complement(B)))=meet(A,B).
% 1.74/1.94  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 14 [copy,13,flip.1] composition(composition(A,B),C)=composition(A,composition(B,C)).
% 1.74/1.94  ---> New Demodulator: 15 [new_demod,14] composition(composition(A,B),C)=composition(A,composition(B,C)).
% 1.74/1.94  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 16 [] composition(A,one)=A.
% 1.74/1.94  ---> New Demodulator: 17 [new_demod,16] composition(A,one)=A.
% 1.74/1.94  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 19 [copy,18,flip.1] join(composition(A,B),composition(C,B))=composition(join(A,C),B).
% 1.74/1.94  ---> New Demodulator: 20 [new_demod,19] join(composition(A,B),composition(C,B))=composition(join(A,C),B).
% 1.74/1.94  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 21 [] converse(converse(A))=A.
% 1.74/1.94  ---> New Demodulator: 22 [new_demod,21] converse(converse(A))=A.
% 1.74/1.94  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 23 [] converse(join(A,B))=join(converse(A),converse(B)).
% 1.85/2.05  ---> New Demodulator: 24 [new_demod,23] converse(join(A,B))=join(converse(A),converse(B)).
% 1.85/2.05  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 25 [] converse(composition(A,B))=composition(converse(B),converse(A)).
% 1.85/2.05  ---> New Demodulator: 26 [new_demod,25] converse(composition(A,B))=composition(converse(B),converse(A)).
% 1.85/2.05  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 27 [] join(composition(converse(A),complement(composition(A,B))),complement(B))=complement(B).
% 1.85/2.05  ---> New Demodulator: 28 [new_demod,27] join(composition(converse(A),complement(composition(A,B))),complement(B))=complement(B).
% 1.85/2.05  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 30 [copy,29,flip.1] join(A,complement(A))=top.
% 1.85/2.05  ---> New Demodulator: 31 [new_demod,30] join(A,complement(A))=top.
% 1.85/2.05  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 33 [copy,32,flip.1] meet(A,complement(A))=zero.
% 1.85/2.05  ---> New Demodulator: 34 [new_demod,33] meet(A,complement(A))=zero.
% 1.85/2.05  ** KEPT (pick-wt=33): 35 [] join(meet(composition(A,B),C),composition(meet(A,composition(C,converse(B))),meet(B,composition(converse(A),C))))=composition(meet(A,composition(C,converse(B))),meet(B,composition(converse(A),C))).
% 1.85/2.05  ---> New Demodulator: 36 [new_demod,35] join(meet(composition(A,B),C),composition(meet(A,composition(C,converse(B))),meet(B,composition(converse(A),C))))=composition(meet(A,composition(C,converse(B))),meet(B,composition(converse(A),C))).
% 1.85/2.05  ** KEPT (pick-wt=27): 37 [] join(meet(composition(A,B),C),meet(composition(A,meet(B,composition(converse(A),C))),C))=meet(composition(A,meet(B,composition(converse(A),C))),C).
% 1.85/2.05  ---> New Demodulator: 38 [new_demod,37] join(meet(composition(A,B),C),meet(composition(A,meet(B,composition(converse(A),C))),C))=meet(composition(A,meet(B,composition(converse(A),C))),C).
% 1.85/2.05  ** KEPT (pick-wt=27): 39 [] join(meet(composition(A,B),C),meet(composition(meet(A,composition(C,converse(B))),B),C))=meet(composition(meet(A,composition(C,converse(B))),B),C).
% 1.85/2.05  ---> New Demodulator: 40 [new_demod,39] join(meet(composition(A,B),C),meet(composition(meet(A,composition(C,converse(B))),B),C))=meet(composition(meet(A,composition(C,converse(B))),B),C).
% 1.85/2.05  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 41 [] composition(sk1,top)=sk1.
% 1.85/2.05  ---> New Demodulator: 42 [new_demod,41] composition(sk1,top)=sk1.
% 1.85/2.05  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 43 [] composition(sk2,top)=sk2.
% 1.85/2.05  ---> New Demodulator: 44 [new_demod,43] composition(sk2,top)=sk2.
% 1.85/2.05    Following clause subsumed by 2 during input processing: 0 [copy,2,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.85/2.05    Following clause subsumed by 3 during input processing: 0 [copy,3,flip.1] join(A,B)=join(B,A).
% 1.85/2.05  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 6.
% 1.85/2.05  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 9.
% 1.85/2.05  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 12.
% 1.85/2.05      >> back demodulating 8 with 12.
% 1.85/2.05  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 15.
% 1.85/2.05  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 17.
% 1.85/2.05  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 20.
% 1.85/2.05  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 22.
% 1.85/2.05  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 24.
% 1.85/2.05  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 26.
% 1.85/2.05  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 28.
% 1.85/2.05  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 31.
% 1.85/2.05  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 34.
% 1.85/2.05  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 36.
% 1.85/2.05  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 38.
% 1.85/2.05  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 40.
% 1.85/2.05  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 42.
% 1.85/2.05  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 44.
% 1.85/2.05  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 46.
% 1.85/2.05  
% 1.85/2.05  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.85/2.05  
% 1.85/2.05  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.85/2.05  
% 1.85/2.05  
% 1.85/2.05  Resetting weight limit to 9.
% 1.85/2.05  
% 1.85/2.05  
% 1.85/2.05  Resetting weight limit to 9.
% 1.85/2.05  
% 1.85/2.05  sos_size=128
% 1.85/2.05  
% 1.85/2.05  
% 1.85/2.05  Resetting weight limit to 8.
% 1.85/2.05  
% 1.85/2.05  
% 1.85/2.05  Resetting weight limit to 8.
% 1.85/2.05  
% 1.85/2.05  sos_size=120
% 1.85/2.05  
% 1.85/2.05  
% 1.85/2.05  Resetting weight limit to 7.
% 1.85/2.05  
% 1.85/2.05  
% 1.85/2.05  Resetting weight limit to 7.
% 1.85/2.05  
% 1.85/2.05  sos_size=39
% 1.85/2.05  
% 1.85/2.05  Search stopped because sos empty.
% 1.85/2.05  
% 1.85/2.05  
% 1.85/2.05  Search stopped because sos empty.
% 1.85/2.05  
% 1.85/2.05  ============ end of search ============
% 1.85/2.05  
% 1.85/2.05  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.85/2.05  clauses given                251
% 1.85/2.05  clauses generated           9282
% 1.85/2.05  clauses kept                 404
% 1.85/2.05  clauses forward subsumed    3398
% 1.85/2.05  clauses back subsumed          0
% 1.85/2.05  Kbytes malloced             6835
% 1.85/2.05  
% 1.85/2.05  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.85/2.05  user CPU time          0.11          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.85/2.05  system CPU time        0.01          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.85/2.05  wall-clock time        1             (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 1.85/2.05  
% 1.85/2.05  Process 7420 finished Wed Jul 27 09:59:26 2022
% 1.85/2.05  Otter interrupted
% 1.85/2.05  PROOF NOT FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------