TSTP Solution File: REL009+1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : REL009+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 13:55:48 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 214.08s 28.79s
% Output : CNFRefutation 214.08s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',maddux1_join_commutativity) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X2] : join(X0,join(X1,X2)) = join(join(X0,X1),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',maddux2_join_associativity) ).
fof(f7,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X2] : composition(join(X0,X1),X2) = join(composition(X0,X2),composition(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',composition_distributivity) ).
fof(f8,axiom,
! [X0] : converse(converse(X0)) = X0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',converse_idempotence) ).
fof(f9,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : converse(join(X0,X1)) = join(converse(X0),converse(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',converse_additivity) ).
fof(f10,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : converse(composition(X0,X1)) = composition(converse(X1),converse(X0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',converse_multiplicativity) ).
fof(f14,conjecture,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( join(X0,X1) = X1
=> ( composition(X2,X1) = join(composition(X2,X0),composition(X2,X1))
& composition(X1,X2) = join(composition(X0,X2),composition(X1,X2)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).
fof(f15,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
( join(X0,X1) = X1
=> ( composition(X2,X1) = join(composition(X2,X0),composition(X2,X1))
& composition(X1,X2) = join(composition(X0,X2),composition(X1,X2)) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f14]) ).
fof(f16,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( composition(X2,X1) != join(composition(X2,X0),composition(X2,X1))
| composition(X1,X2) != join(composition(X0,X2),composition(X1,X2)) )
& join(X0,X1) = X1 ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).
fof(f17,plain,
( ? [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( composition(X2,X1) != join(composition(X2,X0),composition(X2,X1))
| composition(X1,X2) != join(composition(X0,X2),composition(X1,X2)) )
& join(X0,X1) = X1 )
=> ( ( composition(sK2,sK1) != join(composition(sK2,sK0),composition(sK2,sK1))
| composition(sK1,sK2) != join(composition(sK0,sK2),composition(sK1,sK2)) )
& sK1 = join(sK0,sK1) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f18,plain,
( ( composition(sK2,sK1) != join(composition(sK2,sK0),composition(sK2,sK1))
| composition(sK1,sK2) != join(composition(sK0,sK2),composition(sK1,sK2)) )
& sK1 = join(sK0,sK1) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f16,f17]) ).
fof(f19,plain,
! [X0,X1] : join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).
fof(f20,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] : join(X0,join(X1,X2)) = join(join(X0,X1),X2),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
fof(f25,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] : composition(join(X0,X1),X2) = join(composition(X0,X2),composition(X1,X2)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).
fof(f26,plain,
! [X0] : converse(converse(X0)) = X0,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).
fof(f27,plain,
! [X0,X1] : converse(join(X0,X1)) = join(converse(X0),converse(X1)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).
fof(f28,plain,
! [X0,X1] : converse(composition(X0,X1)) = composition(converse(X1),converse(X0)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).
fof(f32,plain,
sK1 = join(sK0,sK1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).
fof(f33,plain,
( composition(sK2,sK1) != join(composition(sK2,sK0),composition(sK2,sK1))
| composition(sK1,sK2) != join(composition(sK0,sK2),composition(sK1,sK2)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).
cnf(c_49,plain,
join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).
cnf(c_50,plain,
join(join(X0,X1),X2) = join(X0,join(X1,X2)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).
cnf(c_54,plain,
join(composition(X0,X1),composition(X2,X1)) = composition(join(X0,X2),X1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).
cnf(c_55,plain,
converse(converse(X0)) = X0,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).
cnf(c_56,plain,
join(converse(X0),converse(X1)) = converse(join(X0,X1)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).
cnf(c_57,plain,
composition(converse(X0),converse(X1)) = converse(composition(X1,X0)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).
cnf(c_61,negated_conjecture,
( join(composition(sK2,sK0),composition(sK2,sK1)) != composition(sK2,sK1)
| join(composition(sK0,sK2),composition(sK1,sK2)) != composition(sK1,sK2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).
cnf(c_62,negated_conjecture,
join(sK0,sK1) = sK1,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).
cnf(c_77,negated_conjecture,
( join(composition(sK2,sK1),composition(sK2,sK0)) != composition(sK2,sK1)
| join(composition(sK1,sK2),composition(sK0,sK2)) != composition(sK1,sK2) ),
inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_50,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_78,negated_conjecture,
join(sK1,sK0) = sK1,
inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_50,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_112,plain,
( join(composition(sK2,sK1),composition(sK2,sK0)) != composition(sK2,sK1)
| composition(sK1,sK2) != composition(sK1,sK2) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_77,c_54,c_78]) ).
