TSTP Solution File: REL009+1 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : REL009+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 13:42:46 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 10.72s 2.17s
% Output   : Proof 11.99s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem  : REL009+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.10  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.12/0.30  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.30  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.30  % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 20:03:43 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.51  ________       _____
% 0.15/0.51  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.15/0.51  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.15/0.51  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.15/0.51  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.15/0.51  
% 0.15/0.51  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.15/0.51  (2023-06-19)
% 0.15/0.51  
% 0.15/0.51  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.15/0.51  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.15/0.51                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.15/0.51  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.15/0.51  
% 0.15/0.51  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.15/0.51  
% 0.15/0.52  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.15/0.53  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.15/0.54  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.15/0.54  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.15/0.54  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.15/0.54  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.15/0.54  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.15/0.54  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.15/0.54  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 1.58/0.89  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.13/0.90  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.24/0.93  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 2.24/0.93  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.24/0.94  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 2.24/0.94  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 2.24/0.94  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 3.52/1.18  Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.22/1.19  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.37/1.21  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.40/1.24  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.40/1.24  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 4.40/1.26  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 5.06/1.37  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 10.72/2.15  Prover 4: Found proof (size 126)
% 10.72/2.15  Prover 4: proved (1615ms)
% 10.72/2.15  Prover 6: stopped
% 10.72/2.15  Prover 1: stopped
% 10.72/2.15  Prover 2: stopped
% 10.72/2.15  Prover 0: stopped
% 10.72/2.15  Prover 5: stopped
% 10.72/2.16  Prover 3: stopped
% 10.72/2.16  
% 10.72/2.17  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 10.72/2.17  
% 10.72/2.19  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 10.72/2.19  Assumptions after simplification:
% 10.72/2.19  ---------------------------------
% 10.72/2.19  
% 10.72/2.19    (composition_distributivity)
% 10.72/2.22     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] :  ! [v5:
% 10.72/2.22      $i] : ( ~ (composition(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (composition(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~
% 10.72/2.22      (join(v3, v4) = v5) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v6: $i] :
% 10.72/2.22      (composition(v6, v2) = v5 & join(v0, v1) = v6 & $i(v6) & $i(v5))) &  ! [v0:
% 10.72/2.22      $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] : ( ~
% 10.72/2.22      (composition(v3, v2) = v4) |  ~ (join(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1)
% 10.72/2.22      |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v5: $i] :  ? [v6: $i] : (composition(v1, v2) = v6 &
% 10.72/2.22        composition(v0, v2) = v5 & join(v5, v6) = v4 & $i(v6) & $i(v5) & $i(v4)))
% 10.72/2.22  
% 10.72/2.22    (converse_additivity)
% 10.72/2.23     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] : ( ~
% 10.72/2.23      (converse(v1) = v3) |  ~ (converse(v0) = v2) |  ~ (join(v2, v3) = v4) |  ~
% 10.72/2.23      $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v5: $i] : (converse(v5) = v4 & join(v0, v1) = v5 &
% 10.72/2.23        $i(v5) & $i(v4))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~
% 10.72/2.23      (join(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] :  ?
% 10.72/2.23      [v5: $i] : (converse(v2) = v3 & converse(v1) = v5 & converse(v0) = v4 &
% 10.72/2.23        join(v4, v5) = v3 & $i(v5) & $i(v4) & $i(v3)))
% 10.72/2.23  
% 10.72/2.23    (converse_cancellativity)
% 10.72/2.23     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (composition(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~
% 10.72/2.23      $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] :  ? [v5: $i] :  ? [v6: $i] :
% 10.72/2.23      (converse(v0) = v3 & composition(v3, v4) = v5 & complement(v2) = v4 &
% 10.72/2.23        complement(v1) = v6 & join(v5, v6) = v6 & $i(v6) & $i(v5) & $i(v4) &
% 10.72/2.23        $i(v3)))
% 10.72/2.23  
% 10.72/2.23    (converse_idempotence)
% 10.72/2.23     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (converse(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | converse(v1)
% 10.72/2.23      = v0)
% 10.72/2.23  
% 10.72/2.23    (converse_multiplicativity)
% 10.72/2.23     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] : ( ~
% 10.72/2.23      (converse(v1) = v2) |  ~ (converse(v0) = v3) |  ~ (composition(v2, v3) = v4)
% 10.72/2.23      |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v5: $i] : (converse(v5) = v4 & composition(v0,
% 10.72/2.23          v1) = v5 & $i(v5) & $i(v4))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :
% 10.72/2.23    ( ~ (composition(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4:
% 10.72/2.23        $i] :  ? [v5: $i] : (converse(v2) = v3 & converse(v1) = v4 & converse(v0)
% 10.72/2.23        = v5 & composition(v4, v5) = v3 & $i(v5) & $i(v4) & $i(v3)))
% 10.72/2.23  
% 10.72/2.23    (goals)
% 10.72/2.23     ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] :  ? [v5:
% 10.72/2.23      $i] :  ? [v6: $i] :  ? [v7: $i] :  ? [v8: $i] : (composition(v2, v1) = v7 &
% 10.72/2.23      composition(v2, v0) = v6 & composition(v1, v2) = v4 & composition(v0, v2) =
% 10.72/2.23      v3 & join(v6, v7) = v8 & join(v3, v4) = v5 & join(v0, v1) = v1 & $i(v8) &
% 10.72/2.24      $i(v7) & $i(v6) & $i(v5) & $i(v4) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0) & ( ~
% 10.72/2.24        (v8 = v7) |  ~ (v5 = v4)))
% 10.72/2.24  
% 10.72/2.24    (maddux1_join_commutativity)
% 10.72/2.24     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (join(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1)
% 10.72/2.24      |  ~ $i(v0) | (join(v0, v1) = v2 & $i(v2))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  !
