TSTP Solution File: PUZ054-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : PUZ054-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art04.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 04:11:20 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.01s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP24753/PUZ/PUZ054-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ..... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 237] [nf = 0] [nu = 225] [ut = 172]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 3001] [nf = 0] [nu = 2905] [ut = 210]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 18451] [nf = 0] [nu = 17839] [ut = 210]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 106826] [nf = 0] [nu = 103106] [ut = 210]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 617014] [nf = 0] [nu = 594634] [ut = 210]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 3573703] [nf = 0] [nu = 3439351] [ut = 210]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 62 secs [nr = 20751992] [nf = 0] [nu = 19945796] [ut = 210]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 41035147] [nf = 0] [nu = 39439801] [ut = 210]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 41037941] [nf = 0] [nu = 39442511] [ut = 210]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 41053391] [nf = 0] [nu = 39457445] [ut = 210]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 41141766] [nf = 0] [nu = 39542712] [ut = 210]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 124 secs [nr = 41651954] [nf = 0] [nu = 40034240] [ut = 210]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 133 secs [nr = 44608643] [nf = 0] [nu = 42878957] [ut = 210]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 183 secs [nr = 61786932] [nf = 0] [nu = 59385402] [ut = 210]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 101727232
% resolvents: 101727232 factors: 0
% Number of unit clauses generated: 97765486
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 96.11
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 2 [1] = 170 [2] = 38
% Total = 210
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 97765486 [2] = 3961746
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] p_2 (+)74 (-)136
% ------------------
% Total: (+)74 (-)136
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 210
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 0
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 101727232
% Number of unification failures: 39365136
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 10064
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 4398603
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 32
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 1097102
% Max entries in substitution set: 16
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 80921221
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 30310479
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 33
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 17
% Number of states in UCFA table: 241
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 3376
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 528000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.07
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 37
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 141092368
% ConstructUnitClause() = 80921429
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 151.31 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 339091
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------