TSTP Solution File: QUA007^1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : QUA007^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 02:30:32 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 3.82s 0.91s
% Output : Refutation 3.82s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : QUA007^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.14/0.15 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Mon May 20 13:37:38 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.36 This is a TH0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.15/0.36 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.38 % (1677)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (1678)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (1679)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (1680)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (1681)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (1682)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (1683)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (1684)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (1681)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.38 % (1681)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (1681)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.38 % (1681)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.38 % (1681)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.15/0.38
% 0.15/0.38 % (1681)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.15/0.38 % (1681)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.38 % (1681)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.38 % (1681)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (1681)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (1680)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.38 % (1680)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (1680)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.38 % (1680)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.38 % (1680)Termination phase: Function definition elimination
% 0.15/0.38
% 0.15/0.38 % (1680)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.15/0.38 % (1680)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.38 % (1680)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.15/0.38 % (1680)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (1680)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (1684)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.38 % (1684)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (1684)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.39 % (1684)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.39 % (1684)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39 % (1684)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.15/0.39 % (1684)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.39 % (1684)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.15/0.39 % (1682)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.39 % (1682)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (1682)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.39 % (1682)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39 % (1682)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.39 % (1682)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.39 % (1682)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.15/0.39 % (1682)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (1682)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (1684)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (1684)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (1678)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.39 % (1678)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (1678)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.39 % (1678)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.39 % (1678)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39 % (1678)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.15/0.39 % (1678)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.39 % (1678)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.15/0.39 % (1678)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (1678)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (1679)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.39 % (1679)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (1679)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.39 % (1679)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39 % (1679)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.39 % (1679)Time elapsed: 0.007 s
% 0.15/0.39 % (1679)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.15/0.39 % (1679)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (1679)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (1683)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.39 % (1683)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (1683)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.39 % (1683)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.39 % (1683)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39 % (1683)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 0.15/0.39 % (1683)Time elapsed: 0.014 s
% 0.15/0.39 % (1683)Instructions burned: 18 (million)
% 0.15/0.39 % (1683)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (1683)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.40 % (1685)lrs+1002_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_not_be_gen:hud=14:prag=on:sp=weighted_frequency:tnu=1:i=37:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/37Mi)
% 0.15/0.40 % (1686)lrs+2_16:1_acc=model:au=on:bd=off:c=on:e2e=on:nm=2:sos=all:i=15:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/15Mi)
% 0.15/0.40 % (1687)dis+21_1:1_cbe=off:cnfonf=off:fs=off:fsr=off:hud=1:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.15/0.40 % (1688)lrs+1002_1:1_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_gen:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=4203469,65536:i=1041:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/1041Mi)
% 0.15/0.40 % (1689)lrs+10_1:1_av=off:chr=on:plsq=on:slsq=on:i=7:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.15/0.40 % (1687)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.40 % (1687)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.40 % (1687)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.40 % (1687)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.40 % (1687)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.15/0.40
% 0.15/0.40 % (1687)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.15/0.40 % (1687)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.40 % (1687)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.15/0.40 % (1687)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.40 % (1687)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.40 % (1690)lrs+10_1:1_acc=on:amm=sco:cs=on:tgt=full:i=16:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/16Mi)
% 0.15/0.40 % (1686)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.40 % (1686)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.40 % (1686)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.41 % (1686)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.41
% 0.15/0.41
% 0.15/0.41 % (1686)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 0.15/0.41 % (1686)Time elapsed: 0.007 s
% 0.15/0.41 % (1686)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.15/0.41 % (1686)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41 % (1686)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41 % (1689)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.41 % (1689)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41 % (1689)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.41 % (1689)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.41 % (1689)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.41
% 0.15/0.41 % (1689)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.15/0.41 % (1689)Time elapsed: 0.007 s
% 0.15/0.41 % (1689)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.15/0.41 % (1689)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41 % (1689)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41 % (1692)lrs+21_1:1_au=on:cnfonf=off:fd=preordered:fe=off:fsr=off:hud=11:inj=on:kws=precedence:s2pl=no:sp=weighted_frequency:tgt=full:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.15/0.41 % (1692)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.41 % (1692)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41 % (1692)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.41 % (1692)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.41 % (1692)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.15/0.41
% 0.15/0.41 % (1692)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.15/0.41 % (1692)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.41 % (1692)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.15/0.41 % (1692)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41 % (1692)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 % (1690)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.42 % (1690)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 % (1690)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.42 % (1690)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.42 % (1690)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 % (1690)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.15/0.42 % (1690)Time elapsed: 0.014 s
% 0.15/0.42 % (1690)Instructions burned: 16 (million)
% 0.15/0.42 % (1690)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 % (1690)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 % (1693)lrs+2_1:1_apa=on:au=on:bd=preordered:cnfonf=off:cs=on:ixr=off:sos=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.15/0.42 % (1693)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.42 % (1693)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 % (1693)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.42 % (1693)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.42 % (1693)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 % (1693)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.15/0.42 % (1693)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.42 % (1693)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.15/0.42 % (1693)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 % (1693)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 % (1688)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.42 % (1688)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 % (1688)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.42 % (1688)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 % (1688)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.15/0.42 % (1688)Time elapsed: 0.044 s
% 0.15/0.42 % (1688)Instructions burned: 27 (million)
% 0.15/0.42 % (1688)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 % (1688)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 % (1694)lrs+10_1:1_cnfonf=off:cs=on:hud=3:prag=on:sup=off:i=7:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.15/0.42 % (1695)dis+1002_1:1_add=large:cnfonf=lazy_pi_sigma_gen:fe=off:prag=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.15/0.42 % (1685)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.42 % (1685)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 % (1685)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.42 % (1685)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.42 % (1685)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 % (1685)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.15/0.42 % (1685)Time elapsed: 0.046 s
% 0.15/0.42 % (1685)Instructions burned: 38 (million)
% 0.15/0.42 % (1685)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 % (1685)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 % (1695)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.42 % (1695)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 % (1695)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.42 % (1695)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.42 % (1695)Termination phase: Function definition elimination
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 % (1695)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.15/0.42 % (1695)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.42 % (1695)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.15/0.42 % (1695)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 % (1695)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 % (1694)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.42 % (1694)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 % (1694)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.42 % (1694)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 % (1694)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.42 % (1694)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.42 % (1694)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.15/0.42 % (1694)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 % (1694)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43 % (1696)dis+1004_1:1_cha=on:cs=on:fe=off:hud=1:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 0.15/0.43 % (1696)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.43 % (1696)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43 % (1696)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.43 % (1696)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.43 % (1696)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 % (1696)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.15/0.43 % (1696)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.43 % (1696)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.15/0.43 % (1696)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43 % (1696)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43 % (1697)lrs+1002_1:1_anc=all_dependent:au=on:cbe=off:fde=unused:ntd=on:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.15/0.43 % (1698)lrs+10_1:1_e2e=on:sd=1:sgt=8:ss=axioms:i=710:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/710Mi)
% 0.15/0.43 % (1699)lrs+1004_1:1_chr=on:prag=on:i=6:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/6Mi)
% 0.15/0.44 % (1700)dis+1002_5:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:fde=none:fs=off:fsr=off:sos=on:i=902:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/902Mi)
% 0.15/0.44 % (1701)dis+21_1:8_apa=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:fsr=off:hud=0:ins=1:kws=inv_frequency:nwc=10.0:ss=axioms:st=5.0:i=21:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/21Mi)