% 10.72/2.24    [v2: $i] : ( ~ (join(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | (join(v1, v0) =
% 10.72/2.24        v2 & $i(v2)))
% 10.72/2.24  
% 10.72/2.24    (function-axioms)
% 10.72/2.24     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 10.72/2.24      (composition(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (composition(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] : 
% 10.72/2.24    ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (meet(v3, v2) = v1) | 
% 10.72/2.24      ~ (meet(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3:
% 10.72/2.24      $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (join(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (join(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 10.72/2.24      $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (converse(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 10.72/2.24      (converse(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | 
% 10.72/2.24      ~ (complement(v2) = v1) |  ~ (complement(v2) = v0))
% 10.72/2.24  
% 10.72/2.24  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 10.72/2.24  --------------------------------------------
% 10.72/2.24  composition_associativity, composition_identity, def_top, def_zero,
% 10.72/2.24  maddux2_join_associativity, maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan,
% 10.72/2.24  maddux4_definiton_of_meet
% 10.72/2.24  
% 10.72/2.24  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 10.72/2.24  ---------------------------------
% 10.72/2.24  
% 10.72/2.24  Begin of proof
% 10.72/2.24  | 
% 10.72/2.24  | ALPHA: (maddux1_join_commutativity) implies:
% 10.72/2.24  |   (1)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (join(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~
% 10.72/2.24  |          $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | (join(v0, v1) = v2 & $i(v2)))
% 10.72/2.24  | 
% 10.72/2.24  | ALPHA: (composition_distributivity) implies:
% 10.72/2.24  |   (2)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] : (
% 10.72/2.24  |          ~ (composition(v3, v2) = v4) |  ~ (join(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ $i(v2) | 
% 10.72/2.24  |          ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v5: $i] :  ? [v6: $i] : (composition(v1,
% 10.72/2.24  |              v2) = v6 & composition(v0, v2) = v5 & join(v5, v6) = v4 & $i(v6)
% 10.72/2.24  |            & $i(v5) & $i(v4)))
% 10.72/2.24  |   (3)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] : 
% 10.72/2.24  |        ! [v5: $i] : ( ~ (composition(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (composition(v0, v2) =
% 10.72/2.24  |            v3) |  ~ (join(v3, v4) = v5) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | 
% 10.72/2.24  |          ? [v6: $i] : (composition(v6, v2) = v5 & join(v0, v1) = v6 & $i(v6) &
% 10.72/2.24  |            $i(v5)))
% 10.72/2.25  | 
% 10.72/2.25  | ALPHA: (converse_additivity) implies:
% 10.72/2.25  |   (4)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (join(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~
% 10.72/2.25  |          $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] :  ? [v5: $i] :
% 10.72/2.25  |          (converse(v2) = v3 & converse(v1) = v5 & converse(v0) = v4 & join(v4,
% 10.72/2.25  |              v5) = v3 & $i(v5) & $i(v4) & $i(v3)))
% 10.72/2.25  | 
% 10.72/2.25  | ALPHA: (converse_multiplicativity) implies:
% 10.72/2.25  |   (5)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (composition(v0, v1) =
% 10.72/2.25  |            v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] :  ? [v5:
% 10.72/2.25  |            $i] : (converse(v2) = v3 & converse(v1) = v4 & converse(v0) = v5 &
% 10.72/2.25  |            composition(v4, v5) = v3 & $i(v5) & $i(v4) & $i(v3)))
% 10.72/2.25  | 
% 10.72/2.25  | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 10.72/2.25  |   (6)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (converse(v2) =
% 10.72/2.25  |            v1) |  ~ (converse(v2) = v0))
% 10.72/2.25  |   (7)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 10.72/2.25  |          (join(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (join(v3, v2) = v0))
% 10.72/2.25  |   (8)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 10.72/2.25  |          (composition(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (composition(v3, v2) = v0))
% 10.72/2.25  | 
% 10.72/2.25  | DELTA: instantiating (goals) with fresh symbols all_17_0, all_17_1, all_17_2,
% 10.72/2.25  |        all_17_3, all_17_4, all_17_5, all_17_6, all_17_7, all_17_8 gives:
% 10.72/2.25  |   (9)  composition(all_17_6, all_17_7) = all_17_1 & composition(all_17_6,
% 10.72/2.25  |          all_17_8) = all_17_2 & composition(all_17_7, all_17_6) = all_17_4 &
