TSTP Solution File: REL008+4 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : REL008+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 19:19:01 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s 1.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   69 (  61 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   77 (  76 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   21 (  13   ~;   6   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   12 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  155 (   8 sgn  56   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : X1 = join(complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),complement(join(complement(X1),X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan) ).

fof(maddux1_join_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',maddux1_join_commutativity) ).

fof(modular_law_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : join(meet(composition(X1,X2),X3),meet(composition(X1,meet(X2,composition(converse(X1),X3))),X3)) = meet(composition(X1,meet(X2,composition(converse(X1),X3))),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+1.ax',modular_law_1) ).

fof(maddux4_definiton_of_meet,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : meet(X1,X2) = complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',maddux4_definiton_of_meet) ).

fof(maddux2_join_associativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : join(X1,join(X2,X3)) = join(join(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',maddux2_join_associativity) ).

fof(converse_multiplicativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : converse(composition(X1,X2)) = composition(converse(X2),converse(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',converse_multiplicativity) ).

fof(composition_distributivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : composition(join(X1,X2),X3) = join(composition(X1,X3),composition(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',composition_distributivity) ).

fof(converse_additivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : converse(join(X1,X2)) = join(converse(X1),converse(X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',converse_additivity) ).

fof(converse_cancellativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : join(composition(converse(X1),complement(composition(X1,X2))),complement(X2)) = complement(X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',converse_cancellativity) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( join(join(composition(X1,join(X2,X3)),composition(X1,X2)),composition(X1,X3)) = join(composition(X1,X2),composition(X1,X3))
      & join(join(composition(X1,X2),composition(X1,X3)),composition(X1,join(X2,X3))) = composition(X1,join(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',goals) ).

fof(converse_idempotence,axiom,
    ! [X1] : converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',converse_idempotence) ).

fof(composition_associativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : composition(X1,composition(X2,X3)) = composition(composition(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',composition_associativity) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : X3 = join(complement(join(complement(X3),complement(X4))),complement(join(complement(X3),X4))),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : join(X3,X4) = join(X4,X3),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[maddux1_join_commutativity]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] : join(meet(composition(X4,X5),X6),meet(composition(X4,meet(X5,composition(converse(X4),X6))),X6)) = meet(composition(X4,meet(X5,composition(converse(X4),X6))),X6),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[modular_law_1]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : meet(X3,X4) = complement(join(complement(X3),complement(X4))),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[maddux4_definiton_of_meet]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    X1 = join(complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),complement(join(complement(X1),X2))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    join(meet(composition(X1,X2),X3),meet(composition(X1,meet(X2,composition(converse(X1),X3))),X3)) = meet(composition(X1,meet(X2,composition(converse(X1),X3))),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    meet(X1,X2) = complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] : join(X4,join(X5,X6)) = join(join(X4,X5),X6),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[maddux2_join_associativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    join(complement(join(complement(X1),X2)),complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2)))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    join(complement(join(complement(composition(X1,X2)),complement(X3))),complement(join(complement(composition(X1,complement(join(complement(X2),complement(composition(converse(X1),X3)))))),complement(X3)))) = complement(join(complement(composition(X1,complement(join(complement(X2),complement(composition(converse(X1),X3)))))),complement(X3))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_19]),c_0_19]),c_0_19]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    join(X1,join(X2,X3)) = join(join(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    join(complement(join(complement(X1),X2)),complement(join(complement(X2),complement(X1)))) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_17]) ).

fof(c_0_25,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : converse(composition(X3,X4)) = composition(converse(X4),converse(X3)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[converse_multiplicativity]) ).

fof(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] : composition(join(X4,X5),X6) = join(composition(X4,X6),composition(X5,X6)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[composition_distributivity]) ).

fof(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : converse(join(X3,X4)) = join(converse(X3),converse(X4)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[converse_additivity]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    join(complement(join(complement(composition(X1,X2)),complement(X3))),complement(join(complement(X3),complement(composition(X1,complement(join(complement(X2),complement(composition(converse(X1),X3))))))))) = complement(join(complement(X3),complement(composition(X1,complement(join(complement(X2),complement(composition(converse(X1),X3)))))))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_17]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    join(complement(join(complement(X1),X2)),join(complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),X3)) = join(X1,X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    join(complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),complement(join(complement(X2),X1))) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_24]) ).

fof(c_0_31,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : join(composition(converse(X3),complement(composition(X3,X4))),complement(X4)) = complement(X4),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[converse_cancellativity]) ).