% 0.15/0.44 % (1699)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.44 % (1699)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.44 % (1699)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.44 % (1699)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.44 % (1699)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.44
% 0.15/0.44 % (1699)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.44 % (1699)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.44 % (1699)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.15/0.44 % (1699)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.44 % (1699)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.44 % (1702)dis+10_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_gen:fe=off:i=5:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/5Mi)
% 0.21/0.44 % (1702)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.44 % (1702)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.44 % (1702)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.44 % (1702)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.44 % (1702)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 % (1702)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.21/0.44 % (1702)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.44 % (1702)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.21/0.44 % (1702)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.44 % (1702)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.44 % (1697)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.44 % (1697)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.44 % (1697)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.44 % (1703)lrs+2_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:cs=on:fe=off:hud=10:inj=on:ins=3:plsq=on:plsqc=1:sd=10:ss=axioms:tnu=1:i=6:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/6Mi)
% 0.21/0.44 % (1697)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.44 % (1697)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 % (1697)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 0.21/0.44 % (1697)Time elapsed: 0.015 s
% 0.21/0.44 % (1697)Instructions burned: 18 (million)
% 0.21/0.44 % (1697)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.44 % (1697)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.45 % (1703)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.45 % (1703)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.45 % (1703)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.45 % (1703)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 % (1703)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.21/0.45 % (1703)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.45 % (1703)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.21/0.45 % (1703)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.45 % (1703)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.45 % (1701)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.45 % (1701)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.45 % (1701)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.45 % (1701)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.45 % (1701)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 % (1701)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 0.21/0.45 % (1701)Time elapsed: 0.017 s
% 0.21/0.45 % (1701)Instructions burned: 21 (million)
% 0.21/0.45 % (1701)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.45 % (1701)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.45 % (1704)lrs+1002_1:128_au=on:c=on:fsr=off:piset=equals:i=377:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/377Mi)
% 0.21/0.46 % (1706)dis+1010_1:4_atotf=0.2:c=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_simp:fe=off:ins=2:ntd=on:s2a=on:s2at=5.0:sgt=5:ss=axioms:st=1.5:i=779:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/779Mi)
% 0.21/0.46 % (1707)lrs+10_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_not_be_gen:ntd=on:sp=const_min:ss=axioms:sup=off:i=19:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/19Mi)
% 0.21/0.46 % (1704)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.46 % (1704)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.46 % (1704)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.46 % (1704)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46 % (1704)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.21/0.46 % (1704)Time elapsed: 0.008 s
% 0.21/0.46 % (1704)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 0.21/0.46 % (1704)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.46 % (1704)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.46 % (1709)lrs+1010_1:1_au=on:s2a=on:sd=1:sgt=50:ss=axioms:i=879:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/879Mi)
% 0.21/0.46 % (1707)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.46 % (1707)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.46 % (1707)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.46 % (1707)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46 % (1707)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.21/0.46 % (1707)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.46 % (1707)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.21/0.46 % (1707)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.46 % (1707)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.47 % (1709)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.47 % (1709)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.47 % (1709)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.47 % (1709)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.47
% 0.21/0.47
% 0.21/0.47 % (1709)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.21/0.47 % (1709)Time elapsed: 0.008 s
% 0.21/0.47 % (1709)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.21/0.47 % (1709)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.47 % (1709)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.47 % (1712)dis+1002_1:128_acc=on:er=filter:i=17:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/17Mi)
% 0.21/0.47 % (1714)ott+21_1:1_apa=on:au=on:cnfonf=off:sos=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.21/0.48 % (1714)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.48 % (1714)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.48 % (1714)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.48 % (1714)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.48 % (1714)Termination phase: Function definition elimination
% 0.21/0.48
% 0.21/0.48 % (1714)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.21/0.48 % (1714)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.48 % (1714)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.21/0.48 % (1714)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.48 % (1714)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.48 % (1716)lrs+1010_1:8_cnfonf=off:hud=1:inj=on:tnu=5:i=30:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/30Mi)
% 0.21/0.48 % (1712)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.48 % (1712)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.48 % (1712)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.48 % (1712)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.48 % (1712)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.21/0.48
% 0.21/0.48 % (1712)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 0.21/0.48 % (1712)Time elapsed: 0.013 s
% 0.21/0.48 % (1712)Instructions burned: 18 (million)
% 0.21/0.48 % (1712)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.48 % (1712)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.48 % (1718)dis+10_1:1_ixr=off:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:s2a=on:i=127:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/127Mi)
% 0.21/0.49 % (1720)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=conj_eager:cond=on:hi=on:i=100:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/100Mi)
% 0.21/0.49 % (1722)dis+10_1:1_anc=none:cnfonf=lazy_gen:fd=preordered:fe=off:hud=10:ins=3:ixr=off:nwc=5.0:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:sp=const_frequency:uhcvi=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/3Mi)
% 0.21/0.49 % (1716)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.49 % (1716)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.49 % (1716)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.49 % (1716)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.49 % (1716)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49 % (1716)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.21/0.49 % (1716)Time elapsed: 0.015 s
% 0.21/0.49 % (1716)Instructions burned: 30 (million)
% 0.21/0.49 % (1722)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.49 % (1722)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.49 % (1722)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.49 % (1722)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.49 % (1722)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49 % (1722)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.21/0.49 % (1722)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.49 % (1722)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.21/0.49 % (1722)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.49 % (1722)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.49 % (1716)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.49 % (1716)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.49 % (1677)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.49 % (1677)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.49 % (1677)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.49 % (1677)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.49 % (1677)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49 % (1677)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.21/0.49 % (1677)Time elapsed: 0.110 s
% 0.21/0.49 % (1677)Instructions burned: 185 (million)
% 0.21/0.49 % (1677)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.49 % (1677)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.49 % (1720)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.49 % (1720)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.49 % (1720)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.49 % (1720)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49 % (1720)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 0.21/0.49 % (1720)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.49 % (1720)Instructions burned: 13 (million)
% 0.21/0.49 % (1720)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.49 % (1720)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 % (1731)lrs+10_8:1_au=on:avsq=on:e2e=on:ins=3:s2a=on:s2at=3.0:ss=axioms:i=20:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/20Mi)
% 0.21/0.50 % (1733)dis+1002_1:1_cbe=off:hud=5:nm=4:plsq=on:plsqr=7,1:prag=on:sp=const_max:tnu=1:i=86:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/86Mi)
% 0.21/0.50 % (1736)lrs+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:nm=2:ntd=on:sd=2:ss=axioms:st=5.0:i=107:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/107Mi)
% 0.21/0.50 % (1731)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.50 % (1731)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 % (1731)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.50 % (1731)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 % (1731)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.21/0.50 % (1731)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.50 % (1731)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.21/0.50 % (1731)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 % (1731)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 % (1738)lrs+2_1:1024_cnfonf=lazy_gen:fe=off:hud=15:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:i=39:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/39Mi)
% 0.21/0.50 % (1736)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.50 % (1736)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 % (1736)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.50 % (1736)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 % (1736)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.21/0.50 % (1736)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.50 % (1736)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 0.21/0.50 % (1736)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 % (1736)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51 % (1745)dis+10_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_not_gen:fsr=off:kws=precedence:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:ss=axioms:st=1.5:i=448:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/448Mi)
% 0.21/0.51 % (1748)lrs+10_1:512_au=on:fde=unused:lma=on:nm=32:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=16121663,131072:sfv=off:sp=const_max:ss=axioms:st=3.0:tgt=full:i=46:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/46Mi)
% 0.21/0.52 % (1738)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.52 % (1738)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52 % (1738)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.52 % (1738)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.52 % (1738)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.21/0.52
% 0.21/0.52 % (1738)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 0.21/0.52 % (1738)Time elapsed: 0.014 s
% 0.21/0.52 % (1738)Instructions burned: 39 (million)
% 0.21/0.52 % (1738)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52 % (1738)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52 % (1762)lrs+10_1:10_au=on:av=off:cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_pi_sigma_gen:ntd=on:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:i=98:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/98Mi)
% 0.21/0.53 % (1718)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.53 % (1718)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53 % (1718)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.53 % (1718)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.53 % (1718)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.21/0.53
% 0.21/0.53 % (1718)Memory used [KB]: 6012
% 0.21/0.53 % (1718)Time elapsed: 0.047 s
% 0.21/0.53 % (1718)Instructions burned: 129 (million)
