TSTP Solution File: REL003+1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : REL003+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:13:29 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.52s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   47 (  19 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   93 (  66 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   76 (  30   ~;  26   |;  11   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   3 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   23 (  19   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f138,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f62,f63,f125,f137]) ).

fof(f137,plain,
    ( ~ spl6_1
    | spl6_2 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f136]) ).

fof(f136,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl6_1
    | spl6_2 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f135,f61]) ).

fof(f61,plain,
    ( sF5 != sF4
    | spl6_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f59]) ).

fof(f59,plain,
    ( spl6_2
  <=> sF5 = sF4 ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl6_2])]) ).

fof(f135,plain,
    ( sF5 = sF4
    | ~ spl6_1 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f134,f49]) ).

fof(f49,plain,
    sF4 = converse(sK0),
    introduced(function_definition,[]) ).

fof(f134,plain,
    ( sF5 = converse(sK0)
    | ~ spl6_1 ),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f130,f56]) ).

fof(f56,plain,
    ( sK0 = sF2
    | ~ spl6_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f55]) ).

fof(f55,plain,
    ( spl6_1
  <=> sK0 = sF2 ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl6_1])]) ).

fof(f130,plain,
    converse(sF2) = sF5,
    inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f108,f50]) ).

fof(f50,plain,
    sF5 = join(sF3,sF4),
    introduced(function_definition,[]) ).

fof(f108,plain,
    converse(sF2) = join(sF3,sF4),
    inference(superposition,[],[f107,f39]) ).

fof(f39,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0),
    inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X0] : join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',maddux1_join_commutativity) ).

fof(f107,plain,
    converse(sF2) = join(sF4,sF3),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f101,f73]) ).

fof(f73,plain,
    sF2 = join(sK0,sK1),
    inference(superposition,[],[f39,f46]) ).

fof(f46,plain,
    join(sK1,sK0) = sF2,
    introduced(function_definition,[]) ).

fof(f101,plain,
    join(sF4,sF3) = converse(join(sK0,sK1)),
    inference(superposition,[],[f75,f48]) ).

fof(f48,plain,
    converse(sK1) = sF3,
    introduced(function_definition,[]) ).

fof(f75,plain,
    ! [X2] : converse(join(sK0,X2)) = join(sF4,converse(X2)),
    inference(superposition,[],[f29,f49]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : converse(join(X0,X1)) = join(converse(X0),converse(X1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : converse(join(X0,X1)) = join(converse(X0),converse(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',converse_additivity) ).

fof(f125,plain,
    ( spl6_1
    | ~ spl6_2 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f124]) ).

fof(f124,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl6_1
    | ~ spl6_2 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f123,f57]) ).

fof(f57,plain,
    ( sK0 != sF2
    | spl6_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f55]) ).

fof(f123,plain,
    ( sK0 = sF2
    | ~ spl6_2 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f122,f67]) ).

fof(f67,plain,
    converse(sF4) = sK0,
    inference(superposition,[],[f35,f49]) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    ! [X0] : converse(converse(X0)) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0] : converse(converse(X0)) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',converse_idempotence) ).

fof(f122,plain,
    ( converse(sF4) = sF2
    | ~ spl6_2 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f35,f112]) ).

fof(f112,plain,
    ( converse(sF2) = sF4
    | ~ spl6_2 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f108,f65]) ).

fof(f65,plain,
    ( sF4 = join(sF3,sF4)
    | ~ spl6_2 ),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f50,f60]) ).

fof(f60,plain,
    ( sF5 = sF4
    | ~ spl6_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f59]) ).

fof(f63,plain,
    ( spl6_1
    | spl6_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f51,f59,f55]) ).

fof(f51,plain,
    ( sF5 = sF4
    | sK0 = sF2 ),
    inference(definition_folding,[],[f43,f49,f50,f49,f48,f46]) ).

fof(f43,plain,
    ( join(sK1,sK0) = sK0
    | join(converse(sK1),converse(sK0)) = converse(sK0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ( ( join(sK1,sK0) = sK0
      & join(converse(sK1),converse(sK0)) != converse(sK0) )
    | ( join(sK1,sK0) != sK0
      & join(converse(sK1),converse(sK0)) = converse(sK0) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f21,f26]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1] :
        ( ( join(X1,X0) = X0
          & converse(X0) != join(converse(X1),converse(X0)) )
        | ( join(X1,X0) != X0
          & converse(X0) = join(converse(X1),converse(X0)) ) )
   => ( ( join(sK1,sK0) = sK0
        & join(converse(sK1),converse(sK0)) != converse(sK0) )
      | ( join(sK1,sK0) != sK0
        & join(converse(sK1),converse(sK0)) = converse(sK0) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( ( join(X1,X0) = X0
        & converse(X0) != join(converse(X1),converse(X0)) )
      | ( join(X1,X0) != X0
        & converse(X0) = join(converse(X1),converse(X0)) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ~ ! [X1,X0] :
        ( ( join(X1,X0) = X0
         => converse(X0) = join(converse(X1),converse(X0)) )
        & ( converse(X0) = join(converse(X1),converse(X0))
         => join(X1,X0) = X0 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X0] :
        ( ( converse(X1) = join(converse(X0),converse(X1))
         => join(X0,X1) = X1 )
        & ( join(X0,X1) = X1
         => converse(X1) = join(converse(X0),converse(X1)) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f14,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X0] :
      ( ( converse(X1) = join(converse(X0),converse(X1))
       => join(X0,X1) = X1 )
      & ( join(X0,X1) = X1
       => converse(X1) = join(converse(X0),converse(X1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(f62,plain,
    ( ~ spl6_1
    | ~ spl6_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f52,f59,f55]) ).

fof(f52,plain,
    ( sF5 != sF4
    | sK0 != sF2 ),
    inference(definition_folding,[],[f42,f46,f49,f50,f49,f48]) ).

fof(f42,plain,
    ( join(converse(sK1),converse(sK0)) != converse(sK0)
    | join(sK1,sK0) != sK0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : REL003+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 11:08:17 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.50  % (25329)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.20/0.50  % (25329)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.50  % (25346)ott+4_1:1_av=off:bd=off:nwc=5.0:rp=on:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsql=off:slsqr=1,2:sp=frequency:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.20/0.51  % (25339)ott+10_1:28_bd=off:bs=on:tgt=ground:i=101:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/101Mi)
% 0.20/0.51  % (25328)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.20/0.51  % (25340)ott+10_1:5_bd=off:tgt=full:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99Mi)
% 0.20/0.52  % (25329)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.52  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.52  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.52  % (25329)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52  % (25329)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.52  % (25329)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.52  % (25329)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.52  
% 0.20/0.52  % (25329)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.20/0.52  % (25329)Time elapsed: 0.101 s
% 0.20/0.52  % (25329)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.20/0.52  % (25329)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52  % (25329)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52  % (25322)Success in time 0.161 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------