TSTP Solution File: PUZ081_8 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : PUZ081_8 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:12:01 EDT 2023
% Result : CounterSatisfiable 0.19s 0.46s
% Output : Saturation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : PUZ081_8 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:55:01 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.gOKWoQcV12/E---3.1_2380.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.19/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 2458 completed with status 1
% 0.19/0.46 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.19/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.46 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.46 # partial match(1): FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.46 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 2463 completed with status 1
% 0.19/0.46 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.19/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.46 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.46 # partial match(1): FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.46 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.46
% 0.19/0.46 # No proof found!
% 0.19/0.46 # SZS status CounterSatisfiable
% 0.19/0.46 # SZS output start Saturation
% 0.19/0.46 cnf(c_0_15, plain, (~knight(X1)|~says(X1,$false)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])]), ['final']).
% 0.19/0.46 cnf(c_0_16, plain, (knight(X1)|knave(X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]), ['final']).
% 0.19/0.46 cnf(c_0_17, plain, (~knave(X1)|~says(X1,$true)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])])]), ['final']).
% 0.19/0.46 cnf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, (~knight(X1)|~knave(X3)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]), ['final']).
% 0.19/0.46 cnf(c_0_19, plain, (says(mel,(~knave(mel)&~knave(zoey)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]), ['final']).
% 0.19/0.46 cnf(c_0_20, plain, (says(zoey,knave(mel))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]), ['final']).
% 0.19/0.46 # SZS output end Saturation
% 0.19/0.46 # Parsed axioms : 11
% 0.19/0.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Initial clauses : 12
% 0.19/0.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 5
% 0.19/0.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 7
% 0.19/0.46 # Processed clauses : 7
% 0.19/0.46 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.19/0.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 6
% 0.19/0.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.46 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.46 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.46 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 6
% 0.19/0.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.19/0.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.19/0.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.19/0.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.19/0.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.19/0.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 411
% 0.19/0.46
% 0.19/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.46 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.19/0.46 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.19/0.46 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1724 pages
% 0.19/0.46
% 0.19/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.46 # User time : 0.011 s
% 0.19/0.46 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.46 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.19/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1680 pages
% 0.19/0.46 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.19/0.47 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------