% 0.21/0.53 % (1718)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53 % (1718)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53 % (1762)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.53 % (1762)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53 % (1762)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.53 % (1748)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.53 % (1748)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53 % (1748)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.53 % (1748)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.53 % (1748)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.21/0.53
% 0.21/0.53 % (1748)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.21/0.53 % (1748)Time elapsed: 0.020 s
% 0.21/0.53 % (1748)Instructions burned: 48 (million)
% 0.21/0.53 % (1748)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53 % (1748)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53 % (1762)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.53
% 0.21/0.53
% 0.21/0.53 % (1762)Memory used [KB]: 1151
% 0.21/0.53 % (1733)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.53 % (1733)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53 % (1733)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.53 % (1733)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.53 % (1733)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.21/0.53
% 0.21/0.53 % (1733)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.21/0.53 % (1733)Time elapsed: 0.032 s
% 0.21/0.53 % (1733)Instructions burned: 86 (million)
% 0.21/0.53 % (1733)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53 % (1733)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53 % (1762)Time elapsed: 0.007 s
% 0.21/0.53 % (1762)Instructions burned: 16 (million)
% 0.21/0.53 % (1762)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53 % (1762)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53 % (1776)ott+1002_1:1_apa=on:au=on:bd=off:cnfonf=off:fd=off:sos=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=507:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/507Mi)
% 0.21/0.54 % (1776)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.54 % (1776)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.54 % (1776)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.54 % (1776)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.54
% 0.21/0.54
% 0.21/0.54 % (1776)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.21/0.54 % (1776)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.54 % (1776)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.21/0.54 % (1776)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.54 % (1776)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.54 % (1780)dis+1010_2:3_amm=off:fd=preordered:ixr=off:nm=0:pe=on:piset=equals:prag=on:sac=on:tgt=ground:i=149:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/149Mi)
% 0.21/0.54 % (1782)lrs+1004_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_pi_sigma_gen:fe=off:gs=on:hud=10:prag=on:tnu=1:i=6:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/6Mi)
% 0.21/0.54 % (1781)lrs+21_1:16_au=on:bd=off:piset=and:i=39:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/39Mi)
% 1.50/0.54 % (1782)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.50/0.54 % (1782)------------------------------
% 1.50/0.54 % (1782)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 1.50/0.54 % (1782)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.50/0.54 % (1782)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.50/0.54
% 1.50/0.54 % (1782)Memory used [KB]: 9978
% 1.50/0.54 % (1782)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 1.50/0.54 % (1782)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 1.50/0.54 % (1782)------------------------------
% 1.50/0.54 % (1782)------------------------------
% 1.50/0.55 % (1781)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.50/0.55 % (1781)------------------------------
% 1.50/0.55 % (1781)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 1.50/0.55 % (1781)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.50/0.55
% 1.50/0.55
% 1.50/0.55 % (1781)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.50/0.55 % (1781)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 1.50/0.55 % (1781)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 1.50/0.55 % (1781)------------------------------
% 1.50/0.55 % (1781)------------------------------
% 1.50/0.55 % (1788)dis+1002_1:1_aac=none:au=on:e2e=on:nm=2:nwc=10.0:sd=1:ss=axioms:st=3.0:i=1087:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/1087Mi)
% 1.50/0.55 % (1788)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.50/0.55 % (1788)------------------------------
% 1.50/0.55 % (1788)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 1.50/0.55 % (1788)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.50/0.55
% 1.50/0.55
% 1.50/0.55 % (1788)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.50/0.55 % (1788)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 1.50/0.55 % (1788)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 1.50/0.55 % (1788)------------------------------
% 1.50/0.55 % (1788)------------------------------
% 1.50/0.55 % (1798)dis+10_1:1_aac=none:cs=on:i=47:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/47Mi)
% 1.50/0.56 % (1801)lrs+1010_1:128_av=off:cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_simp:fsr=off:ntd=on:ss=axioms:st=1.5:i=44:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/44Mi)
% 1.50/0.56 % (1806)dis+10_1:1_av=off:bd=off:cnfonf=lazy_gen:fe=off:hud=10:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:prag=on:tnu=1:i=432:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/432Mi)
% 1.64/0.57 % (1801)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.64/0.57 % (1801)------------------------------
% 1.64/0.57 % (1801)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 1.64/0.57 % (1801)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.64/0.57
% 1.64/0.57
% 1.64/0.57 % (1801)Memory used [KB]: 1151
% 1.64/0.57 % (1801)Time elapsed: 0.011 s
% 1.64/0.57 % (1801)Instructions burned: 22 (million)
% 1.64/0.57 % (1801)------------------------------
% 1.64/0.57 % (1801)------------------------------
% 1.64/0.57 % (1798)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.64/0.57 % (1798)------------------------------
% 1.64/0.57 % (1798)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 1.64/0.57 % (1798)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.64/0.57 % (1798)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.64/0.57
% 1.64/0.57 % (1798)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 1.64/0.57 % (1798)Time elapsed: 0.018 s
% 1.64/0.57 % (1798)Instructions burned: 49 (million)
% 1.64/0.57 % (1798)------------------------------
% 1.64/0.57 % (1798)------------------------------
% 1.64/0.58 % (1815)lrs+10_7:1_cnfonf=lazy_gen:fe=off:nwc=5.0:plsq=on:i=62:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/62Mi)
% 1.64/0.58 % (1816)lrs+1010_1:16_add=large:amm=off:anc=all_dependent:chr=on:fd=off:ins=2:sp=const_max:tnu=5:uhcvi=on:i=31:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/31Mi)
% 1.64/0.59 % (1780)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.64/0.59 % (1780)------------------------------
% 1.64/0.59 % (1780)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 1.64/0.59 % (1780)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.64/0.59 % (1780)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.64/0.59
% 1.64/0.59 % (1780)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 1.64/0.59 % (1780)Time elapsed: 0.076 s
% 1.64/0.59 % (1780)Instructions burned: 149 (million)
% 1.64/0.59 % (1780)------------------------------
% 1.64/0.59 % (1780)------------------------------
% 1.64/0.59 % (1816)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.64/0.59 % (1816)------------------------------
% 1.64/0.59 % (1816)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 1.64/0.59 % (1816)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.64/0.59 % (1816)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.64/0.59
% 1.64/0.59 % (1816)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 1.64/0.59 % (1816)Time elapsed: 0.014 s
% 1.64/0.59 % (1816)Instructions burned: 32 (million)
% 1.64/0.59 % (1816)------------------------------
% 1.64/0.59 % (1816)------------------------------
% 1.64/0.60 % (1815)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.64/0.60 % (1815)------------------------------
% 1.64/0.60 % (1815)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 1.64/0.60 % (1815)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.64/0.60 % (1815)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.64/0.60
% 1.64/0.60 % (1815)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 1.64/0.60 % (1815)Time elapsed: 0.023 s
% 1.64/0.60 % (1815)Instructions burned: 64 (million)
% 1.64/0.60 % (1815)------------------------------
% 1.64/0.60 % (1815)------------------------------
% 1.64/0.60 % (1822)dis+10_1:128_hud=1:i=96:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/96Mi)
% 1.64/0.60 % (1823)lrs+1002_1:4_au=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_pi_sigma_gen:hud=15:inj=on:nwc=4.0:s2a=on:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity:i=453:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/453Mi)
% 1.64/0.61 % (1824)lrs-1004_1:1_au=on:bsd=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=off:fe=axiom:fsd=on:i=71:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/71Mi)
% 1.64/0.61 % (1823)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.64/0.61 % (1823)------------------------------
% 1.64/0.61 % (1823)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 1.64/0.61 % (1823)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.64/0.61
% 1.64/0.61
% 1.64/0.61 % (1823)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 1.64/0.61 % (1823)Time elapsed: 0.007 s
% 1.64/0.61 % (1823)Instructions burned: 17 (million)
% 1.64/0.61 % (1823)------------------------------
% 1.64/0.61 % (1823)------------------------------
% 1.64/0.62 % (1825)dis+1002_1:1_bd=off:fsr=off:ntd=on:s2a=on:ss=axioms:i=83:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/83Mi)
% 1.64/0.62 % (1825)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.64/0.62 % (1825)------------------------------
% 1.64/0.62 % (1825)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 1.64/0.62 % (1825)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.64/0.62
% 1.64/0.62
% 1.64/0.62 % (1825)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.64/0.62 % (1825)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.64/0.62 % (1825)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 1.64/0.62 % (1825)------------------------------
% 1.64/0.62 % (1825)------------------------------
% 2.06/0.63 % (1826)lrs+10_1:128_cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:hud=1:ins=1:i=11:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/11Mi)
% 2.06/0.63 % (1826)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.06/0.63 % (1826)------------------------------
% 2.06/0.63 % (1826)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.06/0.63 % (1826)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.06/0.63 % (1826)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.06/0.63
% 2.06/0.63 % (1826)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 2.06/0.63 % (1826)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 2.06/0.63 % (1826)Instructions burned: 11 (million)
% 2.06/0.63 % (1826)------------------------------
% 2.06/0.63 % (1826)------------------------------
% 2.06/0.63 % (1824)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.06/0.63 % (1824)------------------------------
% 2.06/0.63 % (1824)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.06/0.63 % (1824)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.06/0.63 % (1824)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.06/0.63
% 2.06/0.63 % (1824)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 2.06/0.63 % (1824)Time elapsed: 0.027 s
% 2.06/0.63 % (1824)Instructions burned: 71 (million)
% 2.06/0.63 % (1824)------------------------------
% 2.06/0.63 % (1824)------------------------------
% 2.06/0.64 % (1822)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.06/0.64 % (1822)------------------------------
% 2.06/0.64 % (1822)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.06/0.64 % (1822)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.06/0.64 % (1822)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.06/0.64
% 2.06/0.64 % (1822)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 2.06/0.64 % (1822)Time elapsed: 0.036 s
% 2.06/0.64 % (1822)Instructions burned: 98 (million)
% 2.06/0.64 % (1822)------------------------------
% 2.06/0.64 % (1822)------------------------------
% 2.06/0.64 % (1827)lrs+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:fsr=off:spb=non_intro:i=41:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/41Mi)
% 2.06/0.64 % (1828)lrs+1004_1:1_chr=on:prag=on:i=6:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/6Mi)
% 2.06/0.64 % (1827)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.06/0.64 % (1827)------------------------------
% 2.06/0.64 % (1827)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.06/0.64 % (1827)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.06/0.64
% 2.06/0.64
% 2.06/0.64 % (1827)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 2.06/0.64 % (1827)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 2.06/0.64 % (1827)Instructions burned: 12 (million)
% 2.06/0.64 % (1827)------------------------------
% 2.06/0.64 % (1827)------------------------------
% 2.06/0.64 % (1828)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.06/0.64 % (1828)------------------------------
% 2.06/0.64 % (1828)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.06/0.65 % (1828)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.06/0.65 % (1828)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.06/0.65
% 2.06/0.65 % (1828)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 2.06/0.65 % (1828)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 2.06/0.65 % (1828)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 2.06/0.65 % (1828)------------------------------
% 2.06/0.65 % (1828)------------------------------
% 2.06/0.65 % (1831)dis+10_1:1_avsq=on:cnfonf=off:e2e=on:nm=32:i=150:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/150Mi)
% 2.06/0.65 % (1835)ott+1010_1:1_au=on:s2a=on:sd=7:ss=axioms:st=1.5:i=343:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/343Mi)
% 2.06/0.65 % (1836)ott+1010_1:4_cbe=off:chr=on:hfsq=on:hfsqr=1,16:hud=3:sac=on:sp=unary_frequency:ss=axioms:st=5.0:tnu=2:i=109:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/109Mi)
% 2.06/0.66 % (1835)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.06/0.66 % (1835)------------------------------
