TSTP Solution File: REL009+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : REL009+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 19:12:58 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.18s 2.55s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 22 ( 19 unt; 0 nHn; 8 RR)
% Number of literals : 25 ( 24 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 31 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_7,plain,
composition(converse(X1),converse(X2)) = converse(composition(X2,X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jibudhd_/lgb.p',i_0_7) ).
cnf(i_0_6,plain,
converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jibudhd_/lgb.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(i_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( join(composition(esk1_0,esk3_0),composition(esk2_0,esk3_0)) != composition(esk2_0,esk3_0)
| join(composition(esk3_0,esk1_0),composition(esk3_0,esk2_0)) != composition(esk3_0,esk2_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jibudhd_/lgb.p',i_0_10) ).
cnf(i_0_12,plain,
join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jibudhd_/lgb.p',i_0_12) ).
cnf(i_0_11,negated_conjecture,
join(esk1_0,esk2_0) = esk2_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jibudhd_/lgb.p',i_0_11) ).
cnf(i_0_4,plain,
join(converse(X1),converse(X2)) = converse(join(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jibudhd_/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(i_0_2,plain,
join(composition(X1,X2),composition(X3,X2)) = composition(join(X1,X3),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jibudhd_/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
composition(converse(X1),converse(X2)) = converse(composition(X2,X1)),
i_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
i_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( join(composition(esk1_0,esk3_0),composition(esk2_0,esk3_0)) != composition(esk2_0,esk3_0)
| join(composition(esk3_0,esk1_0),composition(esk3_0,esk2_0)) != composition(esk3_0,esk2_0) ),
i_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
i_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
join(esk1_0,esk2_0) = esk2_0,
i_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
join(converse(X1),converse(X2)) = converse(join(X1,X2)),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
converse(composition(converse(X1),X2)) = composition(converse(X2),X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
join(composition(X1,X2),composition(X3,X2)) = composition(join(X1,X3),X2),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
( join(composition(esk2_0,esk3_0),composition(esk1_0,esk3_0)) != composition(esk2_0,esk3_0)
| join(composition(esk3_0,esk2_0),composition(esk3_0,esk1_0)) != composition(esk3_0,esk2_0) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
join(esk2_0,esk1_0) = esk2_0,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
converse(join(composition(converse(X1),X2),X3)) = join(composition(converse(X2),X1),converse(X3)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
join(composition(X1,converse(X2)),converse(composition(X2,X3))) = composition(join(X1,converse(X3)),converse(X2)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
join(composition(esk3_0,esk2_0),composition(esk3_0,esk1_0)) != composition(esk3_0,esk2_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_27]),c_0_29])]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
join(composition(X1,X2),composition(X1,X3)) = composition(X1,join(X2,X3)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_25]),c_0_20]),c_0_21]),c_0_21]),c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_29])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : REL009+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Fri Jul 8 11:04:01 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.21/0.47 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.21/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.21/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.18/2.55 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.18/2.55 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.18/2.55 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.18/2.55 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 8.18/2.55 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 8.18/2.55 #
% 8.18/2.55 # Preprocessing time : 0.019 s
% 8.18/2.55 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.18/2.55
% 8.18/2.55 # Proof found!
% 8.18/2.55 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.18/2.55 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.18/2.55 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.18/2.55
% 8.18/2.55 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.18/2.55 # User time : 0.035 s
% 8.18/2.55 # System time : 0.007 s
% 8.18/2.55 # Total time : 0.042 s
% 8.18/2.55 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 8.18/2.55
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------