fof(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( join(join(composition(X1,join(X2,X3)),composition(X1,X2)),composition(X1,X3)) = join(composition(X1,X2),composition(X1,X3))
        & join(join(composition(X1,X2),composition(X1,X3)),composition(X1,join(X2,X3))) = composition(X1,join(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    converse(composition(X1,X2)) = composition(converse(X2),converse(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    composition(join(X1,X2),X3) = join(composition(X1,X3),composition(X2,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    converse(join(X1,X2)) = join(converse(X1),converse(X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

fof(c_0_36,plain,
    ! [X2] : converse(converse(X2)) = X2,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[converse_idempotence]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    join(X1,join(X2,X3)) = join(X2,join(X1,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_17]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    join(complement(join(complement(composition(X1,X2)),complement(X3))),join(complement(join(complement(X3),complement(composition(X1,complement(join(complement(X2),complement(composition(converse(X1),X3)))))))),X4)) = join(complement(join(complement(X3),complement(composition(X1,complement(join(complement(X2),complement(composition(converse(X1),X3)))))))),X4),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    join(X1,complement(join(complement(X2),X1))) = join(X2,complement(join(complement(X1),X2))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    join(composition(converse(X1),complement(composition(X1,X2))),complement(X2)) = complement(X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).

fof(c_0_41,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] : composition(X4,composition(X5,X6)) = composition(composition(X4,X5),X6),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[composition_associativity]) ).

fof(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ( join(join(composition(esk1_0,join(esk2_0,esk3_0)),composition(esk1_0,esk2_0)),composition(esk1_0,esk3_0)) != join(composition(esk1_0,esk2_0),composition(esk1_0,esk3_0))
    | join(join(composition(esk4_0,esk5_0),composition(esk4_0,esk6_0)),composition(esk4_0,join(esk5_0,esk6_0))) != composition(esk4_0,join(esk5_0,esk6_0)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_32])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    composition(converse(X1),join(converse(X2),converse(X3))) = join(composition(converse(X1),converse(X2)),composition(converse(X1),converse(X3))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_35]),c_0_33]),c_0_33]),c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    join(complement(join(complement(X1),X2)),join(X3,complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))))) = join(X3,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    join(X1,complement(join(complement(composition(X2,X3)),complement(X1)))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_21]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    join(X1,complement(join(complement(X2),X1))) = join(X2,complement(join(X2,complement(X1)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    join(X1,join(complement(join(complement(composition(X2,X3)),complement(X1))),X4)) = join(X1,X4),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_29]),c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    join(complement(X1),composition(converse(X2),complement(composition(X2,X1)))) = complement(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    composition(X1,composition(X2,X3)) = composition(composition(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    ( join(join(composition(esk4_0,esk5_0),composition(esk4_0,esk6_0)),composition(esk4_0,join(esk5_0,esk6_0))) != composition(esk4_0,join(esk5_0,esk6_0))
    | join(join(composition(esk1_0,join(esk2_0,esk3_0)),composition(esk1_0,esk2_0)),composition(esk1_0,esk3_0)) != join(composition(esk1_0,esk2_0),composition(esk1_0,esk3_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    composition(X1,join(converse(X2),converse(X3))) = join(composition(X1,converse(X2)),composition(X1,converse(X3))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    join(composition(X1,X2),complement(join(composition(X1,X2),complement(X3)))) = join(X3,composition(X1,X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]),c_0_17]),c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,plain,
    join(X1,complement(join(complement(X1),composition(X2,X3)))) = join(X1,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,plain,
    join(complement(X1),composition(converse(X2),composition(converse(X3),complement(composition(X3,composition(X2,X1)))))) = complement(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_50]),c_0_33]),c_0_50]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
    ( join(composition(esk1_0,esk3_0),join(composition(esk1_0,esk2_0),composition(esk1_0,join(esk2_0,esk3_0)))) != join(composition(esk1_0,esk2_0),composition(esk1_0,esk3_0))
    | join(composition(esk4_0,esk5_0),join(composition(esk4_0,esk6_0),composition(esk4_0,join(esk5_0,esk6_0)))) != composition(esk4_0,join(esk5_0,esk6_0)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_17]),c_0_17]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,plain,
    composition(X1,join(converse(X2),X3)) = join(composition(X1,converse(X2)),composition(X1,X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,plain,
    join(composition(X1,X2),complement(join(composition(X1,X2),complement(X3)))) = join(composition(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_53]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,plain,
    join(X1,complement(complement(X1))) = join(X1,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_55]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,negated_conjecture,
    ( join(composition(esk1_0,esk2_0),join(composition(esk1_0,esk3_0),composition(esk1_0,join(esk2_0,esk3_0)))) != join(composition(esk1_0,esk2_0),composition(esk1_0,esk3_0))
    | join(composition(esk4_0,esk5_0),join(composition(esk4_0,esk6_0),composition(esk4_0,join(esk5_0,esk6_0)))) != composition(esk4_0,join(esk5_0,esk6_0)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,plain,
    composition(X1,join(X2,X3)) = join(composition(X1,X2),composition(X1,X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_62,plain,
    join(composition(X1,X2),join(composition(X1,X2),complement(X3))) = join(composition(X1,X2),complement(join(composition(X1,X2),X3))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_58]) ).

