TSTP Solution File: PUZ149_13 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : PUZ149_13 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 13:23:18 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 5.32s 1.50s
% Output   : Proof 6.94s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : PUZ149_13 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.2.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 22:37:42 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.62  ________       _____
% 0.21/0.62  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.21/0.62  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.21/0.62  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.21/0.62  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.21/0.62  
% 0.21/0.62  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.21/0.62  (2023-06-19)
% 0.21/0.62  
% 0.21/0.62  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.21/0.62  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.21/0.62                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.21/0.62  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.21/0.62  
% 0.21/0.62  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.21/0.62  
% 0.21/0.62  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.21/0.63  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.21/0.65  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.21/0.65  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.21/0.65  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.21/0.65  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.21/0.65  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.21/0.65  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.21/0.65  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 2.62/1.04  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.62/1.05  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.83/1.07  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.83/1.07  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 2.83/1.07  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 2.83/1.07  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 2.83/1.07  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 3.61/1.20  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.61/1.21  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.12/1.24  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 4.12/1.25  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.12/1.25  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.34/1.27  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 4.34/1.28  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.32/1.50  Prover 3: proved (857ms)
% 5.32/1.50  
% 5.32/1.50  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.32/1.50  
% 5.32/1.50  Prover 2: proved (859ms)
% 5.32/1.50  
% 5.32/1.50  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.32/1.50  
% 5.32/1.50  Prover 5: stopped
% 5.32/1.51  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 5.32/1.51  Prover 6: stopped
% 5.32/1.51  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 5.32/1.51  Prover 0: stopped
% 5.32/1.51  Prover 1: Found proof (size 34)
% 5.32/1.51  Prover 1: proved (865ms)
% 5.32/1.51  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 5.32/1.51  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 5.32/1.51  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 5.32/1.53  Prover 4: stopped
% 6.14/1.54  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 6.14/1.55  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 6.14/1.55  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 6.14/1.56  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 6.14/1.56  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 6.44/1.58  Prover 11: stopped
% 6.44/1.59  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.44/1.59  Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.44/1.59  Prover 7: stopped
% 6.44/1.59  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.44/1.59  Prover 13: stopped
% 6.44/1.60  Prover 10: stopped
% 6.44/1.62  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.44/1.62  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.44/1.63  Prover 8: stopped
% 6.44/1.63  
% 6.44/1.63  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 6.44/1.63  
% 6.44/1.63  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 6.44/1.63  Assumptions after simplification:
% 6.44/1.63  ---------------------------------
% 6.44/1.63  
% 6.44/1.63    (make_c_acid)
% 6.82/1.66    $ki_index(#idx(make_c)) & $ki_world($ki_local_world) &  ? [v0: $ki_world] :
% 6.82/1.66    ($ki_accessible(#idx(make_c), $ki_local_world, v0) = 0 & acid(v0) = 0 &
% 6.82/1.66      $ki_world(v0))
% 6.82/1.66  
% 6.82/1.66    (pour_a_acid)
% 6.82/1.66    $ki_index(#idx(pour_a)) & $ki_world($ki_local_world) &  ! [v0: $ki_world] : (
% 6.82/1.66      ~ ($ki_accessible(#idx(pour_a), $ki_local_world, v0) = 0) |  ~ $ki_world(v0)
% 6.82/1.66      |  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & acid(v0) = v1))
% 6.82/1.66  
% 6.82/1.66    (pour_ab_make_axiom_2)
% 6.94/1.66    $ki_index(#idx(pour_a)) & $ki_index(#idx(pour_b)) & $ki_index(#idx(make_c)) &
% 6.94/1.66    $ki_world($ki_local_world) & ( ? [v0: $ki_world] :
% 6.94/1.66      ($ki_accessible(#idx(pour_a), $ki_local_world, v0) = 0 & $ki_world(v0) &  ?
