TSTP Solution File: PUZ035-7 by iProver---3.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.8
% Problem : PUZ035-7 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 13:19:40 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.77s 1.21s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.77s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 19 ( 2 unt; 7 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 38 ( 0 equ; 21 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 4 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,plain,
( truth(isa(X0,knight))
| truth(isa(X0,knave)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',everyone_a_knight_or_knave) ).
cnf(c_55,plain,
( reply(X0,X1,yes)
| reply(X0,X1,no) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',yes_or_no) ).
cnf(c_62,negated_conjecture,
( ~ reply(asked,or(isa(asked,knight),isa(other,knight)),X0)
| ~ truth(isa(asked,X1))
| ~ truth(isa(other,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_answer) ).
cnf(c_198,negated_conjecture,
( ~ truth(isa(asked,X0))
| ~ sP0_iProver_split ),
inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[sP0_iProver_split])],[c_62]) ).
cnf(c_199,negated_conjecture,
( ~ truth(isa(other,X0))
| ~ sP1_iProver_split ),
inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[sP1_iProver_split])],[c_62]) ).
cnf(c_200,negated_conjecture,
( ~ reply(asked,or(isa(asked,knight),isa(other,knight)),X0)
| ~ sP2_iProver_split ),
inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[sP2_iProver_split])],[c_62]) ).
cnf(c_201,negated_conjecture,
( sP0_iProver_split
| sP1_iProver_split
| sP2_iProver_split ),
inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[])],[c_62]) ).
cnf(c_202,plain,
( ~ truth(isa(asked,knight))
| ~ sP0_iProver_split ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_198]) ).
cnf(c_203,plain,
( ~ truth(isa(other,knight))
| ~ sP1_iProver_split ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_199]) ).
cnf(c_205,plain,
( truth(isa(asked,knight))
| truth(isa(asked,knave)) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_49]) ).
cnf(c_235,plain,
( ~ truth(isa(asked,knave))
| ~ sP0_iProver_split ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_198]) ).
cnf(c_250,plain,
( ~ truth(isa(other,knave))
| ~ sP1_iProver_split ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_199]) ).
cnf(c_330,plain,
( ~ reply(asked,or(isa(asked,knight),isa(other,knight)),yes)
| ~ sP2_iProver_split ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_200]) ).
cnf(c_331,plain,
( reply(asked,or(isa(asked,knight),isa(other,knight)),yes)
| reply(asked,or(isa(asked,knight),isa(other,knight)),no) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_55]) ).
cnf(c_365,plain,
( ~ reply(asked,or(isa(asked,knight),isa(other,knight)),no)
| ~ sP2_iProver_split ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_200]) ).
cnf(c_442,negated_conjecture,
( sP1_iProver_split
| sP2_iProver_split ),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_201,c_201,c_202,c_205,c_235,c_330,c_331,c_365]) ).
cnf(c_444,negated_conjecture,
sP1_iProver_split,
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_442,c_330,c_331,c_365,c_442]) ).
cnf(c_456,plain,
( truth(isa(other,knight))
| truth(isa(other,knave)) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_49]) ).
cnf(c_458,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_456,c_444,c_250,c_203]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14 % Problem : PUZ035-7 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.15 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.37 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 22:10:00 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.51 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 1.77/1.21 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.77/1.21 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.77/1.21
% 1.77/1.21 %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 1.77/1.21
% 1.77/1.21 ------ iProver source info
% 1.77/1.21
% 1.77/1.21 git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 1.77/1.21 git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 1.77/1.21 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.77/1.21 git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 1.77/1.21
% 1.77/1.21 ------ Parsing...successful
% 1.77/1.21
% 1.77/1.21
% 1.77/1.21
% 1.77/1.21 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 1.77/1.21
% 1.77/1.21 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 3 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 1.77/1.21 ------ Proving...
% 1.77/1.21 ------ Problem Properties
% 1.77/1.21
% 1.77/1.21
% 1.77/1.21 clauses 17
% 1.77/1.21 conjectures 4
% 1.77/1.21 EPR 3
% 1.77/1.21 Horn 11
% 1.77/1.21 unary 0
% 1.77/1.21 binary 11
% 1.77/1.21 lits 40
% 1.77/1.21 lits eq 0
% 1.77/1.21 fd_pure 0
% 1.77/1.21 fd_pseudo 0
% 1.77/1.21 fd_cond 0
% 1.77/1.21 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 1.77/1.21 AC symbols 0
% 1.77/1.21
% 1.77/1.21 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 1.77/1.21
% 1.77/1.21 ------ no equalities: superposition off
% 1.77/1.21
% 1.77/1.21 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.77/1.21
% 1.77/1.21
% 1.77/1.21 ------
% 1.77/1.21 Current options:
% 1.77/1.21 ------
% 1.77/1.21
% 1.77/1.21
% 1.77/1.21
% 1.77/1.21
% 1.77/1.21 ------ Proving...
% 1.77/1.21
% 1.77/1.21
% 1.77/1.21 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.77/1.21
% 1.77/1.21 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.77/1.21
% 1.77/1.21
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------