TSTP Solution File: PUZ035-6 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : PUZ035-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 18:11:01 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.36s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : PUZ035-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun May 29 00:42:21 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.12/0.36 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.12/0.36 #
% 0.12/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.36 # Number of axioms: 11 Number of unprocessed: 11
% 0.12/0.36 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.12/0.36 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.12/0.36 # Hello from C++
% 0.12/0.36 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.12/0.36 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.12/0.36 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.12/0.36 # 11 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.12/0.36 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.12/0.36 # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.12/0.36 # Found 1 unit axioms.
% 0.12/0.36 # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.12/0.36 # 10 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.12/0.36 # 1 unit axiom clauses
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.12/0.36 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.12/0.36 # Returning from population with 14 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.12/0.36 # We now have 14 tableaux to operate on
% 0.12/0.36 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.36 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.36 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.36 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.36 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (says(asked,not(or(isa(asked,knight),isa(other,knight)))))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (truth(not(X1))|truth(X1))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (~truth(isa(asked,X1))|~truth(isa(other,X2)))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (~truth(not(X1))|~truth(X1))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (~truth(isa(X1,knight))|~truth(isa(X1,knave)))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (truth(X1)|truth(X2)|~truth(or(X1,X2)))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (truth(or(X1,X2))|~truth(X2))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (truth(or(X1,X2))|~truth(X1))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (truth(X1)|~says(X2,X1)|~truth(isa(X2,knight)))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (truth(isa(X1,knight))|~says(X1,X2)|~truth(X2))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (truth(isa(X1,knave))|truth(isa(X1,knight)))).
% 0.12/0.36 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.36 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.36 # Found 10 steps
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (truth(isa(asked,knave))|truth(isa(asked,knight))), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_139, plain, (truth(isa(asked,knave))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_20])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_143, plain, (~truth(not(isa(asked,knave)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_19])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_145, plain, (truth(not(not(isa(asked,knave))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_18])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_140, plain, (truth(isa(asked,knight))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_17])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_159, plain, (truth(or(isa(asked,knight),isa(other,knight)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_20])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_176, plain, (~truth(not(or(isa(asked,knight),isa(other,knight))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_14])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_186, plain, (~says(asked,not(or(isa(asked,knight),isa(other,knight))))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_21])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_187, plain, (~truth(isa(asked,knight))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_140])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_152, plain, (truth(or(X3,not(not(isa(asked,knave)))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_152, ...])).
% 0.12/0.36 # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.36 # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.36 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.36 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.36 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.36 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.36 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (says(asked,not(or(isa(asked,knight),isa(other,knight)))))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (truth(not(X1))|truth(X1))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (~truth(isa(asked,X1))|~truth(isa(other,X2)))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (~truth(not(X1))|~truth(X1))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (~truth(isa(X1,knight))|~truth(isa(X1,knave)))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (truth(X1)|truth(X2)|~truth(or(X1,X2)))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (truth(or(X1,X2))|~truth(X2))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (truth(or(X1,X2))|~truth(X1))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (truth(X1)|~says(X2,X1)|~truth(isa(X2,knight)))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (truth(isa(X1,knight))|~says(X1,X2)|~truth(X2))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (truth(isa(X1,knave))|truth(isa(X1,knight)))).
% 0.12/0.36 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.37 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37 # Found 11 steps
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (~truth(isa(asked,knight))|~truth(isa(other,knight))), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (~truth(isa(asked,knight))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_12])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_44, plain, (truth(isa(asked,knave))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_20])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_73, plain, (~truth(not(isa(asked,knave)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_19])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (~truth(isa(other,knight))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_80, plain, (truth(isa(other,knight))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_24])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_81, plain, (~truth(or(isa(other,knight),isa(other,knight)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_19])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_129, plain, (truth(not(or(isa(other,knight),isa(other,knight))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_141, plain, (truth(isa(other,knight))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_24])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_75, plain, (truth(not(not(isa(asked,knave))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_75, ...])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_142, plain, (~says(other,not(or(isa(other,knight),isa(other,knight))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_142, ...])).
% 0.12/0.37 # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37 # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.37 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (says(asked,not(or(isa(asked,knight),isa(other,knight)))))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (truth(not(X1))|truth(X1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (~truth(isa(asked,X1))|~truth(isa(other,X2)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (~truth(not(X1))|~truth(X1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (~truth(isa(X1,knight))|~truth(isa(X1,knave)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (truth(X1)|truth(X2)|~truth(or(X1,X2)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (truth(or(X1,X2))|~truth(X2))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (truth(or(X1,X2))|~truth(X1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (truth(X1)|~says(X2,X1)|~truth(isa(X2,knight)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (truth(isa(X1,knight))|~says(X1,X2)|~truth(X2))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (truth(isa(X1,knave))|truth(isa(X1,knight)))).
% 0.12/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.37 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37 # Found 11 steps
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (~truth(isa(asked,knight))|~truth(isa(other,knight))), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (~truth(isa(other,knight))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_12])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_67, plain, (truth(isa(other,knave))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_20])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_73, plain, (~truth(not(isa(other,knave)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_19])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (~truth(isa(asked,knight))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_80, plain, (truth(isa(asked,knight))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_23])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_81, plain, (~truth(or(isa(asked,knight),isa(asked,knight)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_19])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_129, plain, (truth(not(or(isa(asked,knight),isa(asked,knight))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_141, plain, (truth(isa(asked,knight))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_23])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_75, plain, (truth(not(not(isa(other,knave))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_75, ...])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_142, plain, (~says(asked,not(or(isa(asked,knight),isa(asked,knight))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_142, ...])).
% 0.12/0.37 # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37 # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.37 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (says(asked,not(or(isa(asked,knight),isa(other,knight)))))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (truth(not(X1))|truth(X1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (~truth(isa(asked,X1))|~truth(isa(other,X2)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (~truth(not(X1))|~truth(X1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (~truth(isa(X1,knight))|~truth(isa(X1,knave)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (truth(X1)|truth(X2)|~truth(or(X1,X2)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (truth(or(X1,X2))|~truth(X2))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (truth(or(X1,X2))|~truth(X1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (truth(X1)|~says(X2,X1)|~truth(isa(X2,knight)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (truth(isa(X1,knight))|~says(X1,X2)|~truth(X2))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (truth(isa(X1,knave))|truth(isa(X1,knight)))).
% 0.12/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.37 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37 # Found 11 steps
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (~truth(isa(asked,knight))|~truth(isa(other,knave))), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (~truth(isa(other,knave))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_12])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_68, plain, (truth(isa(other,knight))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_20])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_73, plain, (~truth(not(isa(other,knight)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_19])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (~truth(isa(asked,knight))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_80, plain, (truth(isa(asked,knight))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_23])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_81, plain, (~truth(or(isa(asked,knight),isa(asked,knight)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_19])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_129, plain, (truth(not(or(isa(asked,knight),isa(asked,knight))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_141, plain, (truth(isa(asked,knight))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_23])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_75, plain, (truth(not(not(isa(other,knight))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_75, ...])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_142, plain, (~says(asked,not(or(isa(asked,knight),isa(asked,knight))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_142, ...])).
% 0.12/0.37 # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37 # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.37 # Child (20839) has found a proof.
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 # Proof search is over...
% 0.12/0.37 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------