TSTP Solution File: PUZ035-2 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : PUZ035-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 13:11:01 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.67s 0.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.67s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : PUZ035-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Sat Aug 26 22:14:41 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.56  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.67/0.71  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.67/0.71  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 0.67/0.71  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.67/0.71  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.67/0.71  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.67/0.71  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.67/0.71  
% 0.67/0.71  % Result      :Theorem 0.090000s
% 0.67/0.71  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.090000s
% 0.67/0.71  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.67/0.71  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.67/0.71  % File     : PUZ035-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.67/0.71  % Domain   : Puzzles
% 0.67/0.71  % Problem  : Knights and Knaves #36
% 0.67/0.71  % Version  : [Sto95] axioms : Augmented.
% 0.67/0.71  % English  : On an island, there live exactly two types of people: knights
% 0.67/0.71  %            and knaves. Knights always tell the truth and knaves always
% 0.67/0.71  %            lie. I landed on the island, met two inhabitants, asked one of
% 0.67/0.71  %            them: "Is one of you a knight?" and he answered me. What can
% 0.67/0.71  %            be said about the types of the asked and the other person
% 0.67/0.71  %            depending on the answer I get?
% 0.67/0.71  
% 0.67/0.71  % Refs     : [Smu78] Smullyan (1978), What is the Name of This Book? The Ri
% 0.67/0.71  %          : [Sto95] Stolzenburg (1995), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe.
% 0.67/0.71  %          : [BFS97] Baumgartner et al. (1997), Computing Answers with Mode
% 0.67/0.71  % Source   : [Sto95]
% 0.67/0.71  % Names    :
% 0.67/0.71  
% 0.67/0.71  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 0.67/0.71  % Rating   : 0.00 v2.1.0
% 0.67/0.71  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   16 (   2 unt;   6 nHn;  16 RR)
% 0.67/0.71  %            Number of literals    :   42 (   0 equ;  24 neg)
% 0.67/0.71  %            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
% 0.67/0.71  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 0.67/0.71  %            Number of predicates  :    5 (   5 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.67/0.71  %            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   6 con; 0-0 aty)
% 0.67/0.71  %            Number of variables   :   12 (   6 sgn)
% 0.67/0.71  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_EPR_NEQ_NHN
% 0.67/0.71  
% 0.67/0.71  % Comments : Contains one redundant clause. The query allows for
% 0.67/0.71  %            disjunctive answer A/X/Y = no/knave/knight;yes/knave/knave;
% 0.67/0.71  %            yes/knight/knave;yes/knight/knight
% 0.67/0.72  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.67/0.72  %----Everyone's either a knight or a knave
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(everyone_a_knight_or_knave,axiom,
% 0.67/0.72      ( ~ person(X)
% 0.67/0.72      | isa(X,knight)
% 0.67/0.72      | isa(X,knave) ) ).
% 0.67/0.72  
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(not_both_a_knight_and_knave,axiom,
% 0.67/0.72      ( ~ isa(X,knight)
% 0.67/0.72      | ~ isa(X,knave) ) ).
% 0.67/0.72  
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(knights_make_true_statements,axiom,
% 0.67/0.72      ( ~ isa(X,knight)
% 0.67/0.72      | tell_the_truth(X) ) ).
% 0.67/0.72  
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(knaves_make_false_statements,axiom,
% 0.67/0.72      ( ~ isa(X,knave)
% 0.67/0.72      | lies(X) ) ).
% 0.67/0.72  
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(statements_are_true_or_false,axiom,
% 0.67/0.72      ( ~ tell_the_truth(X)
% 0.67/0.72      | ~ lies(X) ) ).
% 0.67/0.72  
% 0.67/0.72  %----This is redundant
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(statements_are_true_or_false2,axiom,
% 0.67/0.72      ( ~ person(X)
% 0.67/0.72      | tell_the_truth(X)
% 0.67/0.72      | lies(X) ) ).
% 0.67/0.72  
% 0.67/0.72  %----Possible answer scenarios
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(true_one_is_a_knight,axiom,
% 0.67/0.72      ( isa(asked,knight)
% 0.67/0.72      | isa(other,knight)
% 0.67/0.72      | ~ response(yes)
% 0.67/0.72      | ~ tell_the_truth(asked) ) ).