% 10.72/2.25  |        composition(all_17_8, all_17_6) = all_17_5 & join(all_17_2, all_17_1) =
% 10.72/2.25  |        all_17_0 & join(all_17_5, all_17_4) = all_17_3 & join(all_17_8,
% 10.72/2.25  |          all_17_7) = all_17_7 & $i(all_17_0) & $i(all_17_1) & $i(all_17_2) &
% 10.72/2.25  |        $i(all_17_3) & $i(all_17_4) & $i(all_17_5) & $i(all_17_6) &
% 10.72/2.25  |        $i(all_17_7) & $i(all_17_8) & ( ~ (all_17_0 = all_17_1) |  ~ (all_17_3
% 10.72/2.25  |            = all_17_4))
% 10.72/2.25  | 
% 10.72/2.25  | ALPHA: (9) implies:
% 10.72/2.25  |   (10)  $i(all_17_8)
% 10.72/2.25  |   (11)  $i(all_17_7)
% 10.72/2.25  |   (12)  $i(all_17_6)
% 10.72/2.25  |   (13)  $i(all_17_2)
% 10.72/2.25  |   (14)  $i(all_17_1)
% 10.72/2.25  |   (15)  join(all_17_8, all_17_7) = all_17_7
% 10.72/2.25  |   (16)  join(all_17_5, all_17_4) = all_17_3
% 10.72/2.25  |   (17)  join(all_17_2, all_17_1) = all_17_0
% 10.72/2.25  |   (18)  composition(all_17_8, all_17_6) = all_17_5
% 10.72/2.25  |   (19)  composition(all_17_7, all_17_6) = all_17_4
% 10.72/2.25  |   (20)  composition(all_17_6, all_17_8) = all_17_2
% 10.72/2.25  |   (21)  composition(all_17_6, all_17_7) = all_17_1
% 10.72/2.25  |   (22)   ~ (all_17_0 = all_17_1) |  ~ (all_17_3 = all_17_4)
% 10.72/2.25  | 
% 10.72/2.25  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_17_8, all_17_7, all_17_7, simplifying
% 10.72/2.25  |              with (10), (11), (15) gives:
% 10.72/2.25  |   (23)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] : (converse(all_17_7) = v2 &
% 10.72/2.25  |           converse(all_17_7) = v0 & converse(all_17_8) = v1 & join(v1, v2) =
% 10.72/2.25  |           v0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 10.72/2.25  | 
% 10.72/2.26  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_17_1, all_17_2, all_17_0, simplifying
% 10.72/2.26  |              with (13), (14), (17) gives:
% 10.72/2.26  |   (24)  join(all_17_1, all_17_2) = all_17_0 & $i(all_17_0)
% 10.72/2.26  | 
% 10.72/2.26  | ALPHA: (24) implies:
% 10.72/2.26  |   (25)  $i(all_17_0)
% 10.72/2.26  | 
% 10.72/2.26  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_17_2, all_17_1, all_17_0, simplifying
% 10.72/2.26  |              with (13), (14), (17) gives:
% 10.72/2.26  |   (26)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] : (converse(all_17_0) = v0 &
% 10.72/2.26  |           converse(all_17_1) = v2 & converse(all_17_2) = v1 & join(v1, v2) =
% 10.72/2.26  |           v0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 10.72/2.26  | 
% 10.72/2.26  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (converse_cancellativity) with all_17_8, all_17_6,
% 10.72/2.26  |              all_17_5, simplifying with (10), (12), (18) gives:
% 10.72/2.26  |   (27)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :
% 10.72/2.26  |         (converse(all_17_8) = v0 & composition(v0, v1) = v2 &
% 10.72/2.26  |           complement(all_17_5) = v1 & complement(all_17_6) = v3 & join(v2, v3)
% 10.72/2.26  |           = v3 & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 10.72/2.26  | 
% 10.72/2.26  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_17_8, all_17_6, all_17_5, simplifying
% 10.72/2.26  |              with (10), (12), (18) gives:
% 10.72/2.26  |   (28)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] : (converse(all_17_5) = v0 &
% 10.72/2.26  |           converse(all_17_6) = v1 & converse(all_17_8) = v2 & composition(v1,
% 10.72/2.26  |             v2) = v0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 10.72/2.26  | 
% 10.72/2.26  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_17_8, all_17_7, all_17_6, all_17_5,
% 10.72/2.26  |              all_17_4, all_17_3, simplifying with (10), (11), (12), (16),
% 10.72/2.26  |              (18), (19) gives:
% 10.72/2.26  |   (29)   ? [v0: $i] : (composition(v0, all_17_6) = all_17_3 & join(all_17_8,
% 10.72/2.26  |             all_17_7) = v0 & $i(v0) & $i(all_17_3))
% 10.72/2.26  | 
% 10.72/2.26  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_17_8, all_17_7, all_17_6, all_17_7,
% 10.72/2.26  |              all_17_4, simplifying with (10), (11), (12), (15), (19) gives:
% 10.72/2.26  |   (30)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] : (composition(all_17_7, all_17_6) = v1 &
% 10.72/2.26  |           composition(all_17_8, all_17_6) = v0 & join(v0, v1) = all_17_4 &
% 10.72/2.26  |           $i(v1) & $i(v0) & $i(all_17_4))
% 10.72/2.26  | 
% 10.72/2.26  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (converse_cancellativity) with all_17_7, all_17_6,
% 10.72/2.26  |              all_17_4, simplifying with (11), (12), (19) gives:
% 10.72/2.26  |   (31)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :
% 10.72/2.26  |         (converse(all_17_7) = v0 & composition(v0, v1) = v2 &