% 6.94/1.66        [v1: $ki_world] : ($ki_accessible(#idx(pour_b), v0, v1) = 0 & acid(v1) = 0
% 6.94/1.66          & $ki_world(v1))) |  ! [v0: $ki_world] : ( ~
% 6.94/1.66        ($ki_accessible(#idx(make_c), $ki_local_world, v0) = 0) |  ~ $ki_world(v0)
% 6.94/1.66        |  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & acid(v0) = v1)))
% 6.94/1.66  
% 6.94/1.67    (verify)
% 6.94/1.67    $ki_index(#idx(pour_a)) & $ki_index(#idx(pour_b)) & $ki_world($ki_local_world)
% 6.94/1.67    & ( ! [v0: $ki_world] : ( ~ ($ki_accessible(#idx(pour_a), $ki_local_world, v0)
% 6.94/1.67          = 0) |  ~ $ki_world(v0) | acid(v0) = 0) |  ! [v0: $ki_world] : ( ~
% 6.94/1.67        ($ki_accessible(#idx(pour_a), $ki_local_world, v0) = 0) |  ~ $ki_world(v0)
% 6.94/1.67        |  ! [v1: $ki_world] : ( ~ ($ki_accessible(#idx(pour_b), v0, v1) = 0) |  ~
% 6.94/1.67          $ki_world(v1) |  ? [v2: int] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & acid(v1) = v2))))
% 6.94/1.67  
% 6.94/1.67    (function-axioms)
% 6.94/1.67     ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $ki_world] :
% 6.94/1.67     ! [v3: $ki_world] :  ! [v4: $ki_index] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ ($ki_accessible(v4,
% 6.94/1.67          v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ ($ki_accessible(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 6.94/1.67      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $ki_world] : (v1 =
% 6.94/1.67      v0 |  ~ (acid(v2) = v1) |  ~ (acid(v2) = v0))
% 6.94/1.67  
% 6.94/1.67  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 6.94/1.67  --------------------------------------------
% 6.94/1.67  pour_ab_make_axiom_1, pour_ba_make_axiom_1, pour_ba_make_axiom_2
% 6.94/1.67  
% 6.94/1.67  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 6.94/1.67  ---------------------------------
% 6.94/1.67  
% 6.94/1.67  Begin of proof
% 6.94/1.67  | 
% 6.94/1.67  | ALPHA: (pour_ab_make_axiom_2) implies:
% 6.94/1.67  |   (1)   ? [v0: $ki_world] : ($ki_accessible(#idx(pour_a), $ki_local_world, v0)
% 6.94/1.67  |          = 0 & $ki_world(v0) &  ? [v1: $ki_world] :
% 6.94/1.67  |          ($ki_accessible(#idx(pour_b), v0, v1) = 0 & acid(v1) = 0 &
% 6.94/1.67  |            $ki_world(v1))) |  ! [v0: $ki_world] : ( ~
% 6.94/1.67  |          ($ki_accessible(#idx(make_c), $ki_local_world, v0) = 0) |  ~
% 6.94/1.67  |          $ki_world(v0) |  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & acid(v0) = v1))
% 6.94/1.67  | 
% 6.94/1.67  | ALPHA: (pour_a_acid) implies:
% 6.94/1.68  |   (2)   ! [v0: $ki_world] : ( ~ ($ki_accessible(#idx(pour_a), $ki_local_world,
% 6.94/1.68  |              v0) = 0) |  ~ $ki_world(v0) |  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &
% 6.94/1.68  |            acid(v0) = v1))
% 6.94/1.68  | 
% 6.94/1.68  | ALPHA: (make_c_acid) implies:
% 6.94/1.68  |   (3)   ? [v0: $ki_world] : ($ki_accessible(#idx(make_c), $ki_local_world, v0)
% 6.94/1.68  |          = 0 & acid(v0) = 0 & $ki_world(v0))
% 6.94/1.68  | 
% 6.94/1.68  | ALPHA: (verify) implies:
% 6.94/1.68  |   (4)   ! [v0: $ki_world] : ( ~ ($ki_accessible(#idx(pour_a), $ki_local_world,
% 6.94/1.68  |              v0) = 0) |  ~ $ki_world(v0) | acid(v0) = 0) |  ! [v0: $ki_world]
% 6.94/1.68  |        : ( ~ ($ki_accessible(#idx(pour_a), $ki_local_world, v0) = 0) |  ~
% 6.94/1.68  |          $ki_world(v0) |  ! [v1: $ki_world] : ( ~
% 6.94/1.68  |            ($ki_accessible(#idx(pour_b), v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ $ki_world(v1) |  ?
