TSTP Solution File: PUZ047+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : PUZ047+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 18:27:03 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.72s 0.92s
% Output : Refutation 0.72s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : PUZ047+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 29 01:15:51 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.35 The process was started by sandbox on n024.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.35 Sun May 29 01:15:51 2022
% 0.19/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 24300.
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 formula_list(usable).
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=2.
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.19/0.35 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.19/0.35 in usable.
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.72/0.91
% 0.72/0.91 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.72/0.91
% 0.72/0.91 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.72/0.91
% 0.72/0.91
% 0.72/0.91 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.72/0.91
% 0.72/0.91 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.72/0.91 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.72/0.91 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.72/0.91 number of clauses in intial UL: 15
% 0.72/0.91 number of clauses initially in problem: 16
% 0.72/0.91 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 93
% 0.72/0.91 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 87
% 0.72/0.91 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.72/0.91 absolute distinct symbol count: 8
% 0.72/0.91 distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.72/0.91 distinct function count: 4
% 0.72/0.91 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.72/0.91
% 0.72/0.91 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.72/0.91
% 0.72/0.91
% 0.72/0.91
% 0.72/0.91 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.72/0.91
% 0.72/0.91 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.72/0.92
% 0.72/0.92 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.72/0.92 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.72/0.92 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.72/0.92
% 0.72/0.92 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.53 sec ----> 130 [binary,129.1,15.1] {+} $F.
% 0.72/0.92
% 0.72/0.92 Length of proof is 7. Level of proof is 7.
% 0.72/0.92
% 0.72/0.92 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.72/0.92 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.72/0.92 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.72/0.92
% 0.72/0.92 2 [] {+} -p(north,north,south,north,A)|p(south,north,south,north,go_alone(A)).
% 0.72/0.92 4 [] {+} -p(north,south,north,south,A)|p(south,south,north,south,go_alone(A)).
% 0.72/0.92 5 [] {+} -p(south,south,south,north,A)|p(north,north,south,north,take_wolf(A)).
% 0.72/0.92 9 [] {+} -p(south,A,south,B,C)|p(north,A,north,B,take_goat(C)).
% 0.72/0.92 10 [] {+} -p(north,A,north,B,C)|p(south,A,south,B,take_goat(C)).
% 0.72/0.92 13 [] {+} -p(south,south,north,south,A)|p(north,south,north,north,take_cabbage(A)).
% 0.72/0.92 15 [] {+} -p(north,north,north,north,A).
% 0.72/0.92 16 [] {-} p(south,south,south,south,start).
% 0.72/0.92 17 [hyper,16,9] {-} p(north,south,north,south,take_goat(start)).
% 0.72/0.92 19 [hyper,17,4] {-} p(south,south,north,south,go_alone(take_goat(start))).
% 0.72/0.92 21 [hyper,19,13] {-} p(north,south,north,north,take_cabbage(go_alone(take_goat(start)))).
% 0.72/0.92 27 [hyper,21,10] {-} p(south,south,south,north,take_goat(take_cabbage(go_alone(take_goat(start))))).
% 0.72/0.92 40 [hyper,27,5] {-} p(north,north,south,north,take_wolf(take_goat(take_cabbage(go_alone(take_goat(start)))))).
% 0.72/0.92 68 [hyper,40,2] {-} p(south,north,south,north,go_alone(take_wolf(take_goat(take_cabbage(go_alone(take_goat(start))))))).
% 0.72/0.92 129 [hyper,68,9] {-} p(north,north,north,north,take_goat(go_alone(take_wolf(take_goat(take_cabbage(go_alone(take_goat(start)))))))).
% 0.72/0.92 130 [binary,129.1,15.1] {+} $F.
% 0.72/0.92
% 0.72/0.92 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.72/0.92 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.72/0.92
% 0.72/0.92
% 0.72/0.92 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.72/0.92
% 0.72/0.92
% 0.72/0.92 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.72/0.92
% 0.72/0.92 ============ end of search ============
% 0.72/0.92
% 0.72/0.92 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.72/0.92
% 0.72/0.92 true clauses given 0 (0.0%)
% 0.72/0.92 false clauses given 53
% 0.72/0.92
% 0.72/0.92 FALSE TRUE
% 0.72/0.92 12 19 0
% 0.72/0.92 13 41 0
% 0.72/0.92 tot: 60 0 (0.0% true)
% 0.72/0.92
% 0.72/0.92
% 0.72/0.92 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.72/0.92
% 0.72/0.92 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.72/0.92
% 0.72/0.92 Process 24300 finished Sun May 29 01:15:52 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------