TSTP Solution File: REL013+1 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : REL013+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 19:53:39 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.72s 1.04s
% Output   : Refutation 0.72s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : REL013+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.04/0.12  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Fri Jul  8 12:18:36 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.43/0.99  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.43/0.99  Process 12922 was started by sandbox on n014.cluster.edu,
% 0.43/0.99  Fri Jul  8 12:18:37 2022
% 0.43/0.99  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_12768_n014.cluster.edu".
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_12768_n014.cluster.edu
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.43/0.99  set(auto2).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.43/0.99      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.43/0.99      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.43/0.99  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.43/0.99  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.43/0.99  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.43/0.99  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.43/0.99  clear(print_given).
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (14 formulas)
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.43/0.99  1 (all X0 all X1 join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0)) # label(maddux1_join_commutativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.99  2 (all X0 all X1 all X2 join(X0,join(X1,X2)) = join(join(X0,X1),X2)) # label(maddux2_join_associativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.99  3 (all X0 all X1 X0 = join(complement(join(complement(X0),complement(X1))),complement(join(complement(X0),X1)))) # label(maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.99  4 (all X0 all X1 meet(X0,X1) = complement(join(complement(X0),complement(X1)))) # label(maddux4_definiton_of_meet) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.99  5 (all X0 all X1 all X2 composition(X0,composition(X1,X2)) = composition(composition(X0,X1),X2)) # label(composition_associativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.99  6 (all X0 composition(X0,one) = X0) # label(composition_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.99  7 (all X0 all X1 all X2 composition(join(X0,X1),X2) = join(composition(X0,X2),composition(X1,X2))) # label(composition_distributivity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.99  8 (all X0 converse(converse(X0)) = X0) # label(converse_idempotence) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.99  9 (all X0 all X1 converse(join(X0,X1)) = join(converse(X0),converse(X1))) # label(converse_additivity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.99  10 (all X0 all X1 converse(composition(X0,X1)) = composition(converse(X1),converse(X0))) # label(converse_multiplicativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.99  11 (all X0 all X1 join(composition(converse(X0),complement(composition(X0,X1))),complement(X1)) = complement(X1)) # label(converse_cancellativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.99  12 (all X0 top = join(X0,complement(X0))) # label(def_top) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.99  13 (all X0 zero = meet(X0,complement(X0))) # label(def_zero) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/1.04  14 -(all X0 (composition(X0,zero) = zero & composition(zero,X0) = zero)) # label(goals) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/1.04  
% 0.72/1.04  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.72/1.04  
% 0.72/1.04  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.72/1.04  
% 0.72/1.04  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.72/1.04  
% 0.72/1.04  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.72/1.04  
% 0.72/1.04  Auto_denials:
% 0.72/1.04    % copying label goals to answer in negative clause
% 0.72/1.04  
% 0.72/1.04  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.72/1.04  Function symbol KB weights:  one=1. top=1. zero=1. c1=1. join=1. composition=1. meet=1. complement=1. converse=1.
% 0.72/1.04  
% 0.72/1.04  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.72/1.04  
% 0.72/1.04  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.72/1.04  
% 0.72/1.04  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.72/1.04  
% 0.72/1.04  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.72/1.04  
% 0.72/1.04  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.72/1.04  
% 0.72/1.04  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.72/1.04  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.72/1.04  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.72/1.04  
% 0.72/1.04  % Proof 1 at 0.06 (+ 0.00) seconds: goals.
% 0.72/1.04  % Length of proof is 83.
% 0.72/1.04  % Level of proof is 28.
% 0.72/1.04  % Maximum clause weight is 15.000.
% 0.72/1.04  % Given clauses 79.