cnf(c_113,plain,
join(composition(sK2,sK1),composition(sK2,sK0)) != composition(sK2,sK1),
inference(equality_resolution_simp,[status(thm)],[c_112]) ).
cnf(c_120,plain,
join(sK1,sK0) = sP0_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_121,negated_conjecture,
sP0_iProver_def = sK1,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_78,c_120]) ).
cnf(c_86104,plain,
join(composition(sK2,sP0_iProver_def),composition(sK2,sK0)) != composition(sK2,sP0_iProver_def),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_113,c_121]) ).
cnf(c_86318,plain,
converse(composition(converse(X0),X1)) = composition(converse(X1),X0),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_57]) ).
cnf(c_86511,plain,
join(sP0_iProver_def,sK0) = sP0_iProver_def,
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_120,c_121]) ).
cnf(c_86525,plain,
join(composition(X0,converse(X1)),converse(composition(X1,X2))) = composition(join(X0,converse(X2)),converse(X1)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_54]) ).
cnf(c_86532,plain,
converse(join(X0,converse(X1))) = join(converse(X0),X1),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_56]) ).
cnf(c_104913,plain,
composition(converse(X0),join(X1,converse(X2))) = converse(composition(join(converse(X1),X2),X0)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_86532,c_86318]) ).
cnf(c_104964,plain,
join(composition(converse(X0),X1),converse(X2)) = converse(join(composition(converse(X1),X0),X2)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_86318,c_56]) ).
cnf(c_105053,plain,
join(composition(converse(converse(X0)),X1),converse(converse(composition(X0,X2)))) = converse(composition(join(converse(X1),converse(X2)),converse(X0))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_86525,c_104964]) ).
cnf(c_105169,plain,
join(composition(X0,X1),composition(X0,X2)) = composition(X0,join(X1,X2)),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_105053,c_55,c_104913]) ).
cnf(c_105196,plain,
composition(sK2,join(sP0_iProver_def,sK0)) != composition(sK2,sP0_iProver_def),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_86104,c_105169]) ).
cnf(c_105197,plain,
composition(sK2,sP0_iProver_def) != composition(sK2,sP0_iProver_def),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_105196,c_86511]) ).
cnf(c_105198,plain,
$false,
inference(equality_resolution_simp,[status(thm)],[c_105197]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : REL009+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 23 05:32:09 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 214.08/28.79 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 214.08/28.79 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 214.08/28.79
% 214.08/28.79 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 214.08/28.79
% 214.08/28.79 ------ iProver source info
% 214.08/28.79
% 214.08/28.79 git: date: 2024-06-12 09:56:46 +0000
% 214.08/28.79 git: sha1: 4869ab62f0a3398f9d3a35e6db7918ebd3847e49
% 214.08/28.79 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 214.08/28.79
% 214.08/28.79 ------ Parsing...
% 214.08/28.79 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 214.08/28.79
% 214.08/28.79 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 2 sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 214.08/28.79
% 214.08/28.79 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 214.08/28.79
% 214.08/28.79 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 214.08/28.79 ------ Proving...
% 214.08/28.79 ------ Problem Properties
% 214.08/28.79
% 214.08/28.79
% 214.08/28.79 clauses 15
% 214.08/28.79 conjectures 1
% 214.08/28.79 EPR 1
% 214.08/28.79 Horn 15
% 214.08/28.79 unary 15
% 214.08/28.79 binary 0
% 214.08/28.79 lits 15
% 214.08/28.79 lits eq 15
% 214.08/28.79 fd_pure 0
% 214.08/28.79 fd_pseudo 0
% 214.08/28.79 fd_cond 0
% 214.08/28.79 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 214.08/28.79 AC symbols 1
% 214.08/28.79
% 214.08/28.79 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 214.08/28.79
% 214.08/28.79
% 214.08/28.79 ------
% 214.08/28.79 Current options:
% 214.08/28.79 ------
% 214.08/28.79
% 214.08/28.79
% 214.08/28.79
% 214.08/28.79
% 214.08/28.79 ------ Proving...
% 214.08/28.79
% 214.08/28.79
% 214.08/28.79 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 214.08/28.79
% 214.08/28.79 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 214.08/28.79
% 214.08/28.79
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------