% 10.72/2.26  |           complement(all_17_4) = v1 & complement(all_17_6) = v3 & join(v2, v3)
% 10.72/2.26  |           = v3 & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 10.72/2.26  | 
% 10.72/2.26  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_17_7, all_17_6, all_17_4, simplifying
% 10.72/2.26  |              with (11), (12), (19) gives:
% 10.72/2.26  |   (32)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] : (converse(all_17_4) = v0 &
% 10.72/2.26  |           converse(all_17_6) = v1 & converse(all_17_7) = v2 & composition(v1,
% 10.72/2.26  |             v2) = v0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 10.72/2.26  | 
% 10.72/2.26  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (converse_cancellativity) with all_17_6, all_17_8,
% 10.72/2.26  |              all_17_2, simplifying with (10), (12), (20) gives:
% 10.72/2.26  |   (33)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :
% 10.72/2.26  |         (converse(all_17_6) = v0 & composition(v0, v1) = v2 &
% 10.72/2.26  |           complement(all_17_2) = v1 & complement(all_17_8) = v3 & join(v2, v3)
% 10.72/2.26  |           = v3 & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 10.72/2.26  | 
% 10.72/2.26  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_17_6, all_17_8, all_17_2, simplifying
% 10.72/2.26  |              with (10), (12), (20) gives:
% 10.72/2.26  |   (34)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] : (converse(all_17_2) = v0 &
% 10.72/2.26  |           converse(all_17_6) = v2 & converse(all_17_8) = v1 & composition(v1,
% 10.72/2.26  |             v2) = v0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 10.72/2.26  | 
% 10.72/2.26  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (converse_cancellativity) with all_17_6, all_17_7,
% 10.72/2.26  |              all_17_1, simplifying with (11), (12), (21) gives:
% 10.72/2.27  |   (35)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :
% 10.72/2.27  |         (converse(all_17_6) = v0 & composition(v0, v1) = v2 &
% 10.72/2.27  |           complement(all_17_1) = v1 & complement(all_17_7) = v3 & join(v2, v3)
% 10.72/2.27  |           = v3 & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 10.72/2.27  | 
% 10.72/2.27  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_17_6, all_17_7, all_17_1, simplifying
% 10.72/2.27  |              with (11), (12), (21) gives:
% 10.72/2.27  |   (36)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] : (converse(all_17_1) = v0 &
% 10.72/2.27  |           converse(all_17_6) = v2 & converse(all_17_7) = v1 & composition(v1,
% 10.72/2.27  |             v2) = v0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 10.72/2.27  | 
% 10.72/2.27  | DELTA: instantiating (29) with fresh symbol all_27_0 gives:
% 10.72/2.27  |   (37)  composition(all_27_0, all_17_6) = all_17_3 & join(all_17_8, all_17_7)
% 10.72/2.27  |         = all_27_0 & $i(all_27_0) & $i(all_17_3)
% 10.72/2.27  | 
% 10.72/2.27  | ALPHA: (37) implies:
% 10.72/2.27  |   (38)  join(all_17_8, all_17_7) = all_27_0
% 10.72/2.27  |   (39)  composition(all_27_0, all_17_6) = all_17_3
% 10.72/2.27  | 
% 10.72/2.27  | DELTA: instantiating (30) with fresh symbols all_29_0, all_29_1 gives:
% 10.72/2.27  |   (40)  composition(all_17_7, all_17_6) = all_29_0 & composition(all_17_8,
% 10.72/2.27  |           all_17_6) = all_29_1 & join(all_29_1, all_29_0) = all_17_4 &
% 10.72/2.27  |         $i(all_29_0) & $i(all_29_1) & $i(all_17_4)
% 10.72/2.27  | 
% 10.72/2.27  | ALPHA: (40) implies:
% 10.72/2.27  |   (41)  composition(all_17_7, all_17_6) = all_29_0
% 10.72/2.27  | 
% 10.72/2.27  | DELTA: instantiating (28) with fresh symbols all_31_0, all_31_1, all_31_2
% 10.72/2.27  |        gives:
% 10.72/2.27  |   (42)  converse(all_17_5) = all_31_2 & converse(all_17_6) = all_31_1 &
% 10.72/2.27  |         converse(all_17_8) = all_31_0 & composition(all_31_1, all_31_0) =
% 10.72/2.27  |         all_31_2 & $i(all_31_0) & $i(all_31_1) & $i(all_31_2)
% 10.72/2.27  | 
% 10.72/2.27  | ALPHA: (42) implies:
% 10.72/2.27  |   (43)  converse(all_17_8) = all_31_0
% 10.72/2.27  |   (44)  converse(all_17_6) = all_31_1
% 10.72/2.27  | 
% 10.72/2.27  | DELTA: instantiating (34) with fresh symbols all_33_0, all_33_1, all_33_2
% 10.72/2.27  |        gives:
% 10.72/2.27  |   (45)  converse(all_17_2) = all_33_2 & converse(all_17_6) = all_33_0 &
% 10.72/2.27  |         converse(all_17_8) = all_33_1 & composition(all_33_1, all_33_0) =
% 10.72/2.27  |         all_33_2 & $i(all_33_0) & $i(all_33_1) & $i(all_33_2)
% 10.72/2.27  | 
% 10.72/2.27  | ALPHA: (45) implies:
% 10.72/2.27  |   (46)  $i(all_33_1)
% 10.72/2.27  |   (47)  $i(all_33_0)
% 10.72/2.27  |   (48)  composition(all_33_1, all_33_0) = all_33_2
% 10.72/2.27  |   (49)  converse(all_17_8) = all_33_1
% 10.72/2.27  |   (50)  converse(all_17_6) = all_33_0
% 10.72/2.27  |   (51)  converse(all_17_2) = all_33_2
