TSTP Solution File: REL003-1 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : REL003-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 13:35:43 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.60s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (   8 unt;  10 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   24 (  23 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   16 (   8   ~;   8   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    8 (   5   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   0 sgn;   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    join: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    complement: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    meet: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    composition: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    one: $i ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    converse: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    top: $i ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    zero: $i ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    sk1: $i ).

tff(decl_31,type,
    sk2: $i ).

cnf(goals_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( join(sk1,sk2) = sk2
    | join(converse(sk1),converse(sk2)) = converse(sk2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals_14) ).

cnf(maddux1_join_commutativity_1,axiom,
    join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',maddux1_join_commutativity_1) ).

cnf(goals_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( join(sk1,sk2) != sk2
    | join(converse(sk1),converse(sk2)) != converse(sk2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals_17) ).

cnf(converse_additivity_9,axiom,
    converse(join(X1,X2)) = join(converse(X1),converse(X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',converse_additivity_9) ).

cnf(converse_idempotence_8,axiom,
    converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',converse_idempotence_8) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( join(sk1,sk2) = sk2
    | join(converse(sk1),converse(sk2)) = converse(sk2) ),
    goals_14 ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
    maddux1_join_commutativity_1 ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( join(sk1,sk2) != sk2
    | join(converse(sk1),converse(sk2)) != converse(sk2) ),
    goals_17 ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( join(converse(sk2),converse(sk1)) = converse(sk2)
    | join(sk2,sk1) = sk2 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    converse(join(X1,X2)) = join(converse(X1),converse(X2)),
    converse_additivity_9 ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( join(converse(sk2),converse(sk1)) != converse(sk2)
    | join(sk2,sk1) != sk2 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_6]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
    converse_idempotence_8 ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( converse(join(sk2,sk1)) = converse(sk2)
    | join(sk2,sk1) = sk2 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( converse(join(sk2,sk1)) != converse(sk2)
    | join(sk2,sk1) != sk2 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    join(sk2,sk1) = sk2,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_11])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_14])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem    : REL003-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Fri Aug 25 19:35:02 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.58  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.60  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.21/0.60  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.60  % Proof found
% 0.21/0.60  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.60  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.60  % Total time : 0.003000 s
% 0.21/0.60  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.21/0.60  % Total time : 0.006000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------