TSTP Solution File: PUZ056-2.005 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : PUZ056-2.005 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.5.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 04:11:39 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP25241/PUZ/PUZ056-2.005+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8] [nf = 0] [nu = 6] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 42] [nf = 4] [nu = 20] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 686] [nf = 10] [nu = 298] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4272] [nf = 16] [nu = 2184] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 15248] [nf = 22] [nu = 8374] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 44522] [nf = 28] [nu = 25716] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 116666] [nf = 34] [nu = 70018] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 286076] [nf = 40] [nu = 176928] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 671788] [nf = 46] [nu = 425614] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1532102] [nf = 52] [nu = 989964] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 8 secs [nr = 3423814] [nf = 58] [nu = 2248666] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 18 secs [nr = 7540648] [nf = 64] [nu = 5020728] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 13479566] [nf = 686] [nu = 8919231] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 13479648] [nf = 690] [nu = 8919293] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 13480546] [nf = 700] [nu = 8919723] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 13486716] [nf = 878] [nu = 8922633] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 13617850] [nf = 1228] [nu = 8973059] [ut = 77]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 40 secs [nr = 15247422] [nf = 3658] [nu = 9545617] [ut = 77]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 43372753
% resolvents: 43279180 factors: 93573
% Number of unit clauses generated: 19517385
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 45.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 11 [1] = 2 [3] = 16
% [5] = 48 [7] = 144
% Total = 221
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 19517385 [2] = 18825080 [3] = 4194205 [4] = 714242 [5] = 109779 [6] = 11294
% [7] = 364 [8] = 340 [9] = 64
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] neq_2 (+)6 (-)3
% [1] p_5 (+)106 (-)106
% ------------------
% Total: (+)112 (-)109
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 221
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 4966827
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 43372753
% Number of unification failures: 910712498
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 11254
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 41947557
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 250
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 62
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 14149964
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 5
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 329
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 1078
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.31
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 39
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 954085251
% ConstructUnitClause() = 14150174
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 17.34 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 144576
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------