% 10.72/2.27  | 
% 10.72/2.27  | DELTA: instantiating (32) with fresh symbols all_35_0, all_35_1, all_35_2
% 10.72/2.27  |        gives:
% 10.72/2.27  |   (52)  converse(all_17_4) = all_35_2 & converse(all_17_6) = all_35_1 &
% 10.72/2.27  |         converse(all_17_7) = all_35_0 & composition(all_35_1, all_35_0) =
% 10.72/2.27  |         all_35_2 & $i(all_35_0) & $i(all_35_1) & $i(all_35_2)
% 10.72/2.27  | 
% 10.72/2.27  | ALPHA: (52) implies:
% 10.72/2.27  |   (53)  converse(all_17_7) = all_35_0
% 10.72/2.27  |   (54)  converse(all_17_6) = all_35_1
% 10.72/2.27  | 
% 10.72/2.27  | DELTA: instantiating (36) with fresh symbols all_37_0, all_37_1, all_37_2
% 10.72/2.27  |        gives:
% 10.72/2.27  |   (55)  converse(all_17_1) = all_37_2 & converse(all_17_6) = all_37_0 &
% 10.72/2.27  |         converse(all_17_7) = all_37_1 & composition(all_37_1, all_37_0) =
% 10.72/2.27  |         all_37_2 & $i(all_37_0) & $i(all_37_1) & $i(all_37_2)
% 10.72/2.27  | 
% 10.72/2.27  | ALPHA: (55) implies:
% 10.72/2.27  |   (56)  $i(all_37_1)
% 10.72/2.27  |   (57)  composition(all_37_1, all_37_0) = all_37_2
% 10.72/2.27  |   (58)  converse(all_17_7) = all_37_1
% 10.72/2.27  |   (59)  converse(all_17_6) = all_37_0
% 10.72/2.27  |   (60)  converse(all_17_1) = all_37_2
% 10.72/2.27  | 
% 10.72/2.27  | DELTA: instantiating (26) with fresh symbols all_39_0, all_39_1, all_39_2
% 10.72/2.27  |        gives:
% 10.72/2.27  |   (61)  converse(all_17_0) = all_39_2 & converse(all_17_1) = all_39_0 &
% 10.72/2.27  |         converse(all_17_2) = all_39_1 & join(all_39_1, all_39_0) = all_39_2 &
% 10.72/2.27  |         $i(all_39_0) & $i(all_39_1) & $i(all_39_2)
% 10.72/2.27  | 
% 10.72/2.27  | ALPHA: (61) implies:
% 10.72/2.27  |   (62)  $i(all_39_1)
% 10.72/2.27  |   (63)  $i(all_39_0)
% 10.72/2.27  |   (64)  join(all_39_1, all_39_0) = all_39_2
% 10.72/2.27  |   (65)  converse(all_17_2) = all_39_1
% 10.72/2.27  |   (66)  converse(all_17_1) = all_39_0
% 10.72/2.27  |   (67)  converse(all_17_0) = all_39_2
% 10.72/2.27  | 
% 10.72/2.27  | DELTA: instantiating (23) with fresh symbols all_41_0, all_41_1, all_41_2
% 10.72/2.27  |        gives:
% 10.72/2.27  |   (68)  converse(all_17_7) = all_41_0 & converse(all_17_7) = all_41_2 &
% 10.72/2.27  |         converse(all_17_8) = all_41_1 & join(all_41_1, all_41_0) = all_41_2 &
% 10.72/2.27  |         $i(all_41_0) & $i(all_41_1) & $i(all_41_2)
% 10.72/2.27  | 
% 10.72/2.27  | ALPHA: (68) implies:
% 10.72/2.27  |   (69)  join(all_41_1, all_41_0) = all_41_2
% 10.72/2.28  |   (70)  converse(all_17_8) = all_41_1
% 10.72/2.28  |   (71)  converse(all_17_7) = all_41_2
% 10.72/2.28  |   (72)  converse(all_17_7) = all_41_0
% 10.72/2.28  | 
% 10.72/2.28  | DELTA: instantiating (27) with fresh symbols all_45_0, all_45_1, all_45_2,
% 10.72/2.28  |        all_45_3 gives:
% 10.72/2.28  |   (73)  converse(all_17_8) = all_45_3 & composition(all_45_3, all_45_2) =
% 10.72/2.28  |         all_45_1 & complement(all_17_5) = all_45_2 & complement(all_17_6) =
% 10.72/2.28  |         all_45_0 & join(all_45_1, all_45_0) = all_45_0 & $i(all_45_0) &
% 10.72/2.28  |         $i(all_45_1) & $i(all_45_2) & $i(all_45_3)
% 10.72/2.28  | 
% 10.72/2.28  | ALPHA: (73) implies:
% 10.72/2.28  |   (74)  converse(all_17_8) = all_45_3
% 10.72/2.28  | 
% 10.72/2.28  | DELTA: instantiating (31) with fresh symbols all_47_0, all_47_1, all_47_2,
% 10.72/2.28  |        all_47_3 gives:
% 10.72/2.28  |   (75)  converse(all_17_7) = all_47_3 & composition(all_47_3, all_47_2) =
% 10.72/2.28  |         all_47_1 & complement(all_17_4) = all_47_2 & complement(all_17_6) =
% 10.72/2.28  |         all_47_0 & join(all_47_1, all_47_0) = all_47_0 & $i(all_47_0) &
% 10.72/2.28  |         $i(all_47_1) & $i(all_47_2) & $i(all_47_3)
% 10.72/2.28  | 
% 10.72/2.28  | ALPHA: (75) implies:
% 10.72/2.28  |   (76)  converse(all_17_7) = all_47_3
% 10.72/2.28  | 
% 10.72/2.28  | DELTA: instantiating (35) with fresh symbols all_49_0, all_49_1, all_49_2,
% 10.72/2.28  |        all_49_3 gives:
% 11.99/2.28  |   (77)  converse(all_17_6) = all_49_3 & composition(all_49_3, all_49_2) =
% 11.99/2.28  |         all_49_1 & complement(all_17_1) = all_49_2 & complement(all_17_7) =
% 11.99/2.28  |         all_49_0 & join(all_49_1, all_49_0) = all_49_0 & $i(all_49_0) &
% 11.99/2.28  |         $i(all_49_1) & $i(all_49_2) & $i(all_49_3)
% 11.99/2.28  | 
% 11.99/2.28  | ALPHA: (77) implies:
% 11.99/2.28  |   (78)  converse(all_17_6) = all_49_3
% 11.99/2.28  | 
% 11.99/2.28  | DELTA: instantiating (33) with fresh symbols all_51_0, all_51_1, all_51_2,
% 11.99/2.28  |        all_51_3 gives:
% 11.99/2.28  |   (79)  converse(all_17_6) = all_51_3 & composition(all_51_3, all_51_2) =
% 11.99/2.28  |         all_51_1 & complement(all_17_2) = all_51_2 & complement(all_17_8) =
% 11.99/2.28  |         all_51_0 & join(all_51_1, all_51_0) = all_51_0 & $i(all_51_0) &