% 2.06/0.66 % (1835)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.06/0.66 % (1835)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.06/0.66
% 2.06/0.66
% 2.06/0.66 % (1835)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 2.06/0.66 % (1835)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 2.06/0.66 % (1835)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 2.06/0.66 % (1835)------------------------------
% 2.06/0.66 % (1835)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.66 % (1843)dis+10_1:1_au=on:c=on:e2e=on:fsr=off:sos=all:sp=const_frequency:ss=axioms:i=253:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/253Mi)
% 2.32/0.67 % (1843)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.32/0.67 % (1843)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.67 % (1843)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.32/0.67 % (1843)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.32/0.67
% 2.32/0.67
% 2.32/0.67 % (1843)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 2.32/0.67 % (1843)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 2.32/0.67 % (1843)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 2.32/0.67 % (1843)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.67 % (1843)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.67 % (1850)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:cnfonf=off:sd=1:sgt=16:ss=axioms:i=140:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/140Mi)
% 2.32/0.68 % (1850)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.32/0.68 % (1850)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.68 % (1850)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.32/0.68 % (1850)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.32/0.68
% 2.32/0.68
% 2.32/0.68 % (1850)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 2.32/0.68 % (1850)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 2.32/0.68 % (1850)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 2.32/0.68 % (1850)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.68 % (1850)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.68 % (1745)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.32/0.68 % (1745)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.68 % (1745)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.32/0.68 % (1745)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.32/0.68 % (1745)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.32/0.68
% 2.32/0.68 % (1745)Memory used [KB]: 6908
% 2.32/0.68 % (1745)Time elapsed: 0.172 s
% 2.32/0.68 % (1745)Instructions burned: 449 (million)
% 2.32/0.68 % (1745)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.68 % (1745)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.69 % (1857)dis+1010_16:1_acc=model:au=on:avsq=on:cond=fast:plsq=on:plsqc=2:plsqr=9267,262144:i=614:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/614Mi)
% 2.32/0.69 % (1857)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.32/0.69 % (1857)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.69 % (1857)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.32/0.69 % (1857)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.32/0.69
% 2.32/0.69
% 2.32/0.69 % (1857)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 2.32/0.69 % (1857)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 2.32/0.69 % (1857)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 2.32/0.69 % (1857)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.69 % (1857)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.69 % (1862)lrs+1002_1:1_e2e=on:fde=unused:fe=axiom:prag=on:sd=1:sos=on:ss=axioms:st=2.0:i=202:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/202Mi)
% 2.32/0.69 % (1836)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.32/0.69 % (1836)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.69 % (1836)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.32/0.69 % (1836)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.32/0.69 % (1836)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.32/0.69
% 2.32/0.69 % (1836)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 2.32/0.69 % (1836)Time elapsed: 0.040 s
% 2.32/0.69 % (1836)Instructions burned: 111 (million)
% 2.32/0.69 % (1836)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.69 % (1836)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.69 % (1862)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.32/0.69 % (1862)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.69 % (1862)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.32/0.69 % (1862)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.32/0.69
% 2.32/0.69
% 2.32/0.69 % (1862)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 2.32/0.69 % (1862)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 2.32/0.69 % (1862)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 2.32/0.69 % (1862)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.69 % (1862)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.69 % (1831)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.32/0.69 % (1831)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.69 % (1831)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.32/0.70 % (1831)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.32/0.70 % (1831)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.32/0.70
% 2.32/0.70 % (1831)Memory used [KB]: 6012
% 2.32/0.70 % (1831)Time elapsed: 0.050 s
% 2.32/0.70 % (1831)Instructions burned: 150 (million)
% 2.32/0.70 % (1831)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.70 % (1831)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.70 % (1806)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.32/0.70 % (1806)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.70 % (1806)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.32/0.70 % (1806)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.32/0.70 % (1806)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.32/0.70
% 2.32/0.70 % (1806)Memory used [KB]: 2430
% 2.32/0.70 % (1806)Time elapsed: 0.136 s
% 2.32/0.70 % (1806)Instructions burned: 432 (million)
% 2.32/0.70 % (1806)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.70 % (1806)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.70 % (1698)Refutation not found, non-redundant clauses discarded% (1698)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.70 % (1698)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.32/0.70 % (1698)Termination reason: Refutation not found, non-redundant clauses discarded
% 2.32/0.70
% 2.32/0.70 % (1698)Memory used [KB]: 6908
% 2.32/0.70 % (1698)Time elapsed: 0.253 s
% 2.32/0.70 % (1698)Instructions burned: 688 (million)
% 2.32/0.70 % (1698)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.70 % (1698)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.70 % (1867)dis+1002_1:1_au=on:cs=on:ins=3:kws=inv_frequency:nwc=10.0:ss=axioms:st=3.0:i=339:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/339Mi)
% 2.32/0.70 % (1870)dis+10_1:1_anc=none:cnfonf=lazy_gen:fd=preordered:fe=off:hud=10:ins=3:ixr=off:nwc=5.0:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:sp=const_frequency:uhcvi=on:i=283:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/283Mi)
% 2.32/0.70 % (1867)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.32/0.70 % (1867)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.70 % (1867)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.32/0.70 % (1867)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.32/0.70
% 2.32/0.70
% 2.32/0.70 % (1867)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 2.32/0.70 % (1867)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 2.32/0.70 % (1867)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 2.32/0.70 % (1867)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.70 % (1867)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.70 % (1872)dis+2_1:1_cha=on:hud=7:nwc=3.0:prag=on:tnu=2:i=134:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/134Mi)
% 2.32/0.70 % (1874)dis+1010_1:64_cnfonf=lazy_simp:fd=off:i=298:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/298Mi)
% 2.32/0.70 % (1875)lrs+2_1:8_erd=off:plsq=on:plsqr=32,1:sos=on:i=192:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/192Mi)
% 2.32/0.70 % (1876)lrs+10_1:1_bd=off:hud=1:nm=0:prag=on:sd=2:sgt=32:sos=all:ss=axioms:i=258:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/258Mi)
% 2.32/0.71 % (1882)lrs+1002_1:1024_au=on:cond=fast:ntd=on:piset=and:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=183491,1048576:sac=on:tgt=ground:i=90:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/90Mi)
% 2.32/0.72 % (1706)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.32/0.72 % (1706)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.72 % (1706)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.32/0.72 % (1706)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.32/0.72 % (1706)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.32/0.72
% 2.32/0.72 % (1706)Memory used [KB]: 6268
% 2.32/0.72 % (1706)Time elapsed: 0.262 s
% 2.32/0.72 % (1706)Instructions burned: 780 (million)
% 2.32/0.72 % (1706)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.72 % (1706)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.72 % (1882)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.32/0.72 % (1882)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.72 % (1882)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.32/0.72 % (1882)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.32/0.72
% 2.32/0.72
% 2.32/0.72 % (1882)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 2.32/0.72 % (1882)Time elapsed: 0.010 s
% 2.32/0.72 % (1882)Instructions burned: 20 (million)
% 2.32/0.72 % (1882)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.72 % (1882)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.73 % (1887)dis+1004_16:1_avsq=on:avsqr=1,16:cnfonf=lazy_gen:cs=on:fe=off:tgt=ground:tnu=1:i=231:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/231Mi)
% 2.32/0.73 % (1889)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:s2a=on:sgt=32:slsq=on:slsqc=1:slsql=off:ss=axioms:i=458:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/458Mi)
% 2.85/0.73 % (1889)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.85/0.73 % (1889)------------------------------
% 2.85/0.73 % (1889)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.85/0.73 % (1889)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.85/0.73
% 2.85/0.73
% 2.85/0.73 % (1889)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 2.85/0.73 % (1889)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 2.85/0.73 % (1889)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 2.85/0.73 % (1889)------------------------------
% 2.85/0.73 % (1889)------------------------------
% 2.85/0.74 % (1897)lrs+1010_1:16_add=large:amm=off:anc=all_dependent:chr=on:fd=off:ins=2:sp=const_max:tnu=5:uhcvi=on:i=31:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/31Mi)
% 2.85/0.75 % (1872)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.85/0.75 % (1872)------------------------------
% 2.85/0.75 % (1872)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.85/0.75 % (1872)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.85/0.75 % (1872)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.85/0.75
% 2.85/0.75 % (1872)Memory used [KB]: 6140
% 2.85/0.75 % (1872)Time elapsed: 0.048 s
% 2.85/0.75 % (1872)Instructions burned: 136 (million)
% 2.85/0.75 % (1872)------------------------------
% 2.85/0.75 % (1872)------------------------------
% 2.85/0.75 % (1897)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.85/0.75 % (1897)------------------------------
% 2.85/0.75 % (1897)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.85/0.75 % (1897)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.85/0.75 % (1897)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.85/0.75
% 2.85/0.75 % (1897)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 2.85/0.75 % (1897)Time elapsed: 0.013 s
% 2.85/0.75 % (1897)Instructions burned: 31 (million)
% 2.85/0.75 % (1897)------------------------------
% 2.85/0.75 % (1897)------------------------------
% 2.85/0.76 % (1903)lrs+10_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_gen:kws=inv_precedence:nwc=10.0:s2a=on:sp=weighted_frequency:ss=axioms:i=297:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/297Mi)
% 2.85/0.76 % (1903)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.85/0.76 % (1903)------------------------------
% 2.85/0.76 % (1903)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.85/0.76 % (1903)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.85/0.76
% 2.85/0.76
% 2.85/0.76 % (1903)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 2.85/0.76 % (1903)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 2.85/0.76 % (1903)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 2.85/0.76 % (1903)------------------------------
% 2.85/0.76 % (1903)------------------------------
% 2.85/0.76 % (1905)dis+2_1:4_amm=off:au=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_gen:hfaw=0:hfsq=on:hfsql=off:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=35,4:sac=on:i=987:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/987Mi)
% 2.99/0.77 % (1907)lrs+10_1:1024_avsq=on:avsqc=4:avsqr=584411,1048576:bd=off:bet=on:br=off:chr=on:fsd=on:fsdmm=1:hud=10:nm=0:ntd=on:nwc=9.0:piset=or:plsq=on:plsqc=2:plsql=on:plsqr=852219,1048576:rawr=on:sp=const_frequency:spb=units:i=182:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/182Mi)
% 2.99/0.77 % (1875)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.99/0.77 % (1875)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.77 % (1875)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.99/0.77 % (1875)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.99/0.77 % (1875)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.99/0.77
% 2.99/0.77 % (1875)Memory used [KB]: 6140
% 2.99/0.77 % (1875)Time elapsed: 0.066 s
% 2.99/0.77 % (1875)Instructions burned: 192 (million)
% 2.99/0.77 % (1875)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.77 % (1875)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.78 % (1914)dis+10_1:1_au=on:e2e=on:fde=none:nwc=10.0:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:i=182:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/182Mi)
% 2.99/0.79 % (1700)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.99/0.79 % (1700)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.79 % (1700)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.99/0.79 % (1700)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.99/0.79 % (1700)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.99/0.79
