TSTP Solution File: REL015+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : REL015+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 19:19:13 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 1.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 14
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 53 ( 53 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 53 ( 52 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 3 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 77 ( 6 sgn 34 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(converse_additivity,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : converse(join(X1,X2)) = join(converse(X1),converse(X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',converse_additivity) ).
fof(converse_idempotence,axiom,
! [X1] : converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',converse_idempotence) ).
fof(converse_multiplicativity,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : converse(composition(X1,X2)) = composition(converse(X2),converse(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',converse_multiplicativity) ).
fof(converse_cancellativity,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : join(composition(converse(X1),complement(composition(X1,X2))),complement(X2)) = complement(X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',converse_cancellativity) ).
fof(maddux1_join_commutativity,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',maddux1_join_commutativity) ).
fof(def_top,axiom,
! [X1] : top = join(X1,complement(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',def_top) ).
fof(composition_identity,axiom,
! [X1] : composition(X1,one) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',composition_identity) ).
fof(maddux2_join_associativity,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] : join(X1,join(X2,X3)) = join(join(X1,X2),X3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',maddux2_join_associativity) ).
fof(composition_distributivity,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] : composition(join(X1,X2),X3) = join(composition(X1,X3),composition(X2,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',composition_distributivity) ).
fof(goals,conjecture,
composition(top,top) = top,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',goals) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X3,X4] : converse(join(X3,X4)) = join(converse(X3),converse(X4)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[converse_additivity]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X2] : converse(converse(X2)) = X2,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[converse_idempotence]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X3,X4] : converse(composition(X3,X4)) = composition(converse(X4),converse(X3)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[converse_multiplicativity]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X3,X4] : join(composition(converse(X3),complement(composition(X3,X4))),complement(X4)) = complement(X4),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[converse_cancellativity]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X3,X4] : join(X3,X4) = join(X4,X3),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[maddux1_join_commutativity]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X2] : top = join(X2,complement(X2)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[def_top]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
converse(join(X1,X2)) = join(converse(X1),converse(X2)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
converse(composition(X1,X2)) = composition(converse(X2),converse(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X2] : composition(X2,one) = X2,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[composition_identity]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] : join(X4,join(X5,X6)) = join(join(X4,X5),X6),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[maddux2_join_associativity]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
join(composition(converse(X1),complement(composition(X1,X2))),complement(X2)) = complement(X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
top = join(X1,complement(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
join(converse(X1),X2) = converse(join(X1,converse(X2))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
converse(composition(converse(X1),X2)) = composition(converse(X2),X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
composition(X1,one) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
join(X1,join(X2,X3)) = join(join(X1,X2),X3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
join(complement(X1),composition(converse(X2),complement(composition(X2,X1)))) = complement(X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
converse(join(X1,converse(complement(converse(X1))))) = top,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
composition(converse(one),X1) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
join(X1,join(complement(X1),X2)) = join(top,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
join(complement(converse(X1)),composition(X2,complement(converse(composition(X1,X2))))) = complement(converse(X1)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_18]),c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
join(X1,converse(complement(converse(X1)))) = converse(top),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
converse(one) = one,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
join(top,composition(X1,complement(converse(composition(X2,X1))))) = top,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_24]),c_0_33]),c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
composition(one,X1) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
join(top,complement(converse(X1))) = top,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_26]),c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
join(X1,top) = join(top,complement(complement(X1))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
join(top,complement(X1)) = top,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_17]) ).
fof(c_0_40,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] : composition(join(X4,X5),X6) = join(composition(X4,X6),composition(X5,X6)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[composition_distributivity]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
join(X1,top) = top,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
composition(join(X1,X2),X3) = join(composition(X1,X3),composition(X2,X3)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_40]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
join(top,X1) = top,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_41]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
join(X1,composition(X2,X1)) = composition(join(one,X2),X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
converse(composition(converse(X1),converse(X2))) = composition(X2,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
converse(top) = top,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_43]) ).
fof(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
composition(top,top) != top,
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,plain,
converse(composition(top,converse(join(one,X1)))) = top,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_43]),c_0_45]),c_0_46]) ).
fof(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
composition(top,top) != top,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_47]) ).
cnf(c_0_50,plain,
converse(composition(top,top)) = top,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_41]),c_0_46]) ).
cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
composition(top,top) != top,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_49]) ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_50]),c_0_46]),c_0_51]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : REL015+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jul 8 08:11:31 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/1.41 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% 0.23/1.41
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.41 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object total steps : 53
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object clause steps : 32
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object formula steps : 21
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object initial clauses used : 10
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object initial formulas used : 10
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object generating inferences : 19
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 14
% 0.23/1.41 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.41 # Parsed axioms : 14
% 0.23/1.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Initial clauses : 14
% 0.23/1.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.23/1.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 13
% 0.23/1.41 # Processed clauses : 129
% 0.23/1.41 # ...of these trivial : 24
% 0.23/1.41 # ...subsumed : 30
% 0.23/1.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 75
% 0.23/1.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Backward-rewritten : 27
% 0.23/1.41 # Generated clauses : 1452
% 0.23/1.41 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1236
% 0.23/1.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Paramodulations : 1452
% 0.23/1.41 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 48
% 0.23/1.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 36
% 0.23/1.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 11
% 0.23/1.41 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.23/1.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 875
% 0.23/1.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 875
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 28
% 0.23/1.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12
% 0.23/1.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 160
% 0.23/1.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 64
% 0.23/1.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 18971
% 0.23/1.41
% 0.23/1.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.41 # User time : 0.031 s
% 0.23/1.41 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.23/1.41 # Total time : 0.035 s
% 0.23/1.41 # Maximum resident set size: 4132 pages
% 0.23/23.40 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.23/23.40 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.23/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.peprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.42
% 0.23/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------