TSTP Solution File: PUZ056-1 by Etableau---0.67

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : PUZ056-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 18:11:04 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 7.33s 1.30s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.33s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : PUZ056-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun May 29 03:34:25 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.36  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y_ni
% 0.12/0.36  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 0.12/0.36  #
% 0.12/0.36  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.36  # Number of axioms: 11 Number of unprocessed: 11
% 0.12/0.36  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.12/0.36  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.12/0.36  # Hello from C++
% 0.12/0.36  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.12/0.36  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.12/0.36  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.12/0.36  # 11 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.12/0.36  # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.12/0.36  # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.12/0.36  # Found 10 unit axioms.
% 0.12/0.36  # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.12/0.36  # 1 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.12/0.36  # 10 unit axiom clauses
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.12/0.36  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.12/0.36  # Creating equality axioms
% 0.12/0.36  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.12/0.36  # Returning from population with 14 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.12/0.36  # We now have 14 tableaux to operate on
% 7.33/1.30  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 7.33/1.30  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 7.33/1.30  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 7.33/1.30  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 7.33/1.30  # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 7.33/1.30  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 7.33/1.30  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 7.33/1.30  # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 7.33/1.30  # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.33/1.30  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.33/1.30  # Begin clausification derivation
% 7.33/1.30  
% 7.33/1.30  # End clausification derivation
% 7.33/1.30  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 7.33/1.30  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (fits(small,pin(X1)))).
% 7.33/1.30  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (fits(medium,pin(X1)))).
% 7.33/1.30  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (fits(large,pin(X1)))).
% 7.33/1.30  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (fits(small,on(medium,X1)))).
% 7.33/1.30  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (fits(small,on(large,X1)))).
% 7.33/1.30  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (fits(medium,on(large,X1)))).
% 7.33/1.30  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (nextto(nextto(X1,X2),X3)=nextto(X1,nextto(X2,X3)))).
% 7.33/1.30  cnf(i_0_12, plain, (state(nextto(pin(n2),nextto(pin(n3),on(small,on(medium,on(large,pin(n1))))))))).
% 7.33/1.30  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (nextto(X1,X2)=nextto(X2,X1))).
% 7.33/1.30  cnf(i_0_13, negated_conjecture, (~state(nextto(pin(n1),nextto(pin(n2),on(small,on(medium,on(large,pin(n3))))))))).
% 7.33/1.30  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (nextto(on(X1,X2),X3)=nextto(X2,on(X1,X3))|~fits(X1,X3)|~fits(X1,X2))).
% 7.33/1.30  cnf(i_0_27, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 7.33/1.30  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 7.33/1.30  # Begin printing tableau
% 7.33/1.30  # Found 7 steps
% 7.33/1.30  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (fits(small,pin(X8))), inference(start_rule)).
% 7.33/1.30  cnf(i_0_36, plain, (fits(small,pin(X8))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_35])).
% 7.33/1.30  cnf(i_0_72, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_27])).
% 7.33/1.30  cnf(i_0_71, plain, (fits(small,pin(X8))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 7.33/1.30  cnf(i_0_73, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_27])).
% 7.33/1.30  cnf(i_0_77, plain, (~fits(small,pin(X1))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_17])).
% 7.33/1.30  cnf(i_0_75, plain, (nextto(on(small,pin(X1)),pin(X8))=nextto(pin(X1),on(small,pin(X8)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_75, ...])).
% 7.33/1.30  # End printing tableau
% 7.33/1.30  # SZS output end
% 7.33/1.30  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 7.33/1.31  # Child (14220) has found a proof.
% 7.33/1.31  
% 7.33/1.31  # Proof search is over...
% 7.33/1.31  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------