TSTP Solution File: PUZ078+1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : PUZ078+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 18:11:10 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.47s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : PUZ078+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.5.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat May 28 21:57:42 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.19/0.37 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.19/0.37 #
% 0.19/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.37 # Number of axioms: 52 Number of unprocessed: 51
% 0.19/0.37 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.19/0.37 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.19/0.37 # Hello from C++
% 0.19/0.38 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.19/0.38 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.19/0.38 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.19/0.38 # 51 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.19/0.38 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.19/0.38 # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.19/0.38 # Found 33 unit axioms.
% 0.19/0.38 # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.19/0.38 # 18 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.19/0.38 # 33 unit axiom clauses
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.19/0.38 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.19/0.47 # There were 4 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.47 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.47 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.47 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.47 # There were 4 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.47 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.47 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.47 # There were 4 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.47 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.47 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.47 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.47 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (truthday(esk1_0))).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (consecutive(tuesday)=wednesday)).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (consecutive(monday)=tuesday)).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (day1(esk2_0))).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (consecutive(wednesday)=thursday)).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (day2(esk3_0))).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (day3(esk4_0))).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (consecutive(thursday)=friday)).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (consecutive(friday)=saturday)).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (consecutive(saturday)=sunday)).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (consecutive(sunday)=monday)).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (monday!=tuesday)).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_52, negated_conjecture, (~truthday(tuesday))).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (wednesday!=tuesday)).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (thursday!=tuesday)).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (friday!=tuesday)).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (monday!=wednesday)).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (monday!=thursday)).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (thursday!=wednesday)).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (monday!=friday)).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (friday!=wednesday)).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (saturday!=tuesday)).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (sunday!=tuesday)).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (friday!=thursday)).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (monday!=saturday)).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (saturday!=wednesday)).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (saturday!=thursday)).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (saturday!=friday)).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (monday!=sunday)).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (sunday!=wednesday)).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (sunday!=thursday)).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (sunday!=friday)).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (sunday!=saturday)).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_44, plain, (~day1(X1)|~truthday(monday)|~truthday(X1))).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_51, plain, (~day3(X1)|~truthday(wednesday)|~truthday(X1))).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_50, plain, (~day3(X1)|~truthday(friday)|~truthday(X1))).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_42, plain, (truthday(monday)|truthday(X1)|~day1(X1))).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (X1=sunday|X1=saturday|X1=friday|X1=thursday|X1=wednesday|X1=tuesday|X1=monday)).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (day2(consecutive(X1))|~day1(X1))).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (day1(X1)|~day2(consecutive(X1)))).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (day2(X1)|~day3(consecutive(X1)))).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_47, plain, (truthday(X1)|~day2(thursday)|~day2(X1))).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_46, plain, (truthday(X1)|~day2(saturday)|~day2(X1))).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (day3(consecutive(X1))|~day2(X1))).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_45, plain, (truthday(X1)|~day2(sunday)|~day2(X1))).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (X1=X2|~truthday(X2)|~truthday(X1))).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_49, plain, (truthday(friday)|truthday(wednesday)|truthday(X1)|~day3(X1))).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (X1=X2|~day1(X2)|~day1(X1))).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (X1=X2|~day2(X2)|~day2(X1))).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (X1=X2|~day3(X2)|~day3(X1))).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_48, plain, (day2(sunday)|day2(saturday)|day2(thursday)|~day2(X1)|~truthday(X1))).
% 0.19/0.47 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.47 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.47 # Found 7 steps
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_52, negated_conjecture, (~truthday(tuesday)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_53, plain, (~truthday(tuesday)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_49])).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_93, plain, (truthday(friday)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_44])).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_94, plain, (truthday(wednesday)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_94, ...])).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_96, plain, (~day3(tuesday)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_96, ...])).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_111, plain, (~day1(friday)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_111, ...])).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(i_0_112, plain, (~truthday(monday)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_112, ...])).
% 0.19/0.47 # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.47 # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.47 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.47 # Returning from population with 5 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.19/0.47 # We now have 5 tableaux to operate on
% 0.19/0.47 # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 0.19/0.47 # Proof search is over...
% 0.19/0.47 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------