% 0.72/1.04  
% 0.72/1.04  1 (all X0 all X1 join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0)) # label(maddux1_join_commutativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/1.04  2 (all X0 all X1 all X2 join(X0,join(X1,X2)) = join(join(X0,X1),X2)) # label(maddux2_join_associativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/1.04  3 (all X0 all X1 X0 = join(complement(join(complement(X0),complement(X1))),complement(join(complement(X0),X1)))) # label(maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/1.04  4 (all X0 all X1 meet(X0,X1) = complement(join(complement(X0),complement(X1)))) # label(maddux4_definiton_of_meet) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/1.04  5 (all X0 all X1 all X2 composition(X0,composition(X1,X2)) = composition(composition(X0,X1),X2)) # label(composition_associativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/1.04  6 (all X0 composition(X0,one) = X0) # label(composition_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/1.04  7 (all X0 all X1 all X2 composition(join(X0,X1),X2) = join(composition(X0,X2),composition(X1,X2))) # label(composition_distributivity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/1.04  8 (all X0 converse(converse(X0)) = X0) # label(converse_idempotence) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/1.04  9 (all X0 all X1 converse(join(X0,X1)) = join(converse(X0),converse(X1))) # label(converse_additivity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/1.04  10 (all X0 all X1 converse(composition(X0,X1)) = composition(converse(X1),converse(X0))) # label(converse_multiplicativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/1.04  11 (all X0 all X1 join(composition(converse(X0),complement(composition(X0,X1))),complement(X1)) = complement(X1)) # label(converse_cancellativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/1.04  12 (all X0 top = join(X0,complement(X0))) # label(def_top) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/1.04  13 (all X0 zero = meet(X0,complement(X0))) # label(def_zero) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/1.04  14 -(all X0 (composition(X0,zero) = zero & composition(zero,X0) = zero)) # label(goals) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/1.04  15 composition(A,one) = A # label(composition_identity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(6)].
% 0.72/1.04  16 converse(converse(A)) = A # label(converse_idempotence) # label(axiom).  [clausify(8)].
% 0.72/1.04  17 join(A,complement(A)) = top # label(def_top) # label(axiom).  [clausify(12)].
% 0.72/1.04  18 meet(A,complement(A)) = zero # label(def_zero) # label(axiom).  [clausify(13)].
% 0.72/1.04  19 join(A,B) = join(B,A) # label(maddux1_join_commutativity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(1)].
% 0.72/1.04  20 meet(A,B) = complement(join(complement(A),complement(B))) # label(maddux4_definiton_of_meet) # label(axiom).  [clausify(4)].
% 0.72/1.04  21 converse(join(A,B)) = join(converse(A),converse(B)) # label(converse_additivity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(9)].
% 0.72/1.04  22 join(converse(A),converse(B)) = converse(join(A,B)).  [copy(21),flip(a)].
% 0.72/1.04  23 converse(composition(A,B)) = composition(converse(B),converse(A)) # label(converse_multiplicativity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(10)].
% 0.72/1.04  24 composition(converse(A),converse(B)) = converse(composition(B,A)).  [copy(23),flip(a)].
% 0.72/1.04  25 join(join(A,B),C) = join(A,join(B,C)) # label(maddux2_join_associativity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(2)].
% 0.72/1.04  26 join(A,join(B,C)) = join(C,join(A,B)).  [copy(25),rewrite([19(2)]),flip(a)].
% 0.72/1.04  27 composition(composition(A,B),C) = composition(A,composition(B,C)) # label(composition_associativity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(5)].
% 0.72/1.04  28 composition(join(A,B),C) = join(composition(A,C),composition(B,C)) # label(composition_distributivity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(7)].
% 0.72/1.04  29 join(composition(A,B),composition(C,B)) = composition(join(A,C),B).  [copy(28),flip(a)].
% 0.72/1.04  30 complement(A) = join(composition(converse(B),complement(composition(B,A))),complement(A)) # label(converse_cancellativity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(11)].
% 0.72/1.04  31 join(complement(A),composition(converse(B),complement(composition(B,A)))) = complement(A).  [copy(30),rewrite([19(7)]),flip(a)].
% 0.72/1.04  32 join(complement(join(complement(A),complement(B))),complement(join(complement(A),B))) = A # label(maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan) # label(axiom).  [clausify(3)].
% 0.72/1.04  33 join(complement(join(A,complement(B))),complement(join(complement(A),complement(B)))) = B.  [copy(32),rewrite([19(6),19(8)]),rewrite([19(6)])].
