TSTP Solution File: PUZ060+1 by PyRes---1.3
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.3
% Problem : PUZ060+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 18:24:16 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.40s 0.58s
% Output : Refutation 0.40s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : PUZ060+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 29 00:55:27 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.40/0.58 # Version: 1.3
% 0.40/0.58 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.40/0.58 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.40/0.58 fof(prove_this,conjecture,(![Peanuts]:(![John]:(![Bill]:(![Sue]:(![Apples]:(![Chicken]:(((((((((![X]:(food(X)=>likes(John,X)))&food(Apples))&food(Chicken))&(![X]:((?[Y]:(eats(Y,X)¬_killed_by(Y,X)))=>food(X))))&eats(Bill,Peanuts))&alive(Bill))&(![X]:(eats(Bill,X)=>eats(Sue,X))))&(![Y]:(alive(Y)=>(![X]:not_killed_by(Y,X)))))=>likes(John,Peanuts)))))))),input).
% 0.40/0.58 fof(c0,negated_conjecture,(~(![Peanuts]:(![John]:(![Bill]:(![Sue]:(![Apples]:(![Chicken]:(((((((((![X]:(food(X)=>likes(John,X)))&food(Apples))&food(Chicken))&(![X]:((?[Y]:(eats(Y,X)¬_killed_by(Y,X)))=>food(X))))&eats(Bill,Peanuts))&alive(Bill))&(![X]:(eats(Bill,X)=>eats(Sue,X))))&(![Y]:(alive(Y)=>(![X]:not_killed_by(Y,X)))))=>likes(John,Peanuts))))))))),inference(assume_negation,status(cth),[prove_this])).
% 0.40/0.58 fof(c1,negated_conjecture,(?[Peanuts]:(?[John]:(?[Bill]:(?[Sue]:(?[Apples]:(?[Chicken]:(((((((((![X]:(~food(X)|likes(John,X)))&food(Apples))&food(Chicken))&(![X]:((![Y]:(~eats(Y,X)|~not_killed_by(Y,X)))|food(X))))&eats(Bill,Peanuts))&alive(Bill))&(![X]:(~eats(Bill,X)|eats(Sue,X))))&(![Y]:(~alive(Y)|(![X]:not_killed_by(Y,X)))))&~likes(John,Peanuts)))))))),inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[c0])).
% 0.40/0.58 fof(c2,negated_conjecture,(?[Peanuts]:(?[John]:(((?[Bill]:(((((((![X]:(~food(X)|likes(John,X)))&(?[Apples]:food(Apples)))&(?[Chicken]:food(Chicken)))&(![X]:((![Y]:(~eats(Y,X)|~not_killed_by(Y,X)))|food(X))))&eats(Bill,Peanuts))&alive(Bill))&(?[Sue]:(![X]:(~eats(Bill,X)|eats(Sue,X))))))&(![Y]:(~alive(Y)|(![X]:not_killed_by(Y,X)))))&~likes(John,Peanuts)))),inference(shift_quantors,status(thm),[c1])).
% 0.40/0.58 fof(c3,negated_conjecture,(?[X2]:(?[X3]:(((?[X4]:(((((((![X5]:(~food(X5)|likes(X3,X5)))&(?[X6]:food(X6)))&(?[X7]:food(X7)))&(![X8]:((![X9]:(~eats(X9,X8)|~not_killed_by(X9,X8)))|food(X8))))&eats(X4,X2))&alive(X4))&(?[X10]:(![X11]:(~eats(X4,X11)|eats(X10,X11))))))&(![X12]:(~alive(X12)|(![X13]:not_killed_by(X12,X13)))))&~likes(X3,X2)))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c2])).
% 0.40/0.58 fof(c5,negated_conjecture,(![X5]:(![X8]:(![X9]:(![X11]:(![X12]:(![X13]:(((((((((~food(X5)|likes(skolem0002,X5))&food(skolem0004))&food(skolem0005))&((~eats(X9,X8)|~not_killed_by(X9,X8))|food(X8)))&eats(skolem0003,skolem0001))&alive(skolem0003))&(~eats(skolem0003,X11)|eats(skolem0006,X11)))&(~alive(X12)|not_killed_by(X12,X13)))&~likes(skolem0002,skolem0001)))))))),inference(shift_quantors,status(thm),[fof(c4,negated_conjecture,(((((((((![X5]:(~food(X5)|likes(skolem0002,X5)))&food(skolem0004))&food(skolem0005))&(![X8]:((![X9]:(~eats(X9,X8)|~not_killed_by(X9,X8)))|food(X8))))&eats(skolem0003,skolem0001))&alive(skolem0003))&(![X11]:(~eats(skolem0003,X11)|eats(skolem0006,X11))))&(![X12]:(~alive(X12)|(![X13]:not_killed_by(X12,X13)))))&~likes(skolem0002,skolem0001)),inference(skolemize,status(esa),[c3])).])).
% 0.40/0.58 cnf(c14,negated_conjecture,~likes(skolem0002,skolem0001),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c5])).
% 0.40/0.58 cnf(c6,negated_conjecture,~food(X14)|likes(skolem0002,X14),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c5])).
% 0.40/0.58 cnf(c10,negated_conjecture,eats(skolem0003,skolem0001),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c5])).
% 0.40/0.58 cnf(c11,negated_conjecture,alive(skolem0003),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c5])).
% 0.40/0.58 cnf(c13,negated_conjecture,~alive(X16)|not_killed_by(X16,X15),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c5])).
% 0.40/0.58 cnf(c17,plain,not_killed_by(skolem0003,X17),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c13, c11])).
% 0.40/0.58 cnf(c9,negated_conjecture,~eats(X20,X19)|~not_killed_by(X20,X19)|food(X19),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c5])).
% 0.40/0.58 cnf(c19,plain,~eats(skolem0003,X21)|food(X21),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c9, c17])).
% 0.40/0.58 cnf(c20,plain,food(skolem0001),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c19, c10])).
% 0.40/0.58 cnf(c21,plain,likes(skolem0002,skolem0001),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c20, c6])).
% 0.40/0.58 cnf(c22,plain,$false,inference(resolution,status(thm),[c21, c14])).
% 0.40/0.58 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.40/0.58
% 0.40/0.58 # Initial clauses : 9
% 0.40/0.58 # Processed clauses : 16
% 0.40/0.58 # Factors computed : 0
% 0.40/0.58 # Resolvents computed: 8
% 0.40/0.58 # Tautologies deleted: 0
% 0.40/0.58 # Forward subsumed : 0
% 0.40/0.58 # Backward subsumed : 0
% 0.40/0.58 # -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.40/0.58 # User time : 0.206 s
% 0.40/0.58 # System time : 0.013 s
% 0.40/0.58 # Total time : 0.219 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------