TSTP Solution File: PUZ047-1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : PUZ047-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 13:11:04 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.60s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : PUZ047-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 21:58:10 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.55 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.59 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.59 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.21/0.59 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.59 % Transform :cnf
% 0.21/0.59 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.21/0.59 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.21/0.59
% 0.21/0.59 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.21/0.59 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.21/0.59 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.60 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.60 % File : PUZ047-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.21/0.60 % Domain : Syntactic
% 0.21/0.60 % Problem : Taking the wolf, goat, and cabbage across river
% 0.21/0.60 % Version : Especial.
% 0.21/0.60 % English :
% 0.21/0.60
% 0.21/0.60 % Refs : [And97] Andrews (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.21/0.60 % Source : [And97]
% 0.21/0.60 % Names : THM100 [And97]
% 0.21/0.60
% 0.21/0.60 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.60 % Rating : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.05 v5.2.0, 0.00 v2.5.0
% 0.21/0.60 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 2 unt; 0 nHn; 16 RR)
% 0.21/0.60 % Number of literals : 30 ( 0 equ; 15 neg)
% 0.21/0.60 % Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.21/0.60 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.21/0.60 % Number of predicates : 1 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 5-5 aty)
% 0.21/0.60 % Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% 0.21/0.60 % Number of variables : 19 ( 1 sgn)
% 0.21/0.60 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN
% 0.21/0.60
% 0.21/0.60 % Comments :
% 0.21/0.60 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.60 cnf(thm100_1,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.60 p(south,south,south,south,start) ).
% 0.21/0.60
% 0.21/0.60 cnf(thm100_2,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.60 ( p(north,north,south,north,go_alone(A))
% 0.21/0.60 | ~ p(south,north,south,north,A) ) ).
% 0.21/0.60
% 0.21/0.60 cnf(thm100_3,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.60 ( p(south,north,south,north,go_alone(A))
% 0.21/0.60 | ~ p(north,north,south,north,A) ) ).
% 0.21/0.60
% 0.21/0.60 cnf(thm100_4,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.60 ( p(north,south,north,south,go_alone(A))
% 0.21/0.60 | ~ p(south,south,north,south,A) ) ).
% 0.21/0.60
% 0.21/0.60 cnf(thm100_5,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.60 ( p(south,south,north,south,go_alone(A))
% 0.21/0.60 | ~ p(north,south,north,south,A) ) ).
% 0.21/0.60
% 0.21/0.60 cnf(thm100_6,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.60 ( p(north,north,south,north,take_wolf(A))
% 0.21/0.60 | ~ p(south,south,south,north,A) ) ).
% 0.21/0.60
% 0.21/0.60 cnf(thm100_7,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.60 ( p(south,south,south,north,take_wolf(A))
% 0.21/0.60 | ~ p(north,north,south,north,A) ) ).
% 0.21/0.60
% 0.21/0.60 cnf(thm100_8,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.60 ( p(north,north,north,south,take_wolf(A))
% 0.21/0.60 | ~ p(south,south,north,south,A) ) ).
% 0.21/0.60
% 0.21/0.60 cnf(thm100_9,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.60 ( p(south,south,north,south,take_wolf(A))
% 0.21/0.60 | ~ p(north,north,north,south,A) ) ).
% 0.21/0.60
% 0.21/0.60 cnf(thm100_10,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.60 ( p(north,A,north,B,take_goat(C))
% 0.21/0.60 | ~ p(south,A,south,B,C) ) ).
% 0.21/0.60
% 0.21/0.60 cnf(thm100_11,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.60 ( p(south,A,south,B,take_goat(C))
% 0.21/0.60 | ~ p(north,A,north,B,C) ) ).
% 0.21/0.60
% 0.21/0.60 cnf(thm100_12,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.60 ( p(north,north,south,north,take_cabbage(A))
% 0.21/0.60 | ~ p(south,north,south,south,A) ) ).
% 0.21/0.60
% 0.21/0.60 cnf(thm100_13,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.60 ( p(south,north,south,south,take_cabbage(A))
% 0.21/0.60 | ~ p(north,north,south,north,A) ) ).
