TSTP Solution File: REL009+1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : REL009+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 02:31:25 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.36s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (  21 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   32 (  31 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   13 (   6   ~;   2   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   44 (   0 sgn  22   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(converse_multiplicativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : converse(composition(X1,X2)) = composition(converse(X2),converse(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',converse_multiplicativity) ).

fof(composition_distributivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : composition(join(X1,X2),X3) = join(composition(X1,X3),composition(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',composition_distributivity) ).

fof(converse_additivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : converse(join(X1,X2)) = join(converse(X1),converse(X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',converse_additivity) ).

fof(converse_idempotence,axiom,
    ! [X1] : converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',converse_idempotence) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( join(X1,X2) = X2
     => ( join(composition(X1,X3),composition(X2,X3)) = composition(X2,X3)
        & join(composition(X3,X1),composition(X3,X2)) = composition(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X13,X14] : converse(composition(X13,X14)) = composition(converse(X14),converse(X13)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[converse_multiplicativity]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X10,X11,X12] : composition(join(X10,X11),X12) = join(composition(X10,X12),composition(X11,X12)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[composition_distributivity]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X23,X24] : converse(join(X23,X24)) = join(converse(X23),converse(X24)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[converse_additivity]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    converse(composition(X1,X2)) = composition(converse(X2),converse(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    composition(join(X1,X2),X3) = join(composition(X1,X3),composition(X2,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    converse(join(X1,X2)) = join(converse(X1),converse(X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X22] : converse(converse(X22)) = X22,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[converse_idempotence]) ).

fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( join(X1,X2) = X2
       => ( join(composition(X1,X3),composition(X2,X3)) = composition(X2,X3)
          & join(composition(X3,X1),composition(X3,X2)) = composition(X3,X2) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    composition(converse(X1),join(converse(X2),converse(X3))) = join(composition(converse(X1),converse(X2)),composition(converse(X1),converse(X3))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10]),c_0_8]),c_0_8]),c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( join(esk1_0,esk2_0) = esk2_0
    & ( join(composition(esk1_0,esk3_0),composition(esk2_0,esk3_0)) != composition(esk2_0,esk3_0)
      | join(composition(esk3_0,esk1_0),composition(esk3_0,esk2_0)) != composition(esk3_0,esk2_0) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    composition(X1,join(converse(X2),converse(X3))) = join(composition(X1,converse(X2)),composition(X1,converse(X3))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    join(esk1_0,esk2_0) = esk2_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    composition(X1,join(converse(X2),X3)) = join(composition(X1,converse(X2)),composition(X1,X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( join(composition(esk1_0,esk3_0),composition(esk2_0,esk3_0)) != composition(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    | join(composition(esk3_0,esk1_0),composition(esk3_0,esk2_0)) != composition(esk3_0,esk2_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    join(composition(esk1_0,X1),composition(esk2_0,X1)) = composition(esk2_0,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    composition(X1,join(X2,X3)) = join(composition(X1,X2),composition(X1,X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    join(composition(esk3_0,esk1_0),composition(esk3_0,esk2_0)) != composition(esk3_0,esk2_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    join(composition(X1,esk1_0),composition(X1,esk2_0)) = composition(X1,esk2_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.07  % Problem    : REL009+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.08  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.08/0.27  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.27  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.27  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.27  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.27  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.27  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.08/0.27  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.08/0.27  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 08:32:37 EDT 2024
% 0.08/0.27  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.12/0.34  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.34  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.36  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.12/0.36  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.36  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.36  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.36  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.36  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.36  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.36  # new_bool_3 with pid 14148 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.36  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.12/0.36  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.36  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.36  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.36  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.36  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.12/0.36  # Search class: FUHPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.36  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.36  # Starting H----_047_B31_F1_PI_AE_R4_CS_SP_S2S with 181s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.36  # H----_047_B31_F1_PI_AE_R4_CS_SP_S2S with pid 14154 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.36  # Result found by H----_047_B31_F1_PI_AE_R4_CS_SP_S2S
% 0.12/0.36  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.36  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.36  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.36  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.36  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.12/0.36  # Search class: FUHPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.36  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.36  # Starting H----_047_B31_F1_PI_AE_R4_CS_SP_S2S with 181s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.36  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  # Proof found!
% 0.12/0.36  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.12/0.36  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.36  # Parsed axioms                        : 14
% 0.12/0.36  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 4
% 0.12/0.36  # Initial clauses                      : 11
% 0.12/0.36  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.12/0.36  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 11
% 0.12/0.36  # Processed clauses                    : 101
% 0.12/0.36  # ...of these trivial                  : 20
% 0.12/0.36  # ...subsumed                          : 50
% 0.12/0.36  # ...remaining for further processing  : 31
% 0.12/0.36  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.12/0.36  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.12/0.36  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.12/0.36  # Backward-rewritten                   : 7
% 0.12/0.36  # Generated clauses                    : 480
% 0.12/0.36  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 380
% 0.12/0.36  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.12/0.36  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.12/0.36  # Paramodulations                      : 480
% 0.12/0.36  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.12/0.36  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.12/0.36  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.12/0.36  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.12/0.36  # Total rewrite steps                  : 591
% 0.12/0.36  # ...of those cached                   : 324
% 0.12/0.36  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.12/0.36  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.12/0.36  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.12/0.36  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.12/0.36  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.12/0.36  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.12/0.36  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.12/0.36  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.12/0.36  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.12/0.36  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.12/0.36  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.12/0.36  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.12/0.36  # Current number of processed clauses  : 24
% 0.12/0.36  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 20
% 0.12/0.36  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4
% 0.12/0.36  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.12/0.36  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.12/0.36  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 280
% 0.12/0.36  # ...number of literals in the above   : 280
% 0.12/0.36  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.12/0.36  # Current number of archived clauses   : 7
% 0.12/0.36  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.12/0.36  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.12/0.36  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.12/0.36  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14
% 0.12/0.36  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.12/0.36  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 63
% 0.12/0.36  # BW rewrite match successes           : 61
% 0.12/0.36  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.12/0.36  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.12/0.36  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 5765
% 0.12/0.36  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 61
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36  # User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.12/0.36  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.12/0.36  # Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.12/0.36  # Maximum resident set size: 1760 pages
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36  # User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.12/0.36  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.12/0.36  # Total time               : 0.008 s
% 0.12/0.36  # Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages
% 0.12/0.36  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.12/0.36  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------