TSTP Solution File: REL001+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : REL001+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 19:12:47 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 5.25s 2.15s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 5.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   35 (  35 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   35 (  34 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   43 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_7,plain,
    composition(converse(X1),converse(X2)) = converse(composition(X2,X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3kz3sn6c/lgb.p',i_0_7) ).

cnf(i_0_6,plain,
    converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3kz3sn6c/lgb.p',i_0_6) ).

cnf(i_0_3,plain,
    composition(X1,one) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3kz3sn6c/lgb.p',i_0_3) ).

cnf(i_0_5,plain,
    join(composition(converse(X1),complement(composition(X1,X2))),complement(X2)) = complement(X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3kz3sn6c/lgb.p',i_0_5) ).

cnf(i_0_11,plain,
    join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3kz3sn6c/lgb.p',i_0_11) ).

cnf(i_0_9,plain,
    complement(join(complement(X1),complement(complement(X1)))) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3kz3sn6c/lgb.p',i_0_9) ).

cnf(i_0_8,plain,
    join(X1,complement(X1)) = top,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3kz3sn6c/lgb.p',i_0_8) ).

cnf(i_0_13,plain,
    join(complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),complement(join(complement(X1),X2))) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3kz3sn6c/lgb.p',i_0_13) ).

cnf(i_0_12,plain,
    join(join(X1,X2),X3) = join(X1,join(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3kz3sn6c/lgb.p',i_0_12) ).

cnf(i_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    join(zero,esk1_0) != esk1_0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3kz3sn6c/lgb.p',i_0_10) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    composition(converse(X1),converse(X2)) = converse(composition(X2,X1)),
    i_0_7 ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
    i_0_6 ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    converse(composition(converse(X1),X2)) = composition(converse(X2),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    composition(X1,one) = X1,
    i_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    composition(converse(one),X1) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    join(composition(converse(X1),complement(composition(X1,X2))),complement(X2)) = complement(X2),
    i_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
    i_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    converse(one) = one,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    join(complement(X1),composition(converse(X2),complement(composition(X2,X1)))) = complement(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    composition(one,X1) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    complement(join(complement(X1),complement(complement(X1)))) = zero,
    i_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    join(X1,complement(X1)) = top,
    i_0_8 ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    join(complement(X1),complement(X1)) = complement(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_31]),c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    complement(top) = zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    join(complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),complement(join(complement(X1),X2))) = X1,
    i_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    join(join(X1,X2),X3) = join(X1,join(X2,X3)),
    i_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    join(zero,zero) = zero,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    join(complement(join(complement(X1),X2)),complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2)))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    join(zero,join(zero,X1)) = join(zero,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    join(zero,complement(complement(X1))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_35]),c_0_36]),c_0_37]),c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    join(zero,esk1_0) != esk1_0,
    i_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    join(zero,X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    join(esk1_0,zero) != esk1_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    join(X1,zero) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : REL001+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Jul  8 11:04:31 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.39  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.40  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.40  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.19/0.40  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.19/0.40  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 5.25/2.15  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 5.25/2.15  # No SInE strategy applied
% 5.25/2.15  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 5.25/2.15  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic H_____047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_S2S
% 5.25/2.15  # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 5.25/2.15  #
% 5.25/2.15  # Preprocessing time       : 0.012 s
% 5.25/2.15  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 5.25/2.15  
% 5.25/2.15  # Proof found!
% 5.25/2.15  # SZS status Theorem
% 5.25/2.15  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.25/2.15  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 5.25/2.15  
% 5.25/2.15  # -------------------------------------------------
% 5.25/2.15  # User time                : 0.010 s
% 5.25/2.15  # System time              : 0.009 s
% 5.25/2.15  # Total time               : 0.019 s
% 5.25/2.15  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 5.25/2.15  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------