% 0.72/1.04  34 composition(c1,zero) != zero | composition(zero,c1) != zero # label(goals) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(goals).  [clausify(14)].
% 0.72/1.04  35 complement(top) = zero.  [back_rewrite(18),rewrite([20(2),17(4)])].
% 0.72/1.04  37 converse(composition(A,converse(B))) = composition(B,converse(A)).  [para(16(a,1),24(a,1,1)),flip(a)].
% 0.72/1.04  38 converse(composition(converse(A),B)) = composition(converse(B),A).  [para(16(a,1),24(a,1,2)),flip(a)].
% 0.72/1.04  39 join(A,join(B,complement(A))) = join(B,top).  [para(17(a,1),26(a,2,2)),rewrite([19(2)])].
% 0.72/1.04  40 composition(A,composition(one,B)) = composition(A,B).  [para(15(a,1),27(a,1,1)),flip(a)].
% 0.72/1.04  46 join(complement(one),composition(converse(A),complement(A))) = complement(one).  [para(15(a,1),31(a,1,2,2,1))].
% 0.72/1.04  49 join(complement(converse(A)),composition(B,complement(converse(composition(A,B))))) = complement(converse(A)).  [para(24(a,1),31(a,1,2,2,1)),rewrite([16(4)])].
% 0.72/1.04  51 join(zero,complement(join(complement(A),complement(A)))) = A.  [para(17(a,1),33(a,1,1,1)),rewrite([35(2)])].
% 0.72/1.04  59 join(complement(join(top,complement(A))),complement(join(zero,complement(A)))) = A.  [para(35(a,1),33(a,1,2,1,1))].
% 0.72/1.04  72 composition(converse(one),A) = A.  [para(15(a,1),38(a,1,1)),rewrite([16(2)]),flip(a)].
% 0.72/1.04  78 converse(one) = one.  [para(72(a,1),15(a,1)),flip(a)].
% 0.72/1.04  80 composition(join(A,one),B) = join(B,composition(A,B)).  [para(72(a,1),29(a,1,1)),rewrite([78(4),19(4)]),flip(a)].
% 0.72/1.04  82 join(complement(A),complement(composition(one,A))) = complement(A).  [para(72(a,1),31(a,1,2))].
% 0.72/1.04  83 composition(one,A) = A.  [para(72(a,1),40(a,2)),rewrite([78(2),40(4)])].
% 0.72/1.04  84 join(complement(A),complement(A)) = complement(A).  [back_rewrite(82),rewrite([83(3)])].
% 0.72/1.04  85 join(zero,complement(complement(A))) = A.  [back_rewrite(51),rewrite([84(4)])].
% 0.72/1.04  86 converse(join(A,one)) = join(one,converse(A)).  [para(78(a,1),22(a,1,1)),rewrite([19(5)]),flip(a)].
% 0.72/1.04  90 join(top,complement(A)) = top.  [para(84(a,1),39(a,1,2)),rewrite([17(2),19(4)]),flip(a)].
% 0.72/1.04  91 join(zero,complement(join(zero,complement(A)))) = A.  [back_rewrite(59),rewrite([90(3),35(2)])].
% 0.72/1.04  92 join(top,top) = join(A,top).  [para(90(a,1),39(a,1,2)),flip(a)].
% 0.72/1.04  97 join(A,top) = join(B,top).  [para(92(a,1),39(a,2)),rewrite([90(3)])].
% 0.72/1.04  98 join(A,top) = c_0.  [new_symbol(97)].
% 0.72/1.04  101 join(A,join(B,complement(A))) = c_0.  [back_rewrite(39),rewrite([98(5)])].
% 0.72/1.04  112 c_0 = top.  [para(85(a,1),101(a,1,2)),rewrite([19(2),17(2)]),flip(a)].
% 0.72/1.04  115 join(A,top) = top.  [back_rewrite(98),rewrite([112(3)])].
% 0.72/1.04  140 join(zero,complement(A)) = complement(A).  [para(85(a,1),91(a,1,2,1))].
% 0.72/1.04  141 complement(complement(A)) = A.  [back_rewrite(91),rewrite([140(4),140(4)])].