% 11.99/2.28  |         $i(all_51_1) & $i(all_51_2) & $i(all_51_3)
% 11.99/2.28  | 
% 11.99/2.28  | ALPHA: (79) implies:
% 11.99/2.28  |   (80)  converse(all_17_6) = all_51_3
% 11.99/2.28  | 
% 11.99/2.28  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with all_17_7, all_27_0, all_17_7, all_17_8,
% 11.99/2.28  |              simplifying with (15), (38) gives:
% 11.99/2.28  |   (81)  all_27_0 = all_17_7
% 11.99/2.28  | 
% 11.99/2.28  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (8) with all_17_4, all_29_0, all_17_6, all_17_7,
% 11.99/2.28  |              simplifying with (19), (41) gives:
% 11.99/2.28  |   (82)  all_29_0 = all_17_4
% 11.99/2.28  | 
% 11.99/2.28  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_33_1, all_41_1, all_17_8, simplifying
% 11.99/2.28  |              with (49), (70) gives:
% 11.99/2.28  |   (83)  all_41_1 = all_33_1
% 11.99/2.28  | 
% 11.99/2.28  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_41_1, all_45_3, all_17_8, simplifying
% 11.99/2.28  |              with (70), (74) gives:
% 11.99/2.28  |   (84)  all_45_3 = all_41_1
% 11.99/2.28  | 
% 11.99/2.28  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_31_0, all_45_3, all_17_8, simplifying
% 11.99/2.28  |              with (43), (74) gives:
% 11.99/2.28  |   (85)  all_45_3 = all_31_0
% 11.99/2.28  | 
% 11.99/2.28  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_37_1, all_41_2, all_17_7, simplifying
% 11.99/2.28  |              with (58), (71) gives:
% 11.99/2.28  |   (86)  all_41_2 = all_37_1
% 11.99/2.28  | 
% 11.99/2.28  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_41_2, all_41_0, all_17_7, simplifying
% 11.99/2.28  |              with (71), (72) gives:
% 11.99/2.28  |   (87)  all_41_0 = all_41_2
% 11.99/2.28  | 
% 11.99/2.28  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_41_0, all_47_3, all_17_7, simplifying
% 11.99/2.28  |              with (72), (76) gives:
% 11.99/2.28  |   (88)  all_47_3 = all_41_0
% 11.99/2.28  | 
% 11.99/2.28  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_35_0, all_47_3, all_17_7, simplifying
% 11.99/2.28  |              with (53), (76) gives:
% 11.99/2.28  |   (89)  all_47_3 = all_35_0
% 11.99/2.28  | 
% 11.99/2.28  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_37_0, all_49_3, all_17_6, simplifying
% 11.99/2.28  |              with (59), (78) gives:
% 11.99/2.28  |   (90)  all_49_3 = all_37_0
% 11.99/2.28  | 
% 11.99/2.28  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_35_1, all_49_3, all_17_6, simplifying
% 11.99/2.28  |              with (54), (78) gives:
% 11.99/2.28  |   (91)  all_49_3 = all_35_1
% 11.99/2.28  | 
% 11.99/2.28  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_31_1, all_49_3, all_17_6, simplifying
% 11.99/2.28  |              with (44), (78) gives:
% 11.99/2.28  |   (92)  all_49_3 = all_31_1
% 11.99/2.28  | 
% 11.99/2.28  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_37_0, all_51_3, all_17_6, simplifying
% 11.99/2.28  |              with (59), (80) gives:
% 11.99/2.28  |   (93)  all_51_3 = all_37_0
% 11.99/2.28  | 
% 11.99/2.28  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_33_0, all_51_3, all_17_6, simplifying
% 11.99/2.28  |              with (50), (80) gives:
% 11.99/2.29  |   (94)  all_51_3 = all_33_0
% 11.99/2.29  | 
% 11.99/2.29  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_33_2, all_39_1, all_17_2, simplifying
% 11.99/2.29  |              with (51), (65) gives:
% 11.99/2.29  |   (95)  all_39_1 = all_33_2
% 11.99/2.29  | 
% 11.99/2.29  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_37_2, all_39_0, all_17_1, simplifying
% 11.99/2.29  |              with (60), (66) gives:
% 11.99/2.29  |   (96)  all_39_0 = all_37_2
% 11.99/2.29  | 
% 11.99/2.29  | COMBINE_EQS: (93), (94) imply:
% 11.99/2.29  |   (97)  all_37_0 = all_33_0
% 11.99/2.29  | 
% 11.99/2.29  | SIMP: (97) implies:
% 11.99/2.29  |   (98)  all_37_0 = all_33_0
% 11.99/2.29  | 
% 11.99/2.29  | COMBINE_EQS: (90), (91) imply:
% 11.99/2.29  |   (99)  all_37_0 = all_35_1
% 11.99/2.29  | 
% 11.99/2.29  | SIMP: (99) implies:
% 11.99/2.29  |   (100)  all_37_0 = all_35_1
% 11.99/2.29  | 
% 11.99/2.29  | COMBINE_EQS: (91), (92) imply:
% 11.99/2.29  |   (101)  all_35_1 = all_31_1
% 11.99/2.29  | 
% 11.99/2.29  | COMBINE_EQS: (88), (89) imply:
% 11.99/2.29  |   (102)  all_41_0 = all_35_0
% 11.99/2.29  | 
% 11.99/2.29  | SIMP: (102) implies:
% 11.99/2.29  |   (103)  all_41_0 = all_35_0
% 11.99/2.29  | 
% 11.99/2.29  | COMBINE_EQS: (84), (85) imply:
% 11.99/2.29  |   (104)  all_41_1 = all_31_0
% 11.99/2.29  | 
% 11.99/2.29  | SIMP: (104) implies:
% 11.99/2.29  |   (105)  all_41_1 = all_31_0
% 11.99/2.29  | 
% 11.99/2.29  | COMBINE_EQS: (87), (103) imply:
% 11.99/2.29  |   (106)  all_41_2 = all_35_0
% 11.99/2.29  | 