% 0.21/0.60
% 0.21/0.60 cnf(thm100_14,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.60 ( p(north,south,north,north,take_cabbage(A))
% 0.21/0.60 | ~ p(south,south,north,south,A) ) ).
% 0.21/0.60
% 0.21/0.60 cnf(thm100_15,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.60 ( p(south,south,north,south,take_cabbage(A))
% 0.21/0.60 | ~ p(north,south,north,north,A) ) ).
% 0.21/0.60
% 0.21/0.60 cnf(thm100_16,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.60 ~ p(north,north,north,north,A) ).
% 0.21/0.60
% 0.21/0.60 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.60 % Proof found
% 0.21/0.60 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.60 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.21/0.60 %ClaNum:16(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.21/0.60 %VarNum:37(SingletonVarNum:19)
% 0.21/0.60 %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.21/0.60 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.21/0.60 %SharedTerms:4
% 0.21/0.60 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
% 0.21/0.60 %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.21/0.60 [1]P1(a1,a1,a1,a1,a4)
% 0.21/0.60 [2]~P1(a2,a2,a2,a2,x21)
% 0.21/0.60 [3]~P1(a2,a2,a1,a2,x31)+P1(a1,a1,a1,a2,f5(x31))
% 0.21/0.60 [4]~P1(a2,a1,a2,a1,x41)+P1(a1,a1,a2,a1,f3(x41))
% 0.21/0.60 [5]~P1(a2,a2,a2,a1,x51)+P1(a1,a1,a2,a1,f5(x51))
% 0.21/0.60 [6]~P1(a2,a1,a2,a2,x61)+P1(a1,a1,a2,a1,f6(x61))
% 0.21/0.60 [7]~P1(a2,a2,a1,a2,x71)+P1(a1,a2,a1,a1,f6(x71))
% 0.21/0.60 [8]~P1(a2,a2,a1,a2,x81)+P1(a1,a2,a1,a2,f3(x81))
% 0.21/0.60 [9]~P1(a1,a1,a2,a1,x91)+P1(a2,a1,a2,a1,f3(x91))
% 0.21/0.60 [10]~P1(a1,a1,a2,a1,x101)+P1(a2,a1,a2,a2,f6(x101))
% 0.21/0.60 [11]~P1(a1,a2,a1,a2,x111)+P1(a2,a2,a1,a2,f3(x111))
% 0.21/0.60 [12]~P1(a1,a1,a1,a2,x121)+P1(a2,a2,a1,a2,f5(x121))
% 0.21/0.60 [13]~P1(a1,a2,a1,a1,x131)+P1(a2,a2,a1,a2,f6(x131))
% 0.21/0.60 [14]~P1(a1,a1,a2,a1,x141)+P1(a2,a2,a2,a1,f5(x141))
% 0.21/0.60 [15]~P1(a2,x151,a2,x152,x153)+P1(a1,x151,a1,x152,f7(x153))
% 0.21/0.60 [16]~P1(a1,x161,a1,x162,x163)+P1(a2,x161,a2,x162,f7(x163))
% 0.21/0.60 %EqnAxiom
% 0.21/0.60
% 0.21/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.60 cnf(19,plain,
% 0.21/0.60 (~P1(a2,a2,a1,a2,x191)),
% 0.21/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,16,8])).
% 0.21/0.60 cnf(20,plain,
% 0.21/0.60 (~P1(a1,a2,a1,a1,x201)),
% 0.21/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,16,8,13])).
% 0.21/0.60 cnf(25,plain,
% 0.21/0.60 (~P1(a2,a2,a2,a1,x251)),
% 0.21/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,19,20,16,12,15])).
% 0.21/0.60 cnf(28,plain,
% 0.21/0.60 (P1(a1,a1,a2,a1,f3(f7(a4)))),
% 0.21/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,19,20,16,12,15,4])).
% 0.21/0.60 cnf(30,plain,
% 0.21/0.60 ($false),
% 0.21/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[28,25,14]),
% 0.21/0.60 ['proof']).
% 0.21/0.60 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.21/0.60 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------