% 0.72/1.04  142 join(A,zero) = A.  [back_rewrite(85),rewrite([141(3),19(2)])].
% 0.72/1.04  149 join(A,A) = A.  [para(141(a,1),84(a,1,1)),rewrite([141(2),141(3)])].
% 0.72/1.04  153 join(A,join(A,B)) = join(A,B).  [para(149(a,1),26(a,1)),rewrite([19(3),26(4,R),19(3),26(3,R),149(2)]),flip(a)].
% 0.72/1.04  167 join(complement(one),composition(converse(complement(A)),A)) = complement(one).  [para(141(a,1),46(a,1,2,2))].
% 0.72/1.04  221 join(complement(one),converse(complement(one))) = complement(one).  [para(15(a,1),167(a,1,2))].
% 0.72/1.04  225 converse(complement(one)) = complement(one).  [para(221(a,1),22(a,2,1)),rewrite([16(7),19(6),221(6)]),flip(a)].
% 0.72/1.04  230 converse(top) = top.  [para(225(a,1),86(a,2,2)),rewrite([19(4),17(4),17(6)])].
% 0.72/1.04  234 join(top,converse(A)) = top.  [para(230(a,1),22(a,1,1)),rewrite([19(5),115(5),230(5)])].
% 0.72/1.04  235 converse(composition(A,top)) = composition(top,converse(A)).  [para(230(a,1),24(a,1,1)),flip(a)].
% 0.72/1.04  243 join(top,composition(A,converse(B))) = top.  [para(37(a,1),234(a,1,2))].
% 0.72/1.04  245 join(top,composition(A,B)) = top.  [para(16(a,1),243(a,1,2,2))].
% 0.72/1.04  261 composition(top,join(one,converse(A))) = top.  [para(86(a,1),235(a,2,2)),rewrite([80(4),245(4),230(2)]),flip(a)].
% 0.72/1.04  266 composition(top,join(A,one)) = top.  [para(16(a,1),261(a,1,2,2)),rewrite([19(3)])].
% 0.72/1.04  290 join(zero,composition(A,zero)) = zero.  [para(266(a,1),49(a,1,2,2,1,1)),rewrite([230(2),35(2),230(5),35(5),80(5),153(6),230(6),35(6)])].
% 0.72/1.04  305 join(A,composition(B,zero)) = A.  [para(290(a,1),26(a,1,2)),rewrite([142(2),142(4),19(3)]),flip(a)].
% 0.72/1.04  309 composition(join(A,B),zero) = composition(A,zero).  [para(305(a,1),29(a,1)),flip(a)].
% 0.72/1.04  311 composition(A,zero) = zero.  [para(305(a,1),80(a,2)),rewrite([309(4)])].
% 0.72/1.04  312 composition(zero,c1) != zero # answer(goals).  [back_rewrite(34),rewrite([311(3)]),xx(a)].
% 0.72/1.04  314 composition(converse(zero),A) = converse(zero).  [para(311(a,1),38(a,1,1)),flip(a)].
% 0.72/1.04  327 converse(zero) = zero.  [para(314(a,1),311(a,1))].
% 0.72/1.04  332 composition(zero,A) = zero.  [back_rewrite(314),rewrite([327(2),327(4)])].
% 0.72/1.04  333 $F # answer(goals).  [resolve(332,a,312,a)].
% 0.72/1.04  
% 0.72/1.04  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.72/1.04  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.72/1.04  
% 0.72/1.04  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.72/1.04  
% 0.72/1.04  Given=79. Generated=1700. Kept=312. proofs=1.
% 0.72/1.04  Usable=55. Sos=150. Demods=196. Limbo=5, Disabled=115. Hints=0.
% 0.72/1.04  Megabytes=0.38.
% 0.72/1.04  User_CPU=0.07, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.72/1.04  
% 0.72/1.04  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.72/1.04  
% 0.72/1.04  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.72/1.04  
% 0.72/1.04  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.72/1.04  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.72/1.04  
% 0.72/1.04  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.72/1.04  
% 0.72/1.04  Process 12922 exit (max_proofs) Fri Jul  8 12:18:37 2022
% 0.72/1.04  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------