% 2.99/0.79 % (1700)Memory used [KB]: 8827
% 2.99/0.79 % (1700)Time elapsed: 0.353 s
% 2.99/0.79 % (1700)Instructions burned: 902 (million)
% 2.99/0.79 % (1700)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.79 % (1700)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.79 % (1876)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.99/0.79 % (1876)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.79 % (1876)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.99/0.79 % (1876)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.99/0.79 % (1876)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.99/0.79
% 2.99/0.79 % (1876)Memory used [KB]: 6012
% 2.99/0.79 % (1876)Time elapsed: 0.088 s
% 2.99/0.79 % (1876)Instructions burned: 260 (million)
% 2.99/0.79 % (1876)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.79 % (1876)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.79 % (1870)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.99/0.79 % (1870)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.79 % (1870)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.99/0.79 % (1870)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.99/0.79 % (1870)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.99/0.79
% 2.99/0.79 % (1870)Memory used [KB]: 6012
% 2.99/0.79 % (1870)Time elapsed: 0.092 s
% 2.99/0.79 % (1870)Instructions burned: 285 (million)
% 2.99/0.79 % (1870)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.79 % (1870)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.80 % (1928)dis+10_1:8_cha=on:cnfonf=lazy_pi_sigma_gen:fe=axiom:hud=5:plsq=on:plsqr=32,1:prag=on:sos=all:i=154:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/154Mi)
% 2.99/0.80 % (1931)dis+1003_1:64_atotf=0.4:au=on:fsr=off:hflw=5:hfsq=on:hfsqc=20:hfsql=off:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:i=79:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/79Mi)
% 2.99/0.80 % (1932)dis+1010_5:2_anc=all_dependent:awrs=converge:bd=off:bet=on:c=on:cha=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:fe=axiom:hud=5:kws=precedence:piset=and:prag=on:s2a=on:sac=on:slsq=on:slsqc=1:sp=reverse_arity:ss=axioms:st=1.5:i=216:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/216Mi)
% 2.99/0.80 % (1928)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.99/0.80 % (1928)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.80 % (1928)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.99/0.80 % (1928)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.99/0.80
% 2.99/0.80
% 2.99/0.80 % (1928)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 2.99/0.80 % (1928)Time elapsed: 0.007 s
% 2.99/0.80 % (1928)Instructions burned: 18 (million)
% 2.99/0.80 % (1928)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.80 % (1928)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.80 % (1931)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.99/0.80 % (1931)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.80 % (1931)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.99/0.80 % (1931)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.99/0.80
% 2.99/0.80
% 2.99/0.80 % (1931)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 2.99/0.80 % (1931)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 2.99/0.80 % (1931)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 2.99/0.80 % (1931)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.80 % (1931)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.80 % (1932)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.99/0.80 % (1932)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.80 % (1932)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.99/0.80 % (1932)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.99/0.80
% 2.99/0.80
% 2.99/0.80 % (1932)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 2.99/0.80 % (1932)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 2.99/0.80 % (1932)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 2.99/0.80 % (1932)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.80 % (1932)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.81 % (1874)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.99/0.81 % (1874)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.81 % (1874)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.99/0.81 % (1874)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.99/0.81 % (1874)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.99/0.81
% 2.99/0.81 % (1874)Memory used [KB]: 6140
% 2.99/0.81 % (1874)Time elapsed: 0.104 s
% 2.99/0.81 % (1874)Instructions burned: 298 (million)
% 2.99/0.81 % (1874)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.81 % (1874)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.81 % (1887)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.99/0.81 % (1887)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.81 % (1887)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.99/0.81 % (1887)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.99/0.81 % (1887)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.99/0.81
% 2.99/0.81 % (1887)Memory used [KB]: 6268
% 2.99/0.81 % (1887)Time elapsed: 0.081 s
% 2.99/0.81 % (1887)Instructions burned: 233 (million)
% 2.99/0.81 % (1887)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.81 % (1887)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.81 % (1944)lrs+1002_1:1_fe=off:hud=10:ins=2:sac=on:sp=const_frequency:i=114:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/114Mi)
% 2.99/0.81 % (1945)dis+1002_1:1_acc=on:au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sgt=8:ss=axioms:i=922:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/922Mi)
% 2.99/0.81 % (1947)lrs+10_1:128_au=on:bd=off:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:nwc=10.0:piset=and:i=182:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/182Mi)
% 2.99/0.82 % (1950)ott+1010_1:1024_au=on:av=off:c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:piset=equals:s2a=on:sp=occurrence:spb=units:ss=axioms:i=164:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/164Mi)
% 2.99/0.82 % (1945)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.99/0.82 % (1945)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.82 % (1945)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.99/0.82 % (1945)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.99/0.82
% 2.99/0.82
% 2.99/0.82 % (1945)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 2.99/0.82 % (1945)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 2.99/0.82 % (1945)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 2.99/0.82 % (1945)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.82 % (1945)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.82 % (1951)lrs+1004_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_pi_sigma_gen:fe=off:gs=on:hud=10:prag=on:tnu=1:i=50:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/50Mi)
% 2.99/0.82 % (1950)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.99/0.82 % (1950)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.82 % (1950)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.99/0.82 % (1950)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.99/0.82
% 2.99/0.82
% 2.99/0.82 % (1950)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 2.99/0.82 % (1950)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 2.99/0.82 % (1950)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 2.99/0.82 % (1950)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.82 % (1950)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.82 % (1947)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.99/0.82 % (1947)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.82 % (1947)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.99/0.82 % (1947)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.99/0.82
% 2.99/0.82
% 2.99/0.82 % (1947)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 2.99/0.82 % (1947)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 2.99/0.82 % (1947)Instructions burned: 12 (million)
% 2.99/0.82 % (1947)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.82 % (1947)------------------------------
% 2.99/0.82 % (1958)dis-30_1:1_acc=on:bd=off:fsr=off:plsq=on:plsqr=32,1:i=368:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/368Mi)
% 2.99/0.83 % (1959)dis+2_1:1_bd=off:e2e=on:hud=1:nm=3:piset=or:prag=on:s2a=on:sp=const_max:i=1021:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/1021Mi)
% 2.99/0.83 % (1960)dis+10_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_gen:fe=off:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:prag=on:i=267:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/267Mi)
% 3.56/0.83 % (1951)Instruction limit reached!
% 3.56/0.83 % (1951)------------------------------
% 3.56/0.83 % (1951)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 3.56/0.83 % (1951)Termination reason: Unknown
% 3.56/0.83 % (1951)Termination phase: Saturation
% 3.56/0.83
% 3.56/0.83 % (1951)Memory used [KB]: 10362
% 3.56/0.83 % (1951)Time elapsed: 0.043 s
% 3.56/0.83 % (1951)Instructions burned: 52 (million)
% 3.56/0.83 % (1951)------------------------------
% 3.56/0.83 % (1951)------------------------------
% 3.56/0.83 % (1907)Instruction limit reached!
% 3.56/0.83 % (1907)------------------------------
% 3.56/0.83 % (1907)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 3.56/0.83 % (1907)Termination reason: Unknown
% 3.56/0.83 % (1907)Termination phase: Saturation
% 3.56/0.83
% 3.56/0.83 % (1907)Memory used [KB]: 6012
% 3.56/0.83 % (1907)Time elapsed: 0.088 s
% 3.56/0.83 % (1907)Instructions burned: 183 (million)
% 3.56/0.83 % (1907)------------------------------
% 3.56/0.83 % (1907)------------------------------
% 3.56/0.84 % (1914)Instruction limit reached!
% 3.56/0.84 % (1914)------------------------------
% 3.56/0.84 % (1914)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 3.56/0.84 % (1914)Termination reason: Unknown
% 3.56/0.84 % (1914)Termination phase: Saturation
% 3.56/0.84
% 3.56/0.84 % (1914)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 3.56/0.84 % (1914)Time elapsed: 0.084 s
% 3.56/0.84 % (1914)Instructions burned: 182 (million)
% 3.56/0.84 % (1914)------------------------------
% 3.56/0.84 % (1914)------------------------------
% 3.56/0.84 % (1974)dis+21_1:5_au=on:ntd=on:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:ss=axioms:st=5.0:i=204:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/204Mi)
% 3.56/0.84 % (1976)dis+2_1:1024_atotf=0.0802881:au=on:bs=unit_only:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:fde=none:nwc=10.0:prag=on:i=26:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/26Mi)
% 3.56/0.84 % (1974)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 3.56/0.84 % (1974)------------------------------
% 3.56/0.84 % (1974)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 3.56/0.84 % (1974)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 3.56/0.84
% 3.56/0.84
% 3.56/0.84 % (1974)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 3.56/0.84 % (1974)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 3.56/0.84 % (1974)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 3.56/0.84 % (1974)------------------------------
% 3.56/0.84 % (1974)------------------------------
% 3.56/0.85 % (1944)Instruction limit reached!
% 3.56/0.85 % (1944)------------------------------
% 3.56/0.85 % (1944)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 3.56/0.85 % (1944)Termination reason: Unknown
% 3.56/0.85 % (1944)Termination phase: Saturation
% 3.56/0.85
% 3.56/0.85 % (1944)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 3.56/0.85 % (1944)Time elapsed: 0.059 s
% 3.56/0.85 % (1944)Instructions burned: 115 (million)
% 3.56/0.85 % (1944)------------------------------
% 3.56/0.85 % (1944)------------------------------
% 3.56/0.85 % (1980)dis+1002_1:1_bd=preordered:c=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:hud=10:ixr=off:prag=on:i=53:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/53Mi)
% 3.56/0.85 % (1985)dis+1002_1:1_aac=none:au=on:e2e=on:nm=2:nwc=10.0:sd=1:ss=axioms:st=3.0:i=4436:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/4436Mi)
% 3.56/0.85 % (1976)Instruction limit reached!
% 3.56/0.85 % (1976)------------------------------
% 3.56/0.85 % (1976)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 3.56/0.85 % (1976)Termination reason: Unknown
% 3.56/0.85 % (1976)Termination phase: Saturation
% 3.56/0.85
% 3.56/0.85 % (1976)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 3.56/0.85 % (1976)Time elapsed: 0.011 s
% 3.56/0.85 % (1976)Instructions burned: 28 (million)
% 3.56/0.85 % (1976)------------------------------
% 3.56/0.85 % (1976)------------------------------
% 3.56/0.85 % (1985)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 3.56/0.85 % (1985)------------------------------
% 3.56/0.85 % (1985)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 3.56/0.85 % (1985)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 3.56/0.85
% 3.56/0.85
% 3.56/0.85 % (1985)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 3.56/0.85 % (1985)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 3.56/0.85 % (1985)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 3.56/0.85 % (1985)------------------------------
% 3.56/0.85 % (1985)------------------------------
% 3.56/0.85 % (1986)dis+1010_1:1_acc=model:avsq=on:ixr=off:prag=on:s2a=on:sac=on:i=1539:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/1539Mi)
% 3.56/0.86 % (1987)lrs+2_1:1_bd=off:e2e=on:fde=none:kws=inv_precedence:plsq=on:plsqr=32,1:sos=on:i=408:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/408Mi)
% 3.56/0.86 % (1987)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 3.56/0.86 % (1987)------------------------------
% 3.56/0.86 % (1987)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 3.56/0.86 % (1987)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 3.56/0.86
% 3.56/0.86
% 3.56/0.86 % (1987)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 3.56/0.86 % (1987)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 3.56/0.86 % (1987)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 3.56/0.86 % (1987)------------------------------
% 3.56/0.86 % (1987)------------------------------
% 3.56/0.86 % (1989)lrs+1002_1:1_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_gen:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=4203469,65536:i=5205:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/5205Mi)
% 3.82/0.86 % (1980)Instruction limit reached!
