TSTP Solution File: PUZ034-1.004 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : PUZ034-1.004 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 04:00:50 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.02s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP24206/PUZ/PUZ034-1.004+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 59] [nf = 0] [nu = 51] [ut = 50]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 226] [nf = 0] [nu = 190] [ut = 51]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 707] [nf = 0] [nu = 533] [ut = 62]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1719] [nf = 0] [nu = 1300] [ut = 63]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3668] [nf = 0] [nu = 2847] [ut = 64]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 7372] [nf = 0] [nu = 5880] [ut = 65]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 14412] [nf = 0] [nu = 11771] [ut = 66]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 27884] [nf = 0] [nu = 23214] [ut = 66]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 53903] [nf = 0] [nu = 45537] [ut = 66]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 104611] [nf = 0] [nu = 89326] [ut = 66]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 204193] [nf = 0] [nu = 175673] [ut = 66]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 400909] [nf = 0] [nu = 346672] [ut = 66]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 791158] [nf = 0] [nu = 686411] [ut = 66]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 1567606] [nf = 0] [nu = 1362956] [ut = 66]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 3115442] [nf = 0] [nu = 2712319] [ut = 66]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 12 secs [nr = 6204890] [nf = 0] [nu = 5406394] [ut = 66]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 23 secs [nr = 12376233] [nf = 0] [nu = 10788829] [ut = 66]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 47 secs [nr = 24709861] [nf = 0] [nu = 21546770] [ut = 66]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 95 secs [nr = 49366367] [nf = 0] [nu = 43054349] [ut = 66]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 62873202] [nf = 28] [nu = 54482285] [ut = 66]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 62873369] [nf = 28] [nu = 54482424] [ut = 66]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 62873858] [nf = 32] [nu = 54482767] [ut = 66]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 62876349] [nf = 42] [nu = 54483900] [ut = 83]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 62884839] [nf = 126] [nu = 54487085] [ut = 85]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 232 secs [nr = 81488127] [nf = 83101] [nu = 55375310] [ut = 1639]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 93638359
% resolvents: 93530509 factors: 107850
% Number of unit clauses generated: 57359585
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 61.26
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 9 [1] = 41 [2] = 1 [3] = 11
% [4] = 18 [5] = 3 [6] = 1555 [7] = 50
% Total = 1688
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 57359585 [2] = 19645941 [3] = 14666954 [4] = 1888160 [5] = 75841 [6] = 1867
% [7] = 11
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] attack_2 (+)0 (-)27
% [1] less_2 (+)10 (-)0
% [2] queens_2 (+)1 (-)1
% [3] same_2 (+)0 (-)20
% [4] diagonal_attack_3 (+)0 (-)1576
% [5] do_queens_3 (+)2 (-)0
% [6] range_3 (+)20 (-)3
% [7] select_3 (+)10 (-)0
% [8] sum_3 (+)11 (-)7
% ------------------
% Total: (+)54 (-)1634
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1688
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 24899475
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 593149
% Number of successful unifications: 93638359
% Number of unification failures: 329830876
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 138
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 196496761
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 72574786
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 11160
% Max entries in substitution set: 60
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 29859597
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 28058408
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 41
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 11
% Number of states in UCFA table: 9026
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 42276
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 528000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.02
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.21
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 47
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 423469235
% ConstructUnitClause() = 29861276
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 48.15 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 312128
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------