TSTP Solution File: REL002+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : REL002+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 19:18:52 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s 1.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (  25 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   25 (  24 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (   2 sgn  18   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(maddux2_join_associativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : join(X1,join(X2,X3)) = join(join(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',maddux2_join_associativity) ).

fof(def_top,axiom,
    ! [X1] : top = join(X1,complement(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',def_top) ).

fof(maddux1_join_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',maddux1_join_commutativity) ).

fof(maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : X1 = join(complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),complement(join(complement(X1),X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X1] : join(X1,top) = top,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',goals) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] : join(X4,join(X5,X6)) = join(join(X4,X5),X6),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[maddux2_join_associativity]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X2] : top = join(X2,complement(X2)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[def_top]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    join(X1,join(X2,X3)) = join(join(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    top = join(X1,complement(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : join(X3,X4) = join(X4,X3),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[maddux1_join_commutativity]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : X3 = join(complement(join(complement(X3),complement(X4))),complement(join(complement(X3),X4))),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    join(X1,join(complement(X1),X2)) = join(top,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    X1 = join(complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),complement(join(complement(X1),X2))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    join(X1,join(X2,complement(X1))) = join(top,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    join(complement(join(complement(X1),X2)),complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2)))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] : join(X1,top) = top,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    join(X1,join(X2,complement(X1))) = join(X2,top),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    join(complement(top),complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X1)))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_8]),c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    join(esk1_0,top) != top,
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    join(top,complement(complement(X1))) = join(X1,top),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    join(top,complement(X1)) = top,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_7]),c_0_12]),c_0_8]),c_0_12]),c_0_12]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    join(esk1_0,top) != top,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    join(X1,top) = top,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : REL002+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Jul  8 08:45:44 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.23/1.41  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.41  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.23/1.41  # Preprocessing time       : 0.014 s
% 0.23/1.41  
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.41  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.41  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object total steps             : 25
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object clause steps            : 14
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object formula steps           : 11
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object conjectures             : 5
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 2
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 5
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 5
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object generating inferences   : 6
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 11
% 0.23/1.41  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.41  # Parsed axioms                        : 14
% 0.23/1.41  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 3
% 0.23/1.41  # Initial clauses                      : 11
% 0.23/1.41  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 11
% 0.23/1.41  # Processed clauses                    : 89
% 0.23/1.41  # ...of these trivial                  : 27
% 0.23/1.41  # ...subsumed                          : 20
% 0.23/1.41  # ...remaining for further processing  : 42
% 0.23/1.41  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Backward-rewritten                   : 10
% 0.23/1.41  # Generated clauses                    : 674
% 0.23/1.41  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 583
% 0.23/1.41  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Paramodulations                      : 674
% 0.23/1.41  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of processed clauses  : 32
% 0.23/1.41  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 29
% 0.23/1.41  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.23/1.41  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.23/1.41  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 404
% 0.23/1.41  # ...number of literals in the above   : 404
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of archived clauses   : 10
% 0.23/1.41  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 0.23/1.41  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 5
% 0.23/1.41  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 49
% 0.23/1.41  # BW rewrite match successes           : 43
% 0.23/1.41  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 7984
% 0.23/1.41  
% 0.23/1.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.41  # User time                : 0.021 s
% 0.23/1.41  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.23/1.41  # Total time               : 0.025 s
% 0.23/1.41  # Maximum resident set size: 3340 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------