% 0.67/0.72  
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(lie_one_is_a_knight,axiom,
% 0.67/0.72      ( isa(asked,knight)
% 0.67/0.72      | isa(other,knight)
% 0.67/0.72      | ~ response(no)
% 0.67/0.72      | ~ lies(asked) ) ).
% 0.67/0.72  
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(knight_answers1,axiom,
% 0.67/0.72      ( ~ response(yes)
% 0.67/0.72      | ~ lies(asked)
% 0.67/0.72      | ~ isa(Anyone,knight) ) ).
% 0.67/0.72  
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(knight_answers2,axiom,
% 0.67/0.72      ( ~ response(no)
% 0.67/0.72      | ~ tell_the_truth(asked)
% 0.67/0.72      | ~ isa(Anyone,knight) ) ).
% 0.67/0.72  
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(knight_answers3,axiom,
% 0.67/0.72      ( response(yes)
% 0.67/0.72      | ~ tell_the_truth(asked)
% 0.67/0.72      | ~ isa(Anyone,knight) ) ).
% 0.67/0.72  
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(truthful_answer,axiom,
% 0.67/0.72      ( response(no)
% 0.67/0.72      | isa(asked,knight)
% 0.67/0.72      | isa(other,knight)
% 0.67/0.72      | ~ tell_the_truth(asked) ) ).
% 0.67/0.72  
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(two_answers,axiom,
% 0.67/0.72      ( response(yes)
% 0.67/0.72      | response(no) ) ).
% 0.67/0.72  
% 0.67/0.72  %----Two people
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(asked_person,axiom,
% 0.67/0.72      person(asked) ).
% 0.67/0.72  
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(other_person,axiom,
% 0.67/0.72      person(other) ).
% 0.67/0.72  
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(prove_answer,negated_conjecture,
% 0.67/0.72      ( ~ response(A)
% 0.67/0.72      | ~ isa(asked,X)
% 0.67/0.72      | ~ isa(other,Y) ) ).
% 0.67/0.72  
% 0.67/0.72  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.67/0.72  
% 0.67/0.72  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.67/0.72  % Proof found
% 0.67/0.72  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.67/0.72  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.67/0.72  %ClaNum:16(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.67/0.72  %VarNum:20(SingletonVarNum:12)
% 0.67/0.72  %MaxLitNum:4
% 0.67/0.72  %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.67/0.72  %SharedTerms:16
% 0.67/0.72  %goalClause: 16
% 0.67/0.72  [1]P1(a1)
% 0.67/0.72  [2]P1(a2)
% 0.67/0.72  [3]P4(a6)+P4(a3)
% 0.67/0.72  [4]~P2(x41)+~P5(x41)
% 0.67/0.72  [6]P5(x61)+~P3(x61,a4)
% 0.67/0.72  [7]P2(x71)+~P3(x71,a5)
% 0.67/0.72  [15]~P3(x151,a5)+~P3(x151,a4)
% 0.67/0.72  [5]P2(x51)+~P1(x51)+P5(x51)
% 0.67/0.72  [8]~P3(x81,a4)+P4(a6)+~P5(a1)
% 0.67/0.72  [9]~P3(x91,a4)+~P5(a1)+~P4(a3)
% 0.67/0.72  [10]~P3(x101,a4)+~P2(a1)+~P4(a6)
% 0.67/0.72  [14]~P1(x141)+P3(x141,a5)+P3(x141,a4)
% 0.67/0.72  [16]~P4(x161)+~P3(a1,x162)+~P3(a2,x163)
% 0.67/0.72  [11]P4(a3)+P3(a1,a4)+P3(a2,a4)+~P5(a1)
% 0.67/0.72  [12]P3(a1,a4)+P3(a2,a4)+~P5(a1)+~P4(a6)
% 0.67/0.72  [13]P3(a1,a4)+P3(a2,a4)+~P2(a1)+~P4(a3)
% 0.67/0.72  %EqnAxiom
% 0.67/0.72  
% 0.67/0.72  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(17,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (P3(a1,a4)+P3(a1,a5)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,14])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(19,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (P3(a1,a5)+~P4(a3)+~P5(a1)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,14,10,9])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(21,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (P5(a1)+P2(a1)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,5])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(29,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (P3(a2,a4)+P3(a2,a5)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,14])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(30,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (P3(a2,a5)+~P4(a3)+~P5(a1)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,14,9])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(32,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (~P2(x321)+~P3(x321,a4)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[6,4])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(33,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (P5(a2)+P2(a2)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,5])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(37,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (~P5(x371)+~P3(x371,a5)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[7,4])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(38,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (~P2(a1)+P3(a1,a5)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[32,17])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(40,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (~P4(x401)+~P3(a2,x402)+~P2(a1)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[38,16])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(43,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (P2(a1)+~P4(a3)+~P5(a1)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[19,7])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(44,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (~P3(a1,a4)+~P4(a3)+P2(a1)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[43,6])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(46,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (~P5(a2)+~P4(a3)+~P5(a1)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[30,37])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(47,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (~P4(a3)+~P5(a2)+P2(a1)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[46,21])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(48,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (~P3(a1,a4)+~P5(a2)+~P4(a3)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[47,32])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(49,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (~P3(a2,x491)+~P2(a1)+P4(a3)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[40,3])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(52,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (P3(a1,a5)+~P4(a3)+P2(a1)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[44,17])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(55,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (P3(a1,a5)+~P4(a3)+~P5(a2)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[48,17])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(56,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (P3(a2,a4)+P4(a3)+~P2(a1)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[49,29])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(58,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (P2(a1)+~P4(a3)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[52,7])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(59,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (P2(a1)+P4(a6)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[58,3])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(60,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (~P3(a1,x601)+~P3(a2,x602)+P2(a1)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[59,16])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(61,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (~P4(x611)+~P3(a2,x612)+~P4(a3)+~P5(a2)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[55,16])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(62,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (~P4(a3)+~P3(a2,x621)+~P5(a2)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(factoring_inference,[],[61])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(66,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (P3(a2,a5)+~P4(a3)+~P5(a2)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[62,29])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(68,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (P2(a2)+~P4(a3)+~P5(a2)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[66,7])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(69,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (~P4(a3)+P2(a2)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[68,33])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(70,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (~P5(a2)+~P4(a3)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[69,4])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(71,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (~P5(a2)+P4(a6)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[70,3])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(72,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (~P3(x721,a4)+~P5(a2)+~P2(a1)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[71,10])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(74,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (P3(a2,a5)+~P5(a2)+~P2(a1)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[72,29])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(75,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (~P5(a2)+~P2(a1)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[74,37])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(76,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (~P5(a2)+P5(a1)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[75,21])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(77,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (~P3(a1,a5)+~P5(a2)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[76,37])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(78,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (P3(a1,a4)+~P5(a2)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[77,17])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(79,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (~P3(a2,x791)+~P5(a2)+P2(a1)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[78,60])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(80,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (P3(a2,a5)+P2(a1)+~P5(a2)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[79,29])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(81,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (P2(a2)+~P5(a2)+P2(a1)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[80,7])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(82,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (P3(a1,a5)+~P5(a2)+P2(a2)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[81,38])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(83,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (~P3(a1,a4)+P2(a2)+~P5(a2)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[82,15])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(84,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (P2(a2)+~P5(a2)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[83,78])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(85,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (P2(a2)),
% 0.67/0.72     inference(scs_inference,[],[84,33])).
% 0.67/0.72  cnf(95,plain,
% 0.67/0.72     (P3(a2,a5)),
% 0.67/0.73     inference(scs_inference,[],[85,4,32,29])).
% 0.67/0.73  cnf(100,plain,
% 0.67/0.73     (~P3(a1,x1001)+~P3(a1,x1002)),
% 0.67/0.73     inference(scs_inference,[],[85,4,32,29,60,56,40,16])).
% 0.67/0.73  cnf(107,plain,
% 0.67/0.73     (~P4(x1071)+~P2(a1)),
% 0.67/0.73     inference(scs_inference,[],[95,40])).
% 0.67/0.73  cnf(108,plain,
% 0.67/0.73     (~P2(a1)+P4(a3)),
% 0.67/0.73     inference(scs_inference,[],[95,49])).
% 0.67/0.73  cnf(112,plain,
% 0.67/0.73     (~P2(a1)),
% 0.67/0.73     inference(scs_inference,[],[108,107])).
% 0.67/0.73  cnf(120,plain,
% 0.67/0.73     ($false),
% 0.67/0.73     inference(scs_inference,[],[112,1,7,14,100]),
% 0.67/0.73     ['proof']).
% 0.67/0.73  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.67/0.73  % Total time :0.090000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------