TSTP Solution File: PUZ132+1 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : PUZ132+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 13:11:22 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 0.65s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem    : PUZ132+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime   : Sat Aug 26 22:55:15 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.22/0.59  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.64  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.64  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 0.22/0.64  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.64  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.22/0.64  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.22/0.64  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.22/0.64  
% 0.22/0.64  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.22/0.64  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.22/0.64  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.65  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.65  % File     : PUZ132+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.22/0.65  % Domain   : Puzzles
% 0.22/0.65  % Problem  : Crime in beautiful Washington
% 0.22/0.65  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.22/0.65  % English  : A capital is a city. USA is a country. Every city has crime.
% 0.22/0.65  %            Washington is the capital of the USA. Every country has a
% 0.22/0.65  %            beautiful capital. Therefore, Washington is beautiful but has
% 0.22/0.65  %            crime.
% 0.22/0.65  
% 0.22/0.65  % Refs     :
% 0.22/0.65  % Source   : [TPTP]
% 0.22/0.65  % Names    :
% 0.22/0.65  
% 0.22/0.65  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.22/0.65  % Rating   : 0.03 v7.1.0, 0.04 v7.0.0, 0.03 v6.4.0, 0.08 v6.3.0, 0.00 v6.2.0, 0.04 v6.1.0, 0.07 v6.0.0, 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.04 v5.2.0, 0.00 v4.1.0
% 0.22/0.65  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (   6 unt;   0 def)
% 0.22/0.65  %            Number of atoms       :   16 (   1 equ)
% 0.22/0.65  %            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.22/0.65  %            Number of connectives :    5 (   0   ~;   0   |;   1   &)
% 0.22/0.65  %                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.22/0.65  %            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
% 0.22/0.65  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.22/0.65  %            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.22/0.65  %            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
% 0.22/0.65  %            Number of variables   :    7 (   4   !;   3   ?)
% 0.22/0.65  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 0.22/0.65  
% 0.22/0.65  % Comments :
% 0.22/0.65  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.65  fof(capital_type,axiom,
% 0.22/0.65      ? [A] : capital(A) ).
% 0.22/0.65  
% 0.22/0.65  fof(city_type,axiom,
% 0.22/0.65      ? [A] : city(A) ).
% 0.22/0.65  
% 0.22/0.65  fof(capital_city_type,axiom,
% 0.22/0.65      ! [A] :
% 0.22/0.65        ( capital(A)
% 0.22/0.65       => city(A) ) ).
% 0.22/0.65  
% 0.22/0.65  fof(country_type,axiom,
% 0.22/0.65      ? [A] : country(A) ).
% 0.22/0.65  
% 0.22/0.65  fof(washington_type,axiom,
% 0.22/0.65      capital(washington) ).
% 0.22/0.65  
% 0.22/0.65  fof(usa_type,axiom,
% 0.22/0.65      country(usa) ).
% 0.22/0.65  
% 0.22/0.65  fof(country_capital_type,axiom,
% 0.22/0.65      ! [A] :
% 0.22/0.65        ( country(A)
% 0.22/0.65       => capital(capital_city(A)) ) ).
% 0.22/0.65  
% 0.22/0.65  fof(crime_axiom,axiom,
% 0.22/0.65      ! [X] :
% 0.22/0.65        ( city(X)
% 0.22/0.65       => has_crime(X) ) ).
% 0.22/0.65  
% 0.22/0.65  fof(usa_capital_axiom,axiom,
% 0.22/0.65      capital_city(usa) = washington ).
% 0.22/0.65  
% 0.22/0.65  fof(beautiful_capital_axiom,axiom,
% 0.22/0.65      ! [X] :
% 0.22/0.65        ( country(X)
% 0.22/0.65       => beautiful(capital_city(X)) ) ).
% 0.22/0.65  
% 0.22/0.65  fof(washington_conjecture,conjecture,
% 0.22/0.65      ( beautiful(washington)
% 0.22/0.65      & has_crime(washington) ) ).
% 0.22/0.65  
% 0.22/0.65  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.65  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.65  % Proof found
% 0.22/0.65  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.65  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.22/0.65  %ClaNum:20(EqnAxiom:9)
% 0.22/0.65  %VarNum:8(SingletonVarNum:4)
% 0.22/0.65  %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.22/0.65  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.22/0.65  %SharedTerms:14
% 0.22/0.65  %goalClause: 16
% 0.22/0.65  [11]P1(a6)
% 0.22/0.65  [12]P1(a3)
% 0.22/0.65  [13]P3(a4)
% 0.22/0.65  [14]P4(a1)
% 0.22/0.65  [15]P4(a5)
% 0.22/0.65  [10]E(f2(a1),a6)
% 0.22/0.65  [16]~P5(a6)+~P2(a6)
% 0.22/0.65  [17]~P1(x171)+P3(x171)
% 0.22/0.65  [18]~P3(x181)+P5(x181)
% 0.22/0.65  [19]~P4(x191)+P1(f2(x191))
% 0.22/0.65  [20]~P4(x201)+P2(f2(x201))
% 0.22/0.65  %EqnAxiom
% 0.22/0.65  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.22/0.65  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.22/0.65  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.22/0.65  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f2(x41),f2(x42))
% 0.22/0.65  [5]~P1(x51)+P1(x52)+~E(x51,x52)
% 0.22/0.65  [6]~P4(x61)+P4(x62)+~E(x61,x62)
% 0.22/0.65  [7]~P3(x71)+P3(x72)+~E(x71,x72)
% 0.22/0.65  [8]~P2(x81)+P2(x82)+~E(x81,x82)
% 0.22/0.65  [9]~P5(x91)+P5(x92)+~E(x91,x92)
% 0.22/0.65  
% 0.22/0.65  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.66  cnf(25,plain,
% 0.22/0.66     (P3(a6)),
% 0.22/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[10,11,13,2,5,18,17])).
% 0.22/0.66  cnf(32,plain,
% 0.22/0.66     (~E(a4,x321)+P5(x321)),
% 0.22/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[10,11,13,14,15,2,5,18,17,20,19,4,9])).
% 0.22/0.66  cnf(33,plain,
% 0.22/0.66     (P2(a6)),
% 0.22/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[10,11,13,14,15,2,5,18,17,20,19,4,9,8])).
% 0.22/0.66  cnf(37,plain,
% 0.22/0.66     (~P5(a6)),
% 0.22/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[33,16])).
% 0.22/0.66  cnf(46,plain,
% 0.22/0.66     ($false),
% 0.22/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[25,37,32,2,18]),
% 0.22/0.66     ['proof']).
% 0.22/0.66  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.22/0.66  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------