% 3.82/0.86 % (1980)------------------------------
% 3.82/0.86 % (1980)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 3.82/0.86 % (1980)Termination reason: Unknown
% 3.82/0.86 % (1980)Termination phase: Saturation
% 3.82/0.86
% 3.82/0.86 % (1980)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 3.82/0.86 % (1980)Time elapsed: 0.018 s
% 3.82/0.86 % (1980)Instructions burned: 54 (million)
% 3.82/0.86 % (1980)------------------------------
% 3.82/0.86 % (1980)------------------------------
% 3.82/0.87 % (1993)dis+1010_1:4_au=on:av=off:cbe=off:nwc=10.0:s2a=on:s2at=3.0:sd=2:ss=axioms:st=5.0:i=1913:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/1913Mi)
% 3.82/0.87 % (1995)lrs+2_1:1_bd=off:cbe=off:piset=equals:sd=1:sgt=20:sos=all:ss=axioms:i=4350:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/4350Mi)
% 3.82/0.87 % (1993)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 3.82/0.87 % (1993)------------------------------
% 3.82/0.87 % (1993)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 3.82/0.87 % (1993)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 3.82/0.87
% 3.82/0.87
% 3.82/0.87 % (1993)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 3.82/0.87 % (1993)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 3.82/0.87 % (1993)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 3.82/0.87 % (1993)------------------------------
% 3.82/0.87 % (1993)------------------------------
% 3.82/0.88 % (2002)ott+1010_1:4_cbe=off:chr=on:hfsq=on:hfsqr=1,16:hud=3:sac=on:sp=unary_frequency:ss=axioms:st=5.0:tnu=2:i=68:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/68Mi)
% 3.82/0.90 % (2002)Instruction limit reached!
% 3.82/0.90 % (2002)------------------------------
% 3.82/0.90 % (2002)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 3.82/0.90 % (2002)Termination reason: Unknown
% 3.82/0.90 % (2002)Termination phase: Saturation
% 3.82/0.90
% 3.82/0.90 % (2002)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 3.82/0.90 % (2002)Time elapsed: 0.024 s
% 3.82/0.90 % (2002)Instructions burned: 68 (million)
% 3.82/0.90 % (2002)------------------------------
% 3.82/0.90 % (2002)------------------------------
% 3.82/0.90 % (1958)First to succeed.
% 3.82/0.91 % (1960)Instruction limit reached!
% 3.82/0.91 % (1960)------------------------------
% 3.82/0.91 % (1960)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 3.82/0.91 % (1960)Termination reason: Unknown
% 3.82/0.91 % (1960)Termination phase: Saturation
% 3.82/0.91
% 3.82/0.91 % (1960)Memory used [KB]: 6012
% 3.82/0.91 % (1960)Time elapsed: 0.107 s
% 3.82/0.91 % (1960)Instructions burned: 269 (million)
% 3.82/0.91 % (1960)------------------------------
% 3.82/0.91 % (1960)------------------------------
% 3.82/0.91 % (1958)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 3.82/0.91 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 3.82/0.91 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_0, type, emptyset: $i > $o).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_1, type, union: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_3, type, singleton: $i > $i > $o).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_5, type, sup: ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_6, type, supset: (($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_7, type, unionset: (($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_8, type, addition: $i > $i > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_9, type, leq: $i > $i > $o).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_10, type, multiplication: $i > $i > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_11, type, crossmult: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_30, type, ph4: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_31, type, sK5: $i > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_33, type, sK7: $i > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_34, type, sK8: $i > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_36, type, sK10: $i > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_37, type, sK11: $i > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_38, type, sK12: $i > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_39, type, sK13: $i > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_40, type, sK14: $i > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_41, type, sK15: $i > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_42, type, sK16: $i > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_43, type, sK17: $i > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_44, type, sK18: $i > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_45, type, sK19: $i > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_46, type, sK20: $i > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_47, type, sK21: $i > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_48, type, sK22: $i > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_49, type, sK23: $i > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_50, type, sK24: $i > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_51, type, sK25: $i > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_52, type, sK26: $i > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_53, type, sK27: $i > $i > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_54, type, sK28: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_55, type, sK29: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_56, type, sK30: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_57, type, sK31: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_58, type, sK32: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_59, type, sK33: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_60, type, sK34: ($i > $o) > $i > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_61, type, sK35: ($i > $o) > $i > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_62, type, sK36: ($i > $o) > $i > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_63, type, sK37: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_64, type, sK38: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_65, type, sK39: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_66, type, sK40: ($i > $o) > $i > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_67, type, sK41: ($i > $o) > $i > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_68, type, sK42: ($i > $o) > $i > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_72, type, sK46: $i > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_73, type, sK47: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_74, type, sK48: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_75, type, sK49: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_76, type, sK50: $i > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_77, type, sK51: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_78, type, sK52: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_79, type, sK53: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_80, type, sK54: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_81, type, sK55: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_82, type, sK56: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_83, type, sK57: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_84, type, sK58: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_85, type, sK59: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_86, type, sK60: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_87, type, sK61: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_88, type, sK62: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_89, type, sK63: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_90, type, sK64: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_91, type, sK65: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_92, type, sK66: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_93, type, sK67: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_94, type, sK68: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_95, type, sK69: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_96, type, sK70: ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_97, type, sK71: ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_98, type, sK72: ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_99, type, sK73: ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_100, type, sK74: ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_101, type, sK75: ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_102, type, sK76: $i > $i > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_103, type, sK77: $i > $i > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_104, type, sK78: $i > $i > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_105, type, sK79: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_106, type, sK80: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_107, type, sK81: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(func_def_108, type, sK82: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f1581,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 $false),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f76,f945,f1009,f1014,f1023,f1027,f1031,f1033,f1034,f1035,f1423,f1580])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f1580,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ~spl3_57 | ~spl3_64),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f1579,f1029,f998])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f998,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 spl3_57 <=> ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) = sK43)),
% 3.82/0.91 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_57])])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f1029,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 spl3_64 <=> ! [X2,X1] : (((multiplication @ X1 @ X2) != sK43) | (sK1 != X2) | (sK2 != X1))),
% 3.82/0.91 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_64])])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f1579,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) != sK43) | ~spl3_64),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(equality_resolution,[],[f1515])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f1515,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((multiplication @ sK2 @ X0) != sK43) | (sK1 != X0)) ) | ~spl3_64),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(equality_resolution,[],[f1030])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f1030,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : ((sK2 != X1) | (sK1 != X2) | ((multiplication @ X1 @ X2) != sK43)) ) | ~spl3_64),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f1029])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f1423,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ~spl3_59 | ~spl3_63),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f1422,f1025,f1006])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f1006,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 spl3_59 <=> ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = sK43)),
% 3.82/0.91 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_59])])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f1025,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 spl3_63 <=> ! [X2,X1] : (((multiplication @ X1 @ X2) != sK43) | (sK2 != X1) | (sK0 != X2))),
% 3.82/0.91 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_63])])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f1422,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) != sK43) | ~spl3_63),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(equality_resolution,[],[f1291])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f1291,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((multiplication @ sK2 @ X0) != sK43) | (sK0 != X0)) ) | ~spl3_63),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(equality_resolution,[],[f1026])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f1026,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : ((sK2 != X1) | (sK0 != X2) | ((multiplication @ X1 @ X2) != sK43)) ) | ~spl3_63),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f1025])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f1035,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 (sK2 != sK44) | (sK45 != sK1) | ((multiplication @ sK44 @ sK45) != sK43) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) = sK43)),
% 3.82/0.91 introduced(theory_tautology_sat_conflict,[])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f1034,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 (sK2 != sK44) | (sK45 != sK0) | ((multiplication @ sK44 @ sK45) != sK43) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = sK43)),
% 3.82/0.91 introduced(theory_tautology_sat_conflict,[])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f1033,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ~spl3_57 | spl3_64 | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f963,f942,f1029,f998])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f942,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 spl3_56 <=> ((^[Y0 : $i]: (((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) = Y0) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = Y0))) = (^[Y0 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((((sK1 = Y2) | (sK0 = Y2)) & (sK2 = Y1)) & ((multiplication @ Y1 @ Y2) = Y0))))))))),
