TSTP Solution File: REL008+3 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : REL008+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 19:12:56 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 10.11s 2.72s
% Output : CNFRefutation 10.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 18 ( 18 unt; 0 nHn; 3 RR)
% Number of literals : 18 ( 17 equ; 2 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 35 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_7,plain,
composition(converse(X1),converse(X2)) = converse(composition(X2,X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-f38c1tuo/lgb.p',i_0_7) ).
cnf(i_0_6,plain,
converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-f38c1tuo/lgb.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(i_0_4,plain,
join(converse(X1),converse(X2)) = converse(join(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-f38c1tuo/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(i_0_2,plain,
join(composition(X1,X2),composition(X3,X2)) = composition(join(X1,X3),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-f38c1tuo/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(i_0_11,negated_conjecture,
join(composition(esk1_0,esk2_0),composition(esk1_0,esk3_0)) != composition(esk1_0,join(esk2_0,esk3_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-f38c1tuo/lgb.p',i_0_11) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
composition(converse(X1),converse(X2)) = converse(composition(X2,X1)),
i_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
i_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
join(converse(X1),converse(X2)) = converse(join(X1,X2)),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
converse(composition(X1,converse(X2))) = composition(X2,converse(X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
converse(join(X1,converse(X2))) = join(converse(X1),X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
join(composition(X1,X2),composition(X3,X2)) = composition(join(X1,X3),X2),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
join(converse(X1),composition(X2,converse(X3))) = converse(join(X1,composition(X3,converse(X2)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
composition(join(converse(X1),X2),converse(X3)) = converse(composition(X3,join(X1,converse(X2)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
converse(join(composition(X1,X2),composition(X1,converse(X3)))) = converse(composition(X1,join(X2,converse(X3)))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_17]),c_0_23]),c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
join(composition(X1,X2),composition(X1,converse(X3))) = composition(X1,join(X2,converse(X3))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_25]),c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
join(composition(esk1_0,esk2_0),composition(esk1_0,esk3_0)) != composition(esk1_0,join(esk2_0,esk3_0)),
i_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
join(composition(X1,X2),composition(X1,X3)) = composition(X1,join(X2,X3)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : REL008+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jul 8 13:34:40 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.45 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 10.11/2.72 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 10.11/2.72 # No SInE strategy applied
% 10.11/2.72 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 10.11/2.72 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic H_____047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_S2S
% 10.11/2.72 # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 10.11/2.72 #
% 10.11/2.72 # Preprocessing time : 0.022 s
% 10.11/2.72 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 10.11/2.72
% 10.11/2.72 # Proof found!
% 10.11/2.72 # SZS status Theorem
% 10.11/2.72 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 10.11/2.72 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 10.11/2.72
% 10.11/2.72 # -------------------------------------------------
% 10.11/2.72 # User time : 0.155 s
% 10.11/2.72 # System time : 0.017 s
% 10.11/2.72 # Total time : 0.173 s
% 10.11/2.72 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 10.11/2.72
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------