cnf(c_0_63,plain,
    join(X1,complement(complement(complement(join(complement(composition(X2,X3)),complement(X1)))))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_59]),c_0_48]),c_0_46]) ).

cnf(c_0_64,negated_conjecture,
    ( join(composition(esk1_0,esk2_0),join(composition(esk1_0,esk2_0),join(composition(esk1_0,esk3_0),composition(esk1_0,esk3_0)))) != join(composition(esk1_0,esk2_0),composition(esk1_0,esk3_0))
    | join(composition(esk4_0,esk5_0),join(composition(esk4_0,esk5_0),join(composition(esk4_0,esk6_0),composition(esk4_0,esk6_0)))) != join(composition(esk4_0,esk5_0),composition(esk4_0,esk6_0)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_61]),c_0_37]),c_0_61]),c_0_37]),c_0_61]) ).

cnf(c_0_65,plain,
    join(composition(X1,X2),composition(X1,X2)) = composition(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_62,c_0_63]),c_0_58]),c_0_46]) ).

cnf(c_0_66,negated_conjecture,
    ( join(composition(esk1_0,esk2_0),join(composition(esk1_0,esk2_0),composition(esk1_0,esk3_0))) != join(composition(esk1_0,esk2_0),composition(esk1_0,esk3_0))
    | join(composition(esk4_0,esk5_0),join(composition(esk4_0,esk5_0),composition(esk4_0,esk6_0))) != join(composition(esk4_0,esk5_0),composition(esk4_0,esk6_0)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_65]),c_0_65]) ).

cnf(c_0_67,plain,
    join(composition(X1,X2),join(composition(X1,X2),X3)) = join(composition(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_65]) ).

cnf(c_0_68,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_66,c_0_67]),c_0_67])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : REL008+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Jul  8 11:08:01 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.23/1.41  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.41  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.23/1.41  # Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 0.23/1.41  
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.41  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.41  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object total steps             : 69
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object clause steps            : 44
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object formula steps           : 25
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object conjectures             : 9
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 6
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 12
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 12
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object generating inferences   : 23
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 39
% 0.23/1.41  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.41  # Parsed axioms                        : 17
% 0.23/1.41  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 3
% 0.23/1.41  # Initial clauses                      : 14
% 0.23/1.41  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.23/1.41  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 13
% 0.23/1.41  # Processed clauses                    : 798
% 0.23/1.41  # ...of these trivial                  : 442
% 0.23/1.41  # ...subsumed                          : 156
% 0.23/1.41  # ...remaining for further processing  : 200
% 0.23/1.41  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Backward-rewritten                   : 22
% 0.23/1.41  # Generated clauses                    : 20845
% 0.23/1.41  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 19195
% 0.23/1.41  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Paramodulations                      : 20845
% 0.23/1.41  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of processed clauses  : 178
% 0.23/1.41  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 168
% 0.23/1.41  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 10
% 0.23/1.41  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.23/1.41  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 16352
% 0.23/1.41  # ...number of literals in the above   : 16352
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of archived clauses   : 23
% 0.23/1.41  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6
% 0.23/1.41  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 0.23/1.41  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 6
% 0.23/1.41  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 491
% 0.23/1.41  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 912
% 0.23/1.41  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2261
% 0.23/1.41  # BW rewrite match successes           : 717
% 0.23/1.41  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1220673
% 0.23/1.41  
% 0.23/1.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.41  # User time                : 0.812 s
% 0.23/1.41  # System time              : 0.015 s
% 0.23/1.41  # Total time               : 0.827 s
% 0.23/1.41  # Maximum resident set size: 29896 pages
% 0.23/23.41  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.23/23.42  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.42  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------