TSTP Solution File: PUZ035-1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : PUZ035-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 08:49:42 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.38s
% Output : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 24 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 21 ( 10 ~; 11 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 6 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 10 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f36,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f35,f34]) ).
fof(f34,plain,
! [X0] : ~ response(X0),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f32,f31]) ).
fof(f31,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ isa(asked,X1)
| ~ response(X0) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f28,f15]) ).
fof(f15,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0] :
( ~ isa(other,X3)
| ~ response(X2)
| ~ isa(asked,X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_answer) ).
fof(f28,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( isa(other,knight)
| ~ response(X0)
| ~ isa(asked,X1) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f17,f15]) ).
fof(f17,plain,
( isa(other,knave)
| isa(other,knight) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f1,f14]) ).
fof(f14,axiom,
person(other),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',other_person) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X0] :
( ~ person(X0)
| isa(X0,knave)
| isa(X0,knight) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',everyone_a_knight_or_knave) ).
fof(f32,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ response(X0)
| isa(asked,knight) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f31,f16]) ).
fof(f16,plain,
( isa(asked,knave)
| isa(asked,knight) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f1,f13]) ).
fof(f13,axiom,
person(asked),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',asked_person) ).
fof(f35,plain,
response(yes),
inference(resolution,[],[f34,f12]) ).
fof(f12,axiom,
( response(no)
| response(yes) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',two_answers) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : PUZ035-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Fri May 3 18:02:08 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.36 % (16293)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.15/0.38 % (16294)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (16295)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (16297)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3:gsp=on:nm=4_470 on theBenchmark for (470ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (16296)dis-2_2:3_amm=sco:anc=none:bce=on:fsr=off:gsp=on:nm=16:nwc=1.2:nicw=on:sac=on:sp=weighted_frequency_476 on theBenchmark for (476ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (16298)dis+1_20_av=off:lcm=predicate:nm=2:nwc=2.0_396 on theBenchmark for (396ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (16299)dis+11_4:5_nm=4_216 on theBenchmark for (216ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (16300)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2:si=on:rtra=on:rawr=on:rp=on:fmbksg=on_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 Detected minimum model sizes of [1,1,1]
% 0.15/0.38 Detected maximum model sizes of [2,2,2]
% 0.15/0.38 Detected minimum model sizes of [1]
% 0.15/0.38 Detected maximum model sizes of [6]
% 0.15/0.38 Detected minimum model sizes of [1,1,1]
% 0.15/0.38 Detected maximum model sizes of [2,2,2]
% 0.15/0.38 TRYING [1,1,1]
% 0.15/0.38 TRYING [1]
% 0.15/0.38 TRYING [1,1,1]
% 0.15/0.38 % (16298)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.38 TRYING [2]
% 0.15/0.38 Detected minimum model sizes of [1]
% 0.15/0.38 TRYING [2,1,1]
% 0.15/0.38 Detected maximum model sizes of [6]
% 0.15/0.38 TRYING [2,1,1]
% 0.15/0.38 % (16299)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.38 TRYING [1]
% 0.15/0.38 % (16298)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-16293"
% 0.15/0.38 TRYING [2,2,1]
% 0.15/0.38 % (16296)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.38 TRYING [2,2,1]
% 0.15/0.38 TRYING [2]
% 0.15/0.38 % (16294)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.38 TRYING [2,1,2]
% 0.15/0.38 TRYING [2,1,2]
% 0.15/0.38 % (16300)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.38 TRYING [2,2,2]
% 0.15/0.38 TRYING [2,2,2]
% 0.15/0.38 Cannot enumerate next child to try in an incomplete setup
% 0.15/0.38 % (16297)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (16297)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (16297)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.15/0.38 % (16297)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.38
% 0.15/0.38 % (16297)Memory used [KB]: 735
% 0.15/0.38 % (16297)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.38 % (16298)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.38 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.38 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.38 % (16298)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (16298)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.15/0.38 % (16298)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.38
% 0.15/0.38 % (16298)Memory used [KB]: 747
% 0.15/0.38 % (16298)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.38 % (16298)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.38 % (16293)Success in time 0.019 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------