% 6.94/1.68  |            [v2: int] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & acid(v1) = v2)))
% 6.94/1.68  | 
% 6.94/1.68  | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 6.94/1.68  |   (5)   ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2:
% 6.94/1.68  |          $ki_world] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (acid(v2) = v1) |  ~ (acid(v2) = v0))
% 6.94/1.68  | 
% 6.94/1.68  | DELTA: instantiating (3) with fresh symbol all_9_0 gives:
% 6.94/1.68  |   (6)  $ki_accessible(#idx(make_c), $ki_local_world, all_9_0) = 0 &
% 6.94/1.68  |        acid(all_9_0) = 0 & $ki_world(all_9_0)
% 6.94/1.68  | 
% 6.94/1.68  | ALPHA: (6) implies:
% 6.94/1.68  |   (7)  $ki_world(all_9_0)
% 6.94/1.68  |   (8)  acid(all_9_0) = 0
% 6.94/1.68  |   (9)  $ki_accessible(#idx(make_c), $ki_local_world, all_9_0) = 0
% 6.94/1.68  | 
% 6.94/1.68  | BETA: splitting (1) gives:
% 6.94/1.68  | 
% 6.94/1.68  | Case 1:
% 6.94/1.68  | | 
% 6.94/1.68  | |   (10)   ? [v0: $ki_world] : ($ki_accessible(#idx(pour_a), $ki_local_world,
% 6.94/1.68  | |             v0) = 0 & $ki_world(v0) &  ? [v1: $ki_world] :
% 6.94/1.68  | |           ($ki_accessible(#idx(pour_b), v0, v1) = 0 & acid(v1) = 0 &
% 6.94/1.68  | |             $ki_world(v1)))
% 6.94/1.68  | | 
% 6.94/1.68  | | DELTA: instantiating (10) with fresh symbol all_17_0 gives:
% 6.94/1.69  | |   (11)  $ki_accessible(#idx(pour_a), $ki_local_world, all_17_0) = 0 &
% 6.94/1.69  | |         $ki_world(all_17_0) &  ? [v0: $ki_world] :
% 6.94/1.69  | |         ($ki_accessible(#idx(pour_b), all_17_0, v0) = 0 & acid(v0) = 0 &
% 6.94/1.69  | |           $ki_world(v0))
% 6.94/1.69  | | 
% 6.94/1.69  | | ALPHA: (11) implies:
% 6.94/1.69  | |   (12)  $ki_world(all_17_0)
% 6.94/1.69  | |   (13)  $ki_accessible(#idx(pour_a), $ki_local_world, all_17_0) = 0
% 6.94/1.69  | |   (14)   ? [v0: $ki_world] : ($ki_accessible(#idx(pour_b), all_17_0, v0) = 0
% 6.94/1.69  | |           & acid(v0) = 0 & $ki_world(v0))
% 6.94/1.69  | | 
% 6.94/1.69  | | DELTA: instantiating (14) with fresh symbol all_19_0 gives:
% 6.94/1.69  | |   (15)  $ki_accessible(#idx(pour_b), all_17_0, all_19_0) = 0 &
% 6.94/1.69  | |         acid(all_19_0) = 0 & $ki_world(all_19_0)
% 6.94/1.69  | | 
% 6.94/1.69  | | ALPHA: (15) implies:
% 6.94/1.69  | |   (16)  $ki_world(all_19_0)
% 6.94/1.69  | |   (17)  acid(all_19_0) = 0
% 6.94/1.69  | |   (18)  $ki_accessible(#idx(pour_b), all_17_0, all_19_0) = 0
% 6.94/1.69  | | 
% 6.94/1.69  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_17_0, simplifying with (12), (13)
% 6.94/1.69  | |              gives:
% 6.94/1.69  | |   (19)   ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & acid(all_17_0) = v0)
% 6.94/1.69  | | 
% 6.94/1.69  | | DELTA: instantiating (19) with fresh symbol all_26_0 gives:
% 6.94/1.69  | |   (20)   ~ (all_26_0 = 0) & acid(all_17_0) = all_26_0
% 6.94/1.69  | | 
% 6.94/1.69  | | ALPHA: (20) implies:
% 6.94/1.69  | |   (21)   ~ (all_26_0 = 0)
% 6.94/1.69  | |   (22)  acid(all_17_0) = all_26_0
% 6.94/1.69  | | 
% 6.94/1.69  | | BETA: splitting (4) gives:
% 6.94/1.69  | | 
% 6.94/1.69  | | Case 1:
% 6.94/1.69  | | | 
% 6.94/1.69  | | |   (23)   ! [v0: $ki_world] : ( ~ ($ki_accessible(#idx(pour_a),
% 6.94/1.69  | | |               $ki_local_world, v0) = 0) |  ~ $ki_world(v0) | acid(v0) = 0)
% 6.94/1.69  | | | 
% 6.94/1.69  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (23) with all_17_0, simplifying with (12), (13)
% 6.94/1.69  | | |              gives:
% 6.94/1.69  | | |   (24)  acid(all_17_0) = 0
% 6.94/1.69  | | | 
% 6.94/1.69  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_26_0, 0, all_17_0, simplifying
% 6.94/1.69  | | |              with (22), (24) gives:
% 6.94/1.69  | | |   (25)  all_26_0 = 0
% 6.94/1.69  | | | 
% 6.94/1.69  | | | REDUCE: (21), (25) imply:
% 6.94/1.69  | | |   (26)  $false
% 6.94/1.70  | | | 
% 6.94/1.70  | | | CLOSE: (26) is inconsistent.
