TSTP Solution File: PUZ035-7 by CARINE---0.734

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : PUZ035-7 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 04:04:37 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP7428/PUZ/PUZ035-7+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .............. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 28] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 341] [nf = 18] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 2986] [nf = 202] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 25926] [nf = 1673] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 27 secs [nr = 10365735] [nf = 57761] [nu = 5746164] [ut = 86]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 123 secs [nr = 45549263] [nf = 112352] [nu = 29725242] [ut = 224]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 123 secs [nr = 45552992] [nf = 112370] [nu = 29727924] [ut = 224]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 124 secs [nr = 45841347] [nf = 112554] [nu = 29969099] [ut = 250]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 140 secs [nr = 51320193] [nf = 119982] [nu = 34543405] [ut = 250]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 106052476
% 	resolvents: 105901189	factors: 151287
% Number of unit clauses generated: 79999831
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 75.43
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [1] = 4		[3] = 26	
% [5] = 291	[6] = 134	
% Total = 455
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 79999831	[2] = 24400722	[3] = 1651923	
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] truth_1		(+)357	(-)98
% [1] reply_3		(+)0	(-)0
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)357	(-)98
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 455
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 23983789
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 171084
% Number of successful unifications: 106052476
% Number of unification failures: 239412037
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 34986
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 164267732
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 26281908
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 4031315
% Max entries in substitution set: 12
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 77106052
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 39723033
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 13
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 5
% Number of states in UCFA table: 1280
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 4944
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 120000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.01
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.26
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 45
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 345464513
% ConstructUnitClause() = 77106507
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 98.73 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 353508
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------