TSTP Solution File: PUZ132+1 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : PUZ132+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Dec 26 00:57:30 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 0.16s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 13
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 32 ( 13 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 51 ( 2 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 38 ( 19 ~; 14 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn 9 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(1,axiom,
country(usa),
file('/tmp/tmpgojVjQ/sel_PUZ132+1.p_1',usa_type) ).
fof(3,axiom,
! [X2] :
( city(X2)
=> has_crime(X2) ),
file('/tmp/tmpgojVjQ/sel_PUZ132+1.p_1',crime_axiom) ).
fof(6,conjecture,
( beautiful(washington)
& has_crime(washington) ),
file('/tmp/tmpgojVjQ/sel_PUZ132+1.p_1',washington_conjecture) ).
fof(7,axiom,
! [X2] :
( country(X2)
=> beautiful(capital_city(X2)) ),
file('/tmp/tmpgojVjQ/sel_PUZ132+1.p_1',beautiful_capital_axiom) ).
fof(8,axiom,
capital_city(usa) = washington,
file('/tmp/tmpgojVjQ/sel_PUZ132+1.p_1',usa_capital_axiom) ).
fof(9,axiom,
capital(washington),
file('/tmp/tmpgojVjQ/sel_PUZ132+1.p_1',washington_type) ).
fof(11,axiom,
! [X1] :
( capital(X1)
=> city(X1) ),
file('/tmp/tmpgojVjQ/sel_PUZ132+1.p_1',capital_city_type) ).
fof(12,negated_conjecture,
~ ( beautiful(washington)
& has_crime(washington) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[6]) ).
cnf(13,plain,
country(usa),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[1]) ).
fof(17,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ city(X2)
| has_crime(X2) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
fof(18,plain,
! [X3] :
( ~ city(X3)
| has_crime(X3) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[17]) ).
cnf(19,plain,
( has_crime(X1)
| ~ city(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[18]) ).
fof(26,negated_conjecture,
( ~ beautiful(washington)
| ~ has_crime(washington) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
cnf(27,negated_conjecture,
( ~ has_crime(washington)
| ~ beautiful(washington) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[26]) ).
fof(28,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ country(X2)
| beautiful(capital_city(X2)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
fof(29,plain,
! [X3] :
( ~ country(X3)
| beautiful(capital_city(X3)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[28]) ).
cnf(30,plain,
( beautiful(capital_city(X1))
| ~ country(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[29]) ).
cnf(31,plain,
capital_city(usa) = washington,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
cnf(32,plain,
capital(washington),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
fof(36,plain,
! [X1] :
( ~ capital(X1)
| city(X1) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
fof(37,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ capital(X2)
| city(X2) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[36]) ).
cnf(38,plain,
( city(X1)
| ~ capital(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[37]) ).
cnf(39,plain,
( beautiful(washington)
| ~ country(usa) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[30,31,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(40,plain,
( beautiful(washington)
| $false ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[39,13,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(41,plain,
beautiful(washington),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[40,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(46,negated_conjecture,
( $false
| ~ has_crime(washington) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[27,41,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(47,negated_conjecture,
~ has_crime(washington),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[46,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(48,negated_conjecture,
~ city(washington),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[47,19,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(49,negated_conjecture,
~ capital(washington),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[48,38,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(50,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[49,32,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(51,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[50,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(52,negated_conjecture,
$false,
51,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/PUZ/PUZ132+1.p
% --creating new selector for []
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpgojVjQ/sel_PUZ132+1.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem PUZ132+1.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/PUZ/PUZ132+1.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/PUZ/PUZ132+1.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------