% 6.94/1.70  | | | 
% 6.94/1.70  | | Case 2:
% 6.94/1.70  | | | 
% 6.94/1.70  | | |   (27)   ! [v0: $ki_world] : ( ~ ($ki_accessible(#idx(pour_a),
% 6.94/1.70  | | |               $ki_local_world, v0) = 0) |  ~ $ki_world(v0) |  ! [v1:
% 6.94/1.70  | | |             $ki_world] : ( ~ ($ki_accessible(#idx(pour_b), v0, v1) = 0) | 
% 6.94/1.70  | | |             ~ $ki_world(v1) |  ? [v2: int] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & acid(v1) =
% 6.94/1.70  | | |               v2)))
% 6.94/1.70  | | | 
% 6.94/1.70  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (27) with all_17_0, simplifying with (12), (13)
% 6.94/1.70  | | |              gives:
% 6.94/1.70  | | |   (28)   ! [v0: $ki_world] : ( ~ ($ki_accessible(#idx(pour_b), all_17_0,
% 6.94/1.70  | | |               v0) = 0) |  ~ $ki_world(v0) |  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &
% 6.94/1.70  | | |             acid(v0) = v1))
% 6.94/1.70  | | | 
% 6.94/1.70  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (28) with all_19_0, simplifying with (16), (18)
% 6.94/1.70  | | |              gives:
% 6.94/1.70  | | |   (29)   ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & acid(all_19_0) = v0)
% 6.94/1.70  | | | 
% 6.94/1.70  | | | DELTA: instantiating (29) with fresh symbol all_50_0 gives:
% 6.94/1.70  | | |   (30)   ~ (all_50_0 = 0) & acid(all_19_0) = all_50_0
% 6.94/1.70  | | | 
% 6.94/1.70  | | | ALPHA: (30) implies:
% 6.94/1.70  | | |   (31)   ~ (all_50_0 = 0)
% 6.94/1.70  | | |   (32)  acid(all_19_0) = all_50_0
% 6.94/1.70  | | | 
% 6.94/1.70  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with 0, all_50_0, all_19_0, simplifying
% 6.94/1.70  | | |              with (17), (32) gives:
% 6.94/1.70  | | |   (33)  all_50_0 = 0
% 6.94/1.70  | | | 
% 6.94/1.70  | | | REDUCE: (31), (33) imply:
% 6.94/1.70  | | |   (34)  $false
% 6.94/1.70  | | | 
% 6.94/1.70  | | | CLOSE: (34) is inconsistent.
% 6.94/1.70  | | | 
% 6.94/1.70  | | End of split
% 6.94/1.70  | | 
% 6.94/1.70  | Case 2:
% 6.94/1.70  | | 
% 6.94/1.70  | |   (35)   ! [v0: $ki_world] : ( ~ ($ki_accessible(#idx(make_c),
% 6.94/1.70  | |               $ki_local_world, v0) = 0) |  ~ $ki_world(v0) |  ? [v1: int] :
% 6.94/1.70  | |           ( ~ (v1 = 0) & acid(v0) = v1))
% 6.94/1.70  | | 
% 6.94/1.70  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (35) with all_9_0, simplifying with (7), (9)
% 6.94/1.70  | |              gives:
% 6.94/1.70  | |   (36)   ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & acid(all_9_0) = v0)
% 6.94/1.70  | | 
% 6.94/1.70  | | DELTA: instantiating (36) with fresh symbol all_18_0 gives:
% 6.94/1.70  | |   (37)   ~ (all_18_0 = 0) & acid(all_9_0) = all_18_0
% 6.94/1.70  | | 
% 6.94/1.70  | | ALPHA: (37) implies:
% 6.94/1.70  | |   (38)   ~ (all_18_0 = 0)
% 6.94/1.70  | |   (39)  acid(all_9_0) = all_18_0
% 6.94/1.70  | | 
% 6.94/1.70  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with 0, all_18_0, all_9_0, simplifying with
% 6.94/1.70  | |              (8), (39) gives:
% 6.94/1.70  | |   (40)  all_18_0 = 0
% 6.94/1.70  | | 
% 6.94/1.70  | | REDUCE: (38), (40) imply:
% 6.94/1.70  | |   (41)  $false
% 6.94/1.70  | | 
% 6.94/1.70  | | CLOSE: (41) is inconsistent.
% 6.94/1.70  | | 
% 6.94/1.70  | End of split
% 6.94/1.70  | 
% 6.94/1.70  End of proof
% 6.94/1.70  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 6.94/1.70  
% 6.94/1.70  1085ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------