% 3.82/0.91 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_56])])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f963,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((multiplication @ X1 @ X2) != sK43) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) != sK43) | (sK2 != X1) | (sK1 != X2)) ) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f962])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f962,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) != sK43) | ((multiplication @ X1 @ X2) != sK43) | ($false = (sK1 = X2)) | (sK2 != X1)) ) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f960])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f960,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($false = ((sK1 = X2) | (sK0 = X2))) | ((multiplication @ X1 @ X2) != sK43) | (sK2 != X1) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) != sK43)) ) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f959])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f959,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) != sK43) | ($false = ((multiplication @ X1 @ X2) = sK43)) | (sK2 != X1) | ($false = ((sK1 = X2) | (sK0 = X2)))) ) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f958])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f958,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($false = (sK2 = X1)) | ($false = ((multiplication @ X1 @ X2) = sK43)) | ($false = ((sK1 = X2) | (sK0 = X2))) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) != sK43)) ) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f957])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f957,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) != sK43) | ($false = (((sK1 = X2) | (sK0 = X2)) & (sK2 = X1))) | ($false = ((multiplication @ X1 @ X2) = sK43))) ) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f956])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f956,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) != sK43) | ($false = ((((sK1 = X2) | (sK0 = X2)) & (sK2 = X1)) & ((multiplication @ X1 @ X2) = sK43)))) ) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f955])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f955,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) != sK43) | ($false = ((^[Y0 : $i]: ((((sK1 = Y0) | (sK0 = Y0)) & (sK2 = X1)) & ((multiplication @ X1 @ Y0) = sK43))) @ X2))) ) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(pi_clausification,[],[f954])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f954,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X1 : $i] : (($false = (?? @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((((sK1 = Y0) | (sK0 = Y0)) & (sK2 = X1)) & ((multiplication @ X1 @ Y0) = sK43))))) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) != sK43)) ) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f953])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f953,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X1 : $i] : (((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) != sK43) | ($false = ((^[Y0 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((((sK1 = Y1) | (sK0 = Y1)) & (sK2 = Y0)) & ((multiplication @ Y0 @ Y1) = sK43))))) @ X1))) ) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(pi_clausification,[],[f952])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f952,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ($false = (?? @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((((sK1 = Y1) | (sK0 = Y1)) & (sK2 = Y0)) & ((multiplication @ Y0 @ Y1) = sK43))))))) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) != sK43) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f951])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f951,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 (((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) = sK43) = $false) | ($false = (?? @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((((sK1 = Y1) | (sK0 = Y1)) & (sK2 = Y0)) & ((multiplication @ Y0 @ Y1) = sK43))))))) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f949])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f949,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ((((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) = sK43) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = sK43)) = $false) | ($false = (?? @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((((sK1 = Y1) | (sK0 = Y1)) & (sK2 = Y0)) & ((multiplication @ Y0 @ Y1) = sK43))))))) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f947])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f947,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ((((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) = sK43) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = sK43)) != (?? @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((((sK1 = Y1) | (sK0 = Y1)) & (sK2 = Y0)) & ((multiplication @ Y0 @ Y1) = sK43))))))) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f946])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f946,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 (((^[Y0 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((((sK1 = Y2) | (sK0 = Y2)) & (sK2 = Y1)) & ((multiplication @ Y1 @ Y2) = Y0))))))) @ sK43) != ((^[Y0 : $i]: (((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) = Y0) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = Y0))) @ sK43)) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(negative_extensionality,[],[f944])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f944,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ((^[Y0 : $i]: (((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) = Y0) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = Y0))) != (^[Y0 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((((sK1 = Y2) | (sK0 = Y2)) & (sK2 = Y1)) & ((multiplication @ Y1 @ Y2) = Y0)))))))) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f942])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f1031,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ~spl3_59 | spl3_64 | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f976,f942,f1029,f1006])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f976,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((multiplication @ X1 @ X2) != sK43) | (sK2 != X1) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) != sK43) | (sK1 != X2)) ) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f975])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f975,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) != sK43) | ($false = (sK1 = X2)) | ((multiplication @ X1 @ X2) != sK43) | (sK2 != X1)) ) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f974])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f974,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) != sK43) | ((multiplication @ X1 @ X2) != sK43) | ($false = (sK2 = X1)) | ($false = (sK1 = X2))) ) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f972])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f972,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((multiplication @ X1 @ X2) != sK43) | ($false = ((sK1 = X2) | (sK0 = X2))) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) != sK43) | ($false = (sK2 = X1))) ) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f971])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f971,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($false = (((sK1 = X2) | (sK0 = X2)) & (sK2 = X1))) | ((multiplication @ X1 @ X2) != sK43) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) != sK43)) ) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f970])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f970,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) != sK43) | ($false = ((multiplication @ X1 @ X2) = sK43)) | ($false = (((sK1 = X2) | (sK0 = X2)) & (sK2 = X1)))) ) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f969])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f969,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) != sK43) | ($false = ((((sK1 = X2) | (sK0 = X2)) & (sK2 = X1)) & ((multiplication @ X1 @ X2) = sK43)))) ) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f968])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f968,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($false = ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = sK43)) | ($false = ((((sK1 = X2) | (sK0 = X2)) & (sK2 = X1)) & ((multiplication @ X1 @ X2) = sK43)))) ) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f967])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f967,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($false = ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = sK43)) | ($false = ((^[Y0 : $i]: ((((sK1 = Y0) | (sK0 = Y0)) & (sK2 = X1)) & ((multiplication @ X1 @ Y0) = sK43))) @ X2))) ) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(pi_clausification,[],[f966])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f966,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X1 : $i] : (($false = (?? @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((((sK1 = Y0) | (sK0 = Y0)) & (sK2 = X1)) & ((multiplication @ X1 @ Y0) = sK43))))) | ($false = ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = sK43))) ) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f965])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f965,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X1 : $i] : (($false = ((^[Y0 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((((sK1 = Y1) | (sK0 = Y1)) & (sK2 = Y0)) & ((multiplication @ Y0 @ Y1) = sK43))))) @ X1)) | ($false = ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = sK43))) ) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(pi_clausification,[],[f950])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f950,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ($false = (?? @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((((sK1 = Y1) | (sK0 = Y1)) & (sK2 = Y0)) & ((multiplication @ Y0 @ Y1) = sK43))))))) | ($false = ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = sK43)) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f949])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f1027,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ~spl3_59 | spl3_63 | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f978,f942,f1025,f1006])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f978,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((multiplication @ X1 @ X2) != sK43) | (sK0 != X2) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) != sK43) | (sK2 != X1)) ) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f977])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f977,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($false = (sK0 = X2)) | ((multiplication @ X1 @ X2) != sK43) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) != sK43) | (sK2 != X1)) ) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f973])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f973,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) != sK43) | ($false = (sK2 = X1)) | ((multiplication @ X1 @ X2) != sK43) | ($false = (sK0 = X2))) ) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f972])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f1023,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 spl3_61 | spl3_59 | spl3_57 | spl3_62 | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f992,f942,f1020,f998,f1006,f1016])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f1016,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 spl3_61 <=> (sK45 = sK0)),
% 3.82/0.91 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_61])])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f1020,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 spl3_62 <=> (sK45 = sK1)),
% 3.82/0.91 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_62])])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f992,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 (sK45 = sK1) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = sK43) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) = sK43) | (sK45 = sK0) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f991])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f991,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) = sK43) | (sK45 = sK0) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = sK43) | ($true = (sK1 = sK45)) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f990])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f990,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ((sK0 = sK45) = $true) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) = sK43) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = sK43) | ($true = (sK1 = sK45)) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f989])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f989,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = sK43) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) = sK43) | ($true = ((sK1 = sK45) | (sK0 = sK45))) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f988])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f988,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 (((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = sK43) = $true) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) = sK43) | ($true = ((sK1 = sK45) | (sK0 = sK45))) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f986])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f986,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) = sK43) | ($true = (((sK1 = sK45) | (sK0 = sK45)) & (sK2 = sK44))) | (((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = sK43) = $true) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f984])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f984,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ($true = ((((sK1 = sK45) | (sK0 = sK45)) & (sK2 = sK44)) & ((multiplication @ sK44 @ sK45) = sK43))) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) = sK43) | (((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = sK43) = $true) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f983])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f983,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 (((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) = sK43) = $true) | (((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = sK43) = $true) | ($true = ((((sK1 = sK45) | (sK0 = sK45)) & (sK2 = sK44)) & ((multiplication @ sK44 @ sK45) = sK43))) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f982])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f982,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ((((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) = sK43) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = sK43)) = $true) | ($true = ((((sK1 = sK45) | (sK0 = sK45)) & (sK2 = sK44)) & ((multiplication @ sK44 @ sK45) = sK43))) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f981])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f981,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ($true = ((^[Y0 : $i]: ((((sK1 = Y0) | (sK0 = Y0)) & (sK2 = sK44)) & ((multiplication @ sK44 @ Y0) = sK43))) @ sK45)) | ((((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) = sK43) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = sK43)) = $true) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(sigma_clausification,[],[f980])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f980,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ((?? @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((((sK1 = Y0) | (sK0 = Y0)) & (sK2 = sK44)) & ((multiplication @ sK44 @ Y0) = sK43)))) = $true) | ((((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) = sK43) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = sK43)) = $true) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f979])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f979,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ($true = ((^[Y0 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((((sK1 = Y1) | (sK0 = Y1)) & (sK2 = Y0)) & ((multiplication @ Y0 @ Y1) = sK43))))) @ sK44)) | ((((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) = sK43) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = sK43)) = $true) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(sigma_clausification,[],[f948])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f948,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ($true = (?? @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((((sK1 = Y1) | (sK0 = Y1)) & (sK2 = Y0)) & ((multiplication @ Y0 @ Y1) = sK43))))))) | ((((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) = sK43) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = sK43)) = $true) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f947])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f1014,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 spl3_57 | spl3_59 | spl3_60 | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f994,f942,f1011,f1006,f998])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f1011,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 spl3_60 <=> (sK2 = sK44)),
% 3.82/0.91 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_60])])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f994,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) = sK43) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = sK43) | (sK2 = sK44) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f993])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f993,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) = sK43) | ($true = (sK2 = sK44)) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = sK43) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f987])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f987,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) = sK43) | (((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = sK43) = $true) | ($true = (sK2 = sK44)) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f986])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f1009,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 spl3_57 | spl3_58 | spl3_59 | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f996,f942,f1006,f1002,f998])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f1002,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 spl3_58 <=> ((multiplication @ sK44 @ sK45) = sK43)),