% 11.99/2.29  | SIMP: (106) implies:
% 11.99/2.29  |   (107)  all_41_2 = all_35_0
% 11.99/2.29  | 
% 11.99/2.29  | COMBINE_EQS: (83), (105) imply:
% 11.99/2.29  |   (108)  all_33_1 = all_31_0
% 11.99/2.29  | 
% 11.99/2.29  | COMBINE_EQS: (86), (107) imply:
% 11.99/2.29  |   (109)  all_37_1 = all_35_0
% 11.99/2.29  | 
% 11.99/2.29  | COMBINE_EQS: (98), (100) imply:
% 11.99/2.29  |   (110)  all_35_1 = all_33_0
% 11.99/2.29  | 
% 11.99/2.29  | SIMP: (110) implies:
% 11.99/2.29  |   (111)  all_35_1 = all_33_0
% 11.99/2.29  | 
% 11.99/2.29  | COMBINE_EQS: (101), (111) imply:
% 11.99/2.29  |   (112)  all_33_0 = all_31_1
% 11.99/2.29  | 
% 11.99/2.29  | COMBINE_EQS: (98), (112) imply:
% 11.99/2.29  |   (113)  all_37_0 = all_31_1
% 11.99/2.29  | 
% 11.99/2.29  | REDUCE: (57), (109), (113) imply:
% 11.99/2.29  |   (114)  composition(all_35_0, all_31_1) = all_37_2
% 11.99/2.29  | 
% 11.99/2.29  | REDUCE: (48), (108), (112) imply:
% 11.99/2.29  |   (115)  composition(all_31_0, all_31_1) = all_33_2
% 11.99/2.29  | 
% 11.99/2.29  | REDUCE: (39), (81) imply:
% 11.99/2.29  |   (116)  composition(all_17_7, all_17_6) = all_17_3
% 11.99/2.29  | 
% 11.99/2.29  | REDUCE: (69), (103), (105), (107) imply:
% 11.99/2.29  |   (117)  join(all_31_0, all_35_0) = all_35_0
% 11.99/2.29  | 
% 11.99/2.29  | REDUCE: (64), (95), (96) imply:
% 11.99/2.29  |   (118)  join(all_33_2, all_37_2) = all_39_2
% 11.99/2.29  | 
% 11.99/2.29  | REDUCE: (63), (96) imply:
% 11.99/2.29  |   (119)  $i(all_37_2)
% 11.99/2.29  | 
% 11.99/2.29  | REDUCE: (62), (95) imply:
% 11.99/2.29  |   (120)  $i(all_33_2)
% 11.99/2.29  | 
% 11.99/2.29  | REDUCE: (56), (109) imply:
% 11.99/2.29  |   (121)  $i(all_35_0)
% 11.99/2.29  | 
% 11.99/2.29  | REDUCE: (47), (112) imply:
% 11.99/2.29  |   (122)  $i(all_31_1)
% 11.99/2.29  | 
% 11.99/2.29  | REDUCE: (46), (108) imply:
% 11.99/2.29  |   (123)  $i(all_31_0)
% 11.99/2.29  | 
% 11.99/2.29  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (8) with all_17_4, all_17_3, all_17_6, all_17_7,
% 11.99/2.29  |              simplifying with (19), (116) gives:
% 11.99/2.29  |   (124)  all_17_3 = all_17_4
% 11.99/2.29  | 
% 11.99/2.29  | BETA: splitting (22) gives:
% 11.99/2.29  | 
% 11.99/2.29  | Case 1:
% 11.99/2.29  | | 
% 11.99/2.29  | |   (125)   ~ (all_17_0 = all_17_1)
% 11.99/2.29  | | 
% 11.99/2.29  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_33_2, all_37_2, all_39_2,
% 11.99/2.29  | |              simplifying with (118), (119), (120) gives:
% 11.99/2.30  | |   (126)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] : (converse(all_39_2) = v0
% 11.99/2.30  | |            & converse(all_37_2) = v2 & converse(all_33_2) = v1 & join(v1,
% 11.99/2.30  | |              v2) = v0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 11.99/2.30  | | 
% 11.99/2.30  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_31_0, all_35_0, all_31_1, all_33_2,
% 11.99/2.30  | |              all_37_2, all_39_2, simplifying with (114), (115), (118),
% 11.99/2.30  | |              (121), (122), (123) gives:
% 11.99/2.30  | |   (127)   ? [v0: $i] : (composition(v0, all_31_1) = all_39_2 &
% 11.99/2.30  | |            join(all_31_0, all_35_0) = v0 & $i(v0) & $i(all_39_2))
% 11.99/2.30  | | 
% 11.99/2.30  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_31_0, all_35_0, all_31_1, all_35_0,
% 11.99/2.30  | |              all_37_2, simplifying with (114), (117), (121), (122), (123)
% 11.99/2.30  | |              gives:
% 11.99/2.30  | |   (128)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] : (composition(all_35_0, all_31_1) = v1 &
% 11.99/2.30  | |            composition(all_31_0, all_31_1) = v0 & join(v0, v1) = all_37_2 &
% 11.99/2.30  | |            $i(v1) & $i(v0) & $i(all_37_2))
% 11.99/2.30  | | 
% 11.99/2.30  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_35_0, all_31_1, all_37_2,
% 11.99/2.30  | |              simplifying with (114), (121), (122) gives:
% 11.99/2.30  | |   (129)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] : (converse(all_37_2) = v0
% 11.99/2.30  | |            & converse(all_35_0) = v2 & converse(all_31_1) = v1 &
% 11.99/2.30  | |            composition(v1, v2) = v0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 11.99/2.30  | | 
% 11.99/2.30  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (converse_idempotence) with all_17_1, all_37_2,
% 11.99/2.30  | |              simplifying with (14), (60) gives:
% 11.99/2.30  | |   (130)  converse(all_37_2) = all_17_1
% 11.99/2.30  | | 
% 11.99/2.30  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (converse_idempotence) with all_17_0, all_39_2,
% 11.99/2.30  | |              simplifying with (25), (67) gives:
% 11.99/2.30  | |   (131)  converse(all_39_2) = all_17_0
% 11.99/2.30  | | 
% 11.99/2.30  | | DELTA: instantiating (127) with fresh symbol all_103_0 gives:
% 11.99/2.30  | |   (132)  composition(all_103_0, all_31_1) = all_39_2 & join(all_31_0,
% 11.99/2.30  | |            all_35_0) = all_103_0 & $i(all_103_0) & $i(all_39_2)
% 11.99/2.30  | | 
% 11.99/2.30  | | ALPHA: (132) implies:
% 11.99/2.30  | |   (133)  join(all_31_0, all_35_0) = all_103_0
% 11.99/2.30  | |   (134)  composition(all_103_0, all_31_1) = all_39_2
% 11.99/2.30  | | 
% 11.99/2.30  | | DELTA: instantiating (128) with fresh symbols all_109_0, all_109_1 gives:
% 11.99/2.30  | |   (135)  composition(all_35_0, all_31_1) = all_109_0 & composition(all_31_0,
% 11.99/2.30  | |            all_31_1) = all_109_1 & join(all_109_1, all_109_0) = all_37_2 &
% 11.99/2.30  | |          $i(all_109_0) & $i(all_109_1) & $i(all_37_2)
% 11.99/2.30  | | 
% 11.99/2.30  | | ALPHA: (135) implies:
% 11.99/2.30  | |   (136)  composition(all_35_0, all_31_1) = all_109_0
% 11.99/2.30  | | 
% 11.99/2.30  | | DELTA: instantiating (129) with fresh symbols all_111_0, all_111_1,
% 11.99/2.30  | |        all_111_2 gives:
% 11.99/2.30  | |   (137)  converse(all_37_2) = all_111_2 & converse(all_35_0) = all_111_0 &
% 11.99/2.30  | |          converse(all_31_1) = all_111_1 & composition(all_111_1, all_111_0)
% 11.99/2.30  | |          = all_111_2 & $i(all_111_0) & $i(all_111_1) & $i(all_111_2)
% 11.99/2.30  | | 
% 11.99/2.30  | | ALPHA: (137) implies:
% 11.99/2.30  | |   (138)  converse(all_37_2) = all_111_2
% 11.99/2.30  | | 
% 11.99/2.30  | | DELTA: instantiating (126) with fresh symbols all_125_0, all_125_1,
% 11.99/2.30  | |        all_125_2 gives:
% 11.99/2.30  | |   (139)  converse(all_39_2) = all_125_2 & converse(all_37_2) = all_125_0 &
% 11.99/2.30  | |          converse(all_33_2) = all_125_1 & join(all_125_1, all_125_0) =
% 11.99/2.30  | |          all_125_2 & $i(all_125_0) & $i(all_125_1) & $i(all_125_2)
% 11.99/2.30  | | 
% 11.99/2.30  | | ALPHA: (139) implies:
% 11.99/2.30  | |   (140)  converse(all_37_2) = all_125_0
% 11.99/2.30  | |   (141)  converse(all_39_2) = all_125_2
% 11.99/2.30  | | 
% 11.99/2.30  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with all_35_0, all_103_0, all_35_0, all_31_0,
% 11.99/2.30  | |              simplifying with (117), (133) gives:
% 11.99/2.30  | |   (142)  all_103_0 = all_35_0
% 11.99/2.30  | | 
% 11.99/2.30  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (8) with all_37_2, all_109_0, all_31_1, all_35_0,
% 11.99/2.30  | |              simplifying with (114), (136) gives:
% 11.99/2.30  | |   (143)  all_109_0 = all_37_2
% 11.99/2.30  | | 
% 11.99/2.30  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_111_2, all_125_0, all_37_2,
% 11.99/2.30  | |              simplifying with (138), (140) gives:
% 11.99/2.30  | |   (144)  all_125_0 = all_111_2
% 11.99/2.30  | | 
% 11.99/2.30  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_17_1, all_125_0, all_37_2,
% 11.99/2.30  | |              simplifying with (130), (140) gives:
% 11.99/2.30  | |   (145)  all_125_0 = all_17_1
% 11.99/2.30  | | 
% 11.99/2.30  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_17_0, all_125_2, all_39_2,
% 11.99/2.30  | |              simplifying with (131), (141) gives:
% 11.99/2.30  | |   (146)  all_125_2 = all_17_0
% 11.99/2.30  | | 
% 11.99/2.30  | | COMBINE_EQS: (144), (145) imply:
% 11.99/2.30  | |   (147)  all_111_2 = all_17_1
% 11.99/2.30  | | 
% 11.99/2.30  | | SIMP: (147) implies:
% 11.99/2.30  | |   (148)  all_111_2 = all_17_1
% 11.99/2.30  | | 
% 11.99/2.30  | | REDUCE: (134), (142) imply:
% 11.99/2.30  | |   (149)  composition(all_35_0, all_31_1) = all_39_2
% 11.99/2.30  | | 
% 11.99/2.30  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (8) with all_37_2, all_39_2, all_31_1, all_35_0,
% 11.99/2.30  | |              simplifying with (114), (149) gives:
% 11.99/2.31  | |   (150)  all_39_2 = all_37_2
% 11.99/2.31  | | 
% 11.99/2.31  | | REDUCE: (131), (150) imply:
% 11.99/2.31  | |   (151)  converse(all_37_2) = all_17_0
% 11.99/2.31  | | 
% 11.99/2.31  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_17_1, all_17_0, all_37_2,
% 11.99/2.31  | |              simplifying with (130), (151) gives:
% 11.99/2.31  | |   (152)  all_17_0 = all_17_1
% 11.99/2.31  | | 
% 11.99/2.31  | | REDUCE: (125), (152) imply:
% 11.99/2.31  | |   (153)  $false
% 11.99/2.31  | | 
% 11.99/2.31  | | CLOSE: (153) is inconsistent.
% 11.99/2.31  | | 
% 11.99/2.31  | Case 2:
% 11.99/2.31  | | 
% 11.99/2.31  | |   (154)   ~ (all_17_3 = all_17_4)
% 11.99/2.31  | | 
% 11.99/2.31  | | REDUCE: (124), (154) imply:
% 11.99/2.31  | |   (155)  $false
% 11.99/2.31  | | 
% 11.99/2.31  | | CLOSE: (155) is inconsistent.
% 11.99/2.31  | | 
% 11.99/2.31  | End of split
% 11.99/2.31  | 
% 11.99/2.31  End of proof
% 11.99/2.31  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 11.99/2.31  
% 11.99/2.31  1793ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------