TSTP Solution File: PUZ035-2 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : PUZ035-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:11:44 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.45s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   15 (   6 unt;   6 nHn;  15 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   28 (   0 equ;  11 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   6 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (   9 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(everyone_a_knight_or_knave,axiom,
    ( isa(X1,knight)
    | isa(X1,knave)
    | ~ person(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JlbEIMQ9T2/E---3.1_7840.p',everyone_a_knight_or_knave) ).

cnf(asked_person,axiom,
    person(asked),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JlbEIMQ9T2/E---3.1_7840.p',asked_person) ).

cnf(prove_answer,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ response(X1)
    | ~ isa(asked,X2)
    | ~ isa(other,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JlbEIMQ9T2/E---3.1_7840.p',prove_answer) ).

cnf(other_person,axiom,
    person(other),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JlbEIMQ9T2/E---3.1_7840.p',other_person) ).

cnf(two_answers,axiom,
    ( response(yes)
    | response(no) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JlbEIMQ9T2/E---3.1_7840.p',two_answers) ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    ( isa(X1,knight)
    | isa(X1,knave)
    | ~ person(X1) ),
    everyone_a_knight_or_knave ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    person(asked),
    asked_person ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ response(X1)
    | ~ isa(asked,X2)
    | ~ isa(other,X3) ),
    prove_answer ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( isa(asked,knave)
    | isa(asked,knight) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    person(other),
    other_person ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ response(X1)
    | ~ isa(other,X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( isa(other,knave)
    | isa(other,knight) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    ( response(yes)
    | response(no) ),
    two_answers ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ response(X1),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_13]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : PUZ035-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.33  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 19:14:06 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.17/0.44  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.44  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JlbEIMQ9T2/E---3.1_7840.p
% 0.17/0.45  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.17/0.45  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.45  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 7925 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.17/0.45  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.45  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.45  # Search class: FGHNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.45  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 7954 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.17/0.45  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.45  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.45  # Search class: FGHNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.45  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.45  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.45  
% 0.17/0.45  # Proof found!
% 0.17/0.45  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.17/0.45  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.45  # Parsed axioms                        : 16
% 0.17/0.45  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Initial clauses                      : 16
% 0.17/0.45  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 16
% 0.17/0.45  # Processed clauses                    : 40
% 0.17/0.45  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.17/0.45  # ...remaining for further processing  : 39
% 0.17/0.45  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Backward-subsumed                    : 6
% 0.17/0.45  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Generated clauses                    : 17
% 0.17/0.45  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 11
% 0.17/0.45  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 0.17/0.45  # Paramodulations                      : 16
% 0.17/0.45  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.17/0.45  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.17/0.45  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.45  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.17/0.45  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.45  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.17/0.45  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45  # Current number of processed clauses  : 16
% 0.17/0.45  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
% 0.17/0.45  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.45  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.17/0.45  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 13
% 0.17/0.45  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3
% 0.17/0.45  # ...number of literals in the above   : 10
% 0.17/0.45  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Current number of archived clauses   : 23
% 0.17/0.45  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 96
% 0.17/0.45  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 61
% 0.17/0.45  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4
% 0.17/0.45  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.17/0.45  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 619
% 0.17/0.45  
% 0.17/0.45  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.45  # User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.45  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.17/0.45  # Total time               : 0.004 s
% 0.17/0.45  # Maximum resident set size: 1636 pages
% 0.17/0.45  
% 0.17/0.45  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.45  # User time                : 0.014 s
% 0.17/0.45  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.17/0.45  # Total time               : 0.020 s
% 0.17/0.45  # Maximum resident set size: 1680 pages
% 0.17/0.45  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.17/0.45  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------