% 3.82/0.91 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_58])])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f996,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) = sK43) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = sK43) | ((multiplication @ sK44 @ sK45) = sK43) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f995])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f995,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) = sK43) | ((multiplication @ sK44 @ sK45) = sK43) | (((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = sK43) = $true) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f985])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f985,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ($true = ((multiplication @ sK44 @ sK45) = sK43)) | (((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = sK43) = $true) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) = sK43) | spl3_56),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f984])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f945,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ~spl3_56 | spl3_2),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f940,f73,f942])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f73,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 spl3_2 <=> ((multiplication @ sK2 @ (sup @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK1 = Y0) | (sK0 = Y0))))) = (sup @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) = Y0) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = Y0)))))),
% 3.82/0.91 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_2])])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f940,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ((^[Y0 : $i]: (((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) = Y0) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = Y0))) != (^[Y0 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((((sK1 = Y2) | (sK0 = Y2)) & (sK2 = Y1)) & ((multiplication @ Y1 @ Y2) = Y0)))))))) | spl3_2),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f900])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f900,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ((^[Y0 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((((^[Y3 : $i]: ((sK1 = Y3) | (sK0 = Y3))) @ Y2) & (sK2 = Y1)) & ((multiplication @ Y1 @ Y2) = Y0))))))) != (^[Y0 : $i]: (((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) = Y0) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = Y0)))) | spl3_2),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(equality_resolution,[],[f741])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f741,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i > $o] : (((^[Y0 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: (((X1 @ Y2) & (X0 = Y1)) & ((multiplication @ Y1 @ Y2) = Y0))))))) != (^[Y0 : $i]: (((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) = Y0) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = Y0)))) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ (sup @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK1 = Y0) | (sK0 = Y0))))) != (multiplication @ X0 @ (sup @ X1)))) ) | spl3_2),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(superposition,[],[f729,f62])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f62,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((sup @ (= @ X0)) = X0)) )),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f60])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f60,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((sup @ ((^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: (Y0 = Y1)))) @ X0)) = X0)) )),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f52,f45])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f45,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 (singleton = (^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: (Y0 = Y1)))))),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f22,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 (singleton = (^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: (Y0 = Y1)))))),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f21])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f21,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ((^[X0 : $i, X1 : $i] : ((X0 = X1))) = singleton)),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(rectify,[],[f3])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f3,axiom,(
% 3.82/0.91 ((^[X0 : $i, X2 : $i] : ((X0 = X2))) = singleton)),
% 3.82/0.91 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',singleton_def)).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f52,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((sup @ (singleton @ X0)) = X0)) )),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f5,axiom,(
% 3.82/0.91 ! [X0] : ((sup @ (singleton @ X0)) = X0)),
% 3.82/0.91 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sup_singleset)).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f729,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i > $o] : (((^[Y0 : $i]: (((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) = Y0) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = Y0))) != (^[Y0 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: (((X0 @ Y2) & (X1 @ Y1)) & ((multiplication @ Y1 @ Y2) = Y0)))))))) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ (sup @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK1 = Y0) | (sK0 = Y0))))) != (multiplication @ (sup @ X1) @ (sup @ X0)))) ) | spl3_2),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f75,f64])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f64,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i > $o] : (((multiplication @ (sup @ X0) @ (sup @ X1)) = (sup @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: (((X1 @ Y2) & (X0 @ Y1)) & ((multiplication @ Y1 @ Y2) = Y0)))))))))) )),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f57])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f57,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i > $o] : (((multiplication @ (sup @ X0) @ (sup @ X1)) = (sup @ ((^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y3 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y4 : $i]: (((Y1 @ Y4) & (Y0 @ Y3)) & ((multiplication @ Y3 @ Y4) = Y2))))))))))) @ X0 @ X1)))) )),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f40,f51])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f51,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 (crossmult = (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y3 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y4 : $i]: (((Y1 @ Y4) & (Y0 @ Y3)) & ((multiplication @ Y3 @ Y4) = Y2))))))))))))),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f25,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 (crossmult = (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y3 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y4 : $i]: (((Y1 @ Y4) & (Y0 @ Y3)) & ((multiplication @ Y3 @ Y4) = Y2))))))))))))),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f24])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f24,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 (crossmult = (^[X0 : $i > $o, X1 : $i > $o, X2 : $i] : (? [X3,X4] : (((multiplication @ X4 @ X3) = X2) & (X0 @ X4) & (X1 @ X3)))))),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(rectify,[],[f11])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f11,axiom,(
% 3.82/0.91 (crossmult = (^[X0 : $i > $o, X1 : $i > $o, X6 : $i] : (? [X7,X4] : (((multiplication @ X4 @ X7) = X6) & (X0 @ X4) & (X1 @ X7)))))),
% 3.82/0.91 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',crossmult_def)).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f40,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ( ! [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i > $o] : (((multiplication @ (sup @ X0) @ (sup @ X1)) = (sup @ (crossmult @ X0 @ X1)))) )),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f12,axiom,(
% 3.82/0.91 ! [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i > $o] : ((multiplication @ (sup @ X0) @ (sup @ X1)) = (sup @ (crossmult @ X0 @ X1)))),
% 3.82/0.91 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiplication_def)).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f75,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ((multiplication @ sK2 @ (sup @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK1 = Y0) | (sK0 = Y0))))) != (sup @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) = Y0) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = Y0))))) | spl3_2),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f73])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f76,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ~spl3_2),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f61,f73])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f61,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ((multiplication @ sK2 @ (sup @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK1 = Y0) | (sK0 = Y0))))) != (sup @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) = Y0) | ((multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0) = Y0)))))),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f56])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f56,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 (((^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: (sup @ ((^[Y2 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y3 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y4 : $i]: ((Y2 @ Y4) | (Y3 @ Y4))))))) @ ((^[Y2 : $i]: ((^[Y3 : $i]: (Y2 = Y3)))) @ Y0) @ ((^[Y2 : $i]: ((^[Y3 : $i]: (Y2 = Y3)))) @ Y1)))))) @ (multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) @ (multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0)) != (multiplication @ sK2 @ ((^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: (sup @ ((^[Y2 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y3 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y4 : $i]: ((Y2 @ Y4) | (Y3 @ Y4))))))) @ ((^[Y2 : $i]: ((^[Y3 : $i]: (Y2 = Y3)))) @ Y0) @ ((^[Y2 : $i]: ((^[Y3 : $i]: (Y2 = Y3)))) @ Y1)))))) @ sK1 @ sK0)))),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f39,f54,f54])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f54,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 (addition = (^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: (sup @ ((^[Y2 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y3 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y4 : $i]: ((Y2 @ Y4) | (Y3 @ Y4))))))) @ ((^[Y2 : $i]: ((^[Y3 : $i]: (Y2 = Y3)))) @ Y0) @ ((^[Y2 : $i]: ((^[Y3 : $i]: (Y2 = Y3)))) @ Y1)))))))),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f50,f43,f45,f45])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f43,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 (union = (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y2) | (Y1 @ Y2))))))))),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f31])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f31,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 (union = (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y2) | (Y1 @ Y2))))))))),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f30])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f30,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 (union = (^[X0 : $i > $o, X1 : $i > $o, X2 : $i] : ((X1 @ X2) | (X0 @ X2))))),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f2,axiom,(
% 3.82/0.91 (union = (^[X0 : $i > $o, X1 : $i > $o, X2 : $i] : ((X1 @ X2) | (X0 @ X2))))),
% 3.82/0.91 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',union_def)).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f50,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 (addition = (^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: (sup @ (union @ (singleton @ Y0) @ (singleton @ Y1)))))))),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f23,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 (addition = (^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: (sup @ (union @ (singleton @ Y0) @ (singleton @ Y1)))))))),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f9])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f9,axiom,(
% 3.82/0.91 (addition = (^[X0 : $i, X1 : $i] : (sup @ (union @ (singleton @ X0) @ (singleton @ X1)))))),
% 3.82/0.91 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',addition_def)).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f39,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ((addition @ (multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) @ (multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0)) != (multiplication @ sK2 @ (addition @ sK1 @ sK0)))),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f35])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f35,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ((addition @ (multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) @ (multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0)) != (multiplication @ sK2 @ (addition @ sK1 @ sK0)))),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f33,f34])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f34,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ? [X0,X1,X2] : ((addition @ (multiplication @ X2 @ X1) @ (multiplication @ X2 @ X0)) != (multiplication @ X2 @ (addition @ X1 @ X0))) => ((addition @ (multiplication @ sK2 @ sK1) @ (multiplication @ sK2 @ sK0)) != (multiplication @ sK2 @ (addition @ sK1 @ sK0)))),
% 3.82/0.91 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f33,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ? [X0,X1,X2] : ((addition @ (multiplication @ X2 @ X1) @ (multiplication @ X2 @ X0)) != (multiplication @ X2 @ (addition @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f32])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f32,plain,(
% 3.82/0.91 ~! [X0,X1,X2] : ((addition @ (multiplication @ X2 @ X1) @ (multiplication @ X2 @ X0)) = (multiplication @ X2 @ (addition @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(rectify,[],[f16])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f16,negated_conjecture,(
% 3.82/0.91 ~! [X8,X5,X4] : ((multiplication @ X4 @ (addition @ X5 @ X8)) = (addition @ (multiplication @ X4 @ X5) @ (multiplication @ X4 @ X8)))),
% 3.82/0.91 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f15])).
% 3.82/0.91 thf(f15,conjecture,(
% 3.82/0.91 ! [X8,X5,X4] : ((multiplication @ X4 @ (addition @ X5 @ X8)) = (addition @ (multiplication @ X4 @ X5) @ (multiplication @ X4 @ X8)))),
% 3.82/0.91 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiplication_distrr)).
% 3.82/0.91 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 3.82/0.91 % (1958)------------------------------
% 3.82/0.91 % (1958)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 3.82/0.91 % (1958)Termination reason: Refutation
% 3.82/0.91
% 3.82/0.91 % (1958)Memory used [KB]: 6908
% 3.82/0.91 % (1958)Time elapsed: 0.111 s
% 3.82/0.91 % (1958)Instructions burned: 260 (million)
% 3.82/0.91 % (1958)------------------------------
% 3.82/0.91 % (1958)------------------------------
% 3.82/0.91 % (1676)Success in time 0.54